Skip to main content
Log in

Oil Pipeline Network Evaluation Based on Multi-Channel Convolution and H-Markov Model with Co-Evolution Mechanism

  • Published:
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils Aims and scope

With the development of oil pipeline transportation domains, the layout of regional oil pipeline transportation network is doubly influenced by regional development and its own evolution, more than that, it is a dynamic concept. In order to get more reasonable evaluation results, it is necessary to improve the traditional evaluation method by regarding the network layout behavior and regional space expansion behavior as interactive objects. In this paper, on the basis of analyzing regional development characteristics and pipeline transportation network layout demands from the spatiotemporal perspective, the co-evolution mechanism between them is dissected. Based on this, the multi-dimensional layout evaluation index system is constructed from four dimensions, and a layout evaluation model of oil pipeline transportation network based on multi-channel convolution and the Hidden-Markov model with co-evolution mechanism (i.e., CEM-MCNN-HMM) is proposed, which serves as a framework of co-evolutionary behavior recognition to use convolution kernel of Afferent sizes to extract feature information of different granularity from data in Afferent channels, effectively obtain the property features, behavior features, and interactive features of the behavior objects, and then convert the behavior recognition problem into a classification problem. The Hidden-Markov model is used to excavate the status dependent relations with a certain span of time and main, the classification results to improve the robustness of the model Finally, taking real data set as training data, performance testing of the proposed model is carried out from three aspects: the rationality test of using fractal dimension metrics and resetting fractal measured unit, and the model evaluation criteria based on confusion matrix analysis. The result shows that the performance of CEM-MCNN-HMM is best among all models and can improve the judgment level of the transport network layout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Q. Deng. J. F. Wu, et.al, “A planning model of nature gas gathering pipeline network based on penalty minimum spanning tree,” Transp. Stor, 37, 799-812 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G X. He, Y. T. Liang, et.al, “Layout optimization of gathering systems in CBM fields considering three dimensional terrains and obstacles,” Oil Gas Stor. Transp., 35, 6-18 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Thou, X. P. Li, et.al, “The layout optimization of dendritic pipeline network under the condition of terrain ups and downs,” Oil Gas Field Sur. Eng., 32,11-19 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Liu, S. Q. Chen, et.al, “Research progress on topology layout optimization of oil and gas gathering and transportation system,” Oil Gas Stor. Transp.,37, 121-136 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. J. Mao, L. Hou, et.al, “Topology optimization of multi-level star-shaped gathering pipeline network in topographically complicated gas fields,” Des. Cons:., 38, 10-19 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Zhang, M. H. Zeng and Q. Z. Hu, “Regional Transportation Network Evaluating Based on DEA Model with Mg Restraint Cone,”Highw. Eng., 40, 336-345 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Z. M. Wang, “Evaluation of Henan Province Expressway Network Planning Based on Attribute Mathematical Theory,” J. Chongqing Jiaoton. Univ. (Nat. Sci), 37, 49-57 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Q. Yong, “Evaluation and decision method for comprehensive transportation network layout based on Monte Carlo Simulation,”Appl Res. Compur., 31, 10-17 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. J. Liu, D. Wang, J.J. Hao, and C. X. Dun, “A research on environmental impact assessment along high-speed railways based on LM-BP neural network,” Railw. Transp. Econ., 41, 6-12 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. X. L. Li, X. M. Yu, C. Du, X. Zhang, P. Zhang, and G Y. Zhu, “FCM-MSVM algorithm based on weight optimization and its application in state identification of freeway,”J. Beijing Jiaotong Univ., 42, 72-78 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Sengupta, S. Basak, P. Salkia, S. Paul, V. Tsalavoutis, F. D. Atiah, V. Ravi, and R. A. Peters II, “A review of deep learning with special emphasis on architectures, applications and recent trends,” Knowledge-Based Syst., 194, 1055-1097 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Polson and V. Sokolov, “Deep learning for short-term traffic flow prediction,” Trans. Res., Part C. Emerg. Technol,7, 1-17 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Q. V. Le, W.Y. Zou, S.Y. Yeung, and A.Y. Ng, "Learning hierarchical invariant spatio-temporal features for action recognition with independert subspace analysis," in IEEE Conf. on Comput. Vision, Pattern Recogn., Providence, RI, USA (2011).

  14. Y. K. Wu and H.C. Tan, “Short-term oil field flow forecasting with spatial-temporal correlation in a hybrid deep learning framework,” Comput. Sci., 9, 12 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Weinzaepfel, Z. Harchaoui, and C. Schmid, “Learning to track for spatio-temporal action localization,” IEEE Int. Con, on Comput. Vision. Pattern Recogn. (2015).

  16. G. Y. Xu, J. Mu, G Y. Si, W. B. Hu, and F. Liu, “Combined hydrological time series forecasting model based on CNN and MC,” Jisuanji Xiandaihua, 11, 23-33 (2019).

  17. Y. Y. Zeng, S. G Hu, and S. J. Qu, “Spatial-temporal coupling of oil field location change and construction land expansion in the middle of Yangtze river economic belt,” Resour. Environ. Yangtze Val., 27, 12 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. C. Yuan and X. X. Lin, “Urban oil field network cascading failure evaluation model based of Markov renewal process,” Oper. Res. Manage. Sci., 27, 8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Mandelbrot, “How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension,” Science, 156, 636-638(1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Q. Y. Peng, J. Liu, “Comprehensive coordination quantitative analysis of urban nil transit planning network and urban planning,”J. Oilfield Transp. Eng., 19, 3, (2019).

  21. P. C. Yuan and X. X. Lin, “Urban oil field network cascading failure evaluation model based of Markov renewal process,” Oper. Res. Manage. Sci., 27, 8-19 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Q. V. Le, W.Y. Zou, and S.Y. Yeung. “Learning hierarchical invariant spatio-temporal features for action recognition with independent subspace analysis,” IEEE. Cont on Comput. Vision, Pattern Recogn. (2011).

  23. G W. Taylor. R. Fergus and Y. Lecun, “Convolutional learning of spatio-temporal features,” Eur. Conf on Comput. Vision. Springer-Verlag, 140-153 (2010).

  24. Y. D. Wen, K.P. Zhang and Z.F. Li, “A discriminative feature learning approach for deep face recognition,” Eur. Conf. on Comput. Vision, Springer-Verlag (2016).

  25. L. Rabiner and B. Mang, “An introduction to hidden Markov models,” in IEEE ASSP Mag, 3, 4-16 (1986).

  26. W. Chen, E. Y. Mang, and Y. Zhao, “CNN training algorithm based on Co-studying of multiple classifiers,” Compd. Sci., 43, 9 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. L. Gao, S. Yang, S. Y. Liu and X. W. Li, “Transient stability assessment for power system based on one-dimensional convolutional neural network,”Auto. Electr. Power Syst, 43, 12 (2019).

  28. A. Kanazawa. A. Sharma, and D. Jacobs, "Locally scale-invariant convolutional neural netweek,"NIPS Cont. Deep Learn. Rep. Learn., Montreal Canada (2014).

  29. Y. Kim, “Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification,”EMNLP Conf, 37, 1746-1751 (2014).

  30. X. F. Ji, M. D. Li, W. G Tao, and C. Li, “Twitter emotional analysis based on multi-channel LSTM-CNN model,”J. Langfang Nor. Univ. (Nat. Sci)., 19, 2 (2019).

  31. Y. M. SaMutta, J. Zou and F. Fekri, “Increasing the learning capacity of Esa systems via CNN-HMM models,”IEEE Conf. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61772573. The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Chen.

Additional information

Translated from Khimiya i Tekhnologiya Topliv i Masel, No. 4, pp. 106 —116, July — August, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Chen, M. Oil Pipeline Network Evaluation Based on Multi-Channel Convolution and H-Markov Model with Co-Evolution Mechanism. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 56, 665–681 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-020-01180-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-020-01180-0

keywords

Navigation