A note on mediated simplices
Introduction
In 1989, the second author considered [14] a class of homogeneous polynomials (forms) which had arisen in the study of Hilbert's 17th Problem as monomial substitutions into the arithmetic-geometric inequality. The goal was to determine when such a form, which must be positive semidefinite, had a representation as a sum of squares of forms. The answer was a necessary and sufficient condition involving the arrangement of lattice points in the simplex whose vertices were the n-tuples of the exponents used in the substitution. Further, a claim was made in [14], and not proven, that sufficiently large dilations of any such simplex will also satisfy this condition. The aim of this short note is to prove the claim, and provide further context for the result, both in the study of Hilbert's 17th Problem and the study of lattice point simplices. The second author is happy to acknowledge that the return to this claim was triggered by two nearly simultaneous events: an invitation to speak at the 2019 SIAM Conference on Applied Algebraic Geometry, and a request from Jie Wang for a copy of [15], which was announced in [14] but never written. The second author was supported in part by Simons Collaboration Grant 280987.
Section snippets
Preliminaries
We work with homogeneous polynomials (forms) in , the ring of real polynomials in n variables. Write the monomial as , for . For , denotes the convex hull of S. For , let supp, write for the Newton polytope of p, that is, supp, and let .
A form is positive semidefinite or psd if for all . It is a sum of squares or sos if for forms . Clearly,
Main theorem
The following theorem was asserted in [14, Prop. 2.7].
Theorem 3.1 For every integer , is -mediated.
Corollary 3.2 Any agiform can be written as a sum of squares of forms in the variables for .
To prove Theorem 3.1, we show that any non-vertex is the average of two different points in . The proof for is easy, while the proof for the remaining case ( and ) is more delicate. We defer the discussion of Corollary 3.2 to the next
Implication for Hilbert's 17th problem
Proof of Corollary 3.2 Suppose . Let which is also an agiform. By Theorem 2.1, Theorem 3.1, q is sos, and so which shows that p has the desired representation. □
Implication for polytopes
From the point of view of polytopes, one would more naturally write , where P is a lattice-point simplex in ; without loss of generality, we also assume . Further, the conditions that the vertices lie on a hyperplane and have non-negative coefficients seem artificial. In this way, we can drop n-th component, so that is the usual n-point lattice simplex in .
Let . Then Theorem 3.1 says that if , then a non-vertex can be written as a sum of two different
References (16)
On non-negative forms in real variables some or all of which are non-negative
Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.
(1962)- et al.
A Positivstellensatz for sums of nonnegative circuit polynomials
SIAM J. Appl. Algebra Geom.
(2017) - et al.
The algebraic boundary of the sonc cone
- et al.
Copositive and completely positive quadratic forms
Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.
(1963) Integral body-building in
J. Geom.
(1986)Positive Polynomials, Convex Integral Polytopes and a Random Walk Problem
(1987)- D. Handelman, A Shapley-Folkman lemma for lattice polytopes, manuscript viewed March 19,...
Über die Darstellung definiter Formen als Summe von Formenquadraten
Math. Ann.
(1888)(1981)