Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An efficient sensitivity analysis for energy performance of building envelope: A continuous derivative based approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the framework of building energy assessment, this article proposes to use a derivative based sensitivity analysis of heat transfer models in a building envelope. Two, global and local, estimators are obtained at low computational cost, to evaluate the influence of the parameters on the model outputs. Ranking of these estimators values allows to reduce the number of model unknown parameters by excluding non-significant parameters. A comparison with variance and regression-based methods is carried out and the results highlight the satisfactory accuracy of the continuous-based approach. Moreover, for the carried investigations the approach is 100 times faster compared to the variance-based methods. A case study applies the method to a real-world building wall. The sensitivity of the thermal loads to local or global variations of the wall thermal properties is investigated. Additionally, a case study of wall with window is analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Sanea SA, Zedan MF (2012). Effect of thermal bridges on transmission loads and thermal resistance of building walls under dynamic conditions. Applied Energy, 98: 584–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck J, Arnold K (1977). Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Orlande HRB, Mendes N, Guernouti S (2016). Bayesian inference for estimating thermal properties of a historic building wall. Building and Environment, 106: 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Mendes N (2017). An innovative method for the design of high energy performance building envelopes. Applied Energy, 190: 266–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Gasparin S, Dutykh D, Mendes N (2020). On the comparison of three numerical methods applied to building simulation: Finite-differences, RC circuit approximation and a spectral method. Building Simulation, 13: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovo E (2017). Sensitivity Analysis. An Introduction for the Management Scientist. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukier R, Levine H, Shuler K (1978). Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 26: 1–42.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du Fort EC, Frankel SP (1953). Stability conditions in the numerical treatment of parabolic differential equations. Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation, 7: 135.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson RP, Gelinas RJ (1976). Sensitivity analysis of ordinary differential equation systems—A direct method. Journal of Computational Physics, 21: 123–143.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll TA, Hale N, Trefethen LN (2014). Chebfun Guide. Oxford, UK: Pafnuty Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunker AM (1981). Efficient calculation of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models. Atmospheric Environment (1967), 15: 1155–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunker AM (1984). The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 81: 2385–2393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhower B, O’Neill Z, Fonoberov VA, Mezić I (2012). Uncertainty and sensitivity decomposition of building energy models. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 5: 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparin S, Berger J, Dutykh D, Mendes N (2018a). An improved explicit scheme for whole-building hygrothermal simulation. Building Simulation, 11: 465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparin S, Berger J, Dutykh D, Mendes N (2018b). Stable explicit schemes for simulation of nonlinear moisture transfer in porous materials. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 11: 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparin S, Dreau JL, Salagnac P (2020). A sensitivity analysis of a double-skin facade performance for a building in oceanic climate. in submission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffart J, Rabouille M, Mendes N (2017). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis applied to hygrothermal simulation of a brick building in a hot and humid climate. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiselberg P, Brohus H, Hesselholt A, Rasmussen H, Seinre E, Thomas S (2009). Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings. Renewable Energy, 34: 2030–2036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC (1993). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 42: 327–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC, Davis FJ (2003). Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 81: 23–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homma T, Saltelli A (1996). Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 52: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell JR, Menguc MP, Siegel R (2010). Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes M, Palmer J, Cheng V, Shipworth D (2015). Global sensitivity analysis of England’s housing energy model. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 8: 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iooss B, Lemaître P (2015). A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. In: Dellino G, Meloni C (eds), Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems. Boston, MA, USA: Springer. pp. 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan W, Palmer J (1979). On a proposed floating-point standard. ACM SIGNUM Newsletter, 14: 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucherenko S, Delpuech B, Iooss B, Tarantola S (2015). Application of the control variate technique to estimation of total sensitivity indices. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 134: 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucherenko S, Song S (2016). Derivative-based global sensitivity measures and their link with sobol’ sensitivity indices. In: Cools R, Nuyens D (eds), Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 455–469.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lam JC, Hui SCM (1996). Sensitivity analysis of energy performance of office buildings. Building and Environment, 31: 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB (2018). Matlab R2018a. Natick, MA USA: The MathWorks Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechri HE, Capozzoli A, Corrado V (2010). USE of the ANOVA approach for sensitive building energy design. Applied Energy, 87: 3073–3083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molkenthin C, Scherbaum F, Griewank A, Leovey H, Kucherenko S, et al. (2017). Derivative-based global sensitivity analysis: Upper bounding of sensitivities in seismic-hazard assessment using automatic differentiation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107: 984–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monari F, Strachan P (2017). Characterization of an airflow network model by sensitivity analysis: parameter screening, fixing, prioritizing and mapping. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olver PJ (2013). Introduction to Partial Differential Equations. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plischke E (2010). An effective algorithm for computing global sensitivity indices (EASI). Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95: 354–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roustant O, Fruth J, Iooss B, Kuhnt S (2014). Crossed-derivative based sensitivity measures for interaction screening. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 105: 105–118.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott E (2000). Sensitivity Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Campolongo F, Ratto M (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sobol IM (1967). On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 7: 86–112.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sobol IM (1990). Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie, 2: 112–118.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sobol IM, Kucherenko S (2009). Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79: 3009–3017.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Standards (2010). Arrêté du 26 octobre 2010 relatif aux caractéristiques thermiques et aux exigences de performance énergétique des bâtiments nouveaux et des parties nouvelles de bâtiments. (in French)

  • Tarantola S, Gatelli D, Mara TA (2006). Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91: 717–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian W (2013). A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20: 411–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzani S, Busby D (2014). Screening method using the derivative-based global sensitivity indices with application to reservoir simulator. Oil & Gas Science and Technology — Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles, 69: 619–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trabelsi A, Slimani Z, Virgone J (2018). Response surface analysis of the dimensionless heat and mass transfer parameters of Medium Density Fiberboard. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 127: 623–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter E, Lecourtier Y (1982). Global approaches to identifiability testing for linear and nonlinear state space models. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 24: 472–482.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Walter E, Pronzato L (1990). Qualitative and quantitative experiment design for phenomenological models—A survey. Automatica, 26: 195–213.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y-J, Wilkinson JG, Russell AG (1997). Fast, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional photochemical models. Environmental Science & Technology, 31: 2859–2868.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly funded by the “Conseil Savoie Mont Blanc” (CSMB) and the French Atomic and Alternative Energy Center (CEA). The authors also acknowledge the Junior Chair Research program “Building performance assessment, evaluation and enhancement” from the University of Savoie Mont Blanc in collaboration with the French Atomic and Alternative Energy Center (CEA) and Scientific and Technical Center for Buildings (CSTB). The authors also would like to acknowledge Dr. Denys Dutykh, Dr. Suelen Gasparin and Dr. Sergei Kucherenko for their valued discussions. Julien Berger contributed to this work while affiliated with the Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LOCIE, 73000 Chambéry, France, and finalized it at Laboratoire des Sciences de l’Ingénieur pour l’Environnement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UMR 5271 CNRS, LOCIE, University of Grenoble Alpes, University of Savoie Mont Blanc, 73000, Chambéry, France

    Ainagul Jumabekova

  2. LaSIE, La Rochelle University, CNRS, UMR 7356, 17000, La Rochelle, France

    Julien Berger

  3. CEA, LITEN, DTS, INES, University of Grenoble Alpes, F-38000, Grenoble, France

    Ainagul Jumabekova & Aurélie Foucquier

Authors
  1. Ainagul Jumabekova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julien Berger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aurélie Foucquier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ainagul Jumabekova.

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jumabekova, A., Berger, J. & Foucquier, A. An efficient sensitivity analysis for energy performance of building envelope: A continuous derivative based approach. Build. Simul. 14, 909–930 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0712-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0712-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation