Elsevier

European Journal of Soil Biology

Volume 101, November–December 2020, 103241
European Journal of Soil Biology

Original article
A comparative study of the fauna associated with nest mounds of native and introduced populations of the red wood ant Formica paralugubris

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103241Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We compared mesofauna between native and introduced nests of Formica paralugubris.

  • Communities differed among sites, with nest fauna more similar than soil fauna.

  • Oribatid mite diversity was higher in nests than soils, unlike springtails.

  • Several oribatid species and a few springtails were associated with nest habitats.

  • We did not find clear evidence of multiple mesofauna relocations during transplants.

Abstract

In the second half of the twentieth century, many red wood ant populations were transferred from the Alps to the Apennines as biological control agents. Since the introduction involved the relocation of entire nest mounds, it is presumable that the associated fauna was also relocated. While the introduction of these ants has raised several concerns about their ecological impact, there has been no attempt to investigate the introduction of other nest-associated species. In this study, we collected samples of soil and nest material from three populations of the red wood ant Formica paralugubris, one Alpine native and two imported into the Apennines. We aimed to confirm that nest mounds are hotspots for soil fauna, detect the occurrence of new myrmecophilous species, and compare the nest-associated fauna among sites, to test the hypothesis of mass species relocation. We focused our analyses mainly on two taxa, springtails and oribatid mites, two highly representative groups of the mesofauna inhabiting nest mounds. The results showed higher richness and diversity in nests than soil for oribatids but not for springtails. We found 17 myrmecophilous oribatid species, but only two springtail species. Finally, native and imported sites shared only a few oribatid and springtail species, suggesting that massive relocation did not occur with nest transplants or it was likely limited. Additionally, we found some species never before collected in Italy.

Introduction

Red wood ants (RWA) are typical in Central and Northern Europe, where seven species of Formica s.s. or the F. rufa group are known [1]. In contrast to other ants, these species are mostly associated with coniferous trees and require cold climates [2]. In the southern portion of their distribution area, their presence is limited to higher altitudes [[3], [4], [5], [6]]. In Italy, the species of Formica s.s. are widespread along the Alpine chain, and only the more thermophilic Formica pratensis Retzius, 1783 naturally occurs at more southern locations in the Apennine mountains [7], although its exact distribution is still unknown. In the mid-twentieth century, nests of several alpine RWA species, such as F. paralugubris Seifert, 1996, F. polyctena Förster, 1850, and F. aquilonia Yarrow, 1955, were repeatedly introduced to the Apennines as biocontrol agents for forest insect pests, and in some cases, viable populations established and started to spread [[8], [9], [10]]. Their impact on the arthropod fauna inhabiting the newly occupied area has been demonstrated [9]. All RWA species are known to profoundly affect local communities, from plants to vertebrates, due to their predatory ability, dominant status, and capacity to modify the physical properties of the habitats they colonize [1,[11], [12], [13]]. The large aboveground nest mound is one distinguishing characteristic of these ants. They are formed to maintain stable humidity and temperature in the nest chambers, and often contrast with harsh external conditions [[14], [15], [16]]. For example, in F. polyctena mounds, the difference between the nest and air temperature during the winter can exceed 20 °C [17]. In cold habitats, this microclimatic stability may turn the RWA mounds into “warm islands”, which can be attractive for a wide array of organisms [18,19]. More in general, that ant nests can provide shelter, food and favorable physical conditions for many litter animals has been established for several ant species [e.g. 20,21,22,23,24].

The invertebrate fauna hosted in RWA nest mounds, assessed in multiple studies, includes a broad range of taxa: isopods, spiders, mites, nematodes, springtails and a long list of insects, from flies to several beetle species [[25], [26], [27], [28]]. More than 120 obligate myrmecophilous species have been found in RWA nest mounds, as well as several other species that occasionally inhabit nests because of their combined and often favorable moisture, pH and temperature conditions [19]. Myrmecophily can be defined as the partial or complete dependence on ant colonies by non-ant species [29]. This relationship can be based upon parasitic, commensal or even mutualistic interactions [30,31]. Thus far, more than ten thousand myrmecophilous arthropods are known, and they have evolved numerous strategies to inhabit or have access to ant nests [[32], [33], [34]], such as chemical camouflage, morphological mimicry and pheromonal attractors [[35], [36], [37]].

In this study, we analyze the invertebrate fauna hosted in the nest mounds of F. paralugubris, a highly polydomous and polygynous RWA species [38]. Since this species was one of the most often introduced into the Italian peninsula [10], we focus our study on the comparison of the nest myrmecophiles from native and introduced populations. Ant translocation involved the movement of entire nest mounds [8], and this likely translocated all the associated fauna as well. The main aims of this study are: i) to confirm that nest mounds can be attractive for the soil fauna, both in the native and imported populations, by comparing assemblages inhabiting nest mounds and soil; ii) to identify potentially myrmecophilous species not previously described in the literature; iii) to compare soil and nest fauna across sites and evaluate if this difference supports the hypothesis of species relocation. We focused on springtails (Hexapoda, Collembola) and oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida), which were used in previous studies as common representative taxa of the mesofauna inhabiting RWA nest mounds [[39], [40], [41], [42]]. Among microarthropods, springtails and oribatid mites constitute two of the most species-rich taxa of the soil ecosystem [43]. Although quite distant phylogenetically, the two groups share several ecological and behavioral features because of their adaptation to similar ecological niches. Both groups feed on litter and soil micro-organisms and graze on fungi, and thereby affect the dispersion of saprophytic and mycorrhizal species and control fungal populations [[44], [45], [46], [47]]. Their community structure is modulated by several natural factors, including plant diversity, litter quality and meta-population dynamics. However, these two key groups are also sensitive to anthropogenic factors such as land use, soil tillage, environmental pollution, physical disturbance and fire [[48], [49], [50], [51]].

Section snippets

Study area and sampling design

The sampling was carried out between June and August 2017. Samples of nest material and soil were collected from three sites, one in the Alps in the Giovetto di Paline Nature Reserve (abbreviated as GP, 45° 57′57″N, 10° 7′48″E), and two in the Apennines, in the Abetone forest (abbreviated as AB, 44° 08′50″N, 10° 40′24″ E) and the Campigna Biogenetic Nature Reserve (abbreviated as CA, within the Foreste Casentinesi, Monte Falterona e Campigna National Park, 43° 52′00″N, 11° 44′14″E) (Fig. 1).

Results

The estimate of nest density was similar among sites (AB ~ 13 nests/ha, CA ~ 12 nests/ha, GP ~ 12 nests/ha). We collected a total of 32 springtail species (11 in GP, 21 in CA and 16 in AB) belonging to 21 genera, 122 oribatids (49 in GP, 39 in CA and 51 in AB) belonging to 62 genera, 53 morphospecies of other arthropods, 2 morphospecies of Annelida (Haplotaxida) belonging to the Enchytraeidae and Lumbricidae families, and one nematode morphospecies. Of the 53 morphospecies of arthropods, 39

Richness and diversity of soil and nest fauna

The predictions that higher species richness would be found in nest mounds of F. paralugubris than in the surrounding soil was confirmed for oribatids, but not for springtails. As for this latter group, the presence of red wood ants is known not to be a determining factor affecting their occurrence (see Lenoir et al. [40] for a study with F. polyctena). However, little is known about the difference in richness and diversity between ant nests and the surrounding soil. Conversely, for oribatids,

Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the first study to include an introduced population in a comparative analysis of the nest-associate fauna in red wood ants. We confirmed that RWA nests are hotspots for arthropod biodiversity, particularly for oribatid mites. We found several potentially myrmecophilous species that preferred the nest habitat instead of soil, though the symbiotic relationships with ants should be further investigated to verify myrmecophily. We used for the first time a comparative approach

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (91)

  • T. Parmentier et al.

    Metapopulation processes affecting diversity and distribution of myrmecophiles associated with red wood ants

    Basic Appl. Ecol.

    (2015)
  • J. Stockan et al.

    Introducing wood ants: evolution, phylogeny, identification and distribution

  • A. Risch et al.

    Where and why? Wood ant population ecology

  • G. Gris et al.

    Les grandes colonies de fourmis des bois du Jura (groupe Formica rufa)

    Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft or Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique Suisse

    (1977)
  • D. Cherix et al.

    Distribution verticale des fourmis dans le Jura vaudois et recensement préliminaire des bourdons (Hymenoptera, Formicidae et Apidae)

    Bulletin de la Société vaudoise des Sciences naturelles

    (1979)
  • D. Cherix

    Note preliminaire sur la structure, la phenologie et le regime alimentaire d'une super-colonie de Formica lugubris Zett

    Insectes Soc.

    (1980)
  • C. Bernasconi et al.

    Molecular taxonomy of the Formica rufa group (red wood ants)(Hymenoptera: formicidae): a new cryptic species in the Swiss Alps

    Myrmecol. News

    (2011)
  • C. Baroni Urbani

    Catalogo delle specie di Formicidae d'Italia (Studi sulle mirmecofauna d'Italia -X)

    Memorie della Società entomologica italiana

    (1971)
  • M. Pavan

    Attività italiana per la lotta biologica con formiche del gruppo Formica rufa contro gli insetti dannosi alle foreste, Ministero Agricoltura e Foreste, Roma

    Collana Verde

    (1959)
  • F. Frizzi et al.

    Chronicle of an impact foretold: the fate and effect of the introduced Formica paralugubris ant

    Biol. Invasions

    (2018)
  • A. Masoni et al.

    Molecular identification of imported red wood ant populations in the Campigna biogenetic nature Reserve (foreste Casentinesi national Park, Italy)

    Conserv. Genet. Resour.

    (2019)
  • M. Ohashi et al.

    The effect of red wood ant (Formica rufa group) mounds on root biomass, density, and nutrient concentrations in boreal managed forests

    J. For. Res.

    (2007)
  • D.A. Wardle et al.

    Long‐term aboveground and belowground consequences of red wood ant exclusion in boreal forest

    Ecology

    (2011)
  • R. Rosengren et al.

    Phenology and causation of nest heating and thermoregulation in red wood ants of the Formica rufa group studied in coniferous forest habitats in southern Finland

    Ann. Zool. Fenn.

    (1987)
  • Š. Kadochová et al.

    Red wood ants Formica polyctena switch off active thermoregulation of the nest in autumn

    Insectes Soc.

    (2014)
  • J. Frouz et al.

    Diurnal and seasonal fluctuations in wood ant (Formica polyctena) nest temperature in two geographically distant populations along a south–north gradient

    Insectes Soc.

    (2007)
  • J. Laakso et al.

    Composition and trophic structure of detrital food web in ant nest mounds of Formica aquilonia and in the surrounding forest soil

    Oikos

    (1998)
  • T. Parmentier et al.

    A highly diverse microcosm in a hostile world: a review on the associates of red wood ants (Formica rufa group)

    Insectes Soc.

    (2014)
  • S.M. Berghoff et al.

    First record of the army ant Cheliomyrmex morosus in Panama and its high associate diversity

    Biotropica

    (2007)
  • C.W. Rettenmeyer et al.

    The largest animal association centered on one species: the army ant Eciton burchellii and its more than 300 associates

    Insectes Soc.

    (2011)
  • A. Lapeva-Gjonova

    Ant-associated beetle fauna in Bulgaria: a review and new data

    Psyche

    (2013)
  • J. Arroyo et al.

    The mite (Acari: Oribatida, Mesostigmata) assemblages associated with Lasius flavus (Hymenoptera: formicidae) nests and surrounding soil in an Irish grassland

    Biol. Environ.

    (2015)
  • F.H. Rocha et al.

    Myrmecophilous organisms associated with colonies of the ponerine ant Neoponera villosa (Hymenoptera: formicidae) nesting in Aechmea bracteata bromeliads: a biodiversity hotspot

    Myrmecological News

    (2020)
  • J. Laakso et al.

    Nest mounds of red wood ant (Formica aquilonia): hot spots for litter-dwelling earthworms

    Oecologia

    (1997)
  • N.A. Robinson et al.

    Myrmecophiles and other invertebrate nest associates of the red wood ant Formica rufa (Hymenoptera: formicidae) in north-west England

    Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist.

    (2013)
  • S.K. Härkönen et al.

    Species richness of associates of ants in the nests of red wood ant Formica polyctena (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), Insect Conserv

    Diver

    (2014)
  • S.K. Härkönen et al.

    Comparison of ant-associated beetle communities inhabiting mounds of forest-dwelling ants in forests and forest clearings

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (2018)
  • J. Parker

    Myrmecophily in beetles (Coleoptera): evolutionary patterns and biological mechanisms

    Myrmecological news

    (2016)
  • W.M. Wheeler

    Ants—their Structure, Development and Behavior

    (1960)
  • B. Hölldobler et al.

    The Ants

    (1990)
  • G.C. Eickwort

    Associations of mites with social insects

    Annu. Rev. Entomol.

    (1990)
  • K. Fiedler

    Ant-associates of palaearctic lycaenid butterfly larvae (Hymenoptera: formicidae; Lepidoptera: lycaenidae)–a review

    Myrmecol. Nachrichten

    (2006)
  • S.F. Geiselhardt et al.

    A review of myrmecophily in ant nest beetles (Coleoptera: carabidae: Paussinae): linking early observations with recent findings

    Naturwissenschaften

    (2007)
  • P.E. Cushing

    Myrmecomorphy and myrmecophily in spiders: a review

    Fla. Entomol.

    (1997)
  • T. Akino

    Chemical strategies to deal with ants: a review of mimicry, camouflage, propaganda, and phytomimesis by ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) and other arthropods

    Myrmecol. News

    (2008)
  • Cited by (9)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text