A note on mediated simplices

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2020.106608Get rights and content

Abstract

Many homogeneous polynomials that arise in the study of sums of squares and Hilbert's 17th problem are those formed by monomial substitutions into the arithmetic-geometric inequality. In 1989, Reznick [14] gave a necessary and sufficient condition for such a form to have a representation as a sum of squares of forms, involving the arrangement of lattice points in the simplex whose vertices were the n-tuples of the exponents used in the substitution. Further, a claim was made, and not proven, that sufficiently large dilations of any such simplex will also satisfy this condition. The aim of this short note is to prove the claim, and provide further context for the result, both in the study of Hilbert's 17th Problem and the study of lattice point simplices.

Introduction

In 1989, the second author considered [14] a class of homogeneous polynomials (forms) which had arisen in the study of Hilbert's 17th Problem as monomial substitutions into the arithmetic-geometric inequality. The goal was to determine when such a form, which must be positive semidefinite, had a representation as a sum of squares of forms. The answer was a necessary and sufficient condition involving the arrangement of lattice points in the simplex whose vertices were the n-tuples of the exponents used in the substitution. Further, a claim was made in [14], and not proven, that sufficiently large dilations of any such simplex will also satisfy this condition. The aim of this short note is to prove the claim, and provide further context for the result, both in the study of Hilbert's 17th Problem and the study of lattice point simplices. The second author is happy to acknowledge that the return to this claim was triggered by two nearly simultaneous events: an invitation to speak at the 2019 SIAM Conference on Applied Algebraic Geometry, and a request from Jie Wang for a copy of [15], which was announced in [14] but never written. The second author was supported in part by Simons Collaboration Grant 280987.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

We work with homogeneous polynomials (forms) in R[x]=R[x1,,xn], the ring of real polynomials in n variables. Write the monomial x1α1xnαn as xα, for α=(α1,,αn)Zn. For SZn, cvx(S) denotes the convex hull of S. For p(x)=αc(α)xαR[x], let supp(p)={α|c(α)0}, write New(p) for the Newton polytope of p, that is, New(p)=cvx(supp(p)), and let C(p)=New(p)Zn.

A form pR[x] is positive semidefinite or psd if p(x)0 for all xRn. It is a sum of squares or sos if p=jhj2 for forms hjR[x]. Clearly,

Main theorem

The following theorem was asserted in [14, Prop. 2.7].

Theorem 3.1

For every integer kmax{2,m2}, cvx(kU)Zn is (kU)-mediated.

Corollary 3.2

Any agiform pR[x1,,xn] can be written as a sum of squares of forms in the variables xi1/k for kmax{2,m2}.

To prove Theorem 3.1, we show that any non-vertex wcvx(kU)Zn is the average of two different points in cvx(kU)(2Z)n. The proof for km1 is easy, while the proof for the remaining case (m4 and k=m2) is more delicate. We defer the discussion of Corollary 3.2 to the next

Implication for Hilbert's 17th problem

Proof of Corollary 3.2

Suppose p(x)=λ1xu1++λnxunxw. Letq(x1,,xn):=p(x1k,,xnk)=λ1xku1++λnxkunxkw, which is also an agiform. By Theorem 2.1, Theorem 3.1, q is sos, and soq=j=1rhj2p(x1,,xn)=j=1rhj2(x11/k,,xn1/k), which shows that p has the desired representation. 

At the time that [14] was written, and the proof given here was relegated to the proposed preprint [15], the second author entertained the possibility that such a result might be true for any psd form. Unfortunately, he discovered that the so-called

Implication for polytopes

From the point of view of polytopes, one would more naturally write U=2P, where P is a lattice-point simplex in Rn; without loss of generality, we also assume m=n. Further, the conditions that the vertices lie on a hyperplane and have non-negative coefficients seem artificial. In this way, we can drop n-th component, so that P is the usual n-point lattice simplex in Rn1.

Let d=n1. Then Theorem 3.1 says that if kmax{2,d1}, then a non-vertex w2kPZd can be written as a sum of two different

References (16)

  • P.H. Diananda

    On non-negative forms in real variables some or all of which are non-negative

    Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.

    (1962)
  • M. Dressler et al.

    A Positivstellensatz for sums of nonnegative circuit polynomials

    SIAM J. Appl. Algebra Geom.

    (2017)
  • J. Forsgård et al.

    The algebraic boundary of the sonc cone

  • M. Hall et al.

    Copositive and completely positive quadratic forms

    Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.

    (1963)
  • D. Handelman

    Integral body-building in R3

    J. Geom.

    (1986)
  • D. Handelman

    Positive Polynomials, Convex Integral Polytopes and a Random Walk Problem

    (1987)
  • D. Handelman, A Shapley-Folkman lemma for lattice polytopes, manuscript viewed March 19,...
  • D. Hilbert

    Über die Darstellung definiter Formen als Summe von Formenquadraten

    Math. Ann.

    (1888)
    (1981)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text