Skip to main content
Log in

CCRNet: a novel data-driven approach to improve cross-domain Iris recognition

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of the prominence and robustness of iris recognition systems, iris images acquisition using heterogeneous cameras/sensors, is the prime concern in deploying them for wide-scale applications. The textural qualities of iris samples (images) captured through distinct sensors substantially differ due to the differences in illumination and the underlying hardware that yields intra-class variation within the iris dataset. This paper examines three miscellaneous configurations of convolution and residual blocks to improve cross-domain iris recognition. Further, the finest architecture amongst three is identified by the Friedman test, where the statistical differences in proposed architectures are identified based on the outcomes of Nemeny and Bonferroni-Dunn tests. The quantitative performances of these architectures are perceived on several experiments simulated on two iris datasets; ND-CrossSensor-Iris-2013 and ND-iris-0405. The finest model is referred to as “Collaborative Convolutional Residual Network (CCRNet)” and is further examined on several experiments prepared in similar and cross-domains. Results depict that least two error rates reported by CCRNet are 1.06% and 1.21% that enhances the benchmark for the state of the arts. This is due to fast convergence and rapid weights updation achieved from convolution and residual connections, respectively. It helps in recognizing the micro-patterns existing within the iris region and results in better feature discrimination among large numbers of iris subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed NU, Cvetkovic S, Siddiqi EH, Nikiforov A, Nikiforov I (2017) Combining iris and periocular biometric for matching visible spectrum eye images. Pattern Recogn Lett 91:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahuja K, Islam R, Barbhuiya FA, Dey K (2017) Convolutional neural networks for ocular smartphone-based biometrics. Pattern Recogn Lett 91(3):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowyer KW, Burge MJ (eds) (2016) Handbook of iris recognition. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2009) The nd-iris-0405 iris image database. Technical Report, University of Notre Dame

  5. Choi I, Kim D (2017) A variety of local structure patterns and their hybridization for accurate eye detection. Pattern Recogn 61:417–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choudhary M, Tiwari V, V. U (2019) An approach for iris contact lens detection and classification using ensemble of customized DenseNet and SVM. Futur Gener Comput Syst 101:1259–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dagnes N et al (2018) 3D geometry-based automatic landmark localization in presence of facial occlusions. Multimed Tools Appl 77(11):14177–14205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daugman JG (1993) High confidence visual recognition of persons by a test of statistical independence. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15(11):1148–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daugman J (2009) How iris recognition works. In: The essential guide to image processing. Academic Press, pp 715–739

  10. Doyle, Bowyer K (2015) Robust detection of textured contact lenses in iris recognition using BSIF. IEEE Access 3:1672–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng J et al (2019) 3D face recognition method based on deep convolutional neural network. In: Smart Innovations in Communication and Computational Sciences. Springer, Singapore, pp 123–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman M (1937) The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance. J Am Stat Assoc 32(200):675–701

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Galdi C, Dugelay J (2017) FIRE: fast iris recognition on mobile phones by combining colour and texture features. Pattern Recogn Lett 91(5):44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gangwar A, Joshi A (2016) DeepIrisNet: Deep iris representation with applications in iris recognition and cross-sensor iris recognition. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE, pp 2301–2305

  15. Gorodnichy DO, Chumakov MP (2019) Analysis of the effect of ageing, age, and other factors on iris recognition performance using NEXUS scores dataset. IET Biom 8(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gragnaniello D, Poggi G, Sansone C, Verdoliva L (2015) An investigation of local descriptors for biometric spoofing detection. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Secur 10(4):849–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) "Deep residual learning for image recognition." In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770–778

  18. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham, pp 630–645

    Google Scholar 

  19. He F et al (2017) Deep learning architecture for iris recognition based on optimal Gabor filters and deep belief network. Journal of Electronic Imaging 26(2):023005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu Y, Sirlantzis K, Howells G (2016) Iris liveness detection using regional features. Pattern Recognition Letters 82:242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuehlkamp A, Pinto A, Rocha A, Bowyer KW, Czajka A (2019) Ensemble of multi-view learning classifiers for cross-domain iris presentation attack detection. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Secur 14(6):1419–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu N, Zhang M, Li H, Sun Z, Tan T (2016) Deepiris: learning pairwise filter bank for heterogeneous iris verification. Pattern Recogn Lett 82(2):154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma L, Tan T, Wang Y, Zhang D (2004) Efficient iris recognition by characterizing key local variations. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(6):739–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marcolin F et al (2014) 3D Landmarking in multiexpression face analysis: a preliminary study on eyebrows and mouth. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(4):796–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Menotti D, Chiachia G, Pinto A, Robson Schwartz W, Pedrini H, Xavier Falcao A, Rocha A (2015) Deep representations for Iris, face, and fingerprint spoofing detection. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Secur 10(4):864–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miyazawa K, Ito K, Aoki T, Kobayashi K, Nakajima H (2008) An effective approach for iris recognition using phase-based image matching. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30(10):1741–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Monro DM, Rakshit S, Zhang D (2007) DCT-based iris recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 4:586–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ND-CrossSensor-Iris (2013) [Available]: https://sites.google.com/a/nd.edu/public-cvrl/data-sets

  29. Nguyen DT, Pham TD, Lee YW, Park KR (2018) Deep learning-based enhanced presentation attack detection for iris recognition by combining features from local and global regions based on NIR camera sensor. Sensors (Basel) 18(8):2601–1–2601-32

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nosaka R, Ohkawa Y, Fukui K (2011) Feature extraction based on cooccurrence of adjacent local binary patterns. In: Pacific-Rim Symposium on Image and Video Technology. Springer, pp 82–91

  31. Quinn GW, Grother PJ, Ngan ML, Matey JR (2013) IREX IV: part 1, evaluation of iris identification algorithms (No. NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR)-7949)

  32. Raghavendra R, Busch C (2015) Robust scheme for iris presentation attack detection using multiscale binarized statistical image features. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Secur 10(4):703–715

  33. Rai H, Yadav A (2014) Iris recognition using combined support vector machine and hamming distance approach. Sci Direct, Expert Syst Appl 41(2):588–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramaiah N, Kumar A (2017) Towards more accurate iris recognition using cross-spectral matching. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(1):208–221

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramya M, Krishnaveni V, Sridharan KS (2017) Certain investigation on iris image recognition using hybrid approach of Fourier transform and Bernstein polynomials. Pattern Recogn Lett 94(7):154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saminathan K, Chakravarthy T, Chithra MD (2015) Iris recognition based on kernels of support vector machine. ICTACT J Soft Comput 5(2):889–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Silva P, Luz E, Baeta R, Pedrini H, Falcao AX, Menotti D (2015) An approach to iris contact lens detection based on deep image representations. In: 2015 28th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images. IEEE, pp 157–164

  38. Sun Z, Tan T (2008) Ordinal measures for iris recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(12):2211–2226

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sun Z, Tan T (2009) Ordinal measures for iris recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(12):2211–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tan CW, Kumar A (2013) Towards online iris and periocular recognition under relaxed imaging constraints. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(10):3751–3765. Accessed 3 Dec 2019

  41. Waisy S et al (2018) A multi-biometric iris recognition system based on a deep learning approach. Pattern Anal Applic 21(3):783–802

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Z, Li C, Shao H, Sun J (2018) Eye recognition with mixed convolutional and residual network (MiCoRe-net). IEEE Access 6:17905–17912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xiong X, Wen X, Huang C (2019) Improving RGB-D face recognition via transfer learning from a pretrained 2D network. In International Symposium on Benchmarking, Measuring and Optimization. Springer, Cham, pp 141–148

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao Z, Kumar A (2019) A deep learning based unified framework to detect, segment and recognize irises using spatially corresponding features. Pattern Recogn 93:546–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Tiwari.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix-I

Appendix-I

Table 12. The statistical data required for Friedman test in terms of AUCs reported by three proposed models for 11 different experiments. The ranks given within parenthesis are provided based on the increasing AUC values for each experiment
Table 13. The values of AUC reported by the proposed CCRNet and existing deep learning based Models for 11 different experiments
Table 14. The values of AUC reported by the proposed CCRNet and existing handcrafted methods for 11 different experiments

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choudhary, M., Tiwari, V. & Venkanna, U. CCRNet: a novel data-driven approach to improve cross-domain Iris recognition. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 32807–32831 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09286-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09286-7

Keywords

Navigation