Skip to main content
Log in

On the Paradox of Anomalous Relative Bending Stiffness of Ultrathin Beams in the Gradient Theory of Elasticity

  • Published:
Mechanics of Solids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of refined modeling of ultrafine rods, which arose in connection with the need to explain the known experimental data on the significant dependence of the bending stiffness of such ultrathin structures on their thickness if the thickness becomes very small, commensurate as some authors believe with the characteristic dimensions of the material microstructure, is considered. To simulate such effects, Kirchhoff’s theory of thin rods uses gradient theories, nonlocal, micropolar elasticity theories, including scaled construction parameters. However, the obtained simulation results are very contradictory; the question of the reliability of the obtained results and the nature of the scale-dependent effect of the effective bending properties of ultrathin rods remains unresolved. It is shown in the paper that these effects for Kirchhoff and Timoshenko rods can be explained by taking into account the surface properties for ultrathin rods (plates).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. F. Yang, A. C. M. Chong, D. C. C. Lam, and P. Tong, “Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity,” Int. J. Sol. Struct. 39, 2731–2743 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. M. Wang, Y. Y. Zhang, and X. Q. He, “Vibration of nonlocal Timoshenko beams,” Nanotechnol. 18, 105401 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. M. Ma, X.-L. Gao, and J. N. Reddy, “A microstructure-dependent Timoshenko beam model based on a modified couple stress theory,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56 (12), 3379–3391 (2008).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. H. M. Ma, X.-L. Gao, and J. N. Reddy, “A non-classical Mindlin plate model based on a modified couple stress theory,” Acta Mech. 220 (1–4), 217–235 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Kong, S. Shou, Z. Nie, and K. Wang, “Static and dynamic analysis in micro-beams based on strain gradient elasticity,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. 47 (4), 487–498 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. A. Lazoupulos and A. K. Lazoupulos, “On a strain gradient elastic Timoshenko beam model,” ZAMM 91, 591–882 (2011).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Kakunai, J. Masaki, R. Kuroda, et al., “Measurement of apparent Young’s modulus in the bending of cantilever beam by heterodyne holographic interferometry,” Exp. Mech. 25 (4), 408–412 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. C. C. Lam, F. Yang, A. C. M. Chong, et al., “Experiments and theory in strain gradient Elasticity,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 2003. V. 51. P. 1477–1508 (2003).

  9. A. W. Mc Farland and J. S. Colton, “Role of material microstructure in plate stiffness with relevance to microcantilever sensors,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 15 (5), 1060–1067 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Liebold and W. H. Muller, “Measuring material coefficients of higher gradient elasticity by using AFM techniques and Raman-spectroscopy,” Adv. Struct. Mater. 22, 255–271 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Lakes and W. J. Drugan, “Bending of a Cosserat elastic bar of square cross section: Theory and experiment,” J. Appl. Mech. 82 (9), 091002 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Lakes, “Experimental methods for study of Cosserat elastic solids and other generalized elastic continua,” in Continuum Models for Materials with Micro-Structure, Ed. by H. Mühlhaus and J. Wiley (New York, 1995), Ch. 1, pp. 1–22.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. S. A. Lurie and Y. O. Solyaev, “Revisiting bending theories of elastic gradient beams,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. 126, 1–21 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. E. V. Lomakin, S. A. Lurie, L. N. Rabinskiy and Y. O. Solyaev, “Semi-inverse solution of a pure beam bending problem in gradient elasticity theory. The absence of scale effects,” Dokl. Phys. 63 (4), 161–164 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. A. Lurie, D. B. Volkov-Bogorodsky, P. A. Belov, and E. D. Lykosova, “Do nanosized rods have abnormal mechanical properties? On some fallacious ideas and direct errors related to the use of the gradient theories for simulation of scale-dependent rods,” Nanomech. Sci. Technol.: Int. J. 7 (4), 261–295 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Lurie, Y. Solyaev, A.Volkov, and D. Volkov-Bogorodskiy, “Bending problems in the theory of elastic materials with voids and surface effects,” Mat. Mech. Solids 23 (5), 787-804 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Papargyri-Beskou, K. G. Tsepoura, D. Polyzos, and D. E. Beskos, “Bending and stability analysis of gradient elastic beams,” Int. J. Solids Struct. 40 (2), 385–400 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. A. Lazopoulos, “Post-buckling problems for long elastic beams,” Acta Mech. 164 (3–4), 189–198 (2003).

  19. K. A. Lazopoulos and A. K. Lazopoulos, “Stability of a gradient elastic beam compressed by non-conservative forces,’ ZAMM 90 (3), 174–184 (2010).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. P. A. Belov and S. A. Lurie, “Mathematical theory of damaged media. Gradient theory of elasticity. Formulations hierarchy comparative analysis”, in Analysis and Applications (Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. A. Gusev and S. A. Lurie, “Symmetry conditions in strain gradient elasticity,” Math. Mech. Solids 22 (4), 683-691 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. V. V. Vasiliev and S. A. Lurie, “On correct nonlocal generalized theories of elasticity,” Phys. Mezomech. 19 (3), 269-281 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. X .L .Gao and S. K. Park, “Variational formulation of a simplified strain gradient elasticity theory and its application to a pressurized thick-walled cylinder problem,” Int. J. Sol. Struct. 44 (22–23), 7486–7499 (2007).

  24. P. A. Belov and S. A. Lurie, “Theory of ideal adhesion interactions,” J. Compos. Mech. Des. 14, 545–561 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Lurie, P. Belov, and E. Lykosova, “Extended model of surface-related effects in second gradient elasticity. Surface waves related to the nature of adhesion,” in Nonlinear Wave Dynamics of Materials and Structures, Ed. by H. Altenbach, V. A. Eremeyev, I. S. Pavlov, and A. V. Porubov, (Springer, Cham, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. A. Eremeyev, “On effective properties of materials at the nano- and microscales considering surface effects,” Acta Mech. 227, 29–42 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Liebold and W. H. Muller, “Applications of strain gradient theories to the size effect in submicro-structures incl. Experimental analysis of elastic material parameters,” Bull. TICMI 19 (1), 45–55 (2015).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Liebold and W. H. Muller, “Comparison of gradient elasticity models for the bending of micromaterials,” Comput. Mater. Sci. 116, 52–61 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was carried out under the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant no. 18-01-00553a and state assignment of the Institute of Applied Mechanics of Russian Academy of Sciences AAAA-A17-117032010137-0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Lur’ye.

Additional information

Translated by M. K. Katuev

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lur’ye, S.A. On the Paradox of Anomalous Relative Bending Stiffness of Ultrathin Beams in the Gradient Theory of Elasticity. Mech. Solids 55, 340–347 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654420030085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654420030085

Keywords:

Navigation