Abstract
The error probability of the discrimination of the Standard Model (SM) with massive neutrinos and its new physics (NP) model extension in experiments of the muon neutrino oscillation, following the pion decay \(\pi ^{+} \rightarrow \mu ^{+} + \nu _{\mu }\), is calculated. The stability of the estimation of the NP charged current coupling constant εR is analysed and the robustness of this estimation is checked. It is shown that the upper bound on the error probability of erroneous identification of the Standard Model with its NP model extension has reached the significantly small value of approximately 2.3 × 10− 6.
References
Tanabashi M., et al.: (Particle Data Group): Chapter 14. Neutrino Masses, Mixing, and Oscillations. Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018). and 2019 update
Chakrabortty, J., Gluza, J., Jeliński, T., Srivastava, T.: Theoretical constraints on masses of heavy particles in Left-Right symmetric models. Phys. Lett. B 759, 361–368 (2016)
Quigg, Ch.: Beyond the standard model in many directions. FERMILAB-Conf-04/049-T, arXiv:hep-ph/0404228
Dekens, W., Boer, D.: Viability of minimal left-right models with discrete symmetries. Nucl. Phys. B 889, 727–756 (2014)
Tanabashi, M., et al.: (Particle Data Group): Chapter 10. Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics. Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018). and 2019 update
Siringo, F.: Symmetry breaking of the symmetric left-right model without a scalar bidoublet. Eur. Phys. J. C 32, 555–559 (2004)
Mohapatra, R. N., Pati, J.C.: “Natural” left-right symmetry. Phys. Rev. D 11, 2558–2561 (1975)
Zuber, K.: Neutrino physics. Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2004)
Bergmann, S., Grossman, Y., Nardi, E.: Neutrino propagation in matter with general interactions. Phys. Rev. D 60, 093008 (1999)
del Aguila, F., de Blas, J., Szafron, R., Wudka, J., Zrałek, M.: Evidence for right-handed neutrinos at a neutrino factory. Phys. Lett. B 683, 282–288 (2010)
del Aguila, F., Syska, J., Zrałek, M.: Impact of right-handed interactions on the propagation of Dirac and Majorana neutrinos in matter. Phys. Rev. D 76, 013007 (2007)
Giunti, C., Kim, C. W.: Fundamentals of neutrino physics and astrophysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Ochman, M., Szafron, R., Zrałek, M.: Neutrino production state in oscillation phenomena - are they pure or mixed. J. Phys. G 35, 065003 (2008)
Kuno, Y., Okada, Y.: Muon decay and physics beyond the standard model. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 151–202 (2001)
Syska, J., Zaja̧c, S., Zrałek, M.: Neutrino oscillations in the case of general interaction. Acta Phys. Pol. B 38(11), 3365–3371 (2007)
Halzen, F., Martin, A.D.: Quarks and leptons: An introductory course in modern particle physics, p 264. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (1984)
Fetscher, W.: Helicity of the νμ in π+ decay: A comment on the measurement of Pμξδϱ in muon decay. Phys. Lett. B 140, 117–118 (1984)
Tanabashi, M., et al.: (Particle Data Group). Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018). p.1070, π+ - POLARIZATION OF EMITTED μ+. http://pdglive.lbl.gov/DataBlock.action?node=S008POL
Berman, S.M.: Radiative corrections to pion beta decay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1, 468–469 (1958)
Kinoshita, T.: Radiative corrections to π − e decay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 477–480 (1959)
Marciano, W.J., Sirlin, A.: Radiative corrections to πl2 decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3629–3632 (1993)
Campbell, B.A., Maybury, D.W.: Constraints on scalar couplings from \({\pi }^{\pm } \rightarrow l^{\pm } {\nu }_{l}\). Nucl. Phys. B 709, 419–439 (2005)
Ecker, G., Gasser, J., Pich, A., de Rafael, E.: The role of resonances in chiral perturbation theory. Nucl. Phys. B 321, 311–342 (1989)
Maki, Z., Nakagawa, M., Sakata, S.: Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles. Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870–880 (1962)
Pontecorvo, B.: Neutrino experiments and the problem of conservation of leptonic charge. JETP 26, 984–988 (1968)
Dajka, J., Syska, J., Łuczka, J.: Geometric phase of neutrino propagating through dissipative matter. Phys. Rev. D 83, 097302 (2011)
Jones, B.J.P.: Dynamical pion collapse and the coherence of conventional neutrino beams. Phys. Rev. D 91, 053002 (2015)
Szafron, R., Zrałek, M.: Oscillation of Dirac and Majorana neutrinos from muon decay in the case of a general interaction. Phys. Lett. B 718, 113–116 (2012)
Syska, J., Dajka, J., Łuczka, J.: Interference phenomenon and geometric phase for Dirac neutrino in π+ decay. Phys. Rev. D 87, 117302 (2013)
Syska, J.: Neutrino oscillations in the presence of the crust magnetization. Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 630, 242–245 (2011)
Kim, C.W., Pevsner, A.: Neutrinos in physics and astrophysics. Contemp. Concepts Phys. Vol. 8 Harwood Academic Publishers (1993)
Bekman, B., Gluza, J., Holeczek, J., Syska, J., Zrałek, M.: Matter effects and CP violating neutrino oscillations with non-decoupling heavy neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D 66, 093004 (2002)
del Aguila, F., Syska, J., Zrałek, M.: Neutrino oscillations beyond the Standard Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.2759v1
Tong, D.M., Sjöqvist, E., Kwek, L.C., Oh, C.H.: Kinematic approach to the mixed state geometric phase in nonunitary evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 080405 (2004)
Bengtsson, I., Życzkowski, K.: Geometry of quantum states. An introduction to quantum entanglement, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017). pp. 52, 360, 369, 370, 389 395
Rasmussen, R.W., Lechner, L., Ackermann, M., Kowalski, M., Winter, W.: Astrophysical neutrinos flavored with beyond the standard model physics. Phys. Rev. D 96, 083018 (2017)
Hiai, F., Petz, D.: The proper formula for relative entropy and its asymptotics in quantum probability. Commun. Math. Phys. 143, 99–114 (1991)
Ogawa, T., Nagaoka, H.: Strong converse and Stein’s lemma in quantum hypothesis testing. In: Hayashi, M. (ed.) Asymptotic theory of quantum statistical inference, selected papers. 28-42 Japan Science and Technology Agency & University of Tokyo (2005)
Umegaki, H.: Conditional expectation in an operator algebra. IV. Entropy and information. Ködai Math. Sem. Rep. 14(2), 59–85 (1962)
Lindblad, G.: Entropy, information and quantum measurements. Commun. Math. Phys. 33, 305–322 (1973)
Li, K.: Second-order asymptotics for quantum hypothesis testing. Ann. Statist. 42(1), 171–189 (2014)
Lindblad, G.: Expectations and entropy inequalities for finite quantum systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 39, 111–119 (1974)
Chernoff, H.: A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann. Math. Stat. 23(4), 493–507 (1952)
Hoeffding, W.: Asymptotically optimal tests for multinomial distributions. Ann. Math. Statist. 36(2), 369–401 (1965)
Sanov, I.N.: On the probability of large deviations of random variables. (Russian) Mat. Sbornik N. S. 42 (84), No.1, 11-44 (1957). English translation:, Select. Transl. Mat.. Statist. and Probability 1, 213–244 (1961)
Bengtsson, I., Życzkowski, K.: Geometry of Quantum States. An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement, 2nd edn., p 43 (with 28) 389. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)
Amari, S., Nagaoka, H.: Methods of Information Geometry. Translations of Mathematical Monographs. Vol.191. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)
Braunstein, S.L., Caves, C.M.: Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439–3443 (1994)
Majtey, A.P., Lamberti, P.W., Prato, D.P.: Jensen-Shannon divergence as a measure of distinguishability between mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 72, 052310 (2005)
Adamson, P., et al.: (MINOS Collaboration): Measurement of neutrino and antineutrino oscillations using beam and atmospheric data in MINOS. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 251801 (2013)
Acero, M.A., et al.: (NOvA Collaboration): New constraints on oscillation parameters from νe appearance and νμ disappearance in the NOvA experiment. Phys. Rev. D 98, 032012 (2018)
Abe, K., et al.: (The T2K Collaboration): Updated T2K measurements of muon neutrino and antineutrino disappearance using 1.5 × 1021 protons on target. Phys. Rev. D 96, 011102(R) (2017)
Carroll, T.J.: Muon neutrino disappearance measurement at MINOS+. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 888, 012161 (2017)
Acciarri, R., et al.: (The DUNE Collaboration): Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) conceptual design report. Volume 2: The physics program for DUNE at LBNF. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06148
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by L.J.Ch.. It has been also supported by the Institute of Physics, University of Silesia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: The density matrix at the detection point
Appendix: The density matrix at the detection point
The effective Hamiltonian \({{\mathscr{H}}}\), (5), and neutrino density matrix ρPμ, (3), have the 6 × 6-dimensional matrix representations. The diagonalisation of \({{\mathscr{H}}} \) [11, 31, 32] gives \({{\mathscr{H}}} = \frac {1}{2 E_{\nu }} W \text {diag} (\tilde {m}_{l}^{2}) W^{\dagger }\), where W is the diagonalising unitary matrix defined by the eigenvectors of \(2 E_{\nu } {{\mathscr{H}}}\), and the corresponding real eigenvalues \(\tilde {m}_{l}^{2}\), l = 1,..., 6, are the neutrino effective squared masses. Eν is the neutrino energy, neglecting the mass contribution. W ≡ (Wiλ;l) ≡ (λ〈νi|l〉) defines the transformation from the helicity-mass basis |νi〉λ ≡|p,λ, i〉 to the eigenvector basis |l〉 of \({{\mathscr{H}}}\). For the relativistic neutrino νμ and in the non-dissipative homogeneous medium, from (4) it follows that in |νi〉λ basis the density matrix at the point z = L of νμ detection is [15]:
where T is the time between neutrino production and detection, \({\Delta } E_{ll^{\prime }} \equiv E_{l} - E_{l^{\prime }} = \frac {\Delta \tilde {m}_{ll^{\prime }}^{2}}{2 E_{\nu }} = \frac {\tilde {m}_{l}^{2} - \tilde {m}_{l^{\prime }}^{2}}{2 E_{\nu }}\). The equality \(\varrho _{\text {\textbf {L}}}^{\mu }(\vec {\mathrm {p}}_{\text {\textbf {L}}}) = \varrho ^{\mu }(\vec {\mathrm {p}})\) of the density matrices in the L frame and CM frame is assumed [13]. Because of the W matrix unitarity, the L frame neutrino density matrix at the detection point is normalized, i.e., Tr[ϱμ(t = T)] = 1. Equation (22) is valid in the so-called light-ray approximation T = L [12]. The deviation of T from the relation T = L is experimentally significant if some corrections \(\varepsilon _{ll^{\prime }}\) [12] to the oscillation phases \({\Delta } \phi _{ll^{\prime }} = |{\Delta } E_{ll^{\prime }}| T\) are also significant. As \(\varepsilon _{ll^{\prime }}\) are functions of \({\Delta } \phi _{ll^{\prime }}\), this would require \({\Delta } \phi _{ll^{\prime }} \gg 1\) [12]. However, for the oscillations to be measurable at all, it is necessary that \({\Delta } \phi _{ll^{\prime }} \sim 1\), in which case the corrections \(\varepsilon _{ll^{\prime }}\) to \({\Delta } \phi _{ll^{\prime }}\) can be neglected [12], validating the light-ray approximation.
Finally, using ϱμ(t = T), (22), one can also calculate, e.g., the geometric phase of the μ flavour neutrino state [29] or the cross section \(\sigma _{\mu \rightarrow \beta }\) for the detection of the β flavour neutrino in the L frame [15, 33].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Syska, J. New Physics Right-Chiral CC Coupling Constant Estimation in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Int J Theor Phys 60, 655–666 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04612-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04612-z