Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of compost and chemical fertilizer application on soil physical properties and productivity of sesame (Sesamum Indicum L.)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) is an important food and cash crop in Pakistan, although less soil fertility (organic matter) and suboptimal application of fertilizers cause nutrient depletion and yield decline. Extensive use of inorganic fertilizers without soil physiochemical analysis is problematic in terms of soil fertility and crop productivity. The application of compost combined with or without chemical fertilizer is considered as a sustainable agricultural production system because it enhances crop productivity and soil fertility. Therefore, this research was conducted to evaluate the effects of bio-fertilizer (organic compost) (Bio-F), chemical fertilizer (RDF), and controlled (CK) farming treatments on some soil physical properties and crop yield. The seven different farming treatments based on N equivalency (compost nutritional analysis) including sole compost levels (20 and 30 t ha−1), sole chemical fertilizer (NPK, 30 kg ha−1), integrated fertilizer treatments (compost + RDF), and a controlled treatment were laid in a complete randomized design (CRD) with three replications under the same experimental field conditions from 2017 to 2020 cropping seasons. Before sesame production, soil samples at a depth of (0–15 cm, 15–30 cm) were analyzed to determine the effect of different farming treatments on soil physical properties. A significantly higher grain yield of sesame (805.1 kg ha−1) was obtained from Bio-F3 integrated fertilizer application (30 t ha−1 + ½ RDF). The treatments with higher doses of bio-fertilizer (compost) have a significant reduction in soil weight (bulk density), while the increase has been observed in the porosity values. Compared with sole RDF and Bio-F, integrated farming treatments have significantly improved the soil field capacity, available moisture to plants and wilting point. Therefore, the integrated farming system (chemical fertilizer + compost) is recommended for sustainable agroecology and crop production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noor RS, Wang Z, Umair M, Ameen M, Misaal MA, Sun Y (2020a) Long-term application effects of organic and chemical fertilizers on soil health and productivity of taramira (eruca sativa l.) Under rainfed conditions. J Anim Plant Sci 30(4):970–987

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aslam W, Noor RS, Ullah S, Chen H (2020) Comparative economic analysis of crop yield under organic and conventional farming systems in Punjab, Pakistan. Asian J Agric Biol 8(2):113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abid A, Jie S, Aslam W, Batool S, Lili Y (2020) Application of structural equation modelling to develop a conceptual model for smallholder’s credit access: the mediation of agility and innovativeness in organic food value chain finance. PLoS ONE 15(8):e0235921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Noor RS, Hussain F, Umair M (2020b) Evaluating selected soil physical properties under different soil tillage systems in arid southeast Rawalpindi, Pakistan. J Clean WAS 4(2):41–45

    Google Scholar 

  5. Getachew A, van Beek CL, Bird IM (2014a) Influence of integrated soil fertility management in wheat and teff productivity and soil chemical properties in the highland tropical environment. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14:532–545

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dejene M, Lemlem M (2012) Integrated agronomic crop managements to improve teff productivity under terminal drought, water stress. In Tech Open Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Getachew BL, Paul NN (2014b) Cropping sequence and nitrogen fertilizer effects on the productivity and quality of malting barley and soil fertility in the Ethiopian highlands. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60(9):1261–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shata SM, Mahmoud A, Siam S (2007) Improving calcareous soil productivity by integrated effect of intercropping and fertilizer. Res J Agric Biol Sci 3(6):7330–7739

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abay D, Tesfaye (2012) Combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers to increase yield of barley and improve soil properties at Fereze in Southern Ethiopia. Innov Syst Des Eng 22(1):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  10. Getachew AT (2017) Integrated soil fertility and plant nutrient management in tropical agro-ecosystems: a review. Pedosphere 27(4):662–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chilot Y, B Lakew, F Alemayehu (2002) On-farm evaluation of food barley production packages in the highlands of Wolemera and Degem, Ethiopia. In: Proceedings of a Client-Oriented Research Evaluation Workshop on Towards Farmer Participatory Research: Attempts and Achievements in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia, pp 176–187, Holetta Agricultural Research Centre, Holetta, Ethiopia

  12. Gete Z, Agegnehu G, Abera D, Shahidur R (2010) Fertilizer and soil fertility potential in Ethiopia: constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system. IFPRI, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  13. Godara S, Gupta US, Singh R (2012) Effect of integrated nutrient management on herbage, dry fodder yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.). Forage Res 38(1):59–61

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abedi T, Alemzadeh A, Kazemeini SA (2010) Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on grain yield and protein banding pattern of wheat. Aust J Crop Sci 4:384–389

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z, Liu Z, Noor RS, Cheng Q, Chu X, Qu B, Fe Z, Sun Y (2019a) Furfural wastewater pretreatment of corn stalk for whole slurry anaerobic co-digestion to improve methane production. Sci Total Environ 674:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Olsen SR, Sommer LE (1982) Available Soil P. Page et al., (ed). Methods Soil Anal Part 2:403–430

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy JAMES, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walkley A, Black CA (1934) An examination of different methods for determining soil organic matter and the proposed modification by the chromic acid titration method

  19. Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Prenstice-Hall, Inc., Engle Wood Cliffs 183-204p

    Google Scholar 

  20. Noor RS, Wang Z, Umair M, Ameen M, Imran M, Sun Y (2019) Performance evaluation of a water seed drill. Sustainability 11:137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarkar S, Singh SR, Singh RP (2003) productivity of a rice–lentil cropping sequence in India. J Agric Sci 140(4):419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bustamante MA, Restrepo AP, Alburquerque JA, Pérez-Murcia MD, Paredes C, Moral R, Bernal MP (2013) Recycling of anaerobic digestates by composting: effect of the bulking agent used. J Clean Prod 47:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rashad FM, Saleh WD, Moselhy MA (2010) Bioconversion of rice straw and certain agro-industrial wastes to amendments for organic farming systems: composting, quality, stability and maturity indices. Bioresour Technol 101(1):5952–5960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Z, Cheng Q, Liu Z, Qu J, Chu X, Li N, Noor RS, Liu C, Qu B, Sun Y (2019b) Evaluation of methane production and energy conversion from corn stalk using furfural wastewater pretreatment for whole slurry anaerobic co-digestion. Bioresour Technol 293:121962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. López-González JA, López MJ, Vargas-García MC, Suárez-Estrella F, Jurado M, Moreno J (2013) Tracking organic matter and microbiota dynamics during the stages of lignocellulosic waste composting. Bioresour Technol 146:574–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gu W, Zhang F, Xu P, Tang S, Xie K, Huang X, Huang Q (2011) Effects of sulphur and Thiobacillus thioparus on cow manure aerobic composting. Bioresour Technol 102:6529–6535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharif M, Matiullah K, Tanvir B, Shah AH, Wahid F (2011) Response of fed dung composted with rock phosphate on yield and phosphorus and nitrogen uptake of maize crop. Afr J Biotechnol 10:12595–12601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zarina B, Ullah N, Mmuh K, Akram A, Khan QU, Khan MJ, Batool S, Makhdoom K (2010) Maize response to integrated use of NP-fertilizers and compost. Pakistan. Pak J Bot 42(4):2793–2801

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang L, Sun XY (2015) Effects of earthworm casts and zeolite on the two-stage composting of green waste. Waste Manag 39:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karak T, Bhattacharyya P, Paul RK, Das T, Saha SK (2013) Evaluation of composts from agricultural wastes with fishpond sediment as bulking agent to improve compost quality. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water 41:711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nishanth D, Biswas DR (2008) Kinetics of phosphorus and potassium release from rock phosphate and waste mica enriched compost and their effect on yield and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum). Bioresour Technol 99:3342–3353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wei Y, Wei Z, Cao Z, Zhao Y, Zhao X, Lu Q, Wang X, Zhang X (2016) A regulating method for the distribution of phosphorus fractions based on environmental parameters related to the key phosphate-solubilizing bacteria during composting. Bioresour Technol 211:610–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Galvez-Sola L, Morales J, Mayoral AM, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Martinez-Sabater E, Perez-Murcia MD, Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Moral R (2010) Estimation of phosphorus content and dynamics during composting: use of near infrared spectroscopy. Chemosphere 78:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Biswas DR, Narayanasamy G (2006) Rock phosphate enriched compost: an approach to improve low-grade Indian rock phosphate. Bioresour Technol 97:2243–2251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Morales J, Mayoral AM, Moral R (2009) Study of the composting process of winery and distillery wastes using multivariate techniques. Bioresour Technol 100:4766–4772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanay A, Sahin U, Anapali O (2003) Decrease in hydraulic conductivity of clay soils with salinity-sodicity problems due to freezing and thawing effect. Acta Agric Scand Sect B 53(4):208–210

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hortenstine CC, Rothwell DF (1973) Pelletized municipal refuse compost as a soil amendment and nutrient source for sorghum. J Environ Qual 2(3):343–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Elliot WJ, Ward AD (1995) Soil erosion and control practices. Environ Hydrol:177–204

  39. Demir Y, Dogan Demir A (2019) The effect of organic matter applications on the saturated hydraulic conductivity and available water-holding capacity of sandy soils. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(2):3137–3146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weber J, Karczewska A, Drozd J, Licznar M, Licznar S, Jamroz E, Kocowicz A (2007) Agricultural and ecological aspects of a sandy soil as affected by the application of municipal solid waste composts. Soil Biol Biochem 39(6):1294–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Laguë C, Landry H, Roberge M (2005) Engineering of land application systems for livestock manure: a review. Can Biosyst Eng 47(6.17):e6

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fischer D, Bruno G (2012) Synergisms between compost and biochar for sustainable soil amelioration. Manag Org Waste 1

  43. Celik I, Günal H, Acar M, Gök M, Barut ZB, Pamiralan H (2017) Long-term tillage and residue management effect on soil compaction and nitrate leaching in a Typic Haploxerert soil. Int J Plant Prod 11(1):131–150

    Google Scholar 

  44. Erhart E, Wilfried H (2010) Compost use in organic farming. Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 311–345

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Li Y, Manandhar A, Li G, Shah A (2018) Life cycle assessment of integrated solid-state anaerobic digestion and composting for on-farm organic residues treatment. Waste Manag 76:294–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan, for the research facilities. The authors are thankful and acknowledged the Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China, for their technical scientific support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Rana Shahzad Noor conceived the conceptualization of research study, design and development of the experiment, data collection, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing an original draft, reviewed, supervised, and write-up editing. Fiaz Hussain, Muhammad Umair, and Irfan Abbas contributed in data collection, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, and writing an original draft. Yong Sun supervised the entire research work and contributed as internal reviewer for the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noor, R.S., Hussain, F., Abbas, I. et al. Effect of compost and chemical fertilizer application on soil physical properties and productivity of sesame (Sesamum Indicum L.). Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 905–915 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01066-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01066-5

Keywords

Navigation