Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Structural changes in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United Kingdom (UK): an emission multiplier product matrix (EMPM) approach

  • Original article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) have been a major concern for most of the countries around the world; and as a result, every country is concerned about setting appropriate strategies to curtail it. This study proposes emission multiplier product matrix (EMPM), a novel approach that integrates CO2 emissions with input-output (I-O) tables for estimating pollution generated by inter-industry activities. In combination with structural decomposition analysis (SDA), the proposed EMPM can be used to measure emissions and identify its key drivers such as changes in technology and demand variations. Instead of generalised strategies, this approach is helpful in devising sector-specific pollution reduction strategies. The proposed methodology can also be applied at the sectoral, regional, national or global scale for identification of emissions sources. This study applies the proposed EMPM approach in combination with SDA to the UK’s economy by using I-O tables and emission data for the period 1995–2009. The study finds that, overall, UK’s carbon emission can be reduced through a disaggregated policy aiming to curtail industrial emissions and ensuring a more efficient transport sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The column sums of M matrix represent the multiplier effect of the emissions accounted for by the different demands. More precisely this is the total pollution intensity of different sectors.

  2. Research on linkage analysis dates back to the definition of Rasmussen (1956) of “Summary measures for the inverse matrix”. This paper extends the concept of Rasmussen to the environmental impacts.

  3. The full details of power and sensitivity dispersion indices and the rank of each sector responsible for CO2 emissions are available on request.

References

  • Ali Y (2015) Measuring CO2 emission linkages with the hypothetical extraction method (HEM). Ecol Indic 54:171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali J (2017) Development of an extended input-output model for evaluating the impacts of information technology disruptions on interdependent economic sectors. George Washington University, USA, The School of Engineering and Applied Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Y, Ciaschini M, Pretaroli R, Socci C (2015) Measuring the economic landscape of Italy: target efficiency and control effectiveness. Economia e Politica Industriale 42(3):297–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Y, Ciaschini M, Socci C, Pretaroli R, Severini F (2017) An analysis of CO2 emissions in Italy through the macro multiplier (MM) approach. J Clean Prod 149:238–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Y, Ciaschini M, Socci C, Pretaroli R, Sabir M (2019) Identifying the sources of structural changes in CO2 emissions in Italy. Econ Polit 36(2):509–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Brizga J, Feng K, Hubacek K (2014) Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the Baltic States: a structural decomposition analysis. Ecol Econ 98:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Butnara I, Llop M (2011) Structural decomposition analysis and input-output subsystems: changes in CO2 emissions of Spanish service sectors (2000–2005). Ecol Econ 70(11):2012–2019

    Google Scholar 

  • DECC (2014) The final statement for the first carbon budget period. The United Kingdom, Department of Energy & Climate Change

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2019) Greenhouse gas emission statistics - emission inventories 2018. Copenhagen, Denmark, European Environment Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S., 2019. How the UK transformed its electricity supply in just a decade, Carbon Brief. [online] Available at: https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/how-uk-transformed-electricity-supply-decade/[]

  • Ghosh A (1958) Input-output approach to an allocative system. Economica 25(97):58–64

    Google Scholar 

  • GoUK, 2019. Historical electricity data: 1920 to 2018. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/historical-electricity-data [Accessed 15 November 2019]

  • Graver, B., Zhang, K. & Rutherford, D., 2019. Co2 emissions from commercial aviation in 2018. Working paper 2019–16: international council on clean transportation, Washington

  • Grguric I (2011) Europe 2020–European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Revija za socijalnu politiku 18(1):119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilhoto, J., Martins, J., Sonis, M. & Hewings, G. J. D., 1999. Multiplier product matrix analysis for interregional input-output systems: an application to the Brazilian economy. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA): Paper No. 54671

  • Guo, D. & Hewings, G., 2001. Comparative analysis of China’s economic structures between 1987 and 1997: an input-output perspective. Discussion Paper: Urbana, IL, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory

  • Gutierrez MS (2008) Economic activity and atmospheric pollution in Spain: an input-output approach. Ph.D. Thesis: Departament de Teoria Economica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings G, Sonis M (2009) Coefficient change and innovation spread in input-output models. Working papers in input-output Economics, The International Input-Output Association, 09(3)

  • Hewings G, Sonis M, Jensen RC (1988) Fields of influence of technological change in input-output models. Pap Reg Sci 64(1):25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government, 2011. The carbon plan: delivering our low carbon future. Presented to parliament pursuant to sections 12 and 14 of the climate change act 2008, amended 2nd December 2011 from the version laid before parliament on 1st December 2011: UK

  • IEA (2019) Key world energy statistics 2019. Paris, France, International Energy Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2017. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: global and sectoral aspects (Part A), working group II contribution to the fifth assessment report: intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press

  • IPCC, 2019. Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland

  • Janis B, Feng K, Hubacek K (2014) Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the Baltic States: a structural decomposition analysis. Ecol Econ 98:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordão TC (2016) Analysis of fuel efficiency of largest European airlines in the context of climate change mitigation. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 39(3–4):253–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M (2003) Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 14(1):1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief WW (1936) Quantitative input and output relations in the economic system of the United States. Rev Econ Statist, Volume XVII, pp 105–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhou D, Zhou P, Wang Q (2017) What drives CO2 emissions from China’s civil aviation? An exploration using a new generalized PDA method Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 99:30–45

  • Loeser JD, Treede RD (2008) The Kyoto protocol of IASP basic pain terminology. Pain 137(3):473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens W (2010) Europe 2020 and beyond. European View 9(1):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R, Blair P (2009) Input-output analysis foundations and extensions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Leiden

  • Miller RE, Lahr ML (2001) A taxonomy of extractions. In: Regional Science Perspectives in Economic Analysis: A Festschrift in Memory of Benjamin H. Stevens. Elsevier science, Amsterdam, pp 407–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa K (1966) Internal and external matrix multipliers in the input-output model. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 7(1):38–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa K (1971) An analysis of the interdependence between service and goods-producing sectors. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 12(1):10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS (2018) Consumer price inflation, UK: November 2018. Statistical Bulletin, pp:1–30

  • Owen A, Steen-Olsen K, Barrett J, Wiedmann T, Lenzen M (2014) A structural decomposition approach to comparing MRIO databases. Economic System Research 26(3):262–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen A, Wood R, Barrett J, Evans A (2016) Explaining value chain differences in MRIO databases through structural path decomposition. Economic System Research 28(2):243–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen P (1956) Studies in Intersectoral relations. Einar Harks, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj J, den Elzen M, Höhne N, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H, Schaeffer R, Sha F, Riahi K, Meinshausen M (2016) Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C. Nature 534(7609):631–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose A, Chen C (1991) Sources of change in energy use in the U.S. economy, 1972-1982: a structural decomposition analysis. Resources and Energy 13:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • SNA (2008) System of National Accounts. United Nation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis M, Hewings GD (1999) Economic landscapes: multiplier product matrix analysis for multiregional input-output systems. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 40(1):59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis M, Hewings GJD (2007) Coefficient change and innovation spread in input-output models. Mestrado em Economia Aplicada 004

  • Sonis, M., Hewings, G. J. D. & Guo, J., 1997. Input-output multiplier product matrix. Discussion paper 94-T-12 (revised, 1997): regional economics applications laboratory, University of Illinois

  • Sonis M, Hewings J, Guo J (2000) A new image of classical key sector analysis: minimum information decomposition of the Leontief inverse. Economic System Research 123:401–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., 2016. Globalization and it's new discontents, s.l.: project syndicate, 5(8)

  • Subhesh CB, Matsumura W (2010) Changes in the GHG emission intensity in EU-15: lessons from a decomposition analysis. Energy, Issue 35:3315–3322

  • Sun JW (1998) Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Econ 20(1):85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • The Climate Change Act, 2008. Climate Change Act 2008 (2020 Target, Credit Limit, and Definitions) Order 2009 No. 1258. UK: draft order laid before parliament under sections 6(5), 11(6), 30(2) and 91(1) of the climate change act 2008, for approval by resolution of each house of parliament

  • Timmer, M. P., Dietzenbacher E., Los B., Stehrer R., de Vries G. J., 2015. An illustrated user guide to the world input-output database: the case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, Volume 23, p. 575–605

  • Tukker A, Dietzenbacher E (2013) Global multiregional input-output frameworks: an introduction and outlook. Economic System Research 25:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (1997) United Nations framework convention on climate change. Kyoto Protocol, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): Kyoto, Japan

  • Vehmas J (2009) Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion in selected countries. Int J Environ Technol Manag 11:47–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachsmann U, Wood R, Lenzen M, Schaeffer R (2009) Structural decomposition of energy use in Brazil from 1970 to 1996. Appl Energy 86:578–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Chiu Y-H, Chiu C-R (2015) Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: a modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 51:252–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Hang Y, Su B, Zhou P (2018) Contributions to sector-level carbon intensity change: an integrated decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 70:12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • WDI (2019) World development indicators 2019. US, The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber C (2009) Measuring structural change and energy use: decomposition of the US economy from 1997 to 2002. Energy Policy 37:1561–1570

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe K (2018) Identifying emission hotspots for low carbon technology transfers. J Clean Prod 194:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T (2009) A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ 69:211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood R (2009) Structural decomposition analysis of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 37:4943–4948

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Lahr M (2014) China’s energy consumption change from 1987 to 2007: a multi-regional structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 67:682–693

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousaf Ali.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, Y., Pretaroli, R., Sabir, M. et al. Structural changes in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United Kingdom (UK): an emission multiplier product matrix (EMPM) approach. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 25, 1545–1564 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09936-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09936-z

Keywords

JEL code

Navigation