Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of avatar and voice transform in programming e-learning lectures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports the effectiveness of high frame rate facial animated avatar and voice transformer in eLearning. Three avatars: (real male professor, male avatar, female avatar) were combined with male professor’s voice or VT-4 vocoder transformed voice to create six distinguished videos which were then viewed by university freshmen students. A total of 186 students divided into 15 groups participated in this experiment. Female avatar was the most appealing avatar visually, but its combination with voice transform severely hinders its overall score. This research can be extended to real time live evaluation measuring preferences of students and draw more connections between student perception of avatar and actual lecturers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basogain X, Olabe MA, Olabe JC (2017) Transition to a modern education system through e-learning. In: Proceedings of the 2017 international conference on education and e-learning pp 41–46

  2. Baylor AL,Kim Y (2004) Pedagogical agent design: the impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and in-structional role, 3220, pp 592–603

  3. Baylor AL, Warren D, Park S, Shen E, Perez R (2005) The impact of frustration-mitigating messages delivered by an interface agent, vol 125, pp 73–79

  4. Baylor A, J Ryu (2003) The API (agent persona instrument) for assessing pedagogical agent persona

  5. Craig SD, Schroeder Noah NL (2017) Reconsidering the voice effect when learning from a virtual human. Comput Educ 114:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Du-Ilona P (2017) The effectiveness of gamification as an e-learning strategy. IJMAS, pp 24–26

  7. El-Seoud MA, Taj-Eddin IATF, Seddiek N, El-Khouly MM, Nosseir A (2014) E-learning and students’ motivation: a research study on the effect of e-learning on higher education. Int J Emerg Technolog Learn 9(4):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gulz A, Haake M (2006) Design of animated pedagogical agents-a look at their look. Int J Human-Comput Stud 64(6):322–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsieh R, Shirai A, Sato H (2019) Evaluation of avatar and voice transform in programming e-learning lectures. In: IVA ’19 proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on intelligent virtual agents, pp 197–199

  10. Kieran Walsh (2018) Reflections of health care professionals on e-learning resources for patient safety. Baylor Univ Med Center Proc 31(1):35–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2017.1391580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenberg-Kima R, Baylor A, Plant A, Doerr C (2007) The importance of interface agent visual presence: voice alone is less effective in impacting Young women’s attitudes toward engineering, pp 214–222

  12. Zou L, Tal I, Covaci A, Ibarrola E, Ghinea G (2017) Gabriel-Miro Muntean can multisensorial media improve learner experience? In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM on multimedia systems conference, pp 315–320

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rex Hsieh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsieh, R., Sato, H. Evaluation of avatar and voice transform in programming e-learning lectures. J Multimodal User Interfaces 15, 121–129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-020-00349-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-020-00349-5

Keywords

Navigation