Full length article
Lost in transition – Learning analytics on the transfer from knowledge acquisition to knowledge application in complex problem solving

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106594Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Students should be able to transition from knowledge acquisition to its application.

  • Complex problem solving performance can be used to investigate knowledge transition.

  • A great proportion of students fails to engage in successful knowledge transition.

  • Rates of successful knowledge transition vary according to item complexity.

  • Indications that mental models play a key role for successful knowledge transition.

Abstract

Since Complex Problem Solving (CPS) skills represent a key competence for educational success, they are of great relevance for learning analytics. More specifically, CPS serves as a pertinent showcase for addressing a crucial existing gap contemporary education is facing, the gap between students' ability to acquire and subsequently apply knowledge in uncertain situations, which are increasingly important in the 21st century. While the CPS process incorporates both the acquisition and application of knowledge, many earlier studies have focused on identifying the factors relevant for success in knowledge acquisition. Given the dearth of existing research on factors influencing a successful transition between both CPS phases, we investigated the rates of successful and unsuccessful knowledge transition over the course of nine CPS items in a sample of N = 1151 students in 9th grade. Results showed that many participants were unable to transition their knowledge from the acquisition to the application phase, which was presumably due to an inefficient mental model transfer. Furthermore, the likelihood of students being ‘lost in transition’ was higher in more complex items. Implications are discussed in light of learning analytics, and particularly with regard to the factors to be taken into account by future CPS training programs.

Section snippets

Complex problem solving and knowledge transition

One 21st century skill that has received considerable attention in recent educational research is CPS (Greiff et al., 2013; Herde, Wüstenberg, & Greiff, 2016; Schweizer, Wüstenberg, & Greiff, 2013). Complex problem solving can be defined as the ability to solve problems with dynamic, hidden, or intertwined features. Such problems can be encountered on any societal level, from those with global impact such as, for instance, climate change (e.g., Urry, 2008), to individual ones referring to the

Sample characteristics

We analyzed the log files of a large-scale dataset of 9th grade students in Finland.1

RQ1: How many students who solved the knowledge acquisition phase fail in the knowledge application phase?

Our first RQ addresses the question to what extent the problem of being ‘lost in transition’ is generally occurring. Therefore, we analyzed the relative frequencies of students who, after successfully solving the knowledge acquisition phase, did not manage to perform successfully in the knowledge application phase. The results of this analysis can be seen in Fig. 3 below, indicating that, across all nine MicroDYN items, a significant proportion of students fell into this group (previously

Discussion

The overarching aim of this study was twofold. To begin with, we wanted to uncover the magnitude of what we call the ‘lost in transition’ phenomenon, which refers to the case that a participant successfully explores the hidden variable relations in the knowledge acquisition phase, but fails in reaching the predefined target goals in the following knowledge application phase (i.e., Group B as shown in Fig. 2), in the particular showcase of CPS. In addition, we wanted to investigate potential

Conclusion

The primary aim of this study was to uncover the magnitude of the ‘lost in transition’ phenomenon, referring to the case that a participant who successfully acquires knowledge fails to subsequently apply this knowledge, in CPS. In addition, we discussed some potential reasons for why this phenomenon arises. Overall, we can conclude that a significant amount of students experiences being ‘lost in transition’, and that the probability of this phenomenon occurring particularly depends on the

Credit author statement

Björn Nicolay, Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Florian Krieger, Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing, Resources, Visualization. Matthias Stadler, Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing - review & editing. Janice Gobert, Conceptualization, Resources, Writing - review & editing. Samuel Greiff, Conceptualization, Software, Resources, Writing - review & editing,

Declaration of competing interest

Samuel Greiff is one of two authors of the commercially available COMPRO-test that is based on the multiple complex systems approach, which employs the same assessment principle as MicroDYN. He receives royalty fees for COMPRO.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (Luxembourgish National Research Found) [CORE ‘TRIOPS’]. We would like to explicitly thank our Finnish colleagues for the possibility to analyze this large-scale dataset, which is based on Vainikainen (2014).

References (86)

  • S. Greiff et al.

    Sometimes less is more: Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures

    Intelligence

    (2015)
  • S. Greiff et al.

    Computer-generated log file analyses as a window into students' minds?: A showcase study based on the PISA 2012 assessment of problem solving

    Computers & Education

    (2015)
  • D. Kim et al.

    Learning analytics to support self- regulated learning in asynchronous online courses: A case study at a women's university in South Korea

    Computers & Education

    (2018)
  • A. Kluge

    What you train is what you get? Task requirements and training methods in complex problem-solving

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2008)
  • G. Kolfschoten et al.

    Cognitive learning efficiency through the use of design patterns in teaching

    Computers & Education

    (2010)
  • S. Kröner et al.

    Intelligence assessment with computer simulations

    Intelligence

    (2005)
  • N. Nistor et al.

    What types of data are used in learning analytics? An overview of six cases

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2018)
  • J. Rudolph et al.

    Metacognitive confidence judgments and their link to complex problem solving

    Intelligence

    (2017)
  • F. Schweizer et al.

    Validity of the MicroDYN approach: Complex problem solving predicts school grades beyond working memory capacity

    Learning and Individual Differences

    (2013)
  • M. Schwichow et al.

    Teaching the control-of-variables strategy: A meta-analysis

    Developmental Review

    (2016)
  • V. Shute et al.

    Measuring problem solving skills via stealth assessment in an engaging video game

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2016)
  • P. Sonnleitner et al.

    Students' complex problem solving abilities: Their structure and relations to reasoning ability and educational success

    Intelligence

    (2013)
  • M. Stadler et al.

    Easily too difficult: Estimating item difficulty in computer simulated microworlds

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2016)
  • M. Stadler et al.

    Differentiating between static and complex problems: A theoretical framework and its empirical validation

    Intelligence

    (2019)
  • N. Staggers et al.

    Mental models: Concepts for human-computer interaction research

    International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

    (1993)
  • S. Wüstenberg et al.

    Complex problem solving — more than reasoning?

    Intelligence

    (2012)
  • Xi Zhang et al.

    Learning analytics in collaborative learning supported by Slack: From the perspective of engagement

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2019)
  • R. Adams et al.

    Automatic coding procedures for collaborative problem solving

  • J.R. Anderson

    Acquisition of cognitive skill

    Psychological Review

    (1982)
  • J.R. Anderson et al.

    Learning rapid and precise skills

    Psychological Review

    (2019)
  • J.D. Barrett et al.

    Thinking about applications: Effects on mental models and creative problem-solving

    Creativity Research Journal

    (2013)
  • D. Bates et al.

    Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4

    Journal of Statistical Software

    (2015)
  • A. Buchner

    Basic topics and approaches to the study of complex problem solving

  • J. Canas et al.

    Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks

    Ergonomics

    (2003)
  • P. Charland et al.

    Developing and assessing ERP competencies: Basic and complex knowledge

    Journal of Computer Information Systems

    (2016)
  • Z. Chen et al.

    All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy

    Child Development

    (1999)
  • S. Everwijn et al.

    Ability- or competence-based education: Bridging the gap between knowledge acquisition and ability to apply

    Higher Education

    (1993)
  • J. Funke

    Dynamic systems as tools for analysing human judgement

    Thinking & Reasoning

    (2001)
  • J. Funke

    Complex problem solving

  • J.D. Gobert et al.

    Operationalizing and detecting disengagement within online science microworlds

    Educational Psychologist

    (2015)
  • J.D. Gobert et al.

    From log files to assessment metrics: Measuring students' science inquiry skills using educational data mining

    The Journal of the Learning Sciences

    (2013)
  • S.P. Gott et al.

    Problem solving in technical domains: How mental models and metacognition affect performance

    Instruction: Theoretical and applied perspectives

    (1991)
  • A.C. Graesser et al.

    Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving

    Psychological Science in the Public Interest

    (2018)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Focusing on eigendynamic effects promotes students’ performance in complex problem solving: A log-file analysis of strategic behavior

      2022, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      This pattern of findings suggests that more intelligent (compared to less intelligent) students achieved higher CPS performance scores in the second CPS phase by adequately identifying eigendynamics (first comparison), but regardless of whether they applied the strategic behavior to identify eigendynamic effects early or not (second comparison). Possibly, the strategic behavior to adequately identify eigendynamics and integrate the gained information in the first CPS phase helped more intelligent students to transfer their knowledge acquired in the first CPS phase to the second CPS phase: a process at which surprisingly many students fail (Nicolay et al., 2021). An explanation for the non-significant mediation effect of the second comparison could be that the strategic behavior to identify eigendynamic effects early might be too distant to the second CPS phase to mediate the intelligence-CPS relationship in this CPS phase.

    • How we explore, interpret, and solve complex problems: A cross-national study of problem-solving processes

      2022, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sentences which were subject to different interpretations were further discussed among the researchers and translators. The CPS approach and the CPS tasks have been employed extensively at both the national and international levels (see Csapó and Funke, 2017; Eichmann et al., 2020; Greiff et al., 2013b; Greiff et al., 2015b; Mustafic et al., 2019; Nicolay et al., 2021; OECD, 2014a). The psychometric indices of the test proved to be good, independent of the cultures and nations (see Wüstenberg et al., 2014; Wu and Molnár, 2021).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by a grant from the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (Luxembourgish National Research Found) [CORE ‘TRIOPS’].

    View full text