Skip to main content
Log in

Extending the Equation of State for Three-Aggregate Systems to Their Interfaces

  • SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis is performed of the state of a molecular theory oriented toward describing three-aggregate systems from a single viewpoint that includes their three bulk phases and three types of interfaces (vapor–liquid, solid–vapor, and solid–liquid). It is established that the theory, which is based on the lattice gas model (LGM), provides a common structure to express the pressure of not only three different bulk aggregate states but in their transitional regions of interface boundaries. The existence of vacancies in the LGM allows it to be used for all concentrations of the components of a multicomponent mixture from zero (which is characteristic of rarefied gas) to unity (in mole fractions) (which is characteristic of solids). Mechanical characteristics are calculated for heterogeneous systems using equations of local partial isotherms with the same structure in different regions of a common heterogeneous system. General expressions are derived for the pressure in different aggregate phases and the local pressure in the transitional regions of the three interfaces, through which local pressures the surface tensions of diverse interfaces are determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. I. P. Bazarov, Thermodynamics (Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. F. Voronin, Principles of Thermodynamics (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. O. Hirschfelder, Ch. F. Curtiss and R. B. Bird, Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids (New York, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. A. Mason and T. H. Spurling, The Virial Equation of State (Pergamon, Oxford, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Heer, Statistical Mechanics, Kinetic Theory, and Stochastic Processes (Academic, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. W. Aschcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Holt, Renehart, and Winston, New York, 1976).

  7. J. Mayer and M. Goeppert-Mayer, Statistical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. A. Smirnova, Molecular Solutions (Khimiya, Leningrad, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. V. Gibbs, Thermodynamics: Statistical Mechanics (Nauka, Moscow, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Hill, Statistical Mechanics;Principles and Selected Applications (Dover, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. N. Bogolyubov, Problems of Dynamical Theory in Statictical Physics (Gostekhteorizdat, Moscow, 1946; Intersci., New York, 1962).

  12. F. P. Buff, Z. Electrochem. 56, 311 (1952).

  13. A. G. McLellan, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 213, 274 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Ono and S. Kondo, Molecular Theory of Surface Tension in Liquids (Springer, Berlin, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Rowlinson and B. Widom, Molecular Theory of Capillarity (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K., 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. E. Lane, Aust. J. Chem. 21, 827 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. N. Okunev, V. A. Kaminskii, and Yu. K. Tovbin, Kolloidn. Zh. 47, 1110 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu. K. Tovbin, Zh. Fiz. Khim. 66, 1395 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu. K. Tovbin, Theory of Physical Chemistry Processes at the Gas–Solid Interface (CRC, Boca Raton, 1991).

  20. Yu. K. Tovbin, The Molecular Theory of Adsorption in Porous Solids (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2012; CRC, Boca Raton, 2018).

  21. Yu. K. Tovbin, Small Systems and Fundamentals of Thermodynamics (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2018; CRC, Boca Raton, 2018).

  22. Yu. K. Tovbin, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 80, 1554 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Prigogine and R. Defay, Chemical Thermodynamics (Longmans Green, London, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yu. K. Tovbin, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 90, 1439 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu. K. Tovbin, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 92, 2424 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu. K. Tovbin, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 93, 1662 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu. K. Tovbin, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 94, 270 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-03-00030a.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. K. Tovbin.

Additional information

Translated by L. Chernikova

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

The free energy of a fully distributed heterogeneous lattice system is expressed as \(F(s) = \sum\nolimits_{f = 1}^M {\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^s {\theta _{f}^{i}} } M_{f}^{i}\), where 1 ≤ fМ, М is the number of system sites, function \(M_{f}^{i}\) determines the contribution made by i particles to the free energy of a system for a site with number f (for simplicity, the interactions between nearest neighbors are written) [20, 22, 24]

$$\begin{gathered} \mathop M\nolimits_f^i = \nu _{f}^{i} + kT\ln \theta _{f}^{i} \\ + \;\frac{{kT}}{2}\sum\limits_{g \in {{z}_{f}}} {\ln \left[ {{{\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ii}}\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ik}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ii}}\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ik}}} {{{{(\theta _{f}^{i})}}^{2}}\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ki}}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{{{(\theta _{f}^{i})}}^{2}}\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ki}}}}} \right],} \\ \end{gathered} $$
(A.1)

where \(\theta _{f}^{i}\) is the probability of an i component being at an f site; \(\theta _{{fg}}^{{ik}}\) is the probability of two components i and j being at neighboring sites f and g; \(\nu _{f}^{i}\) is the one-particle contribution to the free energy of the i component, \(\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ik}} = \theta _{{fg}}^{{ik}}\exp ( - \beta \varepsilon _{{fg}}^{{ik}})\), β = (kT)–1; \(\varepsilon _{{fg}}^{{ik}}\) is the energy of i and j components interacting at neighboring f and g sites; and k corresponds to one component of the mixture (the main sort of particles being 1 ≤ ks, ki). The particular number of k is unimportant, due to the ease of solving the problem. The above functions are defined as the average over the ensemble of identical heterogeneous lattices, for which the following normalization relations are satisfied: \(\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^s {\theta _{{fg}}^{{ij}}} = \theta _{g}^{j}\), \(\sum\nolimits_{j = 1}^s {\theta _{{fg}}^{{ij}}} = \theta _{f}^{i}\), \(\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^s {\theta _{f}^{i}} = 1\).

The molecular distribution in the quasi-chemical approximation (\(\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ij}}\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{kl}} = \hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{il}}\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{kj}}\)) is found from the solution to the equations for local partial isotherms [19, 22]:

$$\begin{gathered} \beta ({{\mu }_{i}} - {{\mu }_{s}}) = \beta (\nu _{f}^{i} - \nu _{f}^{s}) + \ln (\theta _{f}^{i}{\text{/}}\theta _{f}^{s}) \\ + \;\sum\limits_{g \in {{z}_{f}}} {\ln \left[ {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^s {\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ij}}} \exp (\beta \varepsilon _{{fg}}^{{sj}}){\text{/}}\theta _{f}^{i}} \right]} {\kern 1pt} . \\ \end{gathered} $$
(A.2)

The relation gzf is the sum over all nearest sites of the central f site. For the layered structure of the interface, this sum becomes z = \(\sum\nolimits_{p = q-1}^{q + 1} {{{z}_{{qp}}}} \), where z is the number of the neighboring sites in the bulk phase, and zqp is the number of sites in the р layer relative to the central site in the q layer. For the bulk phase,

$$\begin{gathered} F(s) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^s {{{N}_{i}}{{M}_{i}}} {\text{,}} \\ {{M}_{i}} = {{\nu }_{i}} + kT\ln {{\theta }_{i}} + \frac{{kT}}{2}z\ln [{{{\hat {\theta }}}_{{ii}}}{\text{/}}{{({{\theta }_{i}})}^{2}}]. \\ \end{gathered} $$
(A.3)

The Gibbs potential of the fully distributed heterogeneous lattice system is defined through the above functions as \(G(s) = \sum\nolimits_{f = 1}^M {\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^s {\theta _{f}^{i}} } \mu _{f}^{i}\), where

$$\mu _{f}^{i} = \nu _{f}^{i} + kT\ln \theta _{f}^{i} + \frac{{kT}}{2}\sum\limits_{g \in {{z}_{f}}} {\ln [\hat {\theta }_{{fg}}^{{ii}}{\text{/}}\theta _{f}^{i}\theta _{g}^{i}]\,} .$$
(A.4)

In the bulk, expression (A.4) for μi becomes the expression for Mi (A.3).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tovbin, Y.K. Extending the Equation of State for Three-Aggregate Systems to Their Interfaces. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 94, 2391–2395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024420110291

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024420110291

Keywords:

Navigation