Skip to main content
Log in

75 Years of EPR. EPR Milestones in 60 Years Bruker History

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Magnetic Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After the discovery of EPR by E.K. Zavoiski 1944 in Kazan (E.K. Zavoiski Zhurn Eksperimentalnoi i teoreticheskoi fiziki 15:344, 1945; E.K. Zavoiski J Phys USSR 9:211–245, 1945) EPR spectrometers were home-built and mostly dedicated to a special application. But commercial instruments in the contrary must be universal and cover a broad range of methods and applications. Therefore they should be compatible with any valuable accessory and offer optimal sensitivity and resolution and they should be easily convertible to other frequency bands and new methods of investigation. The sensitivity of the EPR has increased in consecutive steps, from a S/N of 200 for the week pitch in 1970 up to 3000 with a new microwave source and a new super high Q cavity (SHQE). So far all the main requirements for a universal cw-EPR spectrometer for scientific applications have been met successfully. In 1987 with the ESP380 the first commercial pulse EPR spectrometer was introduced. This was no more an improvement of the previous EPR, this was a revolution in EPR instrumentation. Some necessary microwave-components were not available on the market and had to be developed and produced by the company itself. To cope with the extremely short relaxation times, necessitating high bandwidths, a new range of resonators had to be developed. In cooperation with the Eaton-group Bruker has introduced a rapid scan accessory for the ELEXSYS spectrometers increasing sensitivity for almost two orders of magnitude. The rapid scan may also give new possibilities for EPR imaging in the much less sensitive S- and L-bands for biomedical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.K. Zavoiski, Zh Eksp, Teor. Fiz. 15, 344 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.K. Zavoiski, J. Phys. USSR 9, 211–245 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Laukien, in Handbuch der Physik, ed. by S. Flügge (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1958), pp. 120–376

  4. G.R. Eaton, S.S. Eaton, K.M. Salikhov (eds.), Foundations of Modern EPR (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd, Singapore, 1998) pp. 717–730  

  5. P. Höfer, A. Grupp, H. Nebenführ, M. Mehring, Chem. Phys. Lett. 132, 3–12 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Schmalbein, A. Witte, R. Roder, G. Laukien, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 43, 1664 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. K.P. Dinse, R. Biehl, K. Möbius, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 4335 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.B. Barnes, G. De Paepe, P.C.A. van der Wel, K.-N. Hu, C.-C. Joo, V.S. Bahai, M.L. Mak-Jurkauskas, J.A. Sirigiri, J.H. Herzfeld, R.T. Temkin, R.G. Griffith, Appl. Magn. Reson. 34, 237 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R.R. Ernst, W.A. Anderson, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 37, 93 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R.R. Ernst, G. Bodenhausen, A. Wokaun, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.J. Blume, Phys. Rev. 109, 1867 (1958)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. W.B. Mims, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 283, 1395–1452 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  13. E.R. Davies, Phys. Lett. 47, 1 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C.P. Keijzers, E.J. Reijerse, J. Schmidt (eds.), Pulsed EPR: a New Field of Applications (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Kevan, M.K. Bowman (eds.), Modern Pulsed and Continuous-Wave Electron Spin Resonance (Wiley, New York, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Schweiger, G. Jeschke, Principles of Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.A. Dikanov, Y.D. Tsvetkov, Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation (ESEEM) Spectroscopy (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Thomann, M. Bernardo, Chem. Phys. Lett. 169, 5–11 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y.D. Tsvetkov, A.D. Milov, A.G. Maryasov, Russ. Chem. Rev. 77, 6 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P.C. Lauterbur, Nature 242, 190 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Kumar, D. Welti, R.R. Ernst, J. Magn. Reson. 18, 69 (1975)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. H.G. Fujii, H. Sato-Akaba, M.C. Emoto, K. Itoh, Y. Ishihara, H. Hirata, Magn. Reson. Imaging 31, 130 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Liu, G.S. Timmins, H. Shim, C.M. Gasprovich, K.J. Liu, NMR Biomed. 17, 327 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Q. Godechal, G. Ghanem, M. Cook, B. Gallez, Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 21, 1988 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Vanea, N. Charlier, J. DeWever, M. Dinguizli, O. Feron, J. Baurain, B. Gallez, NMR Biomed. 21, 296 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1961)

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Dadok, R.F. Sprecher, J. Magn. Reson. 13, 243 (1974)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. G.R. Eaton, S.S. Eaton, EPR Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Methods (John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, 2018), pp. 503–520

    Google Scholar 

  29. D.G. Mitchell, R.W. Quine, M. Tseitlin, S.A. Eaton, G.R. Eaton, J. Magn. Reson. 217, 221 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. D.G. Mitchell, G.M. Rosen, M. Tseitlin, B. Symmes, S.A. Eaton, G.R. Eaton, Biophys. J. 105, 338 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. J.R. Biller, M. Tseitlin, R.W. Quine, G.A. Rinard, H.A. Weismiller, H. Elajaili, G.M. Rosen, J.P.Y. Kao, S.A. Eaton, G.R. Eaton, J. Magn. Reson. 242, 162 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. H. Elajaili, J.R. Biller, G.M. Rosen, J.P.Y. Kao, M. Tseytlin, L.A. Buchanan, G.A. Rinard, R.W. Quine, J. McPeak, Y. Shi, S.S. Eaton, G.R. Eaton, J. Magn. Reson. 260, 77 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. B. Epel, S.V. Sundramoorthy, M. Krzykowska-Serda, M.C. Maggio, T. Tseytlin, G.R. Eaton, S.S. Eaton, G.M. Rosen, J.P.Y. Kao, H.J. Halpern, J. Magn. Reson. 276, 32 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Eichhoff.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eichhoff, U., Höfer, P. 75 Years of EPR. EPR Milestones in 60 Years Bruker History. Appl Magn Reson 51, 1723–1737 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-020-01221-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-020-01221-1

Navigation