Skip to main content
Log in

The Metaphysics of Causation in Biological Mechanisms: A Case of the Genetic Switch in Lambda Phage

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emphasis on the organization of entities and their activities and interactions has been labeled one of the most distinct contributions of mechanistic philosophy. In this paper I discuss the manner in which the organization of entities and their activities and interactions participates in bringing about phenomena. I present a well-known example from molecular biology—the functioning of the genetic switch in phage lambda—and discuss Marco J. Nathan’s notion of causation by concentration. Nathan introduces causation by concentration to account for the irreducible causal role that the concentration ratio between two kinds of proteins possesses in the genetic switch mechanism in phage lambda. I discuss what the irreducibility of this causal role amounts to and provide a mechanistic interpretation of Nathan’s causation by concentration; that is, I explain this irreducible causal role as one organizational feature of this mechanism. The paper concludes that biological mechanisms need a causal pluralist framework [similar to Glennan’s account in (2009), (2010) and (2017) but slightly modified] where organizational features such as the concentration ratio have a causally relevant role, yet all the causally productive relations occur at the level of entities or individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a detailed description, see Ptashne (2004).

  2. The gene names are italicized while their corresponding protein names are not.

  3. See Nathan (2014) pp. 199–200, for the complete argument against Salmon/Dowe’s process theory, due to its inability to account for the stability of the genetic switch. The ˝snapshot˝ argument applies equally to the MDC approach.

References

  • Anscombe GEM (1993) Causality and determination. In: Sosa E, Tooley M (eds) Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 88–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright N (2004) Causation: one word, many things. Philos Sci 71(5):805–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver C (2007) Explaining the brain: mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craver C, Darden L (2013) In search of mechanisms. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dowe P (1992) Wesley Salmon’s process theory of causality and the conserved quantity theory. Philosophy of Science 59:195–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowe P (1995) Causality and conserved quantities: a reply to salmon. Phil Sci 62:321–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowe P (2000) Physical causation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies D (2018) Causality. Probability and medicine, Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennan S (1996) Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis 44:49–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennan S (2002) Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science 69:S342-353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennan S (2009) Productivity, relevance, and natural selection. Biol Philos 24:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennan S (2010) Mechanisms, causes, and the layered model of the world. Res 81:362–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennan S (2017) The new mechanical philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall N (2004) Two concepts of causation. In: John C, Ned H, Paul LA (eds) Causation and counterfactuals. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 225–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Illari PM, Williamson J (2011) Mechanisms are real and local. In: Russo F, Williamson J (eds) Phyllis McKay Illari. Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 818–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser MI (2018) The components and boundaries of mechanism. In: Routledge T (ed) Stuart Glennan and Phyllis McKay Illari. Routledge, Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, pp 116–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy A, Bechtel W (2013) Abstraction and the organization of mechanisms. Phil Sci 80(2):241–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machamer P, Darden L, Craver C (2000) Thinking about Mechanisms. Phil Sci 67:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan MJ (2014) Causation by Concentration. Br J Phil Sci 65:191–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ptashne M (2004) A Genetic Switch, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Phage Lambda Revisited

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W (1984) Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W (1998) Causality and explanation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf D.A. (2011) Models and Mechanisms in Psychological Explanation. Synthese, Vol. 183, No. 3, Neuroscience and its philosophy: 313–338

  • Woodward J (2002) What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Phil Sci 69:S366–S377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (2003) Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (2011) Mechanisms revisited. Synthese 183(3):409–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (2013) II - mechanistic explanation: its scope and limits. Aristot Soc Suppl Vol 87:39–65

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported in part by the Croatian Science Foundation under the projects IP-2013-11-5343 and IP-2018-01-3378.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zvonimir Anić.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anić, Z. The Metaphysics of Causation in Biological Mechanisms: A Case of the Genetic Switch in Lambda Phage. Acta Biotheor 69, 435–448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-020-09395-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-020-09395-8

Keywords

Navigation