Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Study on Strain Burst Characteristics of Sandstone Under True Triaxial Loading and Double Faces Unloading in One Direction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a new strain burst test system was used to conduct two types of strain burst experiments by rapidly unloading single and double faces (in one direction), to simulate the strain burst occurring in surrounding rock of tunnel or double tunnel faces during the opposite tunneling. A high-speed image recording system and an acoustic emission system were used to monitor the failure process of strain burst of red sandstone. The commonalities of these two types of strain burst are as follows: failure stress and percentage of dissipation energy due to crack propagation were approximately equal; the evolution of mean velocity of free face was similar, which suddenly increased first and then decreased, then the gradient increased to the extremum value, and finally decreased to zero. Subregions of the fracture were consistent, and both showed shear, buckling, splitting, and ejection zones. However, the strain burst intensity for unloading double faces was larger than that for unloading single face, as demonstrated by a larger initial ejection velocity, larger volume of burst pit, and lower peak frequency. Furthermore, when double faces were unloaded, the flaky and massive features of fragments obtained due to strain burst were more obvious than the fragments obtained from the unloading of single face. Moreover, from yield to burst, when double faces were unloaded, the sandstone strain burst contained more shear microcracks, whereas the strain burst when unloading single face contained more tensile microcracks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

σ 10, σ 20, σ 30 :

Initial maximum, intermediate, minimal principal stress, respectively

σ H, σ h, σ v :

Two horizontal and a vertical in situ stresses

σ X 1, σ X 2 :

Minimal principal stress in negative and positive X-directions, respectively

U :

Total strain energy

U e :

Elastic strain energy

U k :

Kinetic energy

U d :

Dissipation energy

U e r :

Releasable elastic strain energy

U d p :

Dissipation energy due to plastic deformation before yield

U d 1 :

Dissipation energy due to crack propagation from yield to burst

U d 2 :

Dissipation energy due to crack propagation during burst process

v :

Ejection velocity

v y, v z :

Horizontal and vertical ejection velocity

v max :

Maximum initial ejection velocity

m :

Total mass of ejection fragments

d, d 1, d 2 :

Maximum distance between buckling cracks and free face

l, w, h :

Length, width and thickness of fragments

RA:

Rise time divide by amplitude

References

  • Akdag S, Karakus M, Taheri A et al (2018) Effects of thermal damage on strain burst mechanism for brittle rocks under true-triaxial loading conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(6):1657–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexeev A, Revva V, Alyshev N et al (2004) True triaxial loading apparatus and its application to coal outburst prediction. Int J Coal Geol 58(4):245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Kaiser P (2018) Rockburst support reference book—volume 1: rockburst phenomenon and support characteristics. Laurentian Univerisity, Mirarco

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang S, Lee C (2004) Estimation of cracking and damage mechanisms in rock under triaxial compression by moment tensor analysis of acoustic emission. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(7):1069–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Feng X, Li Q et al (2015) Rock burst intensity classification based on the radiated energy with damage intensity at Jinping II hydropower station. China Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(1):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Zhao J, Zhang X et al (2018) A novel true triaxial apparatus for studying the time-dependent behaviour of hard rocks under high stress. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(9):2653–2667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse C, Ohtsu M (2008) Acoustic emission testing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • He M, Miao J, Feng J (2010) Rock burst process of limestone and its acoustic emission characteristics under true-triaxial unloading conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(2):286–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He M, Xia H, Jia X et al (2012) Studies on classification, criteria and control of rockbursts. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 4(2):97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He M, Nie W, Guo W (2012) Experimental investigation of bedding plane orientation on the rockburst behavior of sandstone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(3):311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He N, Ma Q, Shi Y (2012) The optimum arrangement of working face ventilation system for coal mine. Adv Mater Res 482–484:1691–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He M, Ren F, Cheng C (2018) Experimental and numerical analyses on the effect of stiffness on bedded sandstone strain burst with varying dip angle. Bull Eng Geol Env 78(5):3593–3610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Su G, Chen G et al (2019) Experiment on rockburst process of borehole and its acoustic emission characteristics. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(3):783–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Li Y (2014) Conversion of strain energy in triaxial unloading tests on marble. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 66(1):160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser P, McCreath D, Tannant D (1996) Rockburst research handbook. Volume 2: 1990-1995.

  • Li J, Li H, Ma G et al (2013) Assessment of underground tunnel stability to adjacent tunnel explosion. Tunnell Undergr Space Technol Incorp Trench Technol Res 35:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansurov V (2001) Prediction of rockbursts by analysis of induced seismicity data. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(6):893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhart C, Wereley S, Santiago J (1999) PIV measurements of a microchannel flow. Exp Fluids 27(5):414–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao S, Cai M, Guo Q et al (2016) Rock burst prediction based on in-situ stress and energy accumulation theory. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 83:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemat-Nasser S, Horii H (1982) Compression-induced nonplanar crack extension with application to splitting, exfoliation, and rockburst. J Geophys Res Sol Earth 87(B8):6805–6821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortlepp W, Stacey T (1994) Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 9(1):59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plessis M, Malan D (2014) Designing controlled pillar failure—crush pillar support. In: The 6th international platinum conference, ‘platinum–metal for the future’, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

  • Ren F, Zhu C, He M (2020) Moment tensor analysis of acoustic emissions for cracking mechanisms during schist strain burst. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(1):153–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon M (1984) Energy considerations in rock mechanics: fundamental results. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 84(8):233–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Si X, Gong F (2020) Strength-weakening effect and shear-tension failure mode transformation mechanism of rockburst for fine-grained granite under triaxial unloading compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 131:104347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su G, Chen Z, Ju J et al (2017) Influence of temperature on the strainburst characteristics of granite under true triaxial loading conditions. Eng Geol 222:35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su G, Jiang J, Zhai S et al (2017) Influence of tunnel axis stress on strainburst: an experimental study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(6):1551–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su G, Zhai S, Jiang J et al (2017) Influence of radial stress gradient on strainbursts: an experimental study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(10):2659–2676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Tan C (1995) An analysis of present-day regional tectonic stress field and crustal movement trend in China. J Geomech 1(3):1–12 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesarik D, Seymour J, Yanske T (2009) Long-term stability of a backfilled room-and-pillar test section at the Buick Mine, Missouri, USA. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(7):1182–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant no. 2016YFC0600900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 41941018 & 52074299) and Province Education Department of LiaoNing (Grant no. 2020LNQN04) are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuqiang Ren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, M., Ren, F., Liu, D. et al. Experimental Study on Strain Burst Characteristics of Sandstone Under True Triaxial Loading and Double Faces Unloading in One Direction. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 149–171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02272-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02272-3

Keywords

Navigation