Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of Excitation Current Frequency and Amplitude on Corrosion Evaluation Based on Analytical Model for Surface Magnetic Field

  • ELECTROMAGNETIC METHODS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influences of excitation current on the evaluation of the corrosion with a cylindrical shape in a semi-infinite plate are presented in this paper. First, axi-symmetric model of the cylindrical coil above the corroded plate is established and an analytical solution to the surface magnetic field is derived by means of the truncated region eigenfunction expansion method (TREE). Then, the effect of the excitation current frequency and amplitude on the surface magnetic field is investigated and quantitatively evaluated. It is found that the radial magnetic induction intensity increases as the excitation current frequency increases, whereas the axial magnetic induction intensity decreases. The excitation current amplitude is proportional to the radial and axial magnetic induction intensities and does not affect the phase of magnetic induction intensity. As a result, the influence node for detecting the radius and the hollow depth for detecting the hidden depth are obviously dependent on the excitation current frequency in terms of the butterfly-shaped graph. The calculation results are in good agreement with the numerical simulation, showing that the developed model can be used to predict the optimal excitation current frequency. This work indicates that an appropriate excitation current frequency, such as  f = 500 Hz, can improve the characteristic parameter resolution for detecting the corrosion radius. For the detection of hidden depth, the lower excitation current frequency, such as  f = 100 Hz, can amplify the defect phenomenon and improve the detection accuracy. It is not only helpful to develop the analytical model for the surface magnetic field, but also to optimise the parameters of the test device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Garcia Martin, J., Gomez Gil, J., and Vazquez Sanchez, E., Nondestructive techniques based on eddy current testing, Sensors, 2011, vol. 11, no. 33, pp. 2525–2565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xin, J., Lei, N., Udpa, L., and Udpa, S.S., Rotating field eddy current probe with bobbin pickup coil for steam generator tubes inspection, NDT & E Int., 2013, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Efimov, A.G., Development of adaptive eddy current instruments for flaw sizing, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 780–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, Z., Yusa, N., and Miya, K.K., Some advances in numerical analysis techniques for quantitative electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation, Nondestr. Test. Eval., 2009, vol. 24, vols. 1–2, pp. 69–102.

  5. Salemi, A.H., Sadeghi, S.H.H., and Moini, R., Thin skin analysis technique for interaction of arbitrary shape inducer field with long cracks in ferromagnetic metals, NDT & E Int., 2004, vol. 37, pp. 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowler, J.R. and Theodoulidis, T.P., Coil impedance variation due to induced current at the edge of a conductive plate, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2006, vol. 39, no. 13, pp. 2862–2868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowler, J.R. and Theodoulidis, T.P., Eddy currents induced in a conducting rod of finite length by a coaxial encircling coil, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2005, vol. 38, no. 16, pp. 2861–2868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowler, J.R., Theodoulidis, T.P., and Poulakis, N., Eddy current probe signals due to a crack at a right-angled corner, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2012, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 4735–4746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang, F., Liu, S.L., and Xiao, S.G., Quantitative estimation of rectangular surface crack based on the 2-D modeling of surface magnetic field with long straight rectangular wire, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2018, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, F. and Liu, S.L., Evaluation of cracks with different hidden depths and shapes using surface magnetic field measurements based on semi-analytical modelling, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2018, vol. 51, no. 12, p. 125002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein, A.E. and Kalganov, S.A., Eddy current nondestructive testing of long cylindrical components using spatial magnetic field components of different frequencies, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2000, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 360–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Karpenko, O., Ye, C., and Udpa, L., Dual frequency fusion for defect signal enhancement in EC-GMR inspection of riveted multilayer structures, NDT & E Int., 2017, vol. 92, pp. 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51575331 and 51175316).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shulin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng Jiang, Liu, S. & Xin, S. Influences of Excitation Current Frequency and Amplitude on Corrosion Evaluation Based on Analytical Model for Surface Magnetic Field. Russ J Nondestruct Test 56, 668–680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920080057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920080057

Keywords:

Navigation