Abstract
Most of the tropical ecosystems are now altered, consequently modifying the species diversity, composition and feeding behaviours. Precisely, the survival of species is dependent on their characteristics to endure the novel environments immersed in human-dominated landscapes. Thus, comparative studies of how different community attributes and trophic guilds respond to changes in land use would be useful. In this study, we analyzed diversity, composition and food selection of dung beetles in an Atlantic forest enclave (Ombrophilous forest remnant) from North-eastern Brazil. We sampled dung beetles using 60 pitfall traps distributed in our study region. Diversity and composition were estimated by using Hill numbers (or the effective number of species) and biomass of individuals and were compared among three types of vegetation structure (forest, forest edge and open pastures) and four different types of baits (human, pig, chicken and cattle excrements). We found that diversity measures weighted by biomass allowed better detection of the variation between habitat types and food preference than weighted by the number of individuals. The dung beetle biomass indicates that the spatial dominance of open pastures promote a drastic impoverishment of dung beetle diversity and composition. We also found that β diversity shows an evidence of homogenization on the resource food selection, related with the preference in the attraction of dung beetles to exotic omnivores. Our results show that replacing forests with cattle pastures modifies diversity, species composition, and resource food selection patterns, which could affect the ecosystem provision by dung beetles. Despite our study region is immersed in a human-dominated-landscape, forest remnants continue to hold a high diversity assemblage compared with most degraded environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
It will be available if the article is accepted.
References
Allan E, Manning P, Alt F, Binkenstein J, Blaser S, Blüthgen N, Böhm S, Grassein F, Hölzel N, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Morris EK, Oelmann Y, Prati D, Renner SC, Rillig MC, Schaefer M, Schloter M, Schmitt B, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Solly E, Sorkau E, Steckel J, Steffen-Dewenter I, Stempfhuber B, Tschapka M, Weiner CN, Weisser WW, Werner M, Westphal C, Wilcke W, Fischer M (2015) Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol Lett 18:834–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12469
Alvarado F, Dáttilo W, Escobar F (2019) Linking dung beetle diversity and its ecological function in a gradient of livestock intensification management in the Neotropical region. Appl Soil Ecol 143:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.06.016
Anderson MJ (2005) Permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland 26:32–46
Anderson MJ, Crist TO et al (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x
Arneberg P, Andersen J (2003) The energetic equivalence rule rejected because of a potentially common sampling error: evidence from carabid beetles. Oikos 101:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11527.x
Barbosa MRDV, Agra MDF, Sampaio EVSB, Cunha JD, Andrade LD (2004) Diversidade florística na Mata do Pau-Ferro, Areia, Paraíba (eds). Brejos de altitude em Paraíba e Pernambuco–história natural, ecologia e conservação. Biodiversidade 9:111–122
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:289–300 http://www.jstor.com/stable/2346101
Brown JH, Whitham TG, Ernest SM, Gehring CA (2001) Complex species interactions and the dynamics of ecological systems: long-term experiments. Science 293:643–650. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.293.5530.643
Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-9000
Chao A, Jost L (2012) Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93:2533–2547. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1952.1
Chown SL (2001) Physiological variation in insects: hierarchical levels and implications. J Insect Physiol 47:649–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(00)00163-3
Cultid-Medina CA, Escobar F (2016) Assessing the ecological response of dung beetles in an agricultural landscape using number of individuals and biomass in diversity measures. Environ Entomol 45:310–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvv219
Dallimer M, Parnell M, Bicknell JE, Melo M (2012) The importance of novel and agricultural habitats for the avifauna of an oceanic island. J Nat Conserv 20:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcn.2012.04.001
Davis AJ, Sutton SL (1997) A dung beetle that feeds on fig: implications for the measurement of species rarity. J Trop Ecol 13:759–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400010919
de Oliveira RG, de Medeiros WE (2012) Evidences of buried loads in the base of the crust of Borborema plateau (NE Brazil) from Bouguer admittance estimates. J Sam Earth Sci 37:60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2012.02.004
Dinno A (2017) Dunn.Test: Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. R package version 1.3.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test
Dunn OJ (1964) Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181
Edmonds WD, Zídek J (2010) 0129. A taxonomic review of the neotropical genus Coprophanaeus Olsoufieff, 1924 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae)
Filgueiras BK, Tabarelli M, Leal IR, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Iannuzzi L (2015) Dung beetle persistence in human-modified landscapes: combining indicator species with anthropogenic land use and fragmentation-related effects. Ecol Indic 55:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.032
Forman RT (1995) Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landsc Ecol 10:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133027
Gardner TA, Hernández MI, Barlow J, Peres CA (2008) Understanding the biodiversity consequences of habitat change: the value of secondary and plantation forests for neotropical dung beetles. J Appl Ecol 45:883–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01454.x
Génier F (2009) Le genre Eurysternus Dalman, 1824 (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Oniticellini): Révision taxonomique et clés de détermination illustrées Sofia: Pensoft
Halffter G, Matthews EG (1966) Natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana
Hanski I (1983) Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment. Ecology 64:493–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939969
Hanski I, Cambefort Y (1991) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press
Howden HF, Nealis VG (1975) Effects of clearing in a tropical rain forest on the composition of the coprophagous scarab beetle fauna (Coleoptera). Biotropica 7:77–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989750
Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2016) iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (H ill numbers). Methods Ecol Evol 7:1451–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12613
Iannuzzi L, Salomão RP, Costa FC, Liberal CN (2016) Environmental patterns and daily activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in the Atlantic rainforest of Brazil. Entomotropica 31:196–207
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Kotze DJ, O'hara RB (2003) Species decline—but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 135:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1174-3
Larsen TH, Forsyth A (2005) Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies 1. Biotropica 37:322–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00042.x
Larsen TH, Williams NM, Kremen C (2005) Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8:538–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00749.x
Larsen TH, Lopera A, Forsyth A (2006) Extreme trophic and habitat specialization by Peruvian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Coleopts Bull 60:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X(2006)60[315:ETAHSB]2.0.CO;2
Leal IR, Silva JD, Tabarelli M, Lacher JTE (2005) Mudando o curso da conservação da biodiversidade na Caatinga do Nordeste do Brasil. Megadiversidade 1:139–146
Loeuille N, Loreau M (2006) Evolution of body size in food webs: does the energetic equivalence rule hold? Ecol Lett 9:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00861.x
Magurran AE, McGill BJ (2011) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press
Marsden SJ, Whiffin M, Galetti M (2001) Bird diversity and abundance in forest fragments and Eucalyptus plantations around an Atlantic forest reserve, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 10:737–751. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016669118956
Martínez-Falcón AP, Zurita GA, Ortega-Martínez IJ, Moreno CE (2018) Populations and assemblages living on the edge: dung beetles responses to forests-pasture ecotones. PeerJ 6:6148. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6148
Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Dixo M, Bernacci LC, Ribeiro MC, Teixeira AMG, Pardini R (2009) Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biol Conserv 142:1166–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.033
Morante-Filho JC, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Faria D (2016) Patterns and predictors of β-diversity in the fragmented Brazilian Atlantic forest: a multiscale analysis of forest specialist and generalist birds. J Anim Ecol 85:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12448
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:403–853. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Navarrete D, Halffter G (2008) Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) diversity in continuous forest, forest fragments and cattle pastures in a landscape of Chiapas, Mexico: the effects of anthropogenic changes. Biodivers Conserv 17:2869–2898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9402-8
Nichols ES, Gardner TA (2011) Dung beetles as a candidate study taxon in applied biodiversity conservation research. Ecology and Evolution of Dung Beetles 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342000.ch13
Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector S, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vulinec K (2007) Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023
Oliveira FXD, Andrade LAD, Félix LP (2006) Comparações florísticas e estruturais entre comunidades de Floresta Ombrófila Aberta com diferentes idades, no Município de Areia, PB, Brasil. Acta Bot Bras 20:861–873. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062006000400011
R Core Team (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Raine EH, Mikich SB, Lewis OT, Slade EM (2019) Interspecific and intraspecific variation in diet preference in five Atlantic forest dung beetle species. Ecol Entomol 44:436–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12711
Rezende CDP, Cantarutti RB et al (1999) Litter deposition and disappearance in Brachiaria pastures in the Atlantic forest region of the south of Bahia, Brazil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 54:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009797419216
Rodal MJN, Sales MF, Silva MJD, Silva AGD (2005) Flora de um Brejo de Altitude na escarpa oriental do planalto da Borborema, PE, Brasil. Acta Bot Bras 19:843–858. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062005000400020
Rös M, Escobar F, Halffter G (2012) How dung beetles respond to a human-modified variegated landscape in Mexican cloud forest: a study of biodiversity integrating ecological and biogeographical perspectives. Divers Distrib 18:377–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00834.x
Saint-Germain M, Buddle CM et al (2007) Should biomass be considered more frequently as a currency in terrestrial arthropod community analyses? J Appl Ecol 44:330–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01269.x
Sakai S, Inoue T (1999) A new pollination system: dung-beetle pollination discovered in Orchidantha inouei (Lowiaceae, Zingiberales) in Sarawak, Malaysia. Am J Bot 86:56–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656954
Salomão RP, Maia ACD, Bezerra BM, Iannuzzi L (2018) Attractiveness of different food resources to dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) of a dry tropical area. Neotrop Entomol 47:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-017-0515-1
Salomão RP, Alvarado F, Baena-Díaz F, Favila ME, Iannuzzi L, Liberal CN, Santos BA, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, González-Tokman D (2019) Urbanization effects on dung beetle assemblages in a tropical city. Ecol Indic 103:665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.045
Sánchez-de-Jesús HA, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Andresen E, Escobar F (2016) Forest loss and matrix composition are the major drivers shaping dung beetle assemblages in a fragmented rainforest. Landsc Ecol 31:843–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0293-2
Scholtz CH, Davis ALV, Kryger U (2009) Evolutionary biology and conservation of dung beetles. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow
Schroeder PJ, Jenkins DG (2018) How robust are popular beta diversity indices to sampling error? Ecosphere 9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2100
Sewall BJ, Freestone AL, Hawes JE, Andriamanarina E (2013) Size-energy relationships in ecological communities. PLoS One 8:e68657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068657
Supp SR, Ernest SM (2014) Species-level and community-level responses to disturbance: a cross-community analysis. Ecology 95:1717–1723. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2250.1
Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Edmonds WD, Ocampo FC, Schoolmeesters P (2011) A multilingual key to the genera and subgenera of the subfamily Scarabaeinae of the New World (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Zootaxa 2854:1–73. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2854.1.1
Villada-Bedoya S, Cultid-Medina CA, Escobar F, Guevara R, Zurita G (2017) Edge effects on dung beetle assemblages in an Andean mosaic of forest and coffee plantations. Biotropica 49:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12373
Whipple SD, Hoback WW (2012) A comparison of dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) attraction to native and exotic mammal dung. Environ Entomol 41:238–244. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN11285
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York
Zurita G, Peer G, Bellocq MI, Hansbauer MM (2012) Edge effects and their influence on habitat suitability calculations: a continuous approach applied to birds of the Atlantic forest. J Appl Ecol 49:503–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02104.x
Acknowledgements
We extended our thanks to Renato Portela Salomão for the valuable comments on a previous version of this manuscript. The authors also thank to Luciana Iannuzzi for their valuable help identifying the specimens collected and João Paulo O. Santos for valuable artwork assistance. We would like to especially thank Adriana Dantas, Amanda Lima, Ana Cláudia Gonçalves, Ana Rita Leite Vital, Anne Suellen Bandeira, Cinthia Carla Claudino, Filipe Mariano Sousa, Jean Carlos Nunes, José Lucas Lima, Nilmara Lopes Lacerda, Matheus Oliveira, Mércia Inara de Farias, Rogerio Silva, Thamisis Medeiros, José Leonardo dos Santos Gomes, and Anderson Dantas for the field support, and Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) for logistic support. This research was conducted as part of an Ecology field undergrad course provided by the Biological Sciences program of UFPB (Campus II-Areia) in 2019. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES, graduate scholarship to T.A.V.D and a postdoctoral fellowship to F.A).
Funding
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES, graduate scholarship to T.A.V.D and a postdoctoral fellowship to F.A).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.A and R.F.M designed the work program. T.A.V.D and D.B.B. collected the data. F.A. and C.N.L. works with the taxonomy of Scarabaeinae dung beetles. F.A. and R.F.M analysed the data. FA wrote the first draft of the manuscript and F. A, C.N.L, T.A.V.D, D.B.B and R.F.M. contributed substantially to preparing the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 382 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alvarado, F., Liberal, C.N., Dantas, T.A.V. et al. Diversity and resource selection of dung beetles in a relictual mountain forest in Brazil. Int J Trop Insect Sci 41, 1343–1353 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00327-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00327-0