Abstract
Genetic data are crucial for making inferences about the evolutionary history of species and deriving guidelines for conservation strategies. In conservation genetics studies, each step should be critically evaluated, from sampling strategy to data quality assessment and analytical methods: potential issues and biases should be considered, reproducibility should be guaranteed and the results of different analyses should be critically evaluated. By incorporating all these steps, we re-analysed data from Baker et al. (Heredity 119:16–26, 2017): our results led to conclusions that contradict the ones reached by the authors, which were based on weak support and biased analyses. European fallow deer current genetic makeup most likely derives from extensive human-mediated translocations. The genetic expectations of glacial refugia hypothesis cannot be found in current European fallow deer populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson E, Dunham K (2008) The influence of family groups on inferences made with the program structure. Mol Ecol Res 8:1219–1229
Arslangündoğdu Z, Kasparek M, Sarbaçak H, Kaçar MS, Yöntem O, Şahin MT (2010) Development of the population of the European Fallow Deer, Dama dama dama (Linnaeus, 1758), in Turkey: (Mammalia: Cervidae). Zool Middle East 49:3–12
Baker KH, Gray HWI, Ramovs V, Mertzanidou D, Peksen CA, Bilgin CC, Sykes N, Hoelzel AR (2017) Strong population structure in a species manipulated by humans since the Neolithic: the European fallow deer (Dama dama dama). Heredity 119:16–26
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 57:289–300
Chapman DI, Chapman NG (1980) The distribution of fallow deer: a worldwide review. Mammal Rev 10:61–138
Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621–631
Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659
Cornuet JM, Santos F, Beaumont MA, Robert CP, Marin JM, Balding DJ et al (2008) Inferring population history with DIY ABC: a user-friendly approach to approximate Bayesian computation. Bioinformatics 24:2713–2719
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res 10:564–567
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Ralls K, Eldridge M, Dudash MR, Fenster CB et al (2017) Genetic management of fragmented animal and plant populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gilbert KJ, Andrew RL, Bock DG, Franklin MT, Kane NC, Moore JS et al (2012) Recommendations for utilizing and reporting population genetic analyses: the reproducibility of genetic clustering using the program STRUCTURE. Mol Ecol 21:4925–4930
Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486
Hewitt G (2000) The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913
Hewitt G (2004) Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the quaternary. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 359:183–195
Jones OR, Wang J (2010) COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Res 10:551–555
Kopelman NM, Mayzel J, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA, Mayrose I (2015) Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol Ecol Res 15:1179–1191
Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452
Lombaert E, Guillemaud T, Deleury E (2016) A simulation-based evaluation of STRUCTURE software for exploring the introduction routes of invasive species. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/094029
Ludwig A, Vernesi C, Lieckfeldt D, Lattenkamp EZ, Wiethölter A, Lutz W (2012) Origin and patterns of genetic diversity of German fallow deer as inferred from mitochondrial DNA. Eur J Wildl Res 58:495–501
Masseti M (2007) Island of deer. Deer 14:36–40
Masseti M, Vernesi C (2015) Historic zoology of the European fallow deer, Dama dama dama: evidence from biogeography, archaeology and genetics. In: Baker K, Carden R, Madgwick R (eds) Deer and people. Windgather Press, Oxford, pp 13–22
Masseti M, Pecchioli E, Vernesi C (2008) Phylogeography of the last surviving populations of Rhodian and Anatolian fallow deer (Dama dama dama L., 1758). Biol J Linn Soc 93:835–844
McElligott AG, Hayden TJ (2000) Lifetime mating success, sexual selection and life history of fallow bucks (Dama dama). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:203–210
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539
Petit RJ, Aguinagalde I, de Beaulieu JL, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R et al (2003) Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300:1563–1565
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
R Development Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed Aug 2020
Randi E, Apollonio M (1988) Low biochemical variability in European fallow deer (Dama dama L.): natural bottlenecks and the effects of domestication. Heredity 61:405–410
Rousset F (2008) genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Res 8:103–106
Say L, Naulty F, Hayden T (2003) Genetic and behavioural estimates of reproductive skew in male fallow deer. Mol Ecol 12:2793–2800
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Res 4:535–538
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank four anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism that helped us improve a former version of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data archiving
DNA sequences: Genbank accessions KY564399–KY564432 (Baker et al. 2017); JF505623–JF505632 (Ludwig et al. 2012); MN148292–MN148313 (Masseti et al. 2008). Microsatellite DNA genotypes from Baker et al. (2017): Dryad Digital Repository https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d2g8v.r. Supplementary Information is available in the online version of this article at the publisher’s website.
Additional information
Handling editor: Laura Iacolina.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marchesini, A., Vernesi, C., Gandolfi, A. et al. No genetic signature of glacial refugia in current European fallow deer (Dama dama dama L., 1758) populations: a comment on Baker et al. (2017). Mamm Biol 101, 305–312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-020-00076-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-020-00076-0