Abstract
We theoretically study Dyakonov surface waveguide modes that propagate along the planar strip interfacial waveguide between two uniaxial dielectrics. We demonstrate that owing to the one-dimensional electromagnetic confinement, Dyakonov surface waveguide modes can propagate in the directions that are forbidden for the classical Dyakonov surface waves at the infinite interface. We show that this situation is similar to a waveguide effect and formulate the resonance conditions at which Dyakonov surface waveguide modes exist. We demonstrate that the propagation of such modes without losses is possible. We also consider a case of two-dimensional confinement, where the interface between two anisotropic dielectrics is bounded in both orthogonal directions. We show that such a structure supports Dyakonov surface cavity modes. Analytical results are confirmed by comparing with full-wave solutions of Maxwell’s equations. We believe that our work paves the way toward new insights in the field of surface waves in anisotropic media.
1 Introduction
Surface electromagnetic waves, propagating along the interface of two dissimilar media, have been the subject of extensive research during the last decades as they represent one of the fundamental concepts of nanophotonics. Understanding the optical properties of surface waves is of great importance for realizing their practical application.
There are several types of surface waves that differ in material type, domain of existence, propagation constant, decay profile. Among different types of surface waves, there are surface plasmon-polariton at a metal-dielectric interface [1], Tamm surface states at a photonic crystal boundary [2], [3], [4], surface solitons at a nonlinear interface [5], and many others.
Another family of surface waves is Dyakonov surface waves (DSWs), which exist at the interface of two media at least one of which is anisotropic, as predicted in 1988 in the study by D’yakonov [6]. In this pioneering work, the first medium was considered as an isotropic dielectric with the refractive index
is satisfied. In 1998, Walker et al. extended the theory of DSWs to the case of biaxial medium [7] with refractive indices
Later, different combinations of isotropic, uniaxial, biaxial, and chiral materials have been demonstrated to support DSWs [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].
A narrow range of propagation angles makes the experimental observation of DSWs rather complicated [15]. As a result, the first detection of these waves has been demonstrated only in 2009 [16]. The authors used Otto-Kretschmann configuration to observe Dyakonov surface states at the interface of a biaxial crystal and an isotropic liquid. Another perspective approach to obtain Dyakonov-like surface waves experimentally is the usage of partnering thin films between anisotropic and isotropic media [17]. In such systems, the direction of hybrid Dyakonov-guided modes propagation can be controlled by changing the isotropic medium’s refractive index. The results presented in the study by Takayama, Artigas, and Torner [17] show that these types of waves can be used as a sensing unit. It has been demonstrated in a number of publications that DSWs can exist at the interface of isotropic materials and materials with artificially designed shape anisotropy [9], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Moreover, as theoretically shown in Ref. [23], [24], in the metamaterial composed of alternating layers of metals and dielectric, exotic types of surface waves such as Dyakonov plasmons and hybrid plasmons can appear. In such structures, the angular range of existence of DSWs can be extended up to
Recently, in 2019, a new type of surface waves, referred to as Dyakonov-Voigt surface waves, have been theoretically demonstrated at the interface of isotropic and uniaxial materials [25]. Unlike conventional DSWs, Dyakonov-Voigt surface waves decay is the product of a linear and an exponential function of the distance from the interface in anisotropic medium [26], [27], [28]. In contrast to DSWs, Dyakonov-Voigt surface waves propagate only in one direction in each quadrant of the interface plane.
Like in the cases of other surface waves, the feasibility of the practical use of DSWs ultimately depends on whether they can exist in resonator structures of finite size and whether they can propagate without radiative losses. In Ref. [29], it has been shown that the DSWs can be conformally transformed into the bound states of cylindrical metamaterials. Dyakonov-like surface waves have been also theoretically predicted in anisotropic cylindrical waveguides [30]. Owing to the bending of the waveguide boundary, such modes have inevitable radiative losses. In our recent work [44] we considered Dyakonov-like waveguide modes in a flat interfacial strip waveguide confined in the dimension perpendicular to the DSW propagation direction and showed that such modes can propagate without radiative losses.
This article is devoted to the theoretical study of Dyakonov-like surface states at a flat interface confined in one or two dimensions. Like in Ref. [44], we consider two anisotropic uniaxial lossless dielectrics twisted in such a way that their optical axes form an angle of
2 Interface of two uniaxial crystals
We start our discussion by considering a flat infinite interface between two twisted semi-infinite anisotropic uniaxial media shown in Figure 1a. We assume that the optical axes of the upper and lower media are directed along the x and y coordinate axes. As shown in Refs. [31], [32], [33], such a configuration supports DSWs when anisotropic media are optically positive, that is, the condition (1) is satisfied. In Refs. [34], [35], [36], [37], the problem of DSWs has been generalized to the case of two biaxial crystals. In this section, we once again describe some of the key points of DSWs in the uniaxial/uniaxial configuration which are crucial for understanding the properties of Dyakonov-like surface waves in confined media. We denote the dielectric permittivity tensor of the upper half-space as
where
where
where
The numerical solution of the Equation (4) for the Dyakonov wave is represented in Figure 1c by the red curve. One can see that the DSW is located near the intersection of the dispersion curves of extraordinary waves with
The
To estimate the partial contributions of ordinary and extraordinary waves to the DSW, we calculate the ratio of the coefficients
The dispersion relation of DSW can be found analytically from Eq. (4) for the symmetric case of
Moreover, Eq. (4) can also be analytically solved in the cutoff points
This gives us the analytical expression for the cutoff angle
Owing to the symmetry, the second cutoff angle
Like many surface waves, DSWs are elliptically polarized. However, the degree of circular polarization (DCP) depends on the anisotropy factor γ, on the azimuthal angle of propagation φ and on the coordinate z where the electric field is considered. For the most symmetric case (
From Eq. (10), we can see that at
3 Reflection from boundary
Before moving on to exploring the dimensional confinement of Dyakonov-like surface states, it is important to analyze the scattering of a DSW on a single boundary perpendicular to the interface plane along which the DSW propagates. The results obtained in the previous section provide the possibility for performing this analysis.
We consider a DSW propagating along the interface at a varying azimuthal propagation angle φ and hitting the boundary at a varying angle of incidence α (Figure 2a). In this section, we use a new coordinate system where the boundary is parallel to the y-axis and the angle between the optical axes and coordinate axes equals to
It enables us to reduce the 3D scattering problem to a 2D problem in the XZ plane with a fixed out-of-plane wavevector component
First, we explore the most symmetric configuration fixing the azimuthal propagation angle at
Second, we consider the case of the maximal reflection by fixing the incident angle α at 45° and varying the azimuthal propagation angle φ within the φ-range of DSW existence
Figure 2e–l shows the profiles of the period average electric field intensity of the DSW being produced by the port and falling on the boundary at different incident angles α and at a fixed azimuthal propagation angle
We would like to emphasize once again that a nonperfect reflection at
4 One-dimensional confinement
Let us now study the system of upper and lower slabs, tangent to each other, confined between two parallel boundaries located at
Because such a strip waveguide has mirror symmetries
is known then the solution for DSWMs which satisfies mirror boundary conditions at
Moreover, it also satisfies mirror boundary conditions at
These considerations enable us to find the dispersion law of DSWMs. First, we note that the dispersion law of DSW at an infinite interface in
where a function F does not depend on
where n is the mode order.
The dispersion curves of DSWMs
The waveguide width dependence of the propagation constant
As it has been demonstrated in Figure 2, the reflection of DSWMs from the PEC half-space at
which has the meaning of a DSWM decay length expressed in units of the DSWM wavelength. Figure 3f shows the FOM calculated in COMSOL. One can see that for
Our field simulations reveal that for the first-order DSWM, there is the symmetry mismatch and the corresponding overlap integrals vanish, which indicates that the coupling of the first-order DSWM with the slabs’ waveguide modes is not possible. As there is also no radiative leakage to the air (see Figure 2f and its discussion), we conclude that the first-order DSWM has no radiative losses which results in the infinite FOM. Radiative losses of higher-order DSWM’s are fully attributed to the coupling with the slabs’ waveguide modes. We emphasize once again the importance of the obtained result that although DSWMs are generally coupled to propagating EWMs, a symmetry-protected lossless first-order DSWM exists.
Let us consider the field distributions in DSWMs. Cross-sectional electric field profiles of the second-order DSWM in the strip waveguide surrounded by air calculated for different waveguide widths d within the range of the DSWM’s existence are shown in Figure 4a. One can see that at
In the case of the air boundary, this condition will be more complex. The biasing of the DSWMs toward upper or lower slabs explains the presence of the local minimum in the waveguide width dependence of the FOM shown in Figure 3f.
Electric and magnetic field intensity profiles of the first-order and the second-order DSWMs are shown in Figure 4b and c for the widths d such that the symmetry condition (17) is satisfied. For the air boundary, the electric field intensity profile of the n-th-order DSWM has
At the end of this section, we conclude that the one-dimensional electromagnetic confinement makes DSWMs traveling along the direction where classical DSWs cannot propagate. Indeed, as is shown in Figure 1b, DSWs exist at a small angle around the bisector between optical axes of upper and lower anisotropic materials, whereas the DSWMs propagate along one of these optical axes. This feature distinguishes DSWMs from DSWs.
5 Two-dimensional confinement
Owing to the symmetrical configuration of DSWs relative to the optical axes (Figure 1b), one can confine DSWs in two dimensions using two pairs of orthogonal boundaries, as shown in Figure 5a and b. In such a system, the DSW reflects at an angle of
where n is the mode order, d is the side of the square, and
We note that the structure with anisotropic rods shown in Figure 5a and b is S4-symmetrical, that is, it is invariant under 90° rotation about the z-axis and subsequent mirror reflection relative to the
Owing to radiation losses caused by the scattering of DSWs at the air boundaries, DSCMs should have a finite Q-factor when rods are surrounded by air. Generally, the Q-factor depends on the dielectric permittivities of rods and environment, as well as on the mode order. The COMSOL simulation reveals that for the case of air boundaries and components of dielectric tensors of rods
Finally, DSCMs demonstrated in this section can be generalized to the case of cylinders of arbitrary rectangular shape. A DSCM in such a structure is a superposition of DSWs reflecting from boundaries at angles α not equal to 45° and propagating at azimuthal angles φ also not equal to 45°. Such a structure is no longer S4-symmetrical, and the corresponding field distributions are less symmetrical in comparison with the case of square cylinders (See Supplemental Materials for details). Owing to the perfect reflection from the PEC boundary (Figure 2d), the Q-factors of DSCMs in rectangular cylinders with PEC boundaries remain infinite.
6 Conclusion
In conclusion, we have studied Dyakonov-like surface states which appear at the interface between two identical anisotropic dielectrics twisted in such a way that their optical axes form an angle of 90° to each other. First, we have studied the case of the infinite horizontal interface where DSWs exist in a small range of azimuthal angles. In the presence of vertical boundaries that constrain the system from two sides, electromagnetic confinement comes into play. We have demonstrated that such a one-dimensionally confined system supports DSWMs propagating along the direction where conventional DSWs do not exist. We have shown that the first-order DSWM can propagate without losses. This fact opens ample opportunities for using these modes in signal transmission lines and information processing. The existence of DSWMs can be explained in terms of the multireflection of DSWs at angles close to 45° to the interfacial strip waveguide boundaries. We have further improved this idea and considered the interface between two square cylinders made of anisotropic materials. Owing to the two-dimensional electromagnetic confinement, such a system supports Dyakonov surface cavity modes. We believe that our work can open new insights in the field of surface waves in anisotropic media, which can lead to the practical application of DSWs in optoelectronic devices.
7 Theoretical methods
To simulate the DSW reflection from a single boundary, we developed a model in COMSOL Multiphysics where the DSW is excited by a port plane. The field and the wavevector of the mode which are excited by the port are taken as a DSW solution at the infinite interface described in Section 2. Then, we find the S-parameters of such a system by calculating the fields at the reflection and the transmission sides. As a result, we obtain the total reflectance and transmittance of DSW at the boundary. We verified our numerical results obtained in COMSOL Multiphysics using the analytical solutions. When calculating models that do not have an analytical solution, we checked that the final results do not depend on the grid size and the position of the PML layers.
Funding source: Russian Foundation for Basic Research
Award Identifier / Grant number: 18-29-20032
Acknowledgments
Authors acknowledge Ilia M. Fradkin for fruitful discussions.
- 1
Please note that the cutoff points for DSWM for the air boundary are determined approximately due to limitation of the computational domain size in COMSOL.
- 2
The difference between irreducible representations A and B in S4 point group is whether a field changes its sign under the symmetry operation S4. See [43] for details.
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission. D.C. conducted COMSOL simulations. E.A. developed a theoretical model, S.D. conceived the idea of this manuscript and organized the manuscript preparation, N.G. supervised the project and provided the valuable advice on the manuscript.
Research funding: This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant No. 18-29-20032).
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
[1] D. L. Mills and V. M. Agranovich, “Surface Polaritons,” Amsterdam, New York, Oxford; North- Holland Publishing Company: 1988.Search in Google Scholar
[2] N. Malkova and C. Z. Ning, “Shockley and Tamm surface states in photonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 73, no. 11, p. 113113, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.73.113113.10.1364/META.2006.ThD11Search in Google Scholar
[3] A. P. Vinogradov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. M. Merzlikin, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Surface states in photonic crystals,” Phys. Usp., vol. 53, p. 243, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3367/ufne.0180.201003b.0249.10.3367/UFNe.0180.201003b.0249Search in Google Scholar
[4] S. A. Dyakov, A. Baldycheva, T. S. Perova, et al.., “Surface states in the optical spectra of two-dimensional photonic crystals with various surface terminations,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, p. 115126, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.86.115126.10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115126Search in Google Scholar
[5] Y. V. Kartashov, V. A. Vysloukh, and L. Torner, “Surface gap solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 96, no. 7, p. 073901, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.073901.10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.073901Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] M. I. D’yakonov, “New type of electromagnetic wave propagating at an interface,” Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 67, no. April, pp. 714–716, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
[7] D. B. Walker, E. N. Glytsis, and T. K. Gaylord, “Surface mode at isotropic–uniaxial and isotropic–biaxial interfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 248, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.15.000248.10.1364/JOSAA.15.000248Search in Google Scholar
[8] E. E. Narimanov, “Dyakonov waves in biaxial anisotropic crystals,” Phys. Rev., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.98.013818.10.1103/PhysRevA.98.013818Search in Google Scholar
[9] A. Lakhtakia and J. A. Polo, “Dyakonov-Tamm wave at the planar interface of a chiral sculptured thin film and an isotropic dielectric material,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc., vol. 2, pp. 1–12, 2007, https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2007.07021.10.2971/jeos.2007.07021Search in Google Scholar
[10] J. Gao, A. Lakhtakia, and M. Lei, “On dyakonov-tamm waves localized to a central twist defect in a structurally chiral material,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 26, pp. B74–B82, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.26.000b74.10.1364/JOSAB.26.000B74Search in Google Scholar
[11] T. Repän, O. Takayama, and A. V. Lavrinenko, “Photonics,” vol. 7, 2020, p. 34.10.3390/photonics7020034Search in Google Scholar
[12] Y. Zhang, X. Wang, D. Zhang, S. Fu, S. Zhou, and X.-Z. Wang, “Unusual spin and angular momentum of dyakonov waves at the hyperbolic-material surface,” Opt. Express, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 19205–19217, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.395594.10.1364/OE.395594Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] S. Y. Karpov, “Dyakonov surface electromagnetic waves in iii-nitride heterostructures,” Phys. Status Solidi (b), vol. 256, no. 3, p. 1800609, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201800609.10.1002/pssb.201800609Search in Google Scholar
[14] I. Fedorin, “Dyakonov surface waves at the interface of nanocomposites with spherical and ellipsoidal inclusions,” Opt. Quant. Electron., vol. 51, no. 6, p. 201, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-019-1915-8.10.1007/s11082-019-1915-8Search in Google Scholar
[15] O. Takayama, L. C. Crasovan, S. K. Johansen, D. Mihalache, D. Artigas, and L. Torner, “Dyakonov surface waves: A review,” Electromagnetics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 126–145, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1080/02726340801921403.10.1080/02726340801921403Search in Google Scholar
[16] O. Takayama, L. Crasovan, D. Artigas, and L. Torner, “Observation of dyakonov surface waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 2–5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.102.043903.10.1109/CLEOE-EQEC.2009.5194784Search in Google Scholar
[17] O. Takayama, D. Artigas, and L. Torner, “Lossless directional guiding of light in dielectric nanosheets using Dyakonov surface waves,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 419–424, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.90.10.1038/nnano.2014.90Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] F. Chiadini, V. Fiumara, A. Scaglione, and A. Lakhtakia, “Compound guided waves that mix characteristics of surface-plasmon-polariton, Tamm, Dyakonov–Tamm, and Uller–Zenneck waves,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 1197, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.33.001197.10.1364/JOSAB.33.001197Search in Google Scholar
[19] A. Lakhtakia and M. Faryad, “Theory of optical sensing with Dyakonov–Tamm waves,” J. Nanophotonics, vol. 8, p. 083072, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jnp.8.083072.10.1117/1.JNP.8.083072Search in Google Scholar
[20] D. P. Pulsifer, M. Faryad, and A. Lakhtakia, “Observation of the Dyakonov-Tamm wave,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 111, no. 24, pp. 1–5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.111.243902.10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.243902Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] D. Artigas and L. Torner, “Dyakonov surface waves in photonic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 94, no. 1, p. 013901, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.013901.10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.013901Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Z. Jacob and E. E. Narimanov, “Optical hyperspace for plasmons: dyakonov states in metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 93, no. 22, p. 221109, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3037208.10.1063/1.3037208Search in Google Scholar
[23] O. Takayama, D. Artigas, and L. Torner, “Practical dyakonons,” Opt. Lett., vol. 37, no. 20, p. 4311, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.37.004311.10.1364/OL.37.004311Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] O. Takayama, D. Artigas, and L. Torner, “Coupling plasmons and dyakonons,” Opt. Lett., vol. 37, p. 1983, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.37.001983.10.1364/OL.37.001983Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] T. G. Mackay, C. Zhou, and A. Lakhtakia, “Dyakonov–Voigt surface waves,” Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 475, p. 20190317, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0317.10.1098/rspa.2019.0317Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[26] A. Lakhtakia and T. Mackay, “From unexceptional to doubly exceptional surface waves,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.399403.10.1364/JOSAB.399403Search in Google Scholar
[27] A. Lakhtakia, T. G. Mackay, and C. Zhou, “Electromagnetic surface waves at exceptional points,” Eur. J. Phys. in press. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/abb6c7.10.1088/1361-6404/abb6c7Search in Google Scholar
[28] C. Zhou, T. G. Mackay, and A. Lakhtakia, “Theory of dyakonov–tamm surface waves featuring dyakonov–tamm–voigt surface waves,” Optik, Vol. 211, p. 164575, 2020, ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164575.10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164575Search in Google Scholar
[29] V. Kajorndejnukul, D. Artigas, and L. Torner, “Conformal transformation of Dyakonov surface waves into bound states of cylindrical metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, no. 19, pp. 1–6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.100.195404.10.1103/PhysRevB.100.195404Search in Google Scholar
[30] K. Y.. Golenitskii, A. A. Bogdanov, “Dyakonov-like surface waves in anisotropic cylindrical waveguides,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 110, no. 16, p. 165434, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.165434.10.1103/PhysRevB.101.165434Search in Google Scholar
[31] N. Averkiev and M. Dyakonov, “Electromagnetic waves localized at the boundary of transparent anisotropic media,” Opt. Spectrosc., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1118–1121, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
[32] A. N. Darinskii, “Dispersionless polaritons on a twist boundary in optically uniaxial crystals,” Crystallogr. Rep., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 842–844, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1405874.10.1134/1.1405874Search in Google Scholar
[33] A. N. Furs, V. M. Galynsky, and L. M. Barkovsky, “Dispersionless surface polaritons at twist boundaries of crystals and in a transition layer between the crystals,” Opt. Spectrosc., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 454–461, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1890527.10.1134/1.1890527Search in Google Scholar
[34] A. N. Furs, V. M. Galynsky, and L. M. Barkovsky, “Surface polaritons in symmetry planes of biaxial crystals,” J. Phys. Math. Gen., vol. 38, pp. 8083–8101, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/38/37/010.10.1088/0305-4470/38/37/010Search in Google Scholar
[35] S. R. Nelatury, J. A. PoloJr., and A. Lakhtakia, “Surface waves with simple exponential transverse decay at a biaxial bicrystalline interface,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 24, p. 856, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.24.000856.10.1364/JOSAA.24.000856Search in Google Scholar
[36] J. A. PoloJr., S. R. Nelatury, and A. Lakhtakia, “Surface waves at a biaxial bicrystalline interface,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 24, no. 9, p. 2974, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.24.002974.10.1364/JOSAA.24.002974Search in Google Scholar
[37] V. I. Alshits and V. N. Lyubimov, “Dispersionless surface polaritons in the vicinity of different sections of optically uniaxial crystals,” Phys. Solid State, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 386–390, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1451033.10.1134/1.1451033Search in Google Scholar
[38] O. Takayama, A. Y. Nikitin, L. Martin-Moreno, L. Torner, and D. Artigas, “Dyakonov surface wave resonant transmission,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 7, p. 6339, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.19.006339.10.1364/OE.19.006339Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] L. Li, “Fourier modal method for crossed anisotropic gratings with arbitrary permittivity and permeability tensors,” J. Opt. Pure Appl. Opt., vol. 5, no. 4, p. 345, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/5/4/307.10.1088/1464-4258/5/4/307Search in Google Scholar
[40] T. Weiss, G. Granet, N. A. Gippius, S. G. Tikhodeev, and H. Giessen, “Matched coordinates and adaptive spatial resolution in the fourier modal method,” Opt. Express, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 8051–8061, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.17.008051.10.1364/OE.17.008051Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[41] S. G. Tikhodeev, A. L. Yablonskii, E. A. Muljarov, N. A. Gippius, and T. Ishihara, “Quasiguided modes and optical properties of photonic crystal slabs,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 66, p. 045102, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.66.045102.10.1103/PhysRevB.66.045102Search in Google Scholar
[42] A. García-Etxarri, R. Gómez-Medina, L. S. Froufe-Pérez, et al.., “Strong magnetic response of submicron Silicon particles in the infrared,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, p. 4815, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.19.004815.10.1364/OE.19.004815Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[43] http://symmetry.jacobs-university.de.Search in Google Scholar
[44] E. V. Anikin, D. A. Chermoshentsev, S. A. Dyakov, N. A. Gippius, “Dyakonov-like waveguide modes in an interfacial strip waveguide,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 102, no. 16, p. 161113(R), 2020, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.161113.10.1103/PhysRevB.102.161113Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0459).
© 2020 Dmitry A. Chermoshentsev et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.