Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Thermodynamic and kinetic study of NO reduction by pyridine/pyrrole during biomass tar reburning: the quantum chemical method approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

NOx emission is a serious problem during fossil fuel combustion. Novel reburning fuels, namely, nitrogen-containing tar compounds, including pyridine and pyrrole were taken into consideration for NO reduction and investigated by quantum chemical method. Theoretical calculation results show that pyridine could first decompose into small species, such as CN and hydrocarbon radicals, then reduce NO to N2. The decomposition of pyridine should overcome quite high energy barrier and adsorb a large amount of heat. This pathway may occur at high temperature zone, such as core flame zone of pulverized coal fired boiler. As soon as pyridine decomposes, the active intermediates (CN radical, etc.) could reduce NO very quickly. The direct reduction of NO by pyridine molecule should overcome lower energy barrier, which could occur at wider temperature range. Pyrrole is less thermostable than pyridine; the energy barriers of pyrrole cracking and direct reduction of NO stay at same level. Therefore, the reburning efficiency of pyrrole may be better at lower temperature than pyridine. Theoretical calculations indicate that nitrogen-containing tar compounds produced during biomass pyrolysis/gasification could have good performance for NO reduction in pulverized coal fired boiler as well as biomass or MSW furnace.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wendt JO, Sternling C, Matovich M (1973) In Reduction of sulfur trioxide and nitrogen oxides by secondary fuel injection, Symposium (International) on Combustion. Elsevier: pp. 897–904

  2. Smoot LD, Hill S, Xu H (1998) NOx control through reburning. Prog Energy Combust Sci 24(5):385–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Patry M, Engel G (1950) Formation of HCN by the action of nitric oxide on methane at atmospheric pressure, 1. General conditions of formation. Compt Rend 231:1302–1304

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harding NS, Adams BR (2000) Biomass as a reburning fuel: a specialized cofiring application. Biomass Bioenergy 19(6):429–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams B, Harding N (1998) Reburning using biomass for NOx control. Fuel Process Technol 54(1–3):249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhuang H, Niu Y, Gong Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Hui S (2017) Influence of biomass Reburning on NO x reductions during pulverized coal combustion. Energy Fuel 31(5):5597–5602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baxter LL (1993) Ash deposition during biomass and coal combustion: a mechanistic approach. Biomass Bioenergy 4(2):85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duan J, Luo Y-H, Yan N-Q, Chen Y (2007) Effect of biomass gasification tar on NO reduction by biogas reburning. Energy Fuel 21(3):1511–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blander M (1999) Biomass gasification as a means for avoiding fouling and corrosion during combustion. J Mol Liq 83(1–3):323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Han Z, Zeng X, Yao C, Wang Y, Xu G (2016) Comparison of direct combustion in a circulating fluidized bed system and decoupling combustion in a dual fluidized bed system for distilled spirit lees. Energy Fuel 30(3):1693–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dagaut P, Luche J, Cathonnet M (2000) The kinetics of C1 to C4 hydrocarbons/NO interactions in relation with reburning. Proc Combust Inst 28(2):2459–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Etzkorn T, Muris S, Wolfrum J, Dembny C, Bockhorn H, Nelson P, Attia-Shahin A, Warnatz J (1992) In Destruction and formation of NO in low pressure stoichiometric CH4/O2 flames, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1992, Elsevier, pp. 925–932

  13. Bilbao R, Alzueta MU, Millera A, Prada L (1997) Dilution and stoichiometry effects on gas reburning: an experimental study. Ind Eng Chem Res 36(6):2440–2444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bilbao R, Alzueta MU, Millera A (1995) Experimental study of the influence of the operating variables on natural gas reburning efficiency. Ind Eng Chem Res 34(12):4531–4539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bilbao R, Millera A, Alzueta MU, Prada L (1997) Evaluation of the use of different hydrocarbon fuels for gas reburning. Fuel 76(14–15):1401–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dagaut P, Lecomte F (2003) Experiments and kinetic modeling study of NO-reburning by gases from biomass pyrolysis in a JSR. Energy Fuel 17(3):608–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dagaut P, Lecomte F, Chevailler S, Cathonnet M (1999) Experimental and kinetic modeling of nitric oxide reduction by acetylene in an atmospheric pressure jet-stirred reactor. Fuel 78(11):1245–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dagaut P, Lecomte F, Chevailler S, Cathonnet M (1999) The reduction of NO by ethylene in a jet-stirred reactor at 1 atm: experimental and kinetic modelling. Combust Flame 119(4):494–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dagaut P, Luche J, Cathonnet M (2001) Reduction of NO by propane in a JSR at 1 atm: experimental and kinetic modeling. Fuel 80(7):979–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Evans RJ, Milne TA (1997) Chemistry of tar formation and maturation in the thermochemical conversion of biomass. In: Developments in thermochemical biomass conversion. Springer, pp 803–816

  21. Wu Y, Yin W, Yang S, Chang-bin Y, Yue-jin L, Guang-wen X (2013) NO reduction characteristics of biomass pyrolysis products in a drop-tube reactor. Chin J Process Eng 2

  22. Bae SW, Roh SA, Kim SD (2006) NO removal by reducing agents and additives in the selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) process. Chemosphere 65(1):170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sendt K, Bacskay GB, Mackie JC (2000) Pyrolysis of furan: Ab initio quantum chemical and kinetic modeling studies. J Phys Chem A 104(9):1861–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu C-y, Yin R-h, Zhang R-z, Luo Y-h (2012) Experimental and kinetic study of NOx reduction by reburning using syngas from updraft biomass gasification with phenol as a model compound for tar. Energy Fuel 26(6):3739–3746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bunman Y, Do H-S, Zeng X, Han Z, Gao S, Xu G (2018) NO reduction by different tar agents and model compounds in a drop-tube reactor. Fuel Process Technol 172:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller JA (1996) Theory and modeling in combustion chemistry. Sandia National Labs. Albuquerque, NM (United States)

  27. Haworth NL, Mackie JC, Bacskay GB (2003) An ab initio quantum chemical and kinetic study of the NNH+ O reaction potential energy surface: how important is this route to NO in combustion? J Phys Chem A 107(35):6792–6803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Montoya A, Truong TN, Sarofim AF (2000) Application of density functional theory to the study of the reaction of NO with char-bound nitrogen during combustion. J Phys Chem A 104(36):8409–8417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang H, Liu J, Liu J, Luo L, Jiang X (2018) DFT study on the alternative NH3 formation path and its functional group effect. Fuel 214:108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Becidan M, Skreiberg Ø, Hustad JE (2007) NO x and N2O precursors (NH3 and HCN) in pyrolysis of biomass residues. Energy Fuel 21(2):1173–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen H, Wang Y, Xu G, Yoshikawa K (2012) Fuel-N evolution during the pyrolysis of industrial biomass wastes with high nitrogen content. Energies 5(12):5418–5438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu X, Yang S, Wang L, Liu Y, Qian F, Yao W, Zhang S, Chen J (2016) Tracking the conversion of nitrogen during pyrolysis of antibiotic mycelial fermentation residues using XPS and TG-FTIR-MS technology. Environ Pollut 211:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhan H, Zhuang X, Song Y, Yin X, Wu C (2018) Insights into the evolution of fuel-N to NOx precursors during pyrolysis of N-rich nonlignocellulosic biomass. Appl Energy 219:20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu Q, Brage C, Chen G, Sjöström K (2007) The fate of fuel-nitrogen during gasification of biomass in a pressurised fluidised bed gasifier. Fuel 86(4):611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ping-ge D, Zhang L-g, Cheng-cheng J (2012) The influence of pyrolysis temperature on the component of biomass pyrolytic tar. Renew Energy Resour 5

  36. Zhang X, Zhou Z, Zhou J, Jiang S, Liu J, Cen K (2011) Analysis of the reaction between O2 and nitrogen-containing char using the density functional theory. Energy Fuel 25(2):670–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao T, Song W, Fan C, Li S, Glarborg P, Yao X (2018) Density functional theory study of the role of an carbon–oxygen single bond group in the NO–char reaction. Energy Fuel 32(7):7734–7744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang X, Zhou Z, Zhou J, Liu J, Cen K (2012) Density functional study of NO desorption from oxidation of nitrogen containing char by O2. Combust Sci Technol 184(4):445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98(7):5648–5652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Becke AD (1992) Density-functional thermochemistry. I. the effect of the exchange-only gradient correction. J Chem Phys 96(3):2155–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Becke AD (1992) Density-functional thermochemistry. II. The effect of the Perdew–Wang generalized-gradient correlation correction. J Chem Phys 97(12):9173–9177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Patterson JM, Tsamasfyros A, Smith WT Jr (1968) Pyrolysis of pyrrole. J Heterocyclic Chem 5(5):727–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lifshitz A, Tamburu C, Suslensky A (1989) Isomerization and decomposition of pyrrole at elevated temperatures: studies with a single-pulse shock tube. J Phys Chem 93(15):5802–5808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Houser TJ, McCarville ME, Biftu T (1980) Kinetics of the thermal decomposition of pyridine in a flow system. Int J Chem Kinet 12(8):555–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mackie JC, Colket MB, Nelson PF (1990) Shock tube pyrolysis of pyridine. J Phys Chem 94(10):4099–4106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Memon H, Bartle K, Taylor J, Williams A (2000) The shock tube pyrolysis of pyridine. Int J Energy Res 24(13):1141–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mackie JC, Colket MB III, Nelson PF, Esler M (1991) Shock tube pyrolysis of pyrrole and kinetic modeling. Int J Chem Kinet 23(8):733–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Axworthy AE, Dayan VH, Martin GB (1978) Reactions of fuel-nitrogen compounds under conditions of inert pyrolysis. Fuel 57(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mulvihill JN, Phillips LF (1975) In Breakdown of cyanogen in fuel-rich H2/N2/O2 flames, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1975. Elsevier, pp. 1113–1122

  50. Martoprawiro M, Bacskay GB, Mackie JC (1999) Ab initio quantum chemical and kinetic modeling study of the pyrolysis kinetics of pyrrole. J Phys Chem A 103(20):3923–3934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dagaut P, Lecomte F, Chevailler S, Cathonnet M (2000) The oxidation of HCN and reactions with nitric oxide: experimental and detailed kinetic modeling. Combust Sci Technol 155(1):105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Li Y, Li Y, Wang P, Hu W, Zhang S, Shi Q, Zhan S (2017) Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over MnFeOx nanorods. Chem Eng J 330:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Halbgewachs MJ, Diau EWG, Mebel AM, Lin MC, Melius CF (1996) Thermal reduction of NO by NH3: Kinetic modeling of the NH2+NO product branching ratio. Symp Combust 26(2):2109–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Science Foundation of Nanjing Institute of Technology (YKJ201813).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China

    Shanhui Zhao, Linghai Chen, Xiaolong Bi & Wanjun Xu

  2. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Shanhui Zhao

Authors
  1. Shanhui Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linghai Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaolong Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wanjun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanhui Zhao.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, S., Chen, L., Bi, X. et al. Thermodynamic and kinetic study of NO reduction by pyridine/pyrrole during biomass tar reburning: the quantum chemical method approach. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 5937–5946 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01036-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01036-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation