Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils: performance comparison between one- and two-dimensional electrode configurations

  • Clean Up Korea 2019
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Electrokinetic (EK) soil remediation is significantly affected by the electrode configurations. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the performance of one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) arrays with respect to the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils.

Materials and methods

A series of laboratory-scale experiments were carried out using two types of soils: kaolinite soil (KS) artificially spiked with heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, and Zn) and smelter soil (SS) contaminated with Cu and Pb, obtained near a closed smelting factory. First, stepwise experiments on the KS were conducted to compare the EK performance between the 1D and 2D electrode arrays. More specifically, the effect of the number of anode–cathode pairs was investigated in the experiments on the 1D electrode configuration, and trigonal and hexagonal arrangements were compared in the 2D EK experiments. Additionally, the performance of the trigonal array was evaluated according to changes in the anode positions, to switch the areas of effective and ineffective electric field.

Results and discussion

The removal efficiencies of the 1D electrode configuration with four anode–cathode pairs (eight electrodes in total) were 69.1% for Cd, 69.2% for Cu, 74.7% for Ni, 28.3% for Pb, and 71.3% for Zn. The removal efficiencies of the 2D hexagonal electrode array, with a similar number of electrodes (six anodes and one cathode for seven electrodes in total), were 79.8% (Cd), 82.6% (Cu), 83.7% (Ni), 34.3% (Pb), and 81.1% (Zn). The total electric power consumptions for the two types of electrode configurations were investigated to be 15.6 and 22.0 kWh/ton, respectively. Despite the increase in electric power consumption in the 2D electrode configuration, it was more efficient than the 1D configuration due to the increased area of effective (active) electric field and subsequently higher removal efficiency. As a result of changing the positions of anodes in the trigonal 2D arrangement, the removal efficiencies of Cu and Pb were increased to a level similar to that obtained with the hexagonal configuration.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that a 2D electrode configuration increased the EK removal efficiency of contaminants compared with a 1D array. However, cost-effectiveness should be taken into account when optimizing electrode design. Furthermore, the performance of the trigonal 2D EK process was improved by changing the positions of anodes, as a result of the increase in the removal efficiency and decrease in the electrode cost and energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew K, Cundy AB, Hopkinson L, Croudace IW, Warwick PE, Purdie P (2011) Electrokinetic remediation of plutonium-contaminated nuclear site wastes: results from a pilot-scale on-site trial. J Hazar Mater 186:2171–2187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alshawabkeh AN (2009) Electrokinetic soil remediation: challenges and opportunities. Sep Sci Technol 44:2171–2187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alshawabkeh AN, Yeung AT, Bricka MR (1999) Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction. J Environ Eng 125:27–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas O, Herrada RA, Corona JL, Olvera MG, Sepúlveda-Guzmán S, Sirés I (2016) Assessment of IrO2-Ta2O5|Ti electrodes for the electrokinetic treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using different electrode arrays. Electrochim Acta 208:282–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farrah H, Pickering WF (1977) The sorption of lead and cadmium species by clay minerals. Aust J Chem 30:1417–1422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrucci A, Vocciante M, Bagatin R, Ferro S (2017) Electrokinetic remediation of soils contaminated with potentially toxic metals: dedicated analytical tools for assessing the contamination baseline in a complex scenario. J Environ Manag 203:1163–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa A, Cameselle C, Gouveia S, Hansen HK (2016) Electrokinetic treatment of an agricultural soil contaminated with heavy metals. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 51:691–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed J, Acar YB, Gale RJ (1991) Pb(II) removal from kaolinite by electrokinetics. J Geotech Eng 117:241–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo SU, Shin YJ, Yang JS, Moon DH, Koutsospyros A, Baek K (2015) Enhanced electrokinetic transport of sulfate in saline soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim WS, Jeon EK, Jung JM, Jung HB, Ko SH, Seo CI, Baek K (2014) Field application of electrokinetic remediation for multi-metal contaminated paddy soil using two-dimensional electrode configuration. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4482–4491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KY, Kim SO (2002) Electrokinetic soil processing for energy from waste. In: Grover VI, Grover VK, Hogland W (eds) Recovering energy from waste: various aspects. Scientific Publishers, Inc., Enfield, pp 107–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SO, Kim KY, Stüben D (2002) Evaluation of electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from tailing soils. J Environ Eng 128:705–715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SO, Lee KY, Kim KY (2015) Fundamentals of electrokinetics. In: Bundschuh J, Holländer HM, Ma LQ (eds) In-situ remediation of arsenic-contaminated sites. CRC Press/Balkema, EH Leiden, pp 87–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F (2013) Non-uniform electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from contaminated soil with permeable reactive composite electrodes. Appl Mechan Mater 206–261:1145–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Li W, Song W, Guo M (2018) Review of remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: principles and applicability. Sci Total Environ 633:206–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mao X, Shao X, Zhang Z, Han F (2018) Mechanimization of enhanced electro-kinetic remediation on 137Cs contaminated kaolin soils: a semi-pilot study based on experimental and modeling methodology. Electrochim Acta 284:38–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez E, Pérez M, Romero O, Beltrán ED, Castro S, Corona JL, Corona A, Cuevas MC, Bustos E (2012) Effects of electrode material on the efficiency of hydrocarbon removal by an electrokinetic remediation process. Electrochim Acta 86:148–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page MM, Page C (2002) Electroremediation of contaminated soil. J Environ Eng 128:208–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwertman U, Taylor RM (1989) Iron oxides. Minerals in soil environments, 2nd ed., SSSA Book Series No. 1, Soil Science of America, Madison, pp 379–427

  • Sivapullaiah PV, Sriakantappa B, Prakash N, Suma BN (2015) Electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from soil. J Electrochem Sci Eng 5:47–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Ammami MT, Benamar A, Mezazigh S, Wang H (2016) Effect of EDTA, EDDS, NTA and citric acid on electrokinetic remediation of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn contaminated dredged marine sediment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:3126–3133

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Gao K, Zhang Y, Zou H (2017) Remediation of persistent organic pollutant-contaminated soil using biosurfactant-enhanced electrokinetics coupled with a zero-valent iron/activated carbon permeable reactive barrier. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:28142–28151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Virkuytyte J, Sillanpää M, Latostenmaa R (2002) Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview. Sci Total Environ 289:97–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo JC, Yang JS, Jeon EK, Baek K (2015) Enhanced-electrokinetic extraction of heavy metals from dredged harbor sediment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:9912–9921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Zou H, Ji M, Li X, Li L, Tang T (2014) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil by complexing agents and approaching anodes. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:3126–3133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Xu J, Lv S, Liu Z, Liu W (2020) Removal of cadmium in contaminated kaolin by new-style electrokinetic remediation using array electrodes coupled with permeable reactive barrier. Sep Purif Technol 239:11654

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Korea Environment Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) through the Subsurface Environment Management (SEM) Project funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (grant number: 2018002440002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Research Institute of Natural Science (RINS), Gyeongsang National University (GNU), Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea

    Soon-Oh Kim & Woo-Chun Lee

  2. Department of Soil and Groundwater, Korea Environment Corporation, Incheon, 22689, Republic of Korea

    Jin Young Jeong

  3. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and SMART-SEM Research Center, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea

    Seong-Taek Yun & Ho Young Jo

Authors
  1. Soon-Oh Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jin Young Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Woo-Chun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seong-Taek Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ho Young Jo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soon-Oh Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Daniel Alessi

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 1.57 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, SO., Jeong, J.Y., Lee, WC. et al. Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils: performance comparison between one- and two-dimensional electrode configurations. J Soils Sediments 21, 2755–2769 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02803-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02803-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation