Abstract—
The main focus of this study is to investigate the dynamic responses of a simply supported bridge structure in terms of displacement, speed, and acceleration subjected to vehicles traveling at different speeds. The interaction between a bridge and the vehicles moving on it is a coupled, dynamic problem. Conventionally, most research has been focused on the dynamic or impact response of the bridge, but not of the moving vehicles. For the cases where only the bridge response is desired, the moving vehicles have frequently been approximated to the extreme as a number of moving loads. In India, mainly IRC (Indian Road Congress) Class A and IRC Class B loading are considered in the design of bridges including the impact factor as specified in Indian Road Congress IRC-6. In the present practice in India, the speed of the moving vehicles of IRC class A and B is completely overlooked in the designing of the bridge structures. This article deals with the responses of the bridge due to the moving vehicles of IRC Class A and IRC Class B loading. In this study, six different spans of bridges of 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 m are considered. Each span has been analyzed separately due to IRC class A and B loading subjected to vehicle speed ranging from 30 to 210 km/h. Dynamic responses (displacement, velocity, acceleration) and the Impact factor of the bridge for each of the six span length subjected to high-speed IRC class A and B loading have been computed in this study. For earthquake resistance design of bridges, in addition to the vibration caused due to wind and earthquake load, vibration caused by high-speed vehicle need to be considered. In this study, this issue has been addressed in detail. The proposed results can be used as a modification of the IRC specifications when dealing with short and long-span highway bridges by selecting the modified impact factor.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
J. Kim and J. P. Lynch., “Experimental analysis of vehicle-bridge interaction using a wireless monitoring system and a two-stage system identification technique,” Mech. Syst. Sign. Proc. 28, 3–19 (2012).
S. P. Brady, E. J. O’Brien, and A. Znidaric, “Effect of vehicle velocity on the dynamic amplification of two vehicles crossing a simply supported bridge,” J. Bridge. Eng. 11, 250–256 (2006).
J. D. Yau, “Vehicle/bridge interactions of a rail suspension bridge considering support movements,” Interact. Multiscale Mech. 2, 263–276 (2009).
M. Kawatani, C. W. Kim, and K. Yasui, “Seismic response of a highway bridge under traffic loadings,” in Proc. of Pacific Struct. Steel Conf.2007: Steel Structures in Natural Hazards, Wairakei, New Zealand, March 13–16 (Wairakei, 2007), pp. 183–188.
D. Chang and H. Lee, “Impact factors for simple-span highway girder bridges,” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (3), 704–715 (1994).
Y. Yang, C. W. Lin, and J. D. Yau, “Extracting bridge frequencies from the dynamic response of a passing vehicle,” J. Sound Vib. 272, 471–493 (2004).
Z. Qiling, L. Deng, T. Guo, and X. Yin, “Comparative study of different numerical models for vehicle—bridge interaction analysis,” Int. J. Struct. Stability Dyn. 16, 1550057 (2016).
T. Xiang and R. Zhao, “Dynamic interaction analysis of the vehicle-bridge system using transfer matrix method,” Int. J. Struct. Eng. Mech. 20 (1), 111–121 (2005).
D. Chang and H. Lee, “Impact factors for simple-span highway girder bridges,” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (3), 704–715 (1994).
T. L. Wang, D. Huang, and M. Shahawy, “Dynamic response of multi-girder bridges,” J. Struct Eng. 118 (8), 2222–2238 (1992).
R. T. Wang and J. S. Lin, “The vibration of multi-span Timoshenko frames due to moving loads,” J. Sound Vib. 212, 417–434 (1998).
J. J. Wu, A. R. Whittaker, and M. P. Cartmell, “Dynamic responses of structures to moving bodies using combined finite element and analytical methods,” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 2555–2579 (2001).
E. Savin, “Dynamic amplification factor and response spectrum for the evaluation of vibrations of beams under successive moving loads,” J. Sound Vib. 248, 267–288 (2001).
G. T. Michaltsos, “Dynamic behavior of a single-span beam subjected to loads moving with variable speeds,” J. Sound Vib. 258, 359–372 (2002).
Z. Oniszczuk, “Forced transverse vibrations of an elastically connected complex rectangular simply supported double-plate system,” J. Sound Vib. 270, 997–1011 (2004).
H. S. Zibdeh and M. Abu-Hilal, “Stochastic vibration of laminated composite coated beam traversed by a random moving load,” Eng. Struct. 25, 397–404 (2003).
S. S. A. Law and X. Q. Zhu, “Dynamic behavior of damaged concrete bridge structures under moving vehicular loads,” Eng. Struct. 26, 1279–1293 (2004).
P. Lou, G. Dai, and Q. Zeng, “Dynamic analysis of a Timoshenko beam subjected to moving concentrated forces using the finite element method,” Shock Vib. 14, 459–468 (2007).
M. Kawatani, C. W. Kim, T. Kanbara, and N. Nishimura, “Seismic behavior of steel monorail bridges under train load during strong earthquakes,” J. Earthq. Tsunami 7, 1–17 (2013).
C. Johansson, C. Pacoste and R. Karoumi, “Closed-form solution for the mode superposition analysis of the vibration in multi-span beam bridges caused by concentrated moving loads,” Comput. Struct. 119, 85–94 (2013).
Y. B. Yang, S. S. Liao, and B. H. Lin, “Impact formulas for vehicles moving over simple and continuous beams,”. J. Struct. Eng. 121, 1644–1650 (1995).
C. Liu, D. Huang and T. L. Wang, “Analytical dynamic impact study based on correlated road roughness,” Comput. Struct. 80, 1639–1650 (2002).
D. Huang and T. L. Wang, “Impact analysis of cable-stayed bridges,” Comput. Struct. 43, 897–908 (1992).
IRC-06 (Indian Roads Congress - Public Safety Standards of India), Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road bridges: Section II - Loads and Stresses, Fourth Revision (2014).
M. M. Stanisic and J. C. Hardin, “On the response of beams to an arbitrary number of concentrated moving masses,” J. Franklin Inst. 287 (2), 115–123. (1969).
E.C. Ting and M. Yener, “Vehicle-structure interactions in bridge dynamics,“ Shock Vib. Dig. 15, 3–9 (1983).
S. Sadiku and H. Leipholz, “On the dynamics of elastic systems with moving concentrated masses,” Ing.-Arch. 57, 223–242 (1987).
J. M. Biggs, Introduction to Structural Dynamics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).
L. Fryba, Vibration of Solids and Structures Under Moving Loads (Thomas Telford, London, 1999).
Y. B. Yang and S.S. Liao, “Impact Formulas for Vehicles Moving Over Simple and continuous beams,” J. Struct. Eng. 121, 1644–1650 (1995).
D. Huang and T. L. Wang, “Impact analysis of cable-stayed bridges,” Comput. Struct. 43, 897–908 (1992).
Y. B. Yang, J. D. Yau, and Y. S. Wu, Vehicle-Bridge Interaction Dynamics—With Applications to High-Speed Railways (World Scientific, London, 2010).
W. Gao and N. Zhang, “Seismic random vibration analysis of shear beams with random structural parameters Seismic random vibration analysis of shear beams with random structural parameters,” J. Mech. Sci. Techn. 24, 497–504 (2010).
N. Liu, W. Gao, C.M. Song, and N. Zhang, “Probabilistic dynamic analysis of vehicle-bridge interaction system with uncertain parameters,” Comp. Modell. Eng. Sci. 72 (2), 79–102 (2011).
N. Liu, W. Gao, C.M. Song, et al., “Interval dynamic response analysis of vehicle-bridge interaction system with uncertainty,” J. Sound Vib. 332, 3218–3231 (2013).
N. Liu, W. Gao, C.M. Song, et al., “Hybrid probabilistic interval dynamic analysis of vehicle—bridge interaction system with uncertainties,” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 14, 1–25 (2014).
IRC-18 (Indian Roads Congress - Public Safety Standards of India), Prestressed Concrete Road Bridges, Revised Edition (2000).
Y. B. Yang and C.W. Lin, “Vehicle-bridge interaction dynamics and potential applications,” J. Sound Vib. 284, 205–226 (2005).
Y. B. Yang, J. D. Yau, and L. C. Hsu, “Vibration of simple beams due to trains moving at high speeds,” Eng. Struct. 19, 936–944 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
About this article
Cite this article
Nunia, B., Rahman, T. A Study of Vehicle-Bridge Dynamic Interaction due to Indian Road Congress (IRC) Class A and B Loading. Mech. Solids 55, 437–459 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654420030115
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654420030115