Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Tool Posture and Position on Stability in Milling with Parallel Kinematic Machine Tool

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigated the machining stability influenced by tool posture and position in ball-end milling with parallel kinematic machine tool (PKM). Initially, the geometric structure was identified, and the machinery stiffness was measured by impulse respond method at several positions with four tool postures. Then, the milling tests were conducted on flat work surface using a ball-end mills. Cutting force and acceleration signals of milling tests were measured by three-axis dynamometer and accelerometer. Furthermore, these signals were analyzed by using Fast-Fourier transform and Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT). The results showed that the length of arm change with tool posture, where the machinery stiffness decreased with the total length of arms for any tool position. The experimental results also demonstrated the machining stability varied with tool posture; the trend of stability corresponds with the machinery stiffness. The vibration analysis by HHT presented the increasing of power level in the time–frequency plot when the length of arm increase during milling process. Therefore, the geometric influence must be considered to support process planning on the PKM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

Depth of slot (mm)

A X :

Acceleration signal in X-direction (m/s2)

A Y :

Acceleration signal in Y-direction (m/s2)

A Z :

Acceleration signal in Z-direction (m/s2)

n :

Spindle rotation (min−1)

f n :

Natural frequency (Hz)

f T :

Tooth-passing frequency (Hz)

f c :

Self-excited chatter frequency (Hz)

F X :

Force signal in X-direction (N)

F Y :

Force signal in Y-direction (N)

F Z :

Force signal in Z-direction (N)

G :

Dynamic compliance (µm/N)

K :

Machinery stiffness (MN/m)

N t :

Number of flutes

V X :

Feeding speed in X-direction (mm/min)

V Y :

Feeding speed in Y-direction (mm/min)

X :

Machine coordinate system in X-axis (mm)

Y :

Machine coordinate system in Y-axis (mm)

Z :

Machine coordinate system in Z-axis (mm)

θ A :

Tool posture in A-axis (°)

θ B :

Tool posture in B-axis (°)

References

  1. Altintas, Y., & Lee, P. (1998). Mechanics and dynamics of ball end milling. ASME, 120, 684–692.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altintas, Y., Shamoto, E., Lee, P., & Budak, E. (1999). Analytical prediction of stability lobes in ball end milling. ASME, 121, 586–592.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shamoto, E., & Akazawa, K. (2009). Analytical prediction of chatter stability in ball end milling with tool inclination. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 58, 351–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsumura, T., Miyahara, Y., & Ono, T. (2008). Dynamic characteristics in the cutting operations with small diameter end mills. Journal of Advance Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, 2(4), 609–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Selmi, J., Costes, J. P., et al. (2013). Spindle position influence on milling operation stability. Bordeaux: Congres Francais de Mecanique.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Azka, M., Yamada, K., et al. (2020). Hilbert–Huang transform analysis of machining stability in ball-nose end-milling of curved surface. International Journal of Automation Technology, 14(3), 500–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tlusty, J., Ziegert, J. C., et al. (2000). A comparison of stiffness characteristics of serial and parallel machine tools. Journal of Manufacturing Process, 2(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pandilov, Z., & Rall, K. (2006). Parallel kinematics machine tools: History, present, future. Mechanical Engineering—Scientific Journal, 25(1), 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosyid, A., El-Khasawneh, B., & Alazzam, A. (2020). External kinematic calibration of hybrid kinematics machine utilizing lower-DOF planar parallel kinematics mechanisms. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 21, 995–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiens, G. J., & Hardage, D. S. (2006). Structural dynamics and system identification of parallel kinematic machines. In Proceedings of IDETC/CIE, ASME.

  11. Harib, K. H., Ullah, A. M. M., & Hammami, A. (2007). A hexapod-based machine tool with hybrid structure: Kinematic analysis and trajectory planning. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47, 1426–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merlet, J. P. (2002). An initiative for the kinematics study of parallel manipulators. In Proceedings of the workshop on fundamental issues and future research directions for parallel mechanisms and manipulators, Quebec, Canada, October 3–4.

  13. Tunc, L. T., & Shaw, J. (2016). Investigation of the effects of Stewart platform-type industrial robot on stability of robotic milling. International Journal Advance Manufacture Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8420-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, Y., & Xu, Q. (2004). Kinematics and stiffness analysis for a general 3-PRS spatial parallel mechanism. Montreal, Canada: ROMANSY.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lian, B., Sun, T., et al. (2015). Stiffness analysis and experiment of a novel 5-DoF parallel kinematic machine considering gravitational effects. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 95, 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, P., Li, B., Cheung, C. F., & Zhang, J. F. (2017). Stiffness modeling and optimization of a 3-DOF parallel robot in a serial-parallel polishing machine. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 18, 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Altintas, Y. (2001). Analytical prediction of three-dimensional chatter stability in milling. JSME International Journal, 44(3), 717–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang, W. Y., Chen, C. C., & Wu, S. J. (2019). Chatter analysis and stability prediction of milling tool based on zero-order and envelope methods for real-time monitoring and compensation. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 20, 693–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stephenson, D. A., & Agapiou, J. S. (2006). Metal cutting theory and practice (2nd ed., p. 380, 620). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rubio, L., De la Sen, M., et al. (2019). Analysis of discrete time schemes for milling forces control under fractional order holds. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 14(5), 735–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Altintas, Y. (2012). Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design (2nd ed., pp. 92–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, Z., Wang, Z., & Shi, X. (2017). Fast prediction of chatter stability lobe diagram for milling process using frequency response function or modal parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 89, 2603–2612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, Z., Ming, L., Dinghua, Z., & Wanzhu, L. (2016). Cutting force prediction in four-axis milling of curved surfaces with bull-nose end mill. In 9th international conference on digital enterprise technologyDET (vol. 56, pp. 100–104).

  24. Altintas, Y., Stepan, G., Merdol, D., & Dombovari, Z. (2008). Chatter stability of milling in frequency and discrete time domain. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoo, Y. J. (2019). Fault detection of induction motor using fast fourier transform with feature selection via principal component analysis. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 20, 1543–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang, N. E., & Shen, S. (2005). Hilbert–Huang transform and its applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Susanto, A., Liu, C. H., Yamada, K., et al. (2018). Application of Hilbert–Huang transform for vibration signal analysis in end-milling. Precision Engineering, 53, 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. You, S. H., Lee, J. H., & Hoon, S. (2019). A study on cutting characteristics in turning operations of titanium alloy used in automobile. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 20, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Muhammad, I., Khatoon, T., Ullah, S. M., & Ko, T. J. (2018). Development of empirical model for bio machining to improve machinability and surface roughness of polycrystalline copper. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 5, 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges the scholarship support from Research & Innovation in Science & Technology Project (RISET-Pro) in Ministry of Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiji Yamada.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azka, M., Yamada, K., Huda, M.A. et al. Influence of Tool Posture and Position on Stability in Milling with Parallel Kinematic Machine Tool. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 21, 2359–2373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-020-00416-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-020-00416-7

Keywords

Navigation