Abstract
We have studied the contrast sensitivity of the visual system in various ranges of the spatial frequencies in “dry” immersion conditions that simulate the physiological effects of microgravity. The contrast sensitivity in the range of low and high spatial frequencies is indicative of the functional state of the magnocellular and parvocellular neuronal pathways that form the dorsal and ventral information flows from the occipital to the frontal lobes. The study involved ten volunteers who were exposed to “dry” immersion for 21 days. The contrast sensitivity of the visual system was recorded with a method of visocontrastometry. The Gabor elements were used as stimuli. An increase in contrast sensitivity was registered in the low spatial frequency range with specific sensitivity of the magnocellular pathway to these frequencies on the third day of immersion and 1 day after the end of the experiment, compared to the background values. The contrast sensitivity in the high spatial frequency range with specific sensitivity of the parvocellular pathway to these frequencies in the experiment remained unchanged. Thus, our findings have shown that the magnocellular neuronal pathway is involved in the processes of adaptation to extreme ambient conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
F. W. Campbell and J. G. Robson, J. Physiol. 197, 551 (1968).
V. D. Glezer, V. A. Ivanov, and T. A. Shcherbach, Fiziol. Zh. 59 (2), 206 (1973).
D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, J. Physiol. 195, 215 (1968).
D. Hubel and T. Wiesel, J. Neurosci. 3, 1116 (1983).
L. J. Croner and E. Kaplan, Vision Res. 35, 7 (1995).
J. Kulikowski, in Seeing Contour and Colour, Ed. by J. Kulikowski, C. Dickinson, and I. Murray (Pergamon, Oxford, 1989).
D. Regan, Human Perception of Objects: Early Visual Processing of Spatial Form Defined by Luminance, Color, Texture, Motion, and Binocular Disparity (Sinauer, Sunderland, 2000).
W. H. Merigan and J. H. R. Maunsell, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 369 (1993).
Y. J. Kulikovsky and E Robsob, Opt. Zh. 66 (9), 37 (1999).
S. De la Rosa, R. N. Choudhery, and A. Chatziastros, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 38 (2011).
D.J. Calderone, M.J. Hoptman, A. Martinez et al., Cereb. Cortex 23, 1849 (2013).
M. Conci, T. Tollner, M. Leszczynski, and H. J. Muller, Neuropsychologia 49, 2456 (2011).
J. F. De Souza, S. P. Dukelow, J. S. Gati, et al., J. Neurosci. 20, 5835 (2000).
A. Thiele, K. R. Dobkins, and T. D. Albright, Neuron 32, 351 (2001).
S. Keґi, A. Antal, G. Szekeres, et al., J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 14, 190 (2002).
P. D. Butler, S. M. Silverstein, and S. C. Dakin, Biol. Psychiatry 64, 40 (2008).
E. Kaplan and R. Shapley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 2755 (1986).
J. H. R. Maunsell, T. A. Nealey, and D. D. DePriest, J. Neurosci. 10, 3323 (1990).
J. J. Kulikowski, V. Walsh, and I. J. Murray, Limits of Vision (Macmillan, London, 1991).
L. G. Ungerleider and M. Mishkin, in Analysis of Visual Behavior, Ed. by D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, and R. J. W. Mansfield (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982), pp. 549–586.
I. I. Shoshina and Yu. E. Shelepin, Mechanisms of Global and Local Analysis of Visual Information in Scizophrenia (VVM, St. Petersburg, 2016) [in Russian].
I. Shoshina, Y. Shelepin, S. Konkina, et al., Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 44 (2), 244 (2014).
I. I. Shoshina and Yu. E. Shelepin, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 45 (5), 512 (2015).
I. I. Shoshina, Y. E. Shelepin, E. A. Vershinina, and K. O. Novikova, Hum. Physiol. 41 (3), 251 (2015).
B. P. Keane, D. Paterno, S. Kastner, and S. M. Silverstein, J. Abnormal Psychol. 125 (4), 543 (2016).
S. M. Silverstein and R. Rosen, Schizophr. Res. Cog. 2 (2), 46 (2015).
Z. Wang, Z. Yu, Z. Pan, et al., Front. Psychol. 9, 850 (2018).
I. I. Shoshina, E. Zavyalova, and R. Sergienko, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 131, 93 (2018).
F. Z. Meerson, Adaptation to Stress Situations and Physical Loads (Meditsina, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].
S. N. Shilov, I. A. Ignatova, T. A. Muller, et al., Fundament. Issled., No. 1–6, 1275 (2015).
G. Cheron, A. Leroy, E. Palmero-Soler, et al., PLoS One 9 (1), e82371 (2014).
E. Tomilovskaya, T. Shigueva, D. Sayenko, et al., Front. Physiol. 10, 284 (2019).
Yu. E. Shelepin, L. N. Kolersnikova, and Yu. I. Lev-kovich, Visocontrastometry (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 1985) [in Russian].
Funding
Financial support of this study was provided by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (grant no. 19-013-00036).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. The procedure was preliminarily reviewed and approved by the Biomedical Ethic Committee of the Institute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from every participant according to the Helsinki Declaration.
Additional information
Translated by E. Sherstyuk
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shoshina, I.I., Sosnina, I.S., Zelenskiy, K.A. et al. The Contrast Sensitivity of the Visual System in “Dry” Immersion Conditions. BIOPHYSICS 65, 681–685 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350920040211
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350920040211