Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Mediator Role of Negative Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies Between Interpersonal Problems and Borderline Personality Beliefs

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpersonal difficulties and emotion regulation are the core characteristics of borderline personality disorders (BPD). However, how emotion regulation strategies contribute to the association between interpersonal problems and borderline personality symptomatology have not been highlighted within cognitive theory. The current study aims to examine the mediator role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies between interpersonal problems and borderline personality beliefs. The study consisted of 648 (381 women and 267 male) people from Turkey. In addition to Socio-Demographic Form, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex Scales (IIP-32), and Borderline Personality Belief Subscale (BPBS) were used to collect data from participants. Results showed that negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies, particularly catastrophizing, blaming-others and self-blame, mediated interpersonal problems, and borderline personality beliefs. Since the current study used thought-based assessment, the findings provide enlightening information to understand the underlying cognitive processes of the borderline personality pattern, and promising clinical implications to improve intervention programs within cognitive therapy approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akyunus, M., & Gençöz, T. (2020). The distinctive associations of interpersonal of interpersonal problems with personality beliefs within the framework of cognitive theory of personality disorders. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 18(1), 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyunus-İnce, M. (2012). Cognitive aspects of personality disorders: Influences of basic personality traits, cognitive emotion regulation and interpersonal problems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara: Middle East Technical University, Graduate School of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akyunus, M., & Gençöz, T. (2016). Psychometric properties of the inventory of interpersonal problems-circumplex scales short form: a reliability and validity study. Düşünen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 29(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2016290104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnow, S., Stopsack, M., Grabe, H. J., Meinke, C., Spitzer, C., Kronmüller, K., et al. (2009). Interpersonal evaluation bias in borderline personality disorder. Behavior Research Therapy, 47(5), 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Beck, J. S. (1991). The PB questionnaire. Bala Cynwyd: Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Freeman, A., & Davis, D. D. (2004). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders (3rd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Davis, D. D., & Freeman, A. (2015). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhar, S., Brown, G. K., & Beck, A. T. (2008). Dysfunctional beliefs and psychopathology in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornovalova, M. A., Gratz, K. L., Daughters, S. B., Nick, B., Delany-Brumsey, A., Lynch, T. R., et al. (2008). A multimodel assessment of the relationship between emotion dysregulation and borderline personality disorder among inner city substance users in residential treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42, 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. C., Brown, G. K., Beck, A. T., & Grisham, J. R. (2002). Assessment of dysfunctional beliefs in borderline personality disorders. Behavior Research and Therapy, 40(10), 1231–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R. W., & Trull, T. J. (2013). Components of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder: a review. Current psychiatry reports, 15(1), 335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. L., Leung, D. W., & Lynch, T. R. (2008). Impulsivity and emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder. Journal of personality disorders, 22(2), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çakmak, A. F., & Çevik, E. I. (2010). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: development of turkish version of 18-item short form. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10), 2097–2102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daros, A. R., Guevara, M. A., Uliaszek, A. A., McMain, S. F., & Ruocco, A. C. (2018). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies in borderline personality disorder: diagnostic comparisons and associations with potentially harmful behaviors. Psychopathology, 51, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B., De Bolle, M., et al. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Turner, B. J., Rosenthal, Z. M., & Chapman, A. L. (2017). Emotion regulation in borderline personality disorder: an experimental investigation of the effects of instructed acceptance and suppression. Behavior Therapy., 48, 750–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Difference, 30, 1311–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (1999). Emotion regulation: past, present, future. Cognition and Emotion., 13, 551–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process: a regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, N., Rosenthal, Z. M., Geiger, P., & Erikson, K. (2013). Difficulties with emotion regulation mediate the relationship between borderline personality disorder symptom severity and interpersonal problems. Personality and Mental Health, 7, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenroth, M. J., Menaker, J., Peters, E. J., & Pincus, A. L. (2007). Assessment of borderline pathology using the inventory of interpersonal problems circumplex scales (IIP-C): a comparison of clinical samples. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 14, 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, C. J., Schade, N., Kreuger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. (2013). Connecting DSM-5 personality traits and pathological beliefs: Toward a unifying model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 162–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Kring, A. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2, 320–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, S. A., Cheavens, J. S., Festa, F., & Rosenthal, M. Z. (2014). Interpersonal functioning in borderline personality disorder: a systematic review of behavioral and laboratory-based assessments. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(3), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leichsenring, F., Kunst, H., & Hoyer, J. (2003). Borderline personality organization in violent offenders: correlations of identity diffusion and primitive defense mechanism with antisocial features, neuroticism, and interpersonal problems. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic., 67(4), 314–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D., Marziali, E., & Hood, J. (1997). Emotion processing in borderline personality disorders. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 185(4), 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyal, N., Henik, A., & Anholt, G. E. (2014). Cognitive strategies to regulate emotions: current evidence and future directions. Frontiers in psychology., 4, 1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, K. M., & Silk, K. R. (2005). Emotion dysregulation and the development of borderline personality disorder. Development and psychopathology, 17(4), 899–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel, J. J., Moscowitz, D. S., Zuroff, D. C., Sookman, D., & Paris, J. (2007). Stability and variability of affective experience and interpersonal behavior in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(3), 578–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzer, S., Streeck, U., Jaeger, U., Masuhr, O., Warwas, J., Leichsenring, F., et al. (2013). Patterns of interpersonal problems in borderline personality disorder. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 201(2), 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldz, S., Budman, S. H., Demby, A., & Merry, J. (1993). Representation of personality disorders in circumplex and five-factor space: explorations with a clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 5, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söhnchen, F. (2009). Common method variance und single source bias. In S. Albers (Ed.), Methodik der empirischen Forschung [Methodology of Empirical Research] (3rd ed., pp. 137–152). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Takano, K., Sakamoto, S., & Tanno, Y. (2011). Ruminative and reflective forms of self-focus: their relationships with interpersonal skills and emotional reactivity under interpersonal stress. Personality and Individual Difference, 51(4), 515–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkçapar, M. H., Örsel, S., Uğurlu, M., Sargın, E., Turhan, M., Akkoyunlu, S., et al. (2007). Reliability and validity of Turkish version of personality belief questionnaire. Klinik Psikiyatri, 10, 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verzeletti, C., Zammuner, V. L., Galli, C., Agnoli, S., & Duregger, C. (2016). Emotion regulation strategies and psychosocial well-being in adolescence. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1199294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1989). Conceptions of personality disorders and dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment., 1(4), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. G. C., Hallquist, M. N., Beeney, J. E., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2013a). Borderline personality pathology and the stability of interpersonal problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(4), 1094–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. G., Hallquist, M. N., Morse, J. Q., Scott, L. N., Stepp, S. D., Nolf, K. A., et al. (2013b). Clarifying interpersonal heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder using latent mixture modeling. Journal of personality disorders, 27(2), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Isik University, Istanbul, Turkey

    M. Akyunus & S. Karakose

  2. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    T. Gençöz

Authors
  1. M. Akyunus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Gençöz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Karakose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MA concceptualized and designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript, TG supervised, wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript, SK analyzed the data and wrote the original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Karakose.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akyunus, M., Gençöz, T. & Karakose, S. The Mediator Role of Negative Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies Between Interpersonal Problems and Borderline Personality Beliefs. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 39, 322–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00373-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00373-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation