Skip to main content
Log in

A new permeability predictive model based on NMR data for sandstone reservoirs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predicting permeability from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging data using SDR model and Coates model provides a quick and relatively reasonable value for reservoir permeability estimate. Critical to these two models is to find contributions of different level of pore structure to permeability, but pore structure in them is only divided into two levels. In this study, T2 distribution is divided into several segments corresponding to different level of pore structure, and every segment has its weighted characteristic value. By this way, we have considered contributions of more different level of pore structure to permeability and established a new permeability model. It has been tested in dozens of core samples. Compared with results of Coates model and SDR model, the new NMR model result is more consistent with the air permeability. So, we provide an improved permeability estimate for low permeability and tight sandstone reservoir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althaus Stacey M, Chen Jin-Hong, Zhang Jilin (2017) Permeability estimation of a Middle-East tight gas sand with NMR data. URTEC-2669857-MS Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 24-26 July, Austin, Texas, USA, 2017

  • Amyx JW, Bass DW Jr, Whiting RL (1960) Petroleum reservoir engineering. Mc Graw Hill Publ. Co., New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman PC (1956) Flow of gases through porous media. Academic Press Inc., Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates GR, Peveraro RCA, Hardwick A, Roberts D (1991) The magnetic resonance imaging log characterized by comparison with petrophysical properties and laboratory core data, paper 22723, proceedings of the society of petroleum engineers 66th annual technical conference and exhibition.

  • Coates GR, Xiao L, Prammer MG (1999) NMR logging: principles and applications. Haliburton Energy Services, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastidar R, Sondergeld CH, Rai CS (2007) An improved empirical permeability estimator from mercury injection for tight clastic rocks. Petrophysics 48(3):186–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlubac Katherine, Knight Rosemary (2010) An assessment of the use of the Kozeny-Carman Relationship to estimate permeability in anisotropic materials from NMR data. SEG Annual Meeting, 17-22 October, Denver, Colorado, 2010

  • Granberry RJ and Keelan DK (1977) Critical water estimates for gulf coast sands, transactions gulf coast association of geological societies, 63–66

  • Hearst JR, Nelson PH (1985) Well Logging for Physical Properties. Mc Graw Hill Publ. Co., New York, NY

  • Hiller T, Klitzsch N (2018) Joint inversion of nuclear magnetic resonance data from partially saturated rocks using a triangular pore model. Geophysics 83(4):JM15–JM28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huet CC (2005) A modified Purcell/Burdine model for estimating absolute permeability from mercury-injection capillary pressure data, IPTC 10994, the International Technology Conference held in Doha Qatar, 21-23 November, 2005

  • Katz AJ, Thompson AH (1986) Quantitative prediction of permeability in porous rock. Phys Rev B 34(11):8179–8181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon WE (1997) Petrophysical principles of application of NMR logging, the log analyst 38(2):21-43

  • Kenyon WE, Day PI, Straley C, Willemsen JF (1988) A three-part study of nmr longitudinal relaxation properties of watersaturated sandstones. SPE Form Eval 3(3):622–636

  • Latour LL, Kleinberg RL, Mitra PP (1995) Pore-size distributions and tortuosity in heterogeneous porous media. J Magn Reson Ser A 112:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Kang Y, Haghighi M (2018) Investigation of pore size distributions of coals with different structures by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Measurement 116:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PH (2005) Permeability, porosity, and pore-throat size–a three-dimensional perspective. Petrophysics 48(3):186–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson MS (1983) The equivalent channel model for permeability and resistivity in fluid-saturated rock — a re-appraisal. Mech Mater 2:345–352

  • Philip HN (1994) Permeability-porosity relationships in sedimentary rocks. Log Anal 1994:38–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell WR (1949) CApillary pressures - their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefroM. SPE 949039-G, February, 1949

  • Romero Pedro, Salvador BA (2004) Method for characterization of rock quality based on Winland-Pittman and Timus-Coates equations applied to NMR laboratory data. SPWLA 45th Annual Logging Symposium, June 6-9, 2004

  • Salah Ahmed (2012) The impact of pore geometry aspects on porosity-permeability relationship - a critical review to evaluate NMR estimated permeability. SPE150887, the North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Cairo, Egypt, 20-22, February 2012

  • Sigal R (2002) Coates and SDR permeability: two variations on the same theme. Petrophysics 43(1):38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Susilo Agus (2010) Permeability prediction based on capillary model. SPE 141122-STU, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Florence, Italy, 19-22 September 2010

  • Swanson BF (1981) A simple correlation between permeabilities and mercury capillary pressures, SPE 8234-PA, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, 1981

  • Tariq Syed M, Denoo Stan, Cordes Mo (1997) Permeability estimation from modern NMR logging measurements: experiences and applications in the rocky mountain area. SPE-38378-MS, 2017

  • Timur A (1968) An investigation of permeability, porosity, and residual water saturation relationships for sandstone reservoirs. Log Anal 9(4):8–17

  • Volokitin Yakov, Looyestijin Wim, Slijkerman Walter (1999) Constructing capillary pressure curves from nmr log data in the presence of hydrocarbons. SPWLA 40th Annual Logging Symposium, May 30-June 3, 1999

  • Wall CG (1965) Permeability: pore size distribution correlations. J Inst Petrol 51:498

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh JB, Brace WF (1984) The Effect of Pressure on Porosity and the Transport Properties of Rock. J Geophys Res 89(11):9425–9431

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Petrochina for allowing us to publish the study. We would like to thank Changqing Oilfield for providing us core samples.

Funding

This work was supported by the Petrochina scientific research project: Far detecting acoustic logging processing method & Joint inversion research of dielectric scanner logging and NMR logging (No: kt2018-10-07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongjun Xu.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Liang Xiao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, H., Li, C., Fan, Y. et al. A new permeability predictive model based on NMR data for sandstone reservoirs. Arab J Geosci 13, 1085 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06055-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06055-6

Keywords

Navigation