Correction to: J Image Video Proc 2020, 31 (2020)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-020-00515-5

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified a few errors in the published article.

  1. 1.

    Body text contains incorrect sentence - in a simulation, it is possible to analyze the different frequency rates, but it is missing a test generator able to communicate with transceiver. It should be corrected to - in a simulation, it is possible to analyze the different frequency rates, but it is missing a test generator able to communicate with the DUT through the transceiver

  2. 2.

    The Figs. 11 and 12 had been inverted. Correct Figs. 11 and 12 with captions should look as per below:

Fig. 11
figure 1

Output from the Omnitek video analyzer

Fig. 12
figure 2

System connection to test the macroblock FPGA input/output chain

The original article [1] has been corrected.