Abstract
A model was developed to estimate the windbreak effects on soil temperature during the early crop growth stage using the windbreak structure and readily available meteorological data at a reference position. In this model, the windbreak effect on wind speed was estimated from the width and total area density of the windbreaks using an equation parameterized by the data at 13 windbreaks. Windbreak effects on solar radiation were estimated on the basis of the Beer–Lambert law, and the effects on soil temperature were estimated on the basis of the heat conduction equation and the extended force-restore model with the boundary condition of heat balance on the ground surface. The model was validated with 3 years of observations in maize fields with windbreaks in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Our model could reproduce the observed spatial distribution of mean soil temperature during the early growth stage of maize with an increase of 0.4–0.8 °C by wind speed reduction at 3–4 H (H = windbreak height) and a decrease of 0.9–1.0 °C by shade from windbreaks at 0.5 H. This simple process-based model provides a framework for the quantification of windbreak effects on soil temperature at fields with various windbreak structure and meteorological conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Campbell GS (1985) Soil physics with BASIC: transport models for soil-plant systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Campbell GS, Norman J (1998) An introduction to environmental biophysics. Springer, New York
Du M, Ushiyama T, Maki T (2010) Observations and numerical simulations of windbreak effects on surface temperature. In: Latest trends on theoretical and applied mechanics, fluid mechanics and heat and mass transfer, pp 48–52
Foereid B, Bro R, Mogensen VO, Porter JR (2002) Effects of windbreak strips of willow coppice—modelling and field experiment on barley in Denmark. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00007-5
Hagen L (1991) A wind erosion prediction system to meet user needs. J Soil Water Conserv 46:106–111
He Y, Jones PJ, Rayment M (2017) A simple parameterisation of windbreak effects on wind speed reduction and resulting thermal benefits to sheep. Agric For Meteorol 239:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.032
Hirota T, Fukumoto M, Shirooka R, Muramatu K (1995) Simple method of estimating daily mean soil temperature by using the force-restore model. J Agric Meteorol 51:269–277. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.51.269 (in Japanese with English summary)
Hirota T, Pomeroy JW, Granger RJ, Maule CP (2002) An extension of the force-restore method to estimating soil temperature at depth and evaluation for frozen soils under snow. J Geophys Res 107:4767. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001280
Hodges L, Suratman MN, Brandle JM, Hubbard KG (2004) Growth and yield of snap beans as affected by wind protection and microclimate changes due to shelterbelts and planting dates. HortScience 39:996–1004. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.5.996
Hu Z, Islam S (1995) Prediction of ground surface temperature and soil moisture content by the force-restore method. Water Resour Res 31:2531–2539. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR01650
Iwasaki K, Torita H, Abe T et al (2019) Spatial pattern of windbreak effects on maize growth evaluated by an unmanned aerial vehicle in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Agrofor Syst 93:1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0217-7
Kondo J (2000) Atmospheric science near the ground surface. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Mize CW, Egeh MH, Batchelor WD (2005) Predicting maize and soybean production in a sheltered field in the Cornbelt region of North Central USA. Agrofor Syst 64:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-0534-x
Nemoto M, Hirota T, Iwata Y (2008) Application of the extended force-restore model to estimate soil-frost depth in the Tokachi region of Hokkaido, Japan. J Agric Meteorol 64:177–183. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.64.3.7
Okada M (2010) How to measure temperature accurately (2) Calibration of temperature sensors. Clim Biosph 10:1–6 (in Japanese)
Sato S (1955) Calculations on the received solar radiation in the shade of windbreak at Miyazaki City. J Agric Meteorol 11:12–14. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.11.12(in Japanese with English summary)
Sato T (2002) Studies on the effects of shelterbelt structures on climatic improvements. Mem Grad School Agric Hokkaido Univ 24:113–164 (in Japanese with English summary)
Sato T, Takahashi H (1997) A numerical simulation of wind flow and temperature distribution around a shelterbelt. J Agric Meteorol 53:275–283. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.53.275(in Japanese with English summary)
Sudmeyer RA, Speijers J (2007) Influence of windbreak orientation, shade and rainfall interception on wheat and lupin growth in the absence of below-ground competition. Agrofor Syst 71:201–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9070-9
Swan JB, Schneider EC, Moncrief JF, Paulson WH, Peterson AE (1987) Estimating corn growth, yield, and grain moisture from air growing degree days and residue cover. Agron J 79:53–60. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900010012x
Tadaki Y (1970) Studies on the production structure of forest (XVII) Vertical change of specific leaf area in forest canopy. J Jpn For Soc 52:263–268. https://doi.org/10.11519/jjfs1953.52.9_263
Tomari I, Ishiguro T, Fujiwara T (1980) Effect of windbreaks on the improvement of microclimatic conditions in paddy fields. Res Bull Hokkaido Natl Agric Exp Stat 127:31–76 (in Japanese with English summary)
Torita H, Satou H (2007) Relationship between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction. Agric For Meteorol 145:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.018
Vigiak O, Sterk G, Warren A, Hagen LJ (2003) Spatial modeling of wind speed around windbreaks. CATENA 52:273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00018-3
Wang H, Takle ES (1995) A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts. Bound-Layer Meteorol 75:141–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00721047
Wilson JD (2004a) Oblique, stratified winds about a shelter fence. Part I: measurements. J Appl Meteorol 43:1149–1167. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<1149:OSWAAS>2.0.CO;2
Wilson JD (2004b) Oblique, stratified winds about a shelter fence. Part II: comparison of measurements with numerical models. J Appl Meteorol 43:1392–1409. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2147.1
Wilson DR, Muchow RC, Murgatroyd CJ (1995) Model analysis of temperature and solar radiation limitations to maize potential productivity in a cool climate. Field Crops Res 43:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(95)00037-Q
Yamamoto K (2004) LIA for Win32 (LIA32), Version 0.377e. https://www.agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~shinkan/LIA32/index-e.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2016
Yuan F, Wu J, Wang A, Guan D, Zhang Y, Rajah-Boyer KI, Xu X (2019) A semiempirical model for horizontal distribution of surface wind speed leeward windbreaks. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00417-0
Zhang D, Brandle JR, Hodges L, Daningsih E, Hubbard KG (1999) The response of muskmelon growth and development to microclimate modification by shelterbelts. HortScience 34:64–68. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.34.1.64
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Hideo Wada, Marie Touze, Jun’ichi Ono, Yukihiro Bannae, and Osamu Oki for the establishment of study site. We are also grateful to Dr. Tomoyoshi Hirota for his advice on soil temperature simulation. We thank Minoru Fukuchi and Dr. Hirokazu Sato for the assistance of field survey and Drs. Hajime Sato and Kazuhiko Masaka for their helpful discussions. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20K06151.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iwasaki, K., Torita, H. & Abe, T. A simple process-based model for estimating windbreak effects on soil temperature during early crop growth stage. Agroforest Syst 94, 2401–2415 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00561-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00561-y