Abstract
In this work, we compare methods for the sequential determination of U and the transuranium elements Np, Pu, Am, and Cm. The chemical yield, the time spent in the analysis, the amount of secondary waste, and the costs of each method are the aspects of interest. Two methods were compared: extraction chromatography (EC) and ion exchange plus extraction chromatography (IE + EC). The chemical yields of (EC) and (IE + EC) were similar for all radionuclides. The (EC) method is the more effective with respect to time of analysis, the amount of secondary waste and costs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
IAEA (2009). Determination and use of scaling factors for waste characterization in nuclear power plants. IAEA, Vienna (No. NW-T-1.18)
Das N (2010) Recovery of precious metals through biosorption—a review. Hydrometallurgy 103:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.03.016
Won SW, Kotte P, Wei W et al (2014) Biosorbents for recovery of precious metals. Bioresour Technol 160:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.121
Dutta S, Sharma RK (2019) Sustainable magnetically retrievable nanoadsorbents for selective removal of heavy metal ions from different charged wastewaters. Sep Sci Technol 11:371–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815730-5.00015-6
Ojovan MI, Lee WE, Kalmykov SN (2014) An introduction to nuclear waste immobilisation. Elsevier, New York
Houck MM, Siegel JA, Houck MM, Siegel JA (2015) Fires and explosions. Fundam Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800037-3.00018-2
Trojanowicz M, Kołacińska K, Grate JW (2018) A review of flow analysis methods for determination of radionuclides in nuclear wastes and nuclear reactor coolants. Talanta 183:70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.050
Kołacińska K, Trojanowicz M (2014) Application of flow analysis in determination of selected radionuclides. Talanta 125:131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.02.057
Fajardo Y, Avivar J, Ferrer L et al (2010) Automation of radiochemical analysis by applying flow techniques to environmental samples. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 29:1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2010.07.018
Chakravarty R, Chakraborty S, Jadhav S, Dash A (2019) Facile radiochemical separation of clinical-grade 90Y from 90Sr by selective precipitation for targeted radionuclide therapy. Nucl Med Biol 68–69:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2019.01.002
Valdovinos HF, Hernandez R, Graves S et al (2017) Cyclotron production and radiochemical separation of 55Co and 58mCo from 54Fe, 58Ni and 57Fe targets. Appl Radiat Isot 130:90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.09.005
Horwitz EP, Dietz ML, Chiarizia R et al (1995) Separation and preconcentration of actinides by extraction chromatography using a supported liquid anion exchanger: application to the characterization of high-level nuclear waste solutions. Anal Chim Acta 310:63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(95)00144-O
Korkisch J (2013) Modern methods for the separation of rarer metal ions. Elsevier, New York
Kastner GF, Ferreira AV, Miraglia FG et al (2010) 235U and 238U determination in low and medium activity wastes from Nuclear Power Plants. Rev Bras Ciências Ambient 286:1–5 (in Portuguese)
Osváth S, Vajda N, Molnár Z et al (2010) Determination of 237Np, 93Zr and other long-lived radionuclides in medium and low level radioactive waste samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286:675–680
Shimada A, Haraga T, Hoshi A et al (2010) Analysis of Th, U, Pu, and Am in radioactive metal waste using extraction chromatography. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286:765–770
Desideri D, Feduzi L, Meli MA, Roselli C (2011) Sequential determination of Am, Cm, Pu, Np and U by extraction chromatography. Microchem J 97:264–268
Dulanská S, Remenec B, Mátel L, Durkot E (2012) Rapid determination of 239,240Pu, 238Pu, 241Am and 90Sr in radioactive waste using combined SPE sorbents AnaLig® Pu02, AnaLig® Sr01 and TRU® resin. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 293:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1727-9
MacSik Z, Groska J, Vajda N et al (2013) Improved radioanalytical method for the simultaneous determination of Th, U, Np, Pu and Am(Cm on a single TRU column by alpha spectrometry and ICP-MS. Radiochim Acta 101:241–251. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2013.2025
Faye SA, Richards JM, Gallardo AM et al (2017) Development of a standardized sequential extraction protocol for simultaneous extraction of multiple actinide elements. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 312:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5188-z
Luo M, Xing S, Yang Y et al (2018) Sequential analyses of actinides in large-size soil and sediment samples with total sample dissolution. J Environ Radioact 187:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.01.028
Lowenthal MD (1997) Radioactive-waste classification in the United States: history and current predicaments. Lawrence Livermore National Lab (LLNL), Livermore
Satorious MA (2015) Historical and current issues related to disposal of greater-than-class c low-level radioactive waste. 1–11. Policy Issue. SECY-15-0094
Rodriguez M, Gascón JL, Suárez JA (1997) Study of the interferences in the determination of Pu, Am and Cm in radioactive waste by extraction chromatography. Talanta 45:181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(97)00118-5
ASTM (2016) Standard Guide for Determination of plutonium and neptunium in uranium hexafluoride and U-rich matrix by alpha spectrometry 1. 1–4. ASTM C1561 – 10
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (1991) Intercomparison of radionuclide measurements in marine sediment sample IAEA-368. Marine Environment Laboratory
Ribani M, Bottoli CBG, Collins CH et al (2004) Validation in chromatographic and electrophoretic methods. Quim Nova 27:771–780 (in Portuguese)
Ribeiro FAdeL, Ferreira MMC, Morano SC et al (2008) Validation worksheet: a new tool to estimate figures of merit in the validation of univariate analytical methods. Quim Nova 31:164–171 (in Portuguese)
Taddei MHT, Vicente R, Marumo JT et al (2013) Determination of long-lived radionuclides in radioactive wastes from the IEA-R1 nuclear research reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 295:951–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1865-0
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the National Nuclear Energy Commission/Nuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN/CNEN-SP) for an institutional grant. The authors also thank: Laboratório de Poços de Caldas – LAPOC/CNEN-MG for allowing its use during some steps of the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geraldo, B., de Araujo, L.G., Vicente, R. et al. Radioanalytical methods for sequential analysis of actinide isotopes in activated carbon filter-bed waste. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 326, 1559–1568 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07435-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07435-8