Skip to main content
Log in

Geotechnical Properties and Stabilization of Well-graded Sand with Clay and Gravel Soils Contaminated with Gasoline

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the search for alternatives to bioremediation of soils, this research aimed to analyze the effects of lime, cement, and asphalt as stabilizers on clayey gravel and sand soil contaminated with gasoline in the laboratory. Concentrations of 10–20% of lime, cement, and asphalt were added to the soil. A standard sample was chosen to compare the results obtained in the modified Proctor compaction, California bearing ratio (CBR), direct shear, and consolidation tests. It was found that the presence of more than 10% liquid low–density hydrocarbon affects plasticity, void ratio, friction angle, moisture content, dry density, and cohesion. According to the tests carried out, soils contaminated with concentrations lower than 10% of gasoline are recommended to construct the subgrade and sub-base layers in pavements. Finally, it was found that cement is the stabilizer that presented overall higher enhancements of the mechanical properties of the clayey gravel and sand soil among the three stabilizers. However, the results also show that depending on the soil use and specific parameter requirements, other stabilizers can be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO. (2008). T 193, T 236, standard method of test for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO): Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • AASHTO. (2013). T 193, standard method of test for the California bearing ratio. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO): Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • AASHTO (2018). T 180, standard method of test for moisture-density relations of soils using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop, Washington: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).

  • Ahmed, H.R., Abduljauwad, S.N., Akram, T. (2007). Geotechnical behavior of oil-contaminated fine-grained soils. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12(A). http://www.ejge.com/2007/Ppr0720/Ppr0720.htm

  • Alhassan, H. M., & Fagge, S. A. (2013). Effects of crude oil, low point pour fuel oil and vacuum gas oil contamination on the geotechnical properties sand, clay and laterite soils. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(1), 1947–1954 https://www.ijera.com/papers/Vol3_issue1/EQ31941949.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos, C.A. (2015). Strength properties of an epoxy resin and cement-stabilized silty clay soil. Applied Clay Science, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.07.007.

  • ASTM (2011). D3080/D3080M-11 standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions, West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, https://doi.org/10.1520/D3080_D3080M-11.

  • ASTM (2012). D1557-12e1 standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)), West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) international, https://doi.org/10.1520/D1557-12E01.

  • ASTM (2016). D1883-16 standard test method for California bearing ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils, West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, https://doi.org/10.1520/D1883-16.

  • Dafalla, M.A. (2013). Effects of clay and moisture content on direct shear tests for clay-sand mixtures. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/562726.

  • Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Wendroth, O., Jarvis, N., Oostindie, K., Pohl, W., Larsson, M., Gaudet, J.P. (1999). Moisture distributions and wetting rates of soils at experimental fields in the Netherlands, France, Sweden and Germany. Journal of Hydrology, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00258-3.

  • Echeverri-Ramírez, Ó., Valencia-González, Y., Toscano-Patiño, D.E., Ordoñez-Muñoz, F.A., Arango-Salas, C., Osorio-Torres, S.A. (2015). Geotechnical behavior of a tropical residual soil contaminated with gasoline. DYNA, https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n190.42161

  • Galindo-Ortiz, N.J., Rueda, C.A. (2012). Mechanical characterization of clay soils affected by superficial hydrocarbon spills in concentration by weight percentage: 5,10, 15 and 30. Dissertation, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Bucaramanga, Colombia. https://repository.upb.edu.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.11912/2190/digital_23999.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 27 May 2020.

  • Ghasabkolaei, N., Janalizadeh Choobbasti, A., Roshan, N., Ghasemi, S.E. (2017). Geotechnical properties of the soils modified with nanomaterials: a comprehensive review. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.01.010.

  • Gill, J.C., Malamud, B.D. (2014). Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Reviews of Geophysics, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000445.

  • Hassan, H.F., Taha, R., Al Rawas, A., Al Shandoudi, B., Al Gheithi, K., Al Barami, A.M. (2005). Potential uses of petroleum-contaminated soil in highway construction. Construction and Building Materials, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.001.

  • Keramatikerman, M., Chegenizadeh, A., Nikraz, H. (2018). Effect of slag on restoration mechanical characteristics of ethanol gasoline-contaminated clay. Journal of Environmental Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001386.

  • Kermani, M., Ebadi, T. (2012). The effect of oil contamination on the geotechnical properties of fine-grained soils. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal, https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2012.672486.

  • Khajeh, A., Jamshidi Chenari, R., Payan, M. (2020) A simple review of cemented non-conventional Materials: Soil Composites. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01090-x.

  • Khamehchiyan, M., Hossein Charkhabi, A., Tajik, M. (2007). Effects of crude oil contamination on geotechnical properties of clayey and sandy soils. Engineering Geology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.10.009.

  • Khan, S.A., Tan, S.J., Rahman, E.K.A., Muneerah, D.N. (2014). Effect of hydrocarbon contamination and subsequent remedial treatment on the engineering properties of soil. Proceedings IET Conference Publications, https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2014.1065.

  • Nazari Heris, M., Aghajani, S., Hajialilue-Bonab, M., Vafaei Molamahmood, H. (2020). Effects of lead and gasoline contamination on geotechnical properties of clayey soils. Soil and Sediment Contamination, https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2020.1719973.

  • Nazir, A.K. (2011). Effect of motor oil contamination on geotechnical properties of over consolidated clay. Alexandria Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2011.05.002.

  • Núñez-Rojas, D. (2011). Choice and dosage of binders in soil stabilization. “Elección y Dosificación del Conglomerante en Estabilización de Suelos”. Dissertation, Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora, Obregon, Mexico.

  • Rajabi, H., Sharifipour, M. (2019). Geotechnical properties of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: a comprehensive review. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1343-1.

  • Roy, S., Bhalla, S.K. (2017). Role of geotechnical properties of soil on civil engineering structures. Resources and Environment, https://doi.org/10.5923/j.re.20170704.03.

  • Silvestri, V., Mikhail, N., Souli, M. (1997). Permeability response of oil-contaminated compacted clays. In M. Wasemiller and K. Hoddinott (Ed.) Testing soil mixed with waste or recycled materials (pp. 62–75), https://doi.org/10.1520/STP15643S.

  • Sinha, P., Iyer, K.K.R. (2020). Effect of stabilization on characteristics of subgrade soil: a review. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_54.

  • Vaz, C.M.P., Hopmans, J.W. (2001). Soil physics simultaneous measurement of soil penetration resistance and water content with a combined penetrometer-TDR moisture probe. Soil Science Society of America Journal, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6514.

  • Wicander, R., & Monroe, J. (2005). Essentials of geology (fourth ed.). Richmond: Brooks Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, R. N., Nakano, M., & Pusch, R. (2012). Environmental soil properties and behavior (first ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the University of Cartagena, the Colombian Administrative Department of Science, Technology, and Innovation (COLCIENCIAS, for its acronym in Spanish), and Ryerson University is appreciated. Authors also acknowledge the collaboration given by Carolina Figueroa-Suarez and Ariel Aguilar-Velez during the acquisition of the field and experimental data for the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciro Bustillo-Lecompte.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quiñones-Bolaños, E., Bustillo-Lecompte, C. Geotechnical Properties and Stabilization of Well-graded Sand with Clay and Gravel Soils Contaminated with Gasoline. Water Air Soil Pollut 231, 523 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04898-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04898-z

Keywords

Navigation