Circulating osteocyte‐related biomarkers (vitamin D, sclerostin, dickkopf-1), hepcidin, and oxidative stress markers in early breast cancer: Their impact in disease progression and outcome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2020.105773Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is associated with altered circulating osteocyte‐related biomarkers, hepcidin, and oxidative stress parameters.

  • Wnt inhibitors and hepcidin are inversely correlated to vitamin D in early BC.

  • Vitamin D and SOD have a good predictive of outcome in early BC.

  • Hepcidin and iron metabolism are crucial elements in BC development via oxidative stress.

  • Circulating DKK1, hepcidin, and SOD differ between benign breast disease and controls.

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is a major concern to female health worldwide. We assessed the circulating osteocyte‐related biomarkers, hepcidin, and oxidative stress status among early-stage BC patients in aspects of clinical severity and impact on the outcome. The study incorporated 73 patients categorized into 57 early-stage BC and 16 benign breast diseases and 30 healthy controls. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], sclerostin (SOST), dickkopf-1(DKK1), and hepcidin were measured using ELISA, while, serum oxidative stress markers were assessed by spectrophotometry. Our results show that patients with BC showed significant increase in the mean levels of DKK1, SOST, hepcidin, and LPER and significant decrease in the mean levels of 25(OH)D, SOD, GPx, and Hb when compared with controls and benign breast diseases. Significantly higher DKK1, hepcidin, and SOD levels among benign breast diseases were found in comparison to control group. There were significantly lower levels of 25(OH)D, SOD, and Hb and significantly higher levels of SOST, DKK1, hepcidin, No, and LPER with advanced grade. Lower levels of 25(OH)D, SOD and higher levels of SOST, hepcidin were observed with increasing the malignant stage. Reduced levels of 25(OH)D, and SOD were significantly associated with poor prognosis and were strong predictors among BC. There were significant negative correlations between 25(OH)D with LPER, SOST, and hepicidin. We conclude that low 25(OH)D, high SOST, DKK1, and hepcidin, and dysregulated oxidative stress could be helpful in early detection and assessment of BC. 25(OH)D, and SOD were the most relevant to tumor progression and prognosis which indicate a significant role in the BC pathogenesis and could be promising targets in management. Our research paves the way to disrupt vicious circle between these biomarkers to obtain the best care of BC.

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) remains the most widespread malignancy among women all over the world, with more than 268,600 new cases diagnosed in the US in 2017 [1,2]. It is the second most commonly leading cause of cancer deaths in females. Despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, breast cancer incidence is still rising at an amazing rate. Therefore, the scientific search persists for the finding of biomarkers which can be useful with optimum sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing or predicting the tumor behavior and treatment response, or even as therapeutic targets [3]. In Egypt, it is accounting for 29.1 % of cancer deaths and affects 37.7 % of all females [4].

Vitamin D is known to be a vital micronutrient hormone with a significant function in human health. Throughout the last decades, the general public and the medical community have been increasingly concerned over the research of the effects of vitamin D deficiency as a risk factor in many autoimmune, metabolic, and neoplastic pathologies [5]. Accumulating evidence indicates that vitamin D can control the entire tumorigenesis cycle, from initiation to invasion and the interactions between the cells and microenvironments. These processes involve regulating cell behaviors such as differentiation, proliferation, autophagy, apoptosis, and epithelial -mesenchymal transition (EMT), and moderation interactions between cells and microenvironments inducing angiogenesis, production of inflammatory cytokines, and modulation of the immune system [6].

The canonical Wnt–β-catenin signaling pathway is a pathway that plays a role in accelerating cell transcription. The canonical signaling is triggered by the attachment of Wnt ligands to the double receptor complex including frizzled (FZD) protein and either low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6 (LRP5/6). This results in the disruption of the multiprotein β-catenin degradation complex, thereby relieving β-catenin from its proteosomal digestion. This allows the accumulation of β-catenin in the cytoplasm and its subsequent translocation into the nucleus to serve as a transcriptional coactivator for transcription factors belonging to the T-cell factor / lymphoid enhancing factor (TCF / LEF) family to control target gene transcription [7]. Canonical wnt pathway activity is absolutely necessary for the growth of mammary glands and works during pre-and post-natal development at various critical time periods. Many epigenetic defects in the genes of the Wnt pathway have also been found in human breast carcinogenesis [8,9].

Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1) and sclerostin (SOST) were among the various Wnt inhibitors explored. During embryogenesis, their expression begins in the limb bud and persists postnatally in the developed skeleton inside osteoblasts and osteocytes [10]. Sclerostin is a crucial bone remodeling regulator, prevents bone formation through Wnt signaling inhibition. It blocks canonical Wnt signaling by binding to LRP5/6. Sclerostin not only influences the bone formation and mineralization but also affects serum levels of hormones that control mineral accumulation, like calcitriol and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) [11]. While DKK1 lessens Wnt signaling by connecting to LRP5/6 and the Kremen-1 cell surface co-receptor, thus fostering receptor complex internalization [10]. Sclerostin and DKK1 expression aren't limited to bone [12]. Various studies have shown that SOST and DKK1 were involved in the control of different pathological and physiological processes like hippocampal neurogenesis, osteoclastogenesis, proliferation of tumor cells, survival, and bone metastasis [10,11,13,14]. However, the function of DKK1 in tumor biology is contentious [15]. Regarding early-stage BC, the precise roles of SOST and DKK1 in disease progression and clinical prognosis are still unclear.

Hepcidin, is a 25 amino acid hormone, synthesized by hepatocyte and secreted into the blood stream [16]. Hepcidin is encoded on the human chromosome 19 by the hepcidin antimicrobial peptide (HAMP) gene. This protein, originally known as an antimicrobial peptide, is now recognized as a type 2 acute-phase reactant due to its control by interleukin 6 (IL-6). Hepcidin attaches to the ferroportin protein (FPN), the main transmembrane iron export-protein on the iron-regulated cells. The binding causes internalization and subsequent degradation of the hepcidin-ferroportin complex resulting in blocked cellular iron efflux to the plasma and reduction of iron blood concentration. In various cancers, the alterations of iron homeostasis by hepcidin-ferroportin have been actively analyzed [17]. In BC, bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP 7) is overexpressed in breast tissue and linked with increased expression of hepcidin and cancer metastasis [18].

Oxidative stress (OS) develops when the reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels exceed the antioxidant defense systems because of increased ROS output and/or deterioration of the cell's antioxidant ability. This OS plays a crucial role in carcinogenesis [19]. OS can cause oxidative damages in lipids, proteins, and DNA, such as deletion, chromosomal rearrangements, mutations of vital tumor suppressor genes or proto-oncogenes and persuades stimulation of Akt/PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway, which are all hallmarks of cancer development and progression (including BC) [20]. The present study aimed to assess the circulatory osteocyte‐related biomarkers, hepcidin and oxidative stress markers among early-stage breast cancer with the possible comparison of these biochemical parameters with the detected clinicopathological findings and prognosis in these patients which provide a well understanding of the pathogenesis of BC and may be beneficial if targeted in BC management hoping to direct clinical decision-making.

Section snippets

Study design and patients

A hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 73 patients who were newly diagnosed. Patients were recruited from the South Egypt Cancer Institute, Surgery Department, Assiut University, and categorized into 57 BC participants and 16 patients with benign breast diseases. Their mean ages were 55 ± 12, and 43 ± 8 years respectively. Patient characteristics were assessed anonymously. In addition to 30 unrelated healthy, age, and sex-matched control group. The healthy controls were recruited

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Patient's characteristics were presented as mean ± SD for continuous data and as a number of patients (percentage) for categorical variables. Categorical data were analyzed using the chi‐square (χ2) test. Differences between the means of two groups using Student t‐test and Mann‐Whitney test according to the normality of data. A comparison between the groups was tested by one-way

Characterization of the enrolled subjects

The demographic and clinical profiles of the included subjects were described in Table 1. The study included 57 BC patients with their mean age 55 years± 12SD, and 16 patients with benign breast diseases with their mean age 43 years± 8SD. They compared to 30 healthy matched control group with their mean age was 51 years± 10SD. Significantly greater age of BC group compared to the benign group was found. The mean age, body mass index (BMI) and menopausal status were not significantly different

Discussion

Breast cancer is a complex heterogeneous disease characterized by distinct pathological characteristics, differential therapeutic response, and considerable differences in the clinical outcome [22]. Mammography screening is primarily used for the surveillance of high-risk females. However, the reduced sensitivity especially in dense breast tissue, along with BC's high recurrence rate, this requires an alternative non-invasive test which could predict BC and differentiate between benign tumors

Conclusion

Circulatory osteocyte‐related biomarkers, hepcidin, and oxidative stress markers could be helpful in early detection and the assessment of BC patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study of these biomarkers panel in early BC. Our research paves the way to disrupt the vicious circle between oxidative stress, 25(OH)D, hepcidin, DKK1, and SOST to obtain the best care and quality of life for BC patients. These data proposed that these biomarkers could be considered as clinical

Funds

The current research has been funded by the authors themselves.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Reham I El-Mahdy: Investigation, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing - original draft, Software, Methodology. Madeha M. Zakhary: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation. Doaa W. Maximous: Conceptualization, Validation, Formal analysis. Abeer A Mokhtar: Writing - review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis. Mahmoud I. El Dosoky: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Software, Investigation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References (81)

  • S. Reuter et al.

    Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: how are they linked?

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (2010)
  • A. Jezierska-Drutel et al.

    Role of oxidative stress and the microenvironment in breast cancer development and progression

    Advances in Cancer Research

    (2013)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2017

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (2017)
  • F. Bray et al.

    Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (2018)
  • A. Martín-Blázquez et al.

    Untargeted LC-HRMS-based metabolomics to identify novel biomarkers of metastatic colorectal cancer

    Sci. Rep.

    (2019)
  • W. Liu et al.

    The anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D in tumorigenesis

    Int. J. Mol. Sci.

    (2018)
  • G. Xu et al.

    Regulation of gene expression of wnt signaling pathway by dietary high fat and effects on colon epithelia of male mice

    FASEB J.

    (2017)
  • L. Yan et al.

    Activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway in ATF3-induced mammary tumors

    PLoS One

    (2011)
  • N. Takebe et al.

    Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways in cancer stem cells: clinical update

    Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

    (2015)
  • E. Hesse et al.

    Sclerostin inhibition alleviates breast cancer–induced bone metastases and muscle weakness

    JCI Insight

    (2019)
  • H.Z. Ke et al.

    Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 as therapeutic targets in bone diseases

    Endocr. Rev.

    (2012)
  • D. Gatti et al.

    Sclerostin and DKK1 in postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab

    J. Bone Miner. Res.

    (2012)
  • M. Zhu et al.

    Sclerostin induced tumor growth, bone metastasis and osteolysis in breast cancer

    Sci. Rep.

    (2017)
  • L. Chen et al.

    DKK1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell migration and invasion through β-catenin/MMP7 signaling pathway

    Mol. Cancer

    (2013)
  • X. Shao et al.

    The clinical value of hepcidin in breast cancer and its bone metastasis

    Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci.

    (2017)
  • M. Pauk et al.

    Exogenous BMP7 corrects plasma iron overload and bone loss in Bmp6-/-mice

    Int. Orthop.

    (2015)
  • M. Parri et al.

    Redox molecular machines involved in tumor progression

    Antioxid. Redox Signal.

    (2013)
  • S.B. Edge et al.

    Breast cancer staging: predicting outcome and response to treatment

    Breast Surgical Techniques and Interdisciplinary Management

    (2010)
  • O. Yersal et al.

    Biological subtypes of breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications

    World J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2014)
  • M. Kasoha et al.

    Dickkopf-1 (dkk1) protein expression in breast cancer with special reference to bone metastases

    Clin. Exp. Metastasis

    (2018)
  • K.M. O’Brien et al.

    DNA methylation, and breast cancer

    Breast Cancer Res.

    (2018)
  • R. Wei et al.

    Mechanisms underlying the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by vitamin D

    Nutrients

    (2015)
  • K.M. O’Brien et al.

    Serum vitamin D and risk of breast cancer within five years

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2017)
  • M.I. Khan et al.

    Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in breast and renal cancer: current state and future approaches

    Int. J. Oncol.

    (2014)
  • N. Shaukat et al.

    Association between vitamin D deficiency and breast cancer

    Pak. J. Med. Sci.

    (2017)
  • Y. Jamshidinaeini et al.

    Vitamin D status and risk of breast cancer in Iranian women: a case–control study

    J. Am. Coll. Nutr.

    (2016)
  • S.L. McDonnell et al.

    Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations≥ 40 ng/ml are associated with& 65% lower cancer risk: pooled analysis of randomized trial and prospective cohort study

    PLoS One

    (2016)
  • D. Matthews et al.

    Genomic vitamin D signaling in breast cancer: insights from animal models and human cells

    J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2010)
  • L.E. Tavera-Mendoza et al.

    Vitamin D receptor regulates autophagy in the normal mammary gland and in luminal breast cancer cells

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2017)
  • G. Janbabai et al.

    A survey on the relationship between serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level and tumor characteristics in patients with breast cancer

    Int. J. Hematol. Stem Cell Res.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text