Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surface temperature effects of solar panels of fixed-wing drones on drag reduction and energy consumption

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the thermal effects of solar panels are investigated experimentally and computationally on the efficiency of an Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) in laminar and turbulent flows. At first, the impact of temperature on output power and efficiency of an eFlex 30 Wp solar panel is studied. Then, the surface temperature and output voltage of two different types of solar panels, a flexible and a solid panel, are measured under a heat lamp. The heat lamp provides the radiation and raises the temperature of the solar panels. A thermal camera and laser thermometer are used to measure the surface temperature of the solar panels. Considering a tilt-rotor UAV as a case study, an energy balance is modeled for the wing of UAV, which is assumed as a flat plate. Applying the Blasius boundary layer for laminar flow and 1/5 power law for turbulent flow, it is shown that there is skin friction drag changes on the top surface of the solar panel due to its dark blue color. In order to validate the results of the proposed model, a thermal-fluid study is carried out on the NACA 2412 airfoil through COMSOL to see whether changing the surface temperature on the solar panel relates to skin drag reduction. The results indicate that an increase in the surface temperature of the solar panel will decrease the output power and efficiency to a maximum of 8%; while this increase in temperature reduces drag by up to 10% in laminar flow. This research shows that despite the reduction of efficiency and generated power by solar panels with increasing the surface temperature on top of a UAV, the aerodynamic efficiency can be improved with drag reduction in laminar flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassanalian M, Abdelkefi A (2017) Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: a review. Prog Aerosp Sci 91:99–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hassanalian M, Rice D, Abdelkefi A (2018) Evolution of space drones for planetary exploration: a review. Prog Aerosp Sci 97:61–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Traub LW (2011) Range and endurance estimates for battery-powered aircraft. J Aircr 48(2):703–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donateo T, Ficarella A, Spedicato L, Arista A, Ferraro M (2017) A new approach to calculating endurance in electric flight and comparing fuel cells and batteries. Appl Energy 187:807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morton S, D’Sa R, Papanikolopoulos N (2015) Solar powered UAV: design and experiments. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, September 28–October 2 (2015)

  6. Boucher RJ (1985) Sunrise, the world’s first solar-powered airplane. J Aircr 22(10):840–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Noth A (2008) Design of solar powered airplanes for continuous flight. Doctoral dissertation, ETH University, Zürich, Switzerland

  8. Muller RA (2010) Physics and technology for future presidents: an introduction to the essential physics every world leader needs to know. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pathfinder NJCS (1994) Pathfinder and the development of solar rechargeable aircraft. Energy Technol Rev 1994:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noll TE, Brown JM, Perez-Davis ME, Ishmael SD, Tiffany GC, Gaier M (2004) Investigation of the helios prototype aircraft mishap. Volume I mishap report

  11. Meral ME, Dincer F (2011) A review of the factors affecting operation and efficiency of photovoltaic based electricity generation systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(5):2176–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Emery KA, Osterwald CR (1986) Solar cell efficiency measurements. Solar Cells 17(2–3):253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tiedje TOM, Yablonovitch ELI, Cody GD, Brooks BG (1984) Limiting efficiency of silicon solar cells. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 31(5):711–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Omubo-Pepple VB, Israel-Cookey C, Alaminokuma GI (2009) Effects of temperature, solar flux and relative humidity on the efficient conversion of solar energy to electricity. Eur J Sci Res 35(2):173–180

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glover J, McCulloch JSG (1958) The empirical relation between solar radiation and hours of sunshine. Q J R Meteorol Soc 84(360):172–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassanalian M, Radmanesh M, Sedaghat A (2014) Increasing flight endurance of MAVs using multiple quantum well solar cells. Internat J Aeronaut Sp Sci 15:212–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Romeo G, Frulla G, Cestino E (2007) Design of a high-altitude long-endurance solar-powered unmanned air vehicle for multi-payload and operations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 221(2):199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skoplaki E, Palyvos JA (2009) On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: a review of efficiency/power correlations. Sol Energy 83(5):614–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dubey S, Sarvaiya JN, Seshadri B (2013) Temperature dependent photovoltaic (PV) efficiency and its effect on PV production in the world—a review. Energy Procedia 33:311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hassanalian M, Pellerito V, Sedaghat A, Sabri F, Borvayeh L, Sadeghi S (2019) Aerodynamics loads variations of wings with novel heating of top surface: bioinspiration and experimental study. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 109:109884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hassanalian M, Abdelmoula H, Mohammadi S, Bakhtiyarov S, Goerlich J, Javed U (2019) Aquatic animal colors and skin temperature: Biology’s selection for reducing oceanic dolphin’s skin friction drag. J Therm Biol 84:292–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pellerito V, Hassanalian M, Sedaghat A, Sabri F, Borvayeh L, Sadeghi S (2019) Performance analysis of a bioinspired albatross airfoil with heated top wing surface: experimental study. 2019 AIAA propulsion and energy conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, 19–22 August 2019

  23. Hassanalian M, Ayed SB, Ali M, Houde P, Hocut C, Abdelkefi A (2018) Insights on the thermal impacts of wing colorization of migrating birds on their skin friction drag and the choice of their flight route. J Therm Biol 72:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hassanalian M, Abdelmoula H, Ayed SB, Abdelkefi A (2017) Thermal impact of migrating birds’ wing color on their flight performance: Possibility of new generation of biologically inspired drones. J Therm Biol 66:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shiau JK, Ma DM, Yang PY, Wang GF, Gong JH (2009) Design of a solar power management system for an experimental UAV. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 45(4):1350–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oettershagen P, Melzer A, Mantel T, Rudin K, Stastny T, Wawrzacz B, Hinzmann T, Leutenegger S, Alexis K, Siegwart R (2017) Design of small hand-launched solar-powered UAVs: From concept study to a multi-day world endurance record flight. J Field Robot 34(7):1352–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao J, Wang A, Green MA, Ferrazza F (1998) 19.8% efficient “honeycomb” textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 73(14):1991–1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. International Energy Agency (2014) Technology Roadmap Solar Photovoltaic Energy

  29. Fesharaki VJ, Dehghani M, Fesharaki JJ, Tavasoli H (2011) The effect of temperature on photovoltaic cell efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on emerging trends in energy conservation–ETEC, Tehran, Iran, 20–21 November 2011

  30. Rustemli S, Dincer F (2011) Modeling of photovoltaic panel and examining effects of temperature in Matlab/Simulink. Elektron Elektrotech 109(3):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Musanga LM, Barasa WH, Maxwell M (2018) The effect of irradiance and temperature on the performance of monocrystalline silicon solar module in Kakamega. Phys Sci Int J 19(4):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Al-Khazzar AAA (2016) Behavior of four solar PV modules with temperature variation. Int J Renew Energy Res 6(3):1091–1099

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibrahim H, Anani N (2017) Variations of PV module parameters with irradiance and temperature. Energy Procedia 134:276–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Filsom. eFlex 0.8m –for Buildings & Mobility. https://flisom.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Datasheet_eFlex_0.8m_rev.pdf

  35. Radziemska E (2003) The effect of temperature on the power drop in crystalline silicon solar cells. Renew Energy 28(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hassanalian M, Throneberry G, Ali M, Ayed SB, Abdelkefi A (2018) Role of wing color and seasonal changes in ambient temperature and solar irradiation on predicted flight efficiency of the Albatross. J Therm Biol 71:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bergman TL, Incropera FP, DeWitt DP, Lavine AS (2007) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hassanalian, M., Salazar, R., Abdelkefi, A., “Analysis and optimization of a tilt rotor unmanned air vehicle for long distances delivery and payload transportation”, 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, 8–12 January 2018

Download references

Funding

The authors received no funding for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hassanalian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassanalian, M., Mohammadi, S., Acosta, G. et al. Surface temperature effects of solar panels of fixed-wing drones on drag reduction and energy consumption. Meccanica 56, 3–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01261-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01261-8

Keywords

Navigation