Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting and mapping land cover/land use changes in Erbil /Iraq using CA-Markov synergy model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most dynamic components of the environment is land use land cover (LULC), which have been changing remarkably since after the industrial revolution at various scales. Frequent monitoring and quantifying LULC change dynamics provide a better understanding of the function and health of ecosystems. This study aimed at modelling the future changes of LULC for the Erbil governorate in the Kurdistan region of Iraq (KRI) using the synergy Cellular Automata (CA)-Markov model. For this aim, three consecutive-year Landsat imagery (i.e., 1988, 2002, and 2017) were classified using the Maximum Likelihood Classifier. From the classification, three LULC maps with several class categories were generated, and then change-detection analysis was executed. Using the classified (1988–2002) and (2002–2017) LULC maps in the hybrid model, LULC maps for 2017 and 2050 were modelled respectively. The model output (modelled 2017) was validated with the classified 2017 LULC map. The accuracy of agreements between the classified and the modelled maps were Kno = 0.8339, Klocation = 0.8222, Kstandard = 0.7491, respectively. Future predictions demonstrate between 2017 and 2050, built-up land, agricultural land, plantation, dense vegetation and water body will increase by 173.7% (from 424.1 to 1160.8 km2), 79.5% (from 230 to 412.9 km2), 70.2% (from 70.2 to 119.5 km2), 48.9% (from 367.2 to 546.9 km2) and 132.7% (from 10.7 to 24.9 km2), respectively. In contrast, sparse vegetation, barren land will decrease by 9.7% (2274.6 to 2052.8 km2), 18.4% (from 9463.9-7721 km2), respectively. The output of this study is invaluable for environmental scientists, conservation biologists, nature-related NGOs, decision-makers, and urban planners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable

References

  • Akbar TA, Hassan QK, Ishaq S, Batool M, Butt HJ, Jabbar H (2019) Investigative spatial distribution and modelling of existing and future urban land changes and its impact on urbanization and economy. Remote Sens 11:105

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkaradaghi K, Ali SS, Al-Ansari N, Laue J (2018) Evaluation of land use & land cover change using multi-temporal landsat imagery: a case study Sulaimaniyah governorate, Irag. J Geogr Inf Syst 10:247–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data vol 964. US Government Printing Office

  • Berihun ML, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Meshesha DT, Adgo E, Tsubo M, Masunaga T, Fenta AA, Sultan D, Yibeltal M (2019) Exploring land use/land cover changes, drivers and their implications in contrasting agro-ecological environments of Ethiopia. Land Use Policy 87:104052

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas M, Banerji S, Mitra D (2019) Land-use–land-cover change detection and application of Markov model: a case study of eastern part of Kolkata environment. Dev Sustain:1–20

  • Butt A, Shabbir R, Ahmad SS, Aziz N (2015) Land use change mapping and analysis using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Simly watershed, Islamabad, Pakistan. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 18:251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen M, Jokar Arsanjani J (2020) Stimulating implementation of sustainable development goals and conservation action: predicting future land use/cover change in Virunga National Park, Congo. Sustainability 12:1570

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG, Green K (2019) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC Press

  • Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009) Land use and land cover change in greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: Using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl Geogr 29:390–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR (2003) IDRISI Kilimanjaro: Guide to GIS and image processing. Clark University, Worcester

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman J (2012) IDRISI Selva: guide to GIS and image processing Clark Labratories. Clark University, Worcester

    Google Scholar 

  • Eric K, Aldrik B (2007) Modelling land-use change: progress and applications. Springer, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Faqe Ibrahim G (2017) Urban land use land cover changes and their effect on land surface temperature: case study using Dohuk City in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Climate 5:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 80:185–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Wang X, Yang YJ (2018) Deriving suitability factors for CA-Markov land use simulation model based on local historical data. J Environ Manag 206:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson GR, Campbell JB, Zipper CE (2015) Sociopolitical influences on cropland area change in Iraq, 2001–2012. Appl Geogr 62:339–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez C, White JC, Wulder MA (2016) Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 116:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan D, Li H, Inohae T, Su W, Nagaie T, Hokao K (2011) Modeling urban land use change by the integration of cellular automaton and Markov model. Ecol Model 222:3761–3772

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest E (1966) Flora of Iraq. Volume 1, introduction to the flora: an account of the geology, soils, climate and ecology of Iraq with gazetteer, glossary and bibliography. Ministry of Agriculture

  • Hadeel A, Jabbar MT, Chen X (2010) Environmental change monitoring in the arid and semi-arid regions: a case study Al-Basrah Province, Iraq. Environ Monit Assess 167:371–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadi SJ, Shafri HZ, Mahir MD (2014) Modelling LULC for the period 2010-2030 using GIS and remote sensing: a case study of Tikrit, Iraq. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 2014, vol 1. IOP Publishing, p 012053

  • He D, Zhou J, Gao W, Guo H, Yu S, Liu Y (2014) An integrated CA-markov model for dynamic simulation of land use change in Lake Dianchi watershed Beijing. Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis 50:1095-1105

  • He C, Liu Z, Gou S, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Xu L (2019) Detecting global urban expansion over the last three decades using a fully convolutional network. Environ Res Lett 14:034008

    Google Scholar 

  • Hishe S, Bewket W, Nyssen J, Lyimo J (2020) Analysing past land use land cover change and CA-Markov-based future modelling in the middle Suluh Valley, Northern Ethiopia. Geocarto Int 35:225–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooke RL, Martín-Duque JF, Pedraza J (2012) Land transformation by humans: a review. GSA Today 22:4–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Houet T, Hubert-Moy L (2006) Modelling and projecting land-use and land-cover changes with a cellular automaton in considering landscape trajectories: an improvement for simulation of plausible future states. EARSel eProceedings 5(1):63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyandye C, Martz LW (2017) A Markovian and cellular automata land-use change predictive model of the Usangu Catchment. Int J Remote Sens 38:64–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin EG, Jayaprakash C, Munroe DK (2009) Towards a comprehensive framework for modeling urban spatial dynamics. Landsc Ecol 24:1223–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR (1996) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective, vol Ed. 2. Prentice-Hall Inc.

  • Kamusoko C, Aniya M, Adi B, Manjoro M (2009) Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe–simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov-cellular automata model. Appl Geogr 29:435–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Karki S, Thandar AM, Uddin K, Tun S, Aye WM, Aryal K, Kandel P, Chettri N (2018) Impact of land use land cover change on ecosystem services: a comparative analysis on observed data and people’s perception in Inle Lake, Myanmar. Environ Syst Res 7:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Khwarahm NR (2020) Mapping current and potential future distributions of the oak tree (Quercus aegilops) in the Kurdistan Region. Iraq Ecological Processes 9:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:3465–3472

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Dong R, Fu H, Wang J, Yu L, Gong P (2020) Integrating Google earth imagery with Landsat data to improve 30-m resolution land cover mapping. Remote Sens Environ 237:111563

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang S, Fang H, Morisette JT, Chen M, Shuey CJ, Walthall CL, Daughtry CS (2002) Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery. II Validation and applications. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40:2736–2746

    Google Scholar 

  • Liping C, Yujun S, Saeed S (2018) Monitoring and predicting land use and land cover changes using remote sensing and GIS techniques—a case study of a hilly area, Jiangle, China. PLoS ONE 13

  • López E, Bocco G, Mendoza M, Duhau E (2001) Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe: a case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landsc Urban Plan 55:271–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed EA, Hani ZY, Kadhim GQ (2018) Assessing land cover/use changes in Karbala city (Iraq) using GIS techniques and remote sensing data. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018. vol 1. IOP Publishing, p 012047

  • Muller MR, Middleton J (1994) A Markov model of land-use change dynamics in the Niagara region, Ontario, Canada. Landsc Ecol 9:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Munthali M, Mustak S, Adeola A, Botai J, Singh S, Davis N (2020) Modelling land use and land cover dynamics of Dedza district of Malawi using hybrid Cellular Automata and Markov model. RSASE 17:100276

  • Naboureh A, Moghaddam MHR, Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2017) An integrated object-based image analysis and CA-Markov model approach for modeling land use/land cover trends in the Sarab plain. Arab J Geosci 10:259

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar NQ, Ahamad MSS, Hussin W, Samat N (2014) Modelling land-use and land-cover changes using Markov-CA, and multiple decision making in Kirkuk city. IJSRES 2:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey BK, Khare D (2017) Analyzing and modeling of a large river basin dynamics applying integrated cellular automata and Markov model. Environ Earth Sci 76:779

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsa VA, Yavari A, Nejadi A (2016) Spatio-temporal analysis of land use/land cover pattern changes in Arasbaran Biosphere Reserve: Iran. Modeling Earth Syst Environ 2:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflugmacher D, Rabe A, Peters M, Hostert P (2019) Mapping pan-European land cover using Landsat spectral-temporal metrics and the European LUCAS survey. Remote Sens Environ 221:583–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG (2000) Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66:1011–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG Jr (2002) Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:1041–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG Jr, Cheuk ML (2006) A generalized cross-tabulation matrix to compare soft-classified maps at multiple resolutions. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG Jr, Millones M (2011) Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens 32:4407–4429

    Google Scholar 

  • Qader SH, Dash J, Atkinson PM, Rodriguez-Galiano V (2016) Classification of vegetation type in Iraq using satellite-based phenological parameters. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 9:414–424

  • Regmi R, Saha S, Subedi D (2017) Geospatial analysis of land use land cover change modeling in Phewa lake watershed of Nepal by Using GEOMOD Model Himalayan Physics 65–72

  • Richards JA, Richards J (1999) Remote sensing digital image analysis vol 3. Springer

  • Rimal B, Zhang L, Keshtkar H, Wang N, Lin Y (2017) Monitoring and modeling of spatiotemporal urban expansion and land-use/land-cover change using integrated Markov chain cellular automata model. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 6:288

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield GH (1986) Analysis of thematic map classification error matrices. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52:681–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang L, Zhang C, Yang J, Zhu D, Yun W (2011) Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA–Markov model. Math Comput Model 54:938–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:16083–16088

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Mustak S, Srivastava PK, Szabó S, Islam T (2015) Predicting spatial and decadal LULC changes through cellular automata Markov chain models using earth observation datasets and geo-information. Environ Process 2:61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Laari PB, Mustak S, Srivastava PK, Szabó S (2018) Modelling of land use land cover change using earth observation datasets of tons River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India. Geocarto Int 33:1202–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman SV, Czaplewski RL (1998) Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: fundamental principles. Remote Sens Environ 64:331–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Takada T, Miyamoto A, Hasegawa SF (2010) Derivation of a yearly transition probability matrix for land-use dynamics and its applications. Landsc Ecol 25:561–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolessa T, Senbeta F, Kidane M (2017) The impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ecosyst Serv 23:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2013) World Environment Day 2013: How environmental damage causes food insecurity in Iraq. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Factsheet-WorldEnvironment-English.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2020

  • UN (2017) Department of economic and social affairs, population division . World population prospects: The 2017 revision, Volume II: Demographic Profiles. ST/ESA/SER.A/400

  • USDA (2008) Iraq: Drought reduces 2008/09 winter grain production. https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/highlights/2008/05/Iraq_may2008.htm. Accessed 30 Mar 2020

  • Van Oort P (2007) Interpreting the change detection error matrix. Remote Sens Environ 108:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Bakker M, Overmars KP, Staritsky I (2008) Landscape level simulation of land use change. In: Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, pp 211–227

  • Wolfram S (1984) Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature 311:419–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q-s, Li X (2007) Integration of multi-agent systems with cellular automata for simulating urban land expansion Sci Geogr Sin 27:542

  • Zhu Z, Woodcock CE (2014) Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. Remote Sens Environ 144:152–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary M (1973) Geobotanical foundations of the Middle East. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the United States Geological Survey to make the Earth Observation data available. We would also like to thank Mr. Shakawan Hussain from Erbil University for his assistance and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabaz R. Khwarahm.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

Not applicable

Code availability

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khwarahm, N.R., Qader, S., Ararat, K. et al. Predicting and mapping land cover/land use changes in Erbil /Iraq using CA-Markov synergy model. Earth Sci Inform 14, 393–406 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00541-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00541-x

Keywords

Navigation