Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Crashworthiness characteristic of longitudinal deck structures against identified accidental action in marine environment: a study case of ship–bow collision

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rising demand for transportation safety during their operation has become public awareness these days which leads to massive development in navigation and mitigation technologies. However, accidents for various transportation modes, including ship, are still occurring despite this progress. The numbers of involved parameters make accidental phenomena in the maritime environment, namely collision to be the latest concern as its influence on remarkable casualties. This paper aims to analyze ship collision incident which involves cargo carrier and passenger vessel. Structural crashworthiness as the main subject accounting for accidental limit state design and safety assessment is performed using a finite element approach to observe both global and local behaviors of the target ship under the bow impact. Initial prediction indicates that major collision energy is dedicated to destroying the main deck and outer shell. The tendency of the force during the collision period explicitly hints that progressive failure on the deck will continue to take place even if the accidental limit is extended. The behavior of the local member/component of the target ship is also to be presented in the discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Törnqvist R (2003) Design of crashworthy ship structures. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, pp 1–5

  2. Ozturk U, Cicek K (2019) Individual collision risk assessment in ship navigation: a systematic literature review. Ocean Eng 180:130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.042

  3. AGCS (2012) Safety and shipping 1912–2012, from Titanic to Costa Concordia. Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty, Munich, pp 12–15

  4. Gao Y, Hu Z, Ringsberg JW, Wang J (2015) An elastic–plastic ice material model for ship-iceberg collision simulations. Ocean Eng 102:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Montewka J, Ehlers S, Goerlandt F, Hinz T, Tabri K, Kujala P (2014) A framework for risk assessment for maritime transportation systems—A case study for open sea collisions involving RoPax vessels. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 124:142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Obisesan A, Sriramula S (2017) Performance characterisation for risk assessment of striking ship impacts based on struck ship damaged volume. J Mar Sci Appl 16(2):111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-017-1403-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ståhlberg K, Goerlandt F, Sören E, Kujala P (2013) Impact scenario models for probabilistic risk-based design for ship–ship collision. Marine Struct 33:238–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2013.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luís RM, Teixeira AP, Soares CG (2009) Longitudinal strength reliability of a tanker hull accidentally grounded. Struct Saf 31(3):224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chujutalli JH, Estefen SF, Soares CG (2018) Experimental and numerical analysis of small-scale panels with indented stiffeners. J Constr Steel Res 150:7–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.07.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Z, Hu Z, Liu K, Chen G (2020) Application of a material model based on the Johnson-Cook and Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model in ship collision and grounding simulations. Ocean Eng 205:106768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106768

  11. Prabowo AR, Cahyono SI, Sohn JM (2019) Crashworthiness assessment of thin-walled double bottom tanker: a variety of ship grounding incidents. Theor App Mech Lett 9(5):320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2019.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Konovessis D, Cai W, Vassalos D (2013) Development of Bayesian network models for risk-based ship design. J Mar Sci Appl 12(2):14–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-013-1179-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prabowo AR, Bae DM (2019) Environmental risk of maritime territory subjected to accidental phenomena: correlation of oil spill and ship grounding in the Exxon Valdez's case. Res Eng 4:100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100035

  14. Prabowo AR, Sohn JM, Bae DM, Cho JH (2018) Estimating structure response and progressive failure of a ship hull under side-bow collisions. Techn Gazette 25(5):1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20170215113629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moulas D, Shafiee M, Mehmanparast A (2017) Damage analysis of ship collisions with offshore wind turbine foundations. Ocean Eng 143:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moe OH, Sha Y, Veie J, Amdahl J (2017) Analysis of tether anchored floating suspension bridge subjected to extreme environmental loads. Proc Eng 199:3033–3038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alsos HS, Amdahl J (2009) On the resistance to penetration of stiffened plates, Part I—Experiments. Int J Impact Eng 36:799–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alsos HS, Amdahl J, Hopperstad OS (2009) On the resistance to penetration of stiffened plates, Part II—Numerical analysis. Int J Impact Eng 36:875–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ehlers S (2009) A procedure to optimize ship side structures for crashworthiness. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ 24:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1243/14750902JEME179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang S (1999) The mechanics of ship collisions. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, pp 74–90

  21. Zhang S, Villavicencio R, Pedersen PT (2017) Impact mechanics of ship collisions and validations with experimental results. Marine Struct 63:239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang S, Pedersen PT (2017) A method for ship collision damage and energy absorption analysis and its validation. Ships and Offshore Struct 12(Sup1):S11–S20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2016.1254584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang S, Pedersen PT, Villavicencio R (2019) 4—Damaged material volume method. Probability and mechanics of ship collision and grounding. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 271–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815022-1.00004-9

  24. Zhang S, Pedersen PT, Villavicencio R (2019) 5—Collision damage assessment by nonlinear finite element simulations. Probability and mechanics of ship collision and grounding. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 324–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815022-1.00005-0

  25. Zhang S, Villavicencio R, Zhu L, Pedersen PT (2019) Ship collision damage assessment and validation with experiments and numerical simulations. Marine Struct 63:239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bae DM, Prabowo AR, Cao B, Zakki AF, Haryadi GD (2016) Study on collision between two ships using selected parameters in collision simulation. J Mar Sci Appl 15(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-016-1341-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wen HM, Jones N (1993) Experimental investigation of the scaling laws for metal plates struck by large masses. Int J Impact Eng 13(3):485–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(93)90120-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ozguc O, Das PK, Barltrop N (2005) A comparative study on the structural integrity of single and double side skin bulk carriers under collision damage. Marine Struct 18(7–8):511–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2006.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prabowo AR, Baek SJ, Byeon JH, Bae DM, Cho JH, Sohn JM (2017) Investigation on the structural damage of a double-hull ship, Part I—Ship collision. Proc Struct Integ 5:935–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Minorsky VU (1958) An analysis of ship collisions with reference to protection of nuclear power plants. Report NP-7475, Sharp (George G.) Inc., New York

  31. AbuBakar A, Dow RS (2019) The impact analysis characteristics of a ship's bow during collisions. Eng Failure Anal 100:492–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Woisin G (1979) Design against collision. Schiff & Hafen 31:1059–1069

  33. Oshiro RE, Calle MAG, Mazzariol LM, Alves M (2017) Experimental study of collision in scaled naval structures. Int J Impact Eng 110:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Paik JK (2018) Ultimate limit state analysis and design of plated structures. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, pp 494–501

  35. Liu B, Pedersen PT, Zhu L, Zhang S (2018) Review of experiments and calculation procedures for ship collision and grounding damage. Marine Struct 59:105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sourne HL, Besnard N, Cheylan C, Buannic (2012) A ship collision analysis program based on upper bound solutions and coupled with a large rotational ship movement analysis tool. J App Math 2012:375686. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/375686

  37. Prabowo AR, Nubli H, Sohn JM (2020) Energy dissipation of ship structures subjected to impact loading: a study case in side collision. Proc Struc Integ 27:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.07.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia

    Aditya Rio Prabowo

  2. Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering, Geoje, 53302, South Korea

    Aldias Bahatmaka

  3. Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Systems Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, South Korea

    Jung Min Sohn

Authors
  1. Aditya Rio Prabowo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aldias Bahatmaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jung Min Sohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditya Rio Prabowo.

Additional information

Technical Editor: João Marciano Laredo dos Reis.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prabowo, A.R., Bahatmaka, A. & Sohn, J.M. Crashworthiness characteristic of longitudinal deck structures against identified accidental action in marine environment: a study case of ship–bow collision. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 584 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02662-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02662-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation