Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landslide monitoring and runout hazard assessment by integrating multi-source remote sensing and numerical models: an application to the Gold Basin landslide complex, northern Washington

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The landslide complex at Gold Basin, Washington, has been drawing considerable attention after a catastrophic runout of the nearby landslide at Oso, Washington, in 2014. To evaluate potential threats of the Gold Basin landslide to the campground down the slope, remote sensing and numerical modeling were integrated to monitor recent landslide activity and simulate hypothetical runout scenarios. Bare-earth LiDAR DEM (digital elevation model) differencing, InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar), and offset tracking of SAR images reveal that localized collapses at the headscarps have been the primary type of landslide activity at Gold Basin from 2005 to 2019, and currently no signs indicative of movement of a large centralized block or a deep-seated main body were detected. The maximum horizontal deformation rate is 5 m/year occurring primarily from headscarp recession of the middle lobe, and the annual landsliding volume of the whole landslide complex averages 1.03 × 105 m3. From three-dimensional limit equilibrium analysis of generalized terrace structures, the maximum landslide volume is estimated as 2.0 × 106 m3. Simulations of hypothetical runout scenarios were carried out using the depth-averaged two-phase model D-claw with above-obtained landslide geometry constraints. The simulation results demonstrate that debris flows with volume less than 105 m3 only pose limited threats to the campground, while volumes over 106 m3 could cause severe damages. Consequently, the estimated maximum landslide volume of 2.0 × 106 m3 suggests a potential risk to the campground nearby. Adaption of our methodology could prove useful for evaluating other similar landslides globally for hazards prevention and mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  • Angeli MG, Pasuto A, Silvano S (2000) A critical review of landslide monitoring experiences. Eng Geol 55:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker R, Garber M (1978) Theoretical analysis of the stability of slopes. Geotechnique 28:395–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda L, Collins B (1992) Slope stability investigation of the Crown Pacific Property in the South Fork of the Stillaguamish River Basin, unpublished report, 37 p

  • Chen WF (Edition 1) (1975) Limit analysis and soil plasticity. 7:1–638

  • Colesanti C, Wasowski J (2006) Investigating landslides with space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometry. Eng Geol 88(3-4):173–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury AT (2001) Gold Basin landslide remediation feasibility study, alternatives development and analysis, and preliminary project designs, RM 48, SF Stillaguamish River, Prepared for The Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, 45p

  • Fruneau B, Achache J, Delacourt C (1996) Observation and modelling of the Saint-Etienne-de-Tinée landslide using SAR interferometry. Tectonophysics 265(3-4):181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George DL, Iverson RM (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. II. Numerical predictions and experimental tests. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 470(2170):20130820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen RF (2001) Radar interferometry: data interpretation and error analysis (remote sensing and digital image processing). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47633-9

  • Hodgson ME, Jensen JR, Schmidt L, Schill S, Davis B (2003) An evaluation of LIDAR-and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs. Remote Sens Environ 84(2):295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, George DL (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 470(2170):20130819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Reid ME, Iverson NR, LaHusen RG, Logan M, Mann JE, Brien DL (2000) Acute sensitivity of landslide rates to initial soil porosity. Science 290:513–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Berti M (2010) The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments. JGR Earth Surf 115(F3)

  • Iverson RM, George DL, Allstadt K, Reid ME, Collins BD, Vallance JW, Schilling SP, Godt JW, Cannon CM, Magirl CS, Baum RL (2015) Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster. Earth Planet Sci Lett 412:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Dzurisin D (2014) InSAR imaging of Aleutian volcanoes: monitoring a volcanic arc from space: Springer Praxis Books, Geophysical Sciences, Springer, p 390. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00348-6

  • McCabe C (2016) Using Terrestrial LiDAR to Monitor Erosion within the Gold Basin Landslide Complex, Verlot, WA. Master's thesis, University of Washington. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/36260

  • Miller DJ (2019) Gold basin and steelhead haven: landslides on the Stillaguamish. Provided by M2 Environmental Services, pp. 1–37

  • Miller DJ, Miller LR (1999) Hazel/gold basin landslides: geomorphic review draft report. provided by m2 environmental services on behalf of the US army corps of engineers, pp. 1–26

  • Perkins JP, Reid ME, Schmidt KM (2017) Control of landslide volume and hazard by glacial stratigraphic architecture, northwest Washington State, USA. Geology 45:1139–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plank S, Twele A, Martinis S (2016) Landslide mapping in vegetated areas using change detection based on optical and polarimetric SAR data. Remote Sens 8(4):307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roering JJ, Stimely LL, Mackey BH, Schmidt DA (2009) Using DInSAR, airborne LiDAR, and archival air photos to quantify landsliding and sediment transport. Geophys Res Lett 36:L19402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon Wilson Engineers (1954) Report on slide on South Fork Stillaguamish River at Gold Basin forest camp, to the State of Washington Departments of Fisheries, 14p

  • Singleton A, Li Z, Hoey T, Muller JP (2014) Evaluating sub-pixel offset techniques as an alternative to D-InSAR for monitoring episodic landslide movements in vegetated terrain. Remote Sens Environ 147:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squarzoni C, Delacourt C, Allemand P (2003) Nine years of spatial and temporal evolution of the La Valette landslide observed by SAR interferometry. Eng Geol 68(1-2):53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staisch LM (2018) Bedrock mapping and seismic hazard assessment at gold basin landslide, Washington. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20181132

  • Strozzi T, Luckman A, Murray T, Wegmuller U, Werner CL (2002) Glacier motion estimation using SAR offset-tracking procedures. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40:2384–2391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzis A, Anandarajah A, Moore K, Wang I (2006) Slip surface localization in wireless sensor networks for landslide prediction. In 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (pp. 109–116). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1145/1127777.1127797

  • Wartman J, Montgomery DR, Anderson SA, Keaton JR, Benoît J, dela Chapelle J, Gilbert R (2016) The 22 March 2014 Oso landslide, Washington, USA. Geomorphology 253:275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Kim J, George DL, Lu Z (2019) Characterizing seasonally rainfall-driven movement of a translational landslide using SAR imagery and SMAP soil moisture. Remote Sens 11:2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was financially supported by NASA Interdisciplinary Research (IDS) in Earth Science Program (80NSSC17K0022), US Forest Service (16-CR-11062761-035), and the Shuler-Foscue Endowment at Southern Methodist University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuankun Xu.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 512 kb)

ESM 2

(MP4 807 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., George, D.L., Kim, J. et al. Landslide monitoring and runout hazard assessment by integrating multi-source remote sensing and numerical models: an application to the Gold Basin landslide complex, northern Washington. Landslides 18, 1131–1141 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01533-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01533-0

Keywords

Navigation