Next Article in Journal
Editorial for Special Issue “Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Ruby”
Previous Article in Journal
40Ar/39Ar Geochronology and New Mineralogical and Geochemical Data from Lamprophyres of Chompolo Field (South Yakutia, Russia)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fedorite from Murun Alkaline Complex (Russia): Spectroscopy and Crystal Chemical Features
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expanding Family of Litharge-Derived Sulfate Minerals and Synthetic Compounds: Preparation and Crystal Structures of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 and [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy and Ho)

1
Department of Crystallography, Saint-Petersburg State University, University emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Department of Chemistry, Moscow State University, GSP-1, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Institut für Anorganische Chemie der Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany
4
Institut für Geowissenschaften der Universität Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2020, 10(10), 887; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100887
Submission received: 11 September 2020 / Revised: 29 September 2020 / Accepted: 3 October 2020 / Published: 7 October 2020

Abstract

:
During the last decades, layered structures have attracted particular and increasing interest due to the multitude of outstanding properties exhibited by their representatives. Particularly common among their archetypes, with a significant number of mineral and synthetic species structural derivatives, is that of litharge. In the current paper, we report the structural studies of two later rare-earth oxysulfates, [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy, Ho), which belong indeed to the grandreefite family, and a novel compound [Bi2CuO3]SO4, which belongs to a new structure type and demonstrates the second example of Cu2+ incorporation into litharge-type slabs. Crystals of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 were obtained under high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) conditions, whereas polycrystalline samples of [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy, Ho) compounds were prepared via an exchange solid-state reaction. The crystal structure of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 is based on alternation of continuous [Bi2CuO3]2+ layers of edge-sharing OBi2Cu2 and OBi3Cu tetrahedra and sheets of sulfate groups. Cu2+ cations are in cis position in O5Bi2Cu2 and O6Bi2Cu2 oxocentered tetrahedra in litharge slab. The crystal structure of [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy, Ho) is completely analogous to those of grandreefite and oxysulfates of La, Sm, Eu, and Bi.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Litharge-derived architectures are widely represented by both mineral and synthetic species exhibiting exceptional structural and chemical diversity, as well as a variety of properties. While the numerical majority of representatives belongs to the compounds of f-metals, its structural diversity is provided mostly by just two neighbor elements in the Periodic system, lead and bismuth. The easy formation of layered structures is commonly attributed to the “lone-pair” stereochemical activity of Pb2+ and Bi3+, which favors their “one-sided” coordination. The majority of both synthetic and mineral contributions come from the chemistry of oxides [1,2,3] and oxyhalides [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], most commonly the representatives of the so-called Sillén family. The latter generally correspond to ordered alternations of litharge-derived slabs and single or double sheets of monoatomic anions of Group 15–17 elements. For the majority of these architectures, interlayer charge balance requires partial aliovalent substitution for Pb2+ and Bi3+. Overall, the initially neutral [PbO] litharge slabs are essentially more tolerable to the chemical nature of such substituents compared to charged [BiO]+. For instance, lead-based litharge slabs can accommodate various transition metal-based species (vanadate, chromate, molybdate, tungstate, etc.) while oxides and oxyhalides of bismuth are totally resistant to such substitution (Cd2+ (4d10), as a post-transition element [19], is not considered).
Structurally related architectures occur when the interlayer gallery hosts various molecular anions (linear triatomic [20,21], trigonal [22,23,24,25,26], or tetrahedral [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] (Figure 1a–h). There are three possible orientations of tetrahedral anions between the litharge slabs (Figure 1d–f) two of which are represented in nature by the mineral grandreefite [Pb2F2]SO4 [27] and a slag phase [Ba2F2]S2O3 [28]. Synthetic analogs of [Ba2F2]S2O3 were found among [Ln2O2]CrO4 oxychromates (Ln = Pr–Tb [33]). Synthetic analogs of the grandreefite structure are observed also among selenates ([Pb2F2]SeO4 [34] and [Ln2O2]SeO4, Ln = La, Pr, Nd [35]) and chromates ([La2O2]CrO4 [32]). The same structure was also established for [Bi2O2]SO4 [36] and some rare-earth oxysulfates [Ln2O2]SO4 (La [29], Sm [30] and Eu [31]). In the meantime, a different atomic arrangement was suggested for [Nd2O2]SO4 [37]. The crystal structures of other reported [M2O2]SO4 oxysulfates (M = Pr, Gd – Lu, Y [39], Am–Cf [40,41]) are unknown to date. Initially, the XRD patterns of all Ln and An oxysulfates were indexed in orthorhombic symmetry (I-centered, a ~ b ~ 4 Å, c ~ 13Å [39,40,41]) with similar patterns suggesting that all the compounds are isostructural. As shown before, just a handful of these were re-investigated, the later rare-earth compounds remaining mostly unaddressed.
The crystal chemistry of bismuth oxysulfates is more diverse and contains, besides the grandreefite analogue, three relatively complex litharge derivatives incorporating transition metal cations: [Bi6O6]CoO2(SO4)2 with krönkite-type chain anions, [Bi2CoO3]SO4 and [Bi6.27Cu1.6O8](SO4)3, recently re-determined by Lü et al. [44]. The latter are of particular interest representing yet only two known examples of transition metal cations (Co2+ and Cu2+) incorporated into the bismuth-oxide litharge layers. Given that the same layers are resistant to such incorporation in oxyhalides [45], two questions arise: what is the role of tetrahedral (sulfate) anions which makes transition metal substitution possible and if other representatives can be prepared. In the current paper, we report the structural studies of two later rare-earth oxysulfates, [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy, Ho), which belong indeed to the grandreefite family, and a novel compound [Bi2CuO3]SO4, which belongs to a new structure type and demonstrates the second example of Cu2+ incorporation into litharge-type slabs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis

Crystals (Figure 2a) of novel [Bi2CuO3]SO4 were obtained under high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) conditions. The synthesis was performed using the piston cylinder module of a Voggenreiter LP 1000-540/50 system installed at the Institute of Geosciences, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. CuSO4 (Aldrich ≥99.0%, 0.119 g) and BiOCl (Aldrich ≥99.0%, 0.260 g) were weighed, mixed, and finely ground. The mixture was placed into a platinum capsule (outer diameter = 3 mm, wall thickness = 0.2 mm, length = 12 mm). The capsule was sealed on both sides and placed into the center of a 1/2-inch piston cylinder talc−Pyrex assembly. The pressure increased for 5 min at a rate of 0.2 GPa/min, until a working pressure of 1 GPa was reached, whereupon the temperature program was started at a rate of 60 °C/min up to the operating temperature of 600 °C, which was maintained at the set pressure for 6 h. The cooling time was 10 h (cooling rate ≈ 60 °C/h). Simultaneously with cooling, the pressure was released at a rate of 0.1 GPa/h. After room temperature had been reached, the experiment was decompressed during 20 min. The capsule was extracted from the high-pressure assembly and cut for further investigations. The product consisted of grass-green transparent [Bi2CuO3]SO4 crystals in association with unreacted BiOCl.
Polycrystalline samples of [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy, Ho) compounds were prepared via an exchange reaction similar to [Ln2O2]CrO4 [32,33] and [Ln2O2]SeO4 [35]. Rare-earth oxychlorides, LnOCl, prepared by thermal hydrolysis of LnCl3∙6H2O, were mixed with potassium sulfate (pre-dried at 140 °C for 6 h) in 2:1.1 ratio, thoroughly ground and placed in silica-jacketed alumina crucibles. The silica tubes were vacuum-sealed and annealed at 825 °C for 48 h (heating rate 50 °C/h, cooling rate 5 °C/h to 650 °C, after which the furnace was switched off. The products were washed several times with distilled water to remove the KCl by-product and excess K2SO4, and air dried.

2.2. Single-Crystal XRD Studies

A single crystal of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 was attached to glass fiber using an epoxy resin and mounted on a Bruker SMART APEX II DUO diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) equipped with a micro-focus X-ray tube utilizing Mo radiation. The experimental data set was collected at 150 K. Unit-cell parameters were calculated using least-squares fits. Structure factors were derived using APEX 2 after introducing the required corrections [46]; details on data collection are in Table 1. The structure was solved using direct methods and refined in SHELXL [47]. The data are deposited in CCDC under Entry No. 2021664.

2.3. Powder XRD Studies

High-resolution data sets were collected for [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy, Ho) on a PANalytical–X’Pert diffractometer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) utilizing CuKa1,2 radiations. The refinement was done using the JANA2006 software (version 2014.11–0) [48]. As in the case of isostructural [Pb2F2]SeO4 [34] and Bi2O2SO4 [36], indexing the powder patters was not straightforward as two sets of Miller indices are possible for the strongest reflections yielding two alternative unit cells which led to close residuals upon LeBail full-pattern decomposition. The correct ones, listed in Table 1, were chosen based on results of Rietveld analysis wherein the derived atomic arrangements (with the structure of [Eu2O2]SO4 [31] taken as the initial model) were chemically sensible. Due to weak scattering from the oxygen atoms and low sensitivity of the residuals to their coordinates, a mild constraint was imposed on the S–O distances in the SO42– anion. Final Rietveld refinement plots for [Dy2O2]SO4 and [Ho2O2]SO4 are given in the Supplementary Materials. The data are deposited in CCDC under entries No. 2021867 ([Dy2O2]SO4) and 2021874 ([Ho2O2]SO4).

3. Results

3.1. Сrystal Structure of [Bi2CuO3]SO4

The structure of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 contains two symmetrically unique Bi positions and one Cu position. The Bi1 and Bi2 sites are coordinated by nine and ten O atoms each, respectively (Figure 2b). The general feature of the Bi3+ coordination in [Bi2CuO3]SO4 is the presence of four short and very strong Bi-O bonds (2.23–2.37 Å) located in one coordination hemisphere of the Bi3+ cations. In the opposite hemisphere, the Bi3+ cations form from five to six longer Bi3+-O bonds. The distortion of the Bi3+ coordination polyhedra is due to the stereoactivity of s2 “lone-pairs”. However, the distortion of bismuth coordination environments is not as strong as usually observed for Pb2+ in litharge-derived structures.
The Cu site is coordinated by four O atoms to form a distorted CuO4 square complemented by two apical O2− anions. As a result, a distorted [CuO4O2] octahedron is formed. [CuO4O2] octahedra group in pairs via common edge to form Cu2O8 dimers shown in Figure 2. Cu–Cu distance is 2.79 Å. Unfortunately, we were unable to measure magnetic properties of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 due to the insufficient amount of pure material.
One symmetrically independent S6+ cation forms rather symmetrical SO4 tetrahedra. The individual S–O distances are in the range of 1.470(4)–1.491(4) Å, which is in good agreement for well-refined sulfate structures [49].
From the viewpoint of the bond-valence theory the Oa-Bi and Oa-Cu bonds (Oa—additional oxygen atoms not bonded to S) are the shortest and therefore the strongest in the structures of [Bi2CuO3]SO4, which makes it reasonable to consider the Bi-Cu-O substructure consisting of OBi2Cu2 and OBi3Cu tetrahedra interacting with SO4 tetrahedra through relatively weaker Bi-Ot and Cu-Ot bonds. The topology of this oxocentered [Bi2CuO3]2+ structural unit (Figure 3a) is two-dimensional and obviously related to the [Bi2O2]2+ layer typical for compounds structurally related to litharge.
The crystal structure of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 (Figure 3d) is based on alternation of continuous [Bi2CuO3]2+ layers of edge-sharing OBi2Cu2 and OBi3Cu tetrahedra and sheets of sulfate groups. Note that [Bi2CuO3]SO4 belongs to a new structure type. The structure of recently re-investigated [Bi2CoO3]SO4 (Pbca, a = 5.4153(2), b = 14.2437(6), c = 15.7595(7) Å, V = 1215.59 Å3) [44] is also based on litharge-type slabs (Figure 3b). Arrangement of Co2+ cations within litharge slab is different from that observed for Cu2+ in [Bi2CuO3]SO4 (Figure 3e). Cu2+ cations are in cis position in O5Bi2Cu2 and O6Bi2Cu2 oxocentered tetrahedra in [Bi2CuO3]SO4, and Co2+ cations are in trans position in OBi2Co2 oxocentered tetrahedra in [Bi2CoO3]SO4. While the Co2+ are surrounded by Bi3+ only and reside at relatively long separations, the Cu2+ cluster in pairs which results in larger undulation amplitudes in [Bi2CoO3]2+ slabs (Figure 3e) compared to [Bi2CuO3]2+. All this results in lowering the symmetry from orthorhombic for the Co compound to monoclinic to that of Cu. A defect-free [Bi2O2]2+ layer (Figure 3c) has been recently described by us in [Bi2O2](SO4) (Figure 3f) [36].

3.2. Сrystal Structure of [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy, Ho)

The crystal structure of [Ln2O2]SO4 is completely analogous to those of grandreefite and oxysulfates of La, Sm, Eu, and Bi. It contains one symmetrically independent Ln3+ cation (Figure 4a) which is coordinated by eight oxygen atoms. Four Ln-Oa short and strong bonds are formed within the litharge [Ln2O2]2+ slab and four Ln-Ot bonds are formed with sulfate groups in the interlayer (Ot—the oxygen atoms of the sulfate group). The coordination environments of Ln3+ cations are similar to those of Bi3+ in [Bi2O2]SO4 and more distantly related to those in [Bi2CuO3]SO4 described above. One S site has a tetrahedral arrangement typical for hexavalent sulfur; the SO42– tetrahedra are essentially distorted. In general, the structural architecture of [Ln2O2]SO4 (Figure 4b) is similar to [Bi2CuO3]SO4. The current pool of data indicates that structures of the [Ln2O2]SO4 species for Ln = La, Sm, Eu, Dy and Ho ([29,30,31] and this work) are nearly identical except Ln = Nd [37] with suggested trigonal prismatic coordination for Nd3+ which is relatively rare. The suggested non-centrosymmetric I222 space group was not verified. From our viewpoint, there are no chemical reasons why the [Nd2O2]SO4 would adopt a different crystal structure, unless a new polymorph was generated.

4. Discussion

The tetrahedral sulfate, selenate, chromate, and molybdate anions are yet the largest species which can be accommodated in the space between metal-oxide or metal-fluoride litharge slabs. Their effective size essentially exceeds that of the largest monoatomic (Te2–) species. This results in strong distortion (mostly stretching in the ab plane) of the [M2O2]2+ layers. The derivatives of the smallest sulfate anion are the most numerous and include compounds of all rare earths, as well as bismuth. The dissimilarity in bonding to oxygen atoms results in a large distortion of the sulfate tetrahedra; it is their utmost chemical stability that makes these distortions tolerable. According to our results for the Dy and Ho compounds, all [Ln2O2]SO4 crystallize in the monoclinic grandreefite structure (Table 1). In the predominantly ionic structure of [Pb2F2]SO4 with essentially larger [Pb2F2]2+ slabs, the configuration of the sulfate anion is close to regular. Selenate is more voluminous and less chemically stable so only a handful of grandreefite-type compounds is known, including those of the earliest rare-earths and the “direct” analog of grandreefite. Comparison of structural data for the [M2O2]SO4 compounds reveals that distances in [Bi2O2]SO4 are very close to those of [Eu2O2]SO4. Therefore, Bi3+ behaves as a size analog of Eu3+, falling probably beyond the stability limit of oxide selenates. The structure of [La2O2]CrO4 (determined from powder neutron data [32]) exhibits almost regular chromate anions which suggests their relative rigidity. This may explain both why the grandreefite structure is adopted by an only compound of the earliest rare-earth element and why an alternative structure is formed for the compounds of Pr–Tb which is not formed for selenates while the size of CrO42– and SeO42– is relatively close. Note also the relatively low stability of SeO42– against SeO32–. Close structural relationships between [Ln2O2]CrO4 and [Ba2F2](S2O3) suggest possible existence of some more isostructural compounds. However, while Pb contributes to the fluoride sulfate and selenate, barium contributes only to fluoride thiosulfate but not to derivatives of other tetrahedral anions. This may be caused by very low solubility of PbCrO4, BaSO4 and BaSO4 compared to PbF2 and BaF2, while those of BaF2 and BaSO4, as well as PbSO4 (PbSeO4) and PbF2 are of the same order [34].
Incorporation of transition metal cations in square oxygen nets with the O–O distances of 2.7–2.8 Å would suggest a M–O distance of 1.9–2Å which is slightly below the common range for Cu2+ but essentially small for Co2+. Therefore, the M2+ cations reside above the “liharge” oxygens in the structures of [Bi2MO3]SO4 as clearly seen in Figure 3d,e. Their coordination polyhedron is expanded to a distorted square pyramid (or a particularly stretched octahedron) by the oxygen atoms of sulfate tetrahedra. This is not possible in the oxyhalide or oxychalcogenide strcutures shown in Figure 1a without very strong distortions of the anionic layer and coordination polyhedra of Bi3+ or Pb2+. It is possibly the polyatomic nature of the sulfate anions which permits to satisfy the coordination requirements of both Bi3+ and M2+. Note that both Co2+ (3d7) and Cu2+ (3d9) exhibit pronounced Jahn–Teller effect which permits gross distortions of ochahedral coordination. With other M2+ cations like Ni2+ (3d8) this is expected to be essentialy less likely. Furthermore, the arrangement of sulfate anions in the structures of [Bi2MO3]SO4 results in very irregular, “one-sided” coordination of Bi3+, which is, however, rather common due to high stereochemical activity of its lone-pair. This irregularity would not be favored by rare-earth cations. Indeed, interaction of Ln2O3 oxides (Ln ≤ Ho) with CuSO4 (as well as other sulfates of divalent metals) yields only mixtures of [Ln2O2]SO4 and CuO (or other MO oxides) with no hint ath the intermediate [Ln2MO3]SO4 composition [50]. However, it seems rather likely that some other layered structures may be found among oxysulfates of Bi and Co or Cu.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/10/10/887/s1. Figure S1. Rietveld refinement plots for [Ho2O2]SO4 and [Dy2O2]SO4. Table S1. Coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) of atoms in [Bi2CuO3](SO4). Table S2. Anisotropic displacement parameters (Å2) of atoms in [Bi2CuO3](SO4). Table S3. Coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) of atoms in [Dy2O2]SO4. Table S4. Coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) of atoms in [Ho2O2]SO4.

Author Contributions

O.S. and D.C. designed the study; O.S. and E.N. performed and interpreted single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments; I.P. interpreted powder X-ray diffraction experiments; E.N. performed synthesis of [Bi2CuO3]SO4; D.C. and G.A. performed synthesis of [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy and Ho); O.S. and D.C. wrote the paper; A.H. provided materials and work in the high-pressure laboratory. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation through the grant 16-17-10085. E.N. was supported by the internal SPbSU travel grant to the University of Kiel.

Acknowledgments

Technical support by the SPbSU X-ray Diffraction and Microscopy and Microanalysis Resource Centers is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moure, A. Review and perspectives of Aurivillius structures as a lead-free piezoelectric system. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Siidra, O.I.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Filatov, S.K. Minerals and synthetic Pb(II) compounds with oxocentered tetrahedra: Review and classification. Z. Kristallogr. 2008, 223, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Krivovichev, S.V.; Mentré, O.; Siidra, O.I.; Colmont, M.; Filatov, S.K. Anion-centered tetrahedra in inorganic compounds. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6459–6535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Charkin, D.O. Modular approach as applied to the description, prediction, and targeted synthesis of bismuth oxohalides with layered structures. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. Suppl. 2008, 53, 1977–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cooper, M.; Hawthorne, F.C. The crystal structure of kombatite, Pb14(VO4)2O9Cl4. Am. Miner. 1994, 79, 550–554. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonaccorsi, E.; Pasero, M. Crystal structure refinement of sahlinite Pb14(AsO4)2O9Cl4. Mineral. Mag. 2003, 67, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krivovichev, S.V.; Siidra, O.I.; Nazarchuk, E.V.; Burns, P.C.; Depmeier, W. Exceptional topological complexity of lead oxide blocks in Pb31O22X18 (X = Br, Cl). Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 3846–3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Krivovichev, S.V.; Turner, R.; Rumsey, M.; Siidra, O.I.; Kirk, C.A. The crystal structure of mereheadite. Miner. Mag. 2009, 73, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leepore, G.O.; Welch, M.D. The crystal structure of parkinsonite, nominally Pb7MoO9Cl2: A naturally occurring Aurivillius phase. Miner. Mag. 2010, 74, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Turner, R.W.; Siidra, O.I.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Stanley, C.J.; Spratt, J. Rumseyite, [Pb2OF]Cl, the first naturally occurring fluoroxychloride mineral with the parent crystal structure for layered lead oxychlorides. Mineral. Mag. 2012, 76, 1247–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Siidra, O.I.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Turner, R.W.; Rumsey, M.S.; Spratt, J. Crystal chemistry of layered Pb oxychloride minerals with PbO-related structures. Crystal structure of hereroite, [Pb32O20(O,□)](AsO4)2((Si,As,V,Mo)O4)2Cl10. Am. Miner. 2013, 98, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Siidra, O.I.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Turner, R.W.; Rumsey, M.S.; Spratt, J. Crystal chemistry of layered Pb oxychloride minerals with PbO-related structures. II. Crystal structure of vladkrivovichevite, [Pb32O18][Pb4Mn2O]Cl14(BO3)8·2H2O. Am. Miner. 2013, 98, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Siidra, O.I.; Zinyakhina, D.O.; Zadoya, A.I.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Turner, R.W. Synthesis and modular structural architectures of mineralogically inspired novel complex Pb oxyhalides. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 12799–12805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Siidra, O.I.; Gogolin, M.; Lukina, E.A.; Kabbour, H.; Bubnova, R.S.; Mentre, O.; Agakhanov, A.A.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Colmont, M.; Gesing, T. Structural evolution from 0D Units to 3D frameworks in Pb oxyhalides: Unexpected strongly corrugated layers in Pb7O6Br2. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 11550–11556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Siidra, O.I.; Kabbour, H.; Mentré, O.; Nazarchuk, E.V.; Kegler, P.; Zinyakhina, D.O.; Colmont, M.; Depmeier, W. Lead oxychloride borates obtained under extreme conditions. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 9077–9084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chukanov, N.V.; Nekrasova, D.O.; Siidra, O.I.; Polekhovsky, Y.S.; Pekov, I.V. Janchevite, Pb7V5+(O8.50.5)Cl2, a new mineral from Kombat mine, Namibia. Can. Mineral. 2018, 56, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chukanov, N.V.; Siidra, O.I.; Polekhovsky, Y.S.; Pekov, I.V.; Varlamov, D.A.; Ermolaeva, V.N.; Virus, A.A. Erikjonssonite, (Pb32O21)[(V,Si,Mo,As)O4]4Cl9, a new mineral from the Kombat mine and structural classification of layered lead oxychlorides related to litharge. Eur. J. Miner. 2019, 31, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Perchiazzi, N.; Hålenius, U.; Vignola, P.; Demitri, N. Crystal chemical study of ecdemite from Harstigen, a new natural member of the layered lead oxyhalide group. Eur. J. Miner. 2019, 31, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bullen, T.D. Stable isotopes of transition and post-transition metals as tracers in environmental studies. In Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry. Advances in Isotope Geochemistry; Baskaran, M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 177–203. [Google Scholar]
  20. Corkett, A.J.; Chen, Z.; Slabon, A.; Dronskowski, R. Band gap tuning in bismuth oxide carbodiimide Bi2O2NCN. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 6467–6473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hashimoto, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Kikkawa, S.; Kanamaru, F. Synthesis and crystal structure of a new compound, lanthanum dioxymonocyanamide (La2O2CN2). J. Solid State Chem. 1995, 114, 592–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Grice, J.D. A solution to the crystal structures of bismutite and beyerite. Can. Mineral. 2002, 40, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ziegler, P.; Grigoraviciute, I.; Gibson, K.; Glaser, J.; Kareiva, A.; Meyer, H.J. On the characterization of BiMO2NO3 (M = Pb, Ca, Sr, Ba) materials related with the Sillen X1 structure. J. Solid State Chem. 2004, 177, 3610–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Charkin, D.O.; Plokhikh, I.V.; Zadoya, A.I.; Kuznetsova, P.L.; Kazakov, S.M.; Siidra, O.I. CdBiO2NO3, a new layered bismuth oxide nitrate. Solid State Sci. 2018, 84, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, H.; Tian, N.; Jin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S. Syntheses, characterization and nonlinear optical properties of a bismuth subcarbonate Bi2O2CO3. Solid State Sci. 2014, 30, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hybler, J.; Dušek, M. Revision of the crystal structure of kettnerite CaBi[OFCO3]. Eur. J. Mineral. 2007, 19, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kampf, A.R. Grandreefite, Pb2F2SO4: Crystal structure and relationship to the lanthanide oxide sulfates, Ln2O2SO4. Am. Mineral. 1991, 76, 278–282. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kampf, A.R. The crystal structure of Ba2F2(S6+O3S2-), a natural thiosulphate weathering product of old smelting slags at the Surrender Mill, Yorkshire, UK. Mineral. Mag. 2009, 73, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhukov, S.G.; Yatsenko, A.; Chernyshev, V.V.; Trunov, V.; Tserkovnaya, E.; Antson, O.; Hölsä, J.; Baules, P.; Schenk, H. Structural study of lanthanum oxysulfate (LaO)2SO4. Mater. Res. Bull. 1997, 32, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Denisenko, Y.G.; Sal’nikova, E.I.; Basova, S.A.; Molokeev, M.S.; Krylov, A.S.; Aleksandrovsky, A.S.; Oreshonkov, A.S.; Atuchin, V.V.; Volkova, S.S.; Khritokhin, N.A.; et al. Synthesis of samarium oxysulfate Sm2O2SO4 in the high-temperature oxidation reaction and its structural, thermal and luminescent properties. Molecules 2020, 25, 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hartenbach, I.; Schleid, T. Serendipitous formation of single-crystalline Eu2O2(SO4). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2002, 628, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Charkin, D.O.; Grischenko, R.O.; Sadybekov, A.A.; Goff, R.J.; Lightfoot, P. A new approach to synthesis of layered fluorites containing molecular anions: Synthesis of Ln2O2CO3, K(LnO)CO3, and Ln2O2CrO4 via metathesis reactions. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 3065–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Charkin, D.O.; Plokhikh, I.V.; Zadoya, A.I.; Zaloga, A.N.; Depmeier, W.; Siidra, O.I. Structural, thermal, and IR studies of β-[Nd2O2](CrO4), an unexpected analog of a slag phase [Ba2F2](S6+O3S2−). Z. Kristallogr. 2019, 234, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Charkin, D.O.; Plokhikh, I.V.; Zadoya, A.I.; Kazakov, S.M.; Zaloga, A.N.; Kozin, M.S.; Depmeier, W.; Siidra, O.I. [Pb2F2](SeO4): A heavier analogue of grandreefite, the first layered fluoride selenate. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2018, 45, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Charkin, D.O.; Karpov, A.S.; Kazakov, S.M.; Plokhikh, I.V.; Zadoya, A.I.; Kuznetsov, A.N.; Maslakov, K.I.; Teterin, A.Y.; Teterin, Y.A.; Zaloga, A.N.; et al. Synthesis, crystal structure, spectroscopic properties, and thermal behavior of rare-earth oxide selenates, Ln2O2SeO4 (Ln = La, Pr, Nd): The new perspectives of solid-state double-exchange synthesis. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 277, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Charkin, D.O.; Akimov, G.A.; Plokhikh, I.V.; Zaloga, A.N.; Borisov, A.S.; Stefanovich, S.Y.; Kuznetsov, A.N.; Siidra, O.I. Bi2O2SO4, a new representative of the grandreefite structure type. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 282, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Golovnev, N.N.; Molokeev, M.S.; Vereshchagin, S.N.; Atuchin, V.V. Synthesis and thermal transformation of a neodymium(III) complex [Nd(HTBA)2(C2H3O2)(H2O)2]⋅2H2O to non-centrosymmetric oxosulfate Nd2O2SO4. J. Coord. Chem. 2015, 68, 1865–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xue, J.S.; Antonio, M.R.; Soderholm, L. Polymorphs of Ln2MoO6: A neutron diffraction investigation of the crystal structures of La2MoO6 and Tb2MoO6. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Balestracci, R.; Mareschal, G. Etude structural des sulfates basiques de terres rares et d’yttrium. Mater. Res. Bull. 1967, 2, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haire, R.G.; Fahey, J.A. The oxysulfates and oxysulfides of americium, curium and berkelium. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1977, 39, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baybarz, R.D.; Fahey, J.A.; Haire, R.G. The preparation, crystal structures and some properties of califormium oxysulfate and oxysulfide. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1974, 36, 2023–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luu, S.D.N.; Vaqueiro, P. Synthesis, characterisation and thermoelectric properties of the oxytelluride Bi2O2Te. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 226, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Efremov, V.A.; Tyulin, A.V.; Trunov, V.K. Actual structure of tetragonal Ln2O2MoO4 and factors, determining the forming structure of the coordination polyhedra. Koord. Khim. 1987, 13, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lü, M.; Colmont, M.; Kabbour, H.; Colis, S.; Mentré, O. Revised Bi/M layered oxo-sulfate (M = Co, Cu): A structural and magnetic study. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 6969–6978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Aurivillius, B. Crystal structures of ~[MI5Cl][Bi48O59Cl30], MI = Cu, Ag. Acta Chem. Scand. 1990, 44, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bruker-AXS APEX2. Version 2014.11–0; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2014.
  47. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  48. Petřiček, V.; Dušek, M.; Palatinus, L. Crystallographic computing system JANA2006: General features. Z. Krist.-Cryst. Mater. 2014, 229, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hawthorne, F.C.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Burns, P.C. The crystal chemistry of sulfate minerals. Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2000, 40, 1–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tomaszewicz, E. Studies on reactivity in the solid state between some rare-earth metal oxides Ln2O3 where Ln = Y, La, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Ho, Er, Lu and metal sulfates(VI) MSO4 where M = Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 1675–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sillén-type structural architectures in minerals and synthetic compounds. General projection (a) and interlayer (b) in the crystal structure of [Bi2O2]Te [42] and its derivatives hosting molecular anions in the interlayer galleries: [Bi2O2]CN2 [20] (c,d), kettnerite [BiO][CaF][CO3 [26] (e), grandreefite [Pb2F2]SO4 [27] (f), slag phase [Ba2F2]S2O3 [28] (g), and [La2O2]MoO4 [43] (h).
Figure 1. Sillén-type structural architectures in minerals and synthetic compounds. General projection (a) and interlayer (b) in the crystal structure of [Bi2O2]Te [42] and its derivatives hosting molecular anions in the interlayer galleries: [Bi2O2]CN2 [20] (c,d), kettnerite [BiO][CaF][CO3 [26] (e), grandreefite [Pb2F2]SO4 [27] (f), slag phase [Ba2F2]S2O3 [28] (g), and [La2O2]MoO4 [43] (h).
Minerals 10 00887 g001
Figure 2. Green crystals of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 (field of view 0.5 mm) (a). Coordination environments of Bi3+, Cu2+, and S6+ cations in the structure of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 (b). Weaker Bi-O bonds are shown by thin lines. Ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability level.
Figure 2. Green crystals of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 (field of view 0.5 mm) (a). Coordination environments of Bi3+, Cu2+, and S6+ cations in the structure of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 (b). Weaker Bi-O bonds are shown by thin lines. Ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability level.
Minerals 10 00887 g002
Figure 3. [Bi2CuO3]2+ layer (a) in the crystal structure of [Bi2CuO3](SO4), [Bi2CoO3]2+ layer (b) in the structure of [Bi2CoO3](SO4) and [Bi2O2]2+ layer (c) in the structure of [Bi2O2](SO4). General projections of the crystal structure of [Bi2CuO3](SO4) along the b axis (d), [Bi2CoO3](SO4) along the a axis (e), and [Bi2O2](SO4) along the b axis (f).
Figure 3. [Bi2CuO3]2+ layer (a) in the crystal structure of [Bi2CuO3](SO4), [Bi2CoO3]2+ layer (b) in the structure of [Bi2CoO3](SO4) and [Bi2O2]2+ layer (c) in the structure of [Bi2O2](SO4). General projections of the crystal structure of [Bi2CuO3](SO4) along the b axis (d), [Bi2CoO3](SO4) along the a axis (e), and [Bi2O2](SO4) along the b axis (f).
Minerals 10 00887 g003
Figure 4. Cation coordination in the structure of [Dy2O2]SO4 (a). General projection of the crystal structure of [Dy2O2]SO4 along the b axis (b). [Dy2O2]2+ layer (c).
Figure 4. Cation coordination in the structure of [Dy2O2]SO4 (a). General projection of the crystal structure of [Dy2O2]SO4 along the b axis (b). [Dy2O2]2+ layer (c).
Minerals 10 00887 g004
Table 1. Crystallographic data and refinement parameters for [Bi2CuO3](SO4) and [Ln2O2](SO4) (Ln = Dy, Ho).
Table 1. Crystallographic data and refinement parameters for [Bi2CuO3](SO4) and [Ln2O2](SO4) (Ln = Dy, Ho).
Single-Crystal XRDPowder XRD
[Bi2CuO3](SO4) [Dy2O2](SO4)[Ho2O2](SO4)
Space GroupC2/cSpace GroupC2/cC2/c
a (Å)20.0283(7)a (Å)13.3682(2)13.4172(1)
b (Å)5.3970(2)b (Å)4.14721(5)4.15878(4)
c (Å)14.1413(5)c (Å)8.0204(1)8.05626(8)
β, °128.4450(10)β, °107.8070(8)107.6201(8)
V3)1197.19(8)V3)423.35(1)428.44(1)
Dx6.941Dx7.187.024
2θ range (°).2.60–38.502θ range (°).10–12010–120
Rint0.030RP0.0290.015
R10.023RWP (%)0.0430.014
Gof1.040RF (%)0.0290.035
CCDC2021664CCDC20218672021874

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siidra, O.; Charkin, D.; Plokhikh, I.; Nazarchuk, E.; Holzheid, A.; Akimov, G. Expanding Family of Litharge-Derived Sulfate Minerals and Synthetic Compounds: Preparation and Crystal Structures of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 and [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy and Ho). Minerals 2020, 10, 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100887

AMA Style

Siidra O, Charkin D, Plokhikh I, Nazarchuk E, Holzheid A, Akimov G. Expanding Family of Litharge-Derived Sulfate Minerals and Synthetic Compounds: Preparation and Crystal Structures of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 and [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy and Ho). Minerals. 2020; 10(10):887. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siidra, Oleg, Dmitri Charkin, Igor Plokhikh, Evgeny Nazarchuk, Astrid Holzheid, and Georgy Akimov. 2020. "Expanding Family of Litharge-Derived Sulfate Minerals and Synthetic Compounds: Preparation and Crystal Structures of [Bi2CuO3]SO4 and [Ln2O2]SO4 (Ln = Dy and Ho)" Minerals 10, no. 10: 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop