Skip to main content
Log in

Issues of consent and assent in pediatric neurosurgery

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Consent and assent are important concepts to understand in the care of pediatric neurosurgery patients. Recently it has been recommended that although pediatric patients generally do not have the legal capacity to make medical decisions, they be encouraged to be involved in their own care. Given the paucity of information on this topic in the neurosurgery community, the objective is to provide pediatric neurosurgeons with recommendations on how to involve their patients in medical decision-making.

Methods

We review the essential elements and current guidelines of consent and assent for pediatric patients using illustrative neurosurgical case vignettes.

Results

The pediatric population ranges widely in cognitive and psychological development making the process of consent and assent quite complex. The role of the child or adolescent in medical decision-making, issues associated with obtaining assent or dissent, and informed refusal of treatment are considered.

Conclusion

The process of obtaining consent and assent represents a critical yet often overlooked aspect to care of pediatric neurosurgical patients. The pediatric neurosurgeon must be able to distill immensely complex and high-risk procedures into simple, understandable terms. Furthermore, they must recognize when the child’s dissent or refusal to treatment is acceptable. In general, allowing children to be involved in their neurosurgical care is empowering and gives them both identity and agency, which is the vital first step to a successful neurosurgical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller G (2009) Pediatric bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Larcher V, Hutchinson A (2010) How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence? Arch Dis Child 95:307–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.148676

  3. De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R, Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP) (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the ethics working group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162:629–633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-003-1193-z

  4. Harrison C, Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) Bioethics Committee (2004) Treatment decisions regarding infants, children and adolescents. Paediatr Child Health 9:99–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/9.2.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michaud P-A, Berg-Kelly K, Macfarlane A, Benaroyo L (2010) Ethics and adolescent care: an international perspective. Curr Opin Pediatr 22:418–422. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833b53ec

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weithorn LA, Campbell SB (1982) The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Dev 53:1589–1598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCabe MA (1996) Involving children and adolescents in medical decision making: developmental and clinical considerations. J Pediatr Psychol 21:505–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/21.4.505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Justia (1987) Cardwell v. Bechtol https://lawjustiacom/cases/tennessee/supreme-court/1987/724-s-w-2d-739-2html Accessed 19 August 2020

  9. Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, Castellanos FX, Liu H, Zijdenbos A, Paus T, Evans AC, Rapoport JL (1999) Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat Neurosci 2:861–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/13158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Holmes CJ, Jernigan TL, Toga AW (1999) In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nat Neurosci 2:859–861. https://doi.org/10.1038/13154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Tessner KD, Toga AW (2001) Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. J Neurosci 21:8819–8829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Giedd JN (2008) The teen brain: insights from neuroimaging. J Adolesc Health 42:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dahl RE, Gunnar MR (2009) Heightened stress responsiveness and emotional reactivity during pubertal maturation: implications for psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol 21:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinberg L (2010) A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Dev Psychobiol 52:216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartholome WG (1995) Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 96:981–982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Denham EJ, Nelson RM (2002) Self-determination is not an appropriate model for understanding parental permission and child assent. Anesth Analg 94:1049–1051. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200205000-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kon AA (2006) Assent in pediatric research. Pediatrics 117:1806–1810. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller VA, Nelson RM (2006) A developmental approach to child assent for nontherapeutic research. J Pediatr 149:S25–S30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wendler DS (2006) Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations. J Med Ethics 32:229–234. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.011114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Unguru Y, Coppes MJ, Kamani N (2008) Rethinking pediatric assent: from requirement to ideal. Pediatr Clin N Am 55(xii):211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2007.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz AL, Webb SA, Committee on Bioethics (2016) Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 138:e20161485. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee KJ, Havens PL, Sato TT, Hoffman GM, Leuthner SR (2006) Assent for treatment: clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Pediatrics 118:723–730. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Waller BN (2001) Patient autonomy naturalized. Perspect Biol Med 44:584–593. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2001.0076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pousset G, Bilsen J, De Wilde J, Benoit Y, Verlooy J, Bomans A, Deliens L, Mortier F (2009) Attitudes of adolescent cancer survivors toward end-of-life decisions for minors. Pediatrics 124:e1142–e1148. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Code of Virginia § 63.2–100. (Effective untl July 1, 2021) Definitions. https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title63.2/chapter1/section63.2-100/ Accessed 19 August 19 2020

  26. Mercurio MR (2007) An adolescent’s refusal of medical treatment: implications of the Abraham Cheerix case. Pediatrics 120:1357–1358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1458

  27. Talati ED, Lang CW, Ross LF (2010) Reactions of pediatricians to refusals of medical treatment for minors. J Adolesc Health 47:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Doig C, Burgess E (2000) Withholding life-sustaining treatment: are adolescents competent to make these decisions? Can Med Assoc J 162:1585–1588

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ross LF (2009) Against the tide: arguments against respecting a minor’s refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 18:302–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180109090471

  30. Johnston C (2009) Overriding competent medical treatment refusal by adolescents: when “no” means “no.”. Arch Dis Child 94:487–491. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.149781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alderson P (2007) Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research. Soc Sci Med 65:2272–2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Diekema DS (2011) Adolescent refusal of lifesaving treatment: are we asking the right questions? Adolesc Med State Art Rev 22(viii):213–228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sharon Durfy, PhD, for assistance with manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeev D. Sen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Hauptman is a consultant for Medtronic. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sen, R.D., Lee, A., Browd, S.R. et al. Issues of consent and assent in pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 37, 33–37 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04907-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04907-w

Keywords

Navigation