Skip to main content
Log in

Elastic Character of Seismic Coda Envelopes Within East Indian Shield

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic codas are usually characterized by the values of coda Q (Qc). However, interpretation of this quantity is often tricky because of its frequency dependence and acute sensitivity to subjective theoretical assumptions and processing parameters. Here, a simpler and physically more consistent parameterization of coda envelopes is proposed by noting that their temporal decay rates are often nearly frequency-independent. This weak frequency dependence shows that codas mostly consist of elastic reverberations and scattering on larger-scale structures, and the subwavelength-scale scattering and Q-type wave attenuation are weak. A recent study of the eastern Indian Shield by Singh et al. (in this journal) gives an illustration of such elastic coda. From that study, the inferred Qc steeply increases with frequency, lapse times, window lengths, and distances from the seismic station. However, we show that all of these dependencies of Qc represent a common artifact of the acquisition geometry and inversion procedure. In an alternate interpretation, we explain the same coda envelopes by two frequency-independent properties of the Earth’s subsurface: geometrical attenuation denoted γc,Earth and effective Q denoted Qc,Earth. Based on these parameters, the model becomes independent of theoretical assumptions and comparable to other areas, and the acquisition/inversion artifact is reduced. The estimated γc,Earth is above 0.01 s−1, which is also found in other areas of active tectonics. The effective attenuation is weak (Qc,Earth > 5700, likely below the measurable level), which is typical for stable tectonic areas. The data indicate near-surface resonances beneath the recording station. Effects of these resonances on coda envelopes also exceed those of Q-type attenuation. Thus, in the eastern Indian Shield and likely many other areas, coda envelopes are principally controlled by elastic structures such as crustal and near-surface layering, and not necessarily by the S-wave Q and uniformly-distributed random, small-scale scattering as commonly thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source waveforms are schematically modeled by Gabor wavelets. Note that the scattering points are not necessarily located on a straight line

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Singh et al. (2019) provide a resolution estimate that appears comparable to the footprint area (their Fig. 8). However, this estimate refers only to their inverse approach and does not account for the non-uniform weighting of the forward model (Safarshahi and Morozov 2020).

References

  • Aki, K. (1969). Analysis of the seismic coda of local earthquakes as scattered waves. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74, 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki, K. (1980). Attenuation of shear waves in the lithosphere for frequencies from 0.05 to 25 Hz. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 21, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki, K., & Chouet, B. (1975). Origin of coda waves: source, attenuation, and scattering effects. Journal of Geophysical Research, 80, 3322–3342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki, K., & Richards, P. G. (2002). Quantitative seismology (2nd ed.). Sausalito: University Science Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. M. (2004). Empirical attenuation of ground-motion spectral amplitudes in southeastern Canada and the northeastern United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94, 1079–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, A., Kwiatek, G., Martínez-Garzón, P., & Bohnhoff, M. (2019). Sensitivity and stability analysis of coda quality factors at the Geysers geothermal field, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 109, 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchon, M. (1982). The complete synthesis of seismic crustal phases at regional distances. Journal of Geophysical Research, 87, 1735–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campillo, M. (1987). Lg wave propagation in a laterally varying crust and the distribution of the apparent quality factor in central France. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 12604–12614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dainty, A. M. (1981). A scattering model to explain seismic Q observations in the lithosphere between 1 and 30 Hz. Geophysical Research Letters, 8, 1126–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Pezzo, E., Ibañez, J., Prudencio, J., Bianco, F., & De Siena, L. (2016). Absorption and scattering 2-D volcano images from numerically calculated space-weighting functions. Geophysical Journal International, 206, 742–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escudero, C. R., García-Millán, N., & Escalona-Alcázar, F. J. (2016). Attenuation of coda waves in western Mexico using local seismicity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106, 2545–2557. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehler, M., & Sato, H. (2003). Coda. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160, 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, M., Kremers, S., & Fritsche, R. (2019). Characterisation of seismic site effects influenced by near-surface structures using 3D waveform modelling. Journal of Seismology, 23, 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A., & Wennerberg, L. (1987). Energy-flux model of seismic coda: Separation of scattering and intrinsic attenuation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 77, 1223–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampiccolo, E., & Tuvè, T. (2018). Regionalization and dependence of coda Q on frequency and lapse time in the seismically active Peloritani region (northeastern Sicily, Italy). Journal of Seismology, 22, 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9750-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havskov, J., Sørensen, M. B., Vales, D., Özyazıcıoğlu, M., Sánchez, G., & Li, B. (2016). Coda Q in different tectonic areas, influence of processing parameters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106, 956–970. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jhajhria, A., Morozov, I. B., & Teotia, S. S. (2017). Frequency-dependent coda amplitude decays in the region of Himalaya. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107, 1817–1827. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. (2010). Prologue and invitation to participate in a forum on the frequency dependence of seismic Q. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167, 1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0180-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. J., & Cong, L. (1998). Lg coda Q and its relation to the structure and evolution of continents: a global perspective. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 153, 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, I. B. (2008). Geometrical attenuation, frequency dependence of Q, and the absorption band problem. Geophysical Journal International, 175, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, I. B. (2010b). Attenuation coefficients of Rayleigh and Lg waves. Journal of Seismology, 14, 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-010-9196-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, I. B. (2010a). On the causes of frequency-dependent apparent seismological Q. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167, 1131–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0100-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, I. B. (2011). Mechanisms of geometrical seismic attenuation. Annals of Geophysics, 54(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-4780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, I. B. (2013). Frequency dependence of long-period t*. Journal of Seismology, 17, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-012-9315-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, I., Zhang, C., Duenow, J. N., Morozova, E. A., & Smithson, S. B. (2008). Frequency dependence of coda Q, Part I: Numerical modeling and examples from Peaceful Nuclear Explosions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98, 2615–2628. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, I. B., Jhajhria, A., & Deng, W. (2018). On strong positive frequency dependencies of quality factors in local-earthquake seismic Studies. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175, 2595–2607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1826-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishigami, K. (1997). Spatial distribution of coda scatterers in the crust around two active volcanoes and one active fault system in central Japan: Inversion analysis of coda envelope. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 104, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishigami, K. (2006). Crustal heterogeneity in the source region of the 2004 Mid Niigata Prefecture earthquake: inversion analysis of coda envelopes. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 163, 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-005-0024-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez, A. K., Mridula, S. M., Mishra, S. K., & Rai, S. S. (2008). Coda Q estimates in the Andaman Islands using local earthquakes. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 165, 1861–1878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-008-0399-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safarshahi, M., & Morozov, I. B. (2020). Robust empirical time-frequency relations for seismic spectral amplitudes, Part 1: Application to regional S waves in southeastern Iran. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, H. (1977). Energy propagation including scattering effects single isotropic scattering approximation. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 25(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R., Sharma, S., Mitra, S., & Khan, P. K. (2019). Mapping of coda-wave attenuation and its frequency dependency over eastern Indian Shield. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176, 5291–5313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02284-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsujiura, M. (1978). Spectral analysis of the coda waves from local earthquakes. Bulletin of the Earthquake research Institute, University of Tokyo, 53, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J., & Mitchell, B. (1990). A back-projection method for imaging large-scale lateral variation of Lg coda Q with application to continental Africa. Geophysical Journal International, 100, 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Su, F., & Aki, K. (1991). Scattering wave energy propagation in a random isotropic scattering medium 1. Theory, 96, 607–619.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Although the authors of Singh et al. (2019) did not wish to participate in revisiting their results, we highly commend the quality and detail of presentation in their paper. This detail has facilitated the additional analysis carried out in the present paper. Comments and discussions by two anonymous reviewers have contributed to improving this manuscript. This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor B. Morozov.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morozov, I.B., Safarshahi, M. Elastic Character of Seismic Coda Envelopes Within East Indian Shield. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 5799–5818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02600-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02600-2

Keywords

Navigation