Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Highly competitive native aquatic species could suppress the growth of invasive aquatic species with similar traits

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple invaders usually co-occur in an ecosystem and threaten the ecological safety of ecosystems. Invasive species from the same origin could facilitate each other’s establishment, while some species could suppress invasion from others with similar traits. For the successful management of aquatic ecosystems invaded by multiple invasive species, we need to better understand the interaction between multiple common-origin invasive aquatic plants and native aquatic plants with similar traits in a community. A native species, Ludwigia peploides, and two invasive species from the same origin, Myriophyllum aquaticum and Alternanthera philoxeroides were grown as a monoculture (no competitor) or a mixed culture (with competitor) to determine the interactions between the species. The biomass, morphological and photosynthetic physiological traits were measured. The results showed that the biomass traits, relative growth rate and morphological traits (except specific leaf area) of L. peploides were higher than those of the two invasive species. Additionally, L. peploides had significantly higher photosynthetic physiological traits than those of M. aquaticum (in all treatments) and A. philoxeroides (in monoculture). The mixed-culture treatments had relatively less effect on most of the growth traits of L. peploides. However, most of the mixed-culture treatments prominently reduced the biomass, morphological traits and photosynthetic physiological traits of the two invasive species. In addition, the native species had a greater competitive effect than both invaders. Overall, co-invasion between the two invaders was not observed. Furthermore, these results support that highly competitive native species could reduce the growth and the invasive success of less competitive invasive species with similar traits in communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly D, Knight C, Weiss S et al (2002) Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia 130:449–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R (1999) Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks. J Exp Bot 50:29–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armas C, Ordiales R, Pugnaire FI (2004) Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85:2682–2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschehoug ET, Brooker R, Atwater DZ et al (2016) The mechanisms and consequences of interspecific competition among plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 47:263–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilger W, Björkman O (1990) Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. Photosynth Res 25:173–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bita C, Gerats T (2013) Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front Plant Sci 4:273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bogar LM, Dickie IA, Kennedy PG et al (2015) Testing the co-invasion hypothesis: ectomycorrhizal fungal communities on Alnus glutinosa and Salix fragilisin New Zealand. Divers Distrib 21:268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XW, Yu D, Liu CH (2016) Effect of water level fluctuation frequency on Alternanthera philoxeroides, Myriophyllum aquaticum and Ludwigia adscendens in autumn. Chinese J Plant Ecol 40:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee J, Bownes A, Martin G (2011) Prospects for the biological control of submerged macrophytes in South Africa. Afr Entomol 19:469–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai YJ, Shen ZG, Liu Y et al (2009) Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environ Exp Bot 65:177–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dandelot S, Robles C, Pech N et al (2008) Allelopathic potential of two invasive alien Ludwigia spp. Aquat Bot 88:311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong BC, Alpert P, Guo W et al (2012) Effects of fragmentation on the survival and growth of the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. Biol Invasions 14:1101–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong BC, Wang MZ, Liu RH et al (2018) Direct and legacy effects of herbivory on growth and physiology of a clonal plant. Biol Invasions 20:3631–3645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery SM (2007) Limiting similarity between invaders and dominant species in herbaceous plant communities? J Ecol 95:1027–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JR, Poorter H (2010) Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant Cell Environ 24:755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon Fo et al (2008) Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett 4:423–425

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Moreno H, Moles AT (2013) A comparison of the recruitment success of introduced and native species under natural conditions. PLoS ONE 8:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory SL, Bauer JT (2013) Experimental evidence for indirect facilitation among invasive plants. J Ecol 102:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers MD, Fiscus EL, Burkey KO et al (2007) Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and yield of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes differing in sensitivity to ozone. Environ Exp Bot 61:190–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Funk FL, Cleland EE, Suding KN et al (2008) Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends Ecol Evol 23:695–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2015) Is Great Britain heading for a Ponto-Caspian invasional meltdown? J Appl Ecol 52:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillard M, Grewell BJ, Futrell CJ et al (2017) Germination and seedling growth of water primroses: a cross experiment between two invaded ranges with contrasting climates. Front Plant Sci 8:1677

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Glon MG, Larson ER, Reisinger LS et al (2017) Invasive dreissenid mussels benefit invasive crayfish but not native crayfish in the Laurentian Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 43:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golivets M, Wallin KF (2018) Neighbour tolerance, not suppression, provides competitive advantage to non-native plants. Ecol Lett 21:745–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastwell GT, Daniel AJ, Vivian-Smith G (2008) Predicting invasiveness in exotic species: do subtropical native and invasive exotic aquatic plants differ in their growth responses to macronutrients? Divers Distrib 14:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz HL, Winston RL, Schwarzländer M (2019) How safe is weed biological control? A global review of direct nontarget attack. Q Rev Biol 94:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer RA, Torchin ME (2008) Integrating ecological and evolutionary theory of biological invasions. Springer, Berlin, pp 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussner A, Stiers I, Verhofstad MJJM et al (2017) Management and control methods of invasive alien freshwater aquatic plants: a review. Aquat Bot 136:112–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2015) Interactions among multiple invasive animals. Ecology 96:2035–2041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan NR, Larson DL, Huerd SC (2008) Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biol Invasions 10:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien MH, Skarratt B, Maywald GF (1995) Potential geographical distribution of Alligator Weed and its biological control by Agasicles hygrophila. J Aquat Plant Manage 33:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuebbing SE, Classen AT, Simberloff D (2014) Two co-occurring invasive woody shrubs alter soil properties and promote subdominant invasive species. J Appl Ecol 51:124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA (2016) Invasive non-native plants have a greater effect on neighbouring natives than other non-natives. Nature Plants 2:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Luo J, Tian X et al (2015) A new strategy for controlling invasive weeds: selecting valuable native plants to defeat them. Sci Rep 5:11004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler HK, WellbuRn AR (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Analysis 11:591–592

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C (2005) Study on the invasion ecology of exotic species alternanthera philoxeroides. Wuhan University, Wuhan, p 106

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge AG, Whitfeld TJS, Roth AM et al (2018) Invasive plants in Minnesota are “joining the locals”: a trait-based analysis. J Plant Sci 29:746–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Siemann E, He M et al (2016) Warming benefits a native species competing with an invasive congener in the presence of a biocontrol beetle. New Phytol 211:1371–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu X, Han C, Xi D et al (2019) Clonal integration facilitates Alternanthera philoxeroides invading to native plant populations. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis 41:1093–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J (2013) The checklist of the Chinese invasive plants. Chinese Biodivers Sci 21:635–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Macarthur R, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen REC (1998) Biological control of weeds. Annu Rev Entomol 43:369–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meekins JF, McCarthy BC (2000) Responses of the biennial forest herb Alliaria petiolata to variation in population density, nutrient addition and light availability. J Ecol 88:447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelan TS, Thomaz SM, Bini LM (2013) Native macrophyte density and richness affect the invasiveness of a tropical Poaceae species. PLoS ONE 8:e60004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mony C, Koschnick TJ, Haller WT et al (2007) Competition between two invasive Hydrocharitaceae (Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) (Royle) and Egeria densa (Planch)) as influenced by sediment fertility and season. Aquat Bot 86:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murchie EH, Lawson T (2013) Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot 64:3983–3998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Netherland MD, Jones D (2015) Fluridone-Resistant Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) Is still dominant in the Kissimmee Chain of Lakes, FL. Invas Plant Sci Mana 8:212–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paini DR, Funderburk JE, Reitz SR (2008) Competitive exclusion of a worldwide invasive pest by a native. Quantifying competition between two phytophagous insects on two host plant species. J Anim Ecol 77:184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palacio-López K, Gianoli E (2011) Invasive plants do not display greater phenotypic plasticity than their native or non-invasive counterparts: a meta-analysis. Oikos 120:1393–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Geng Y, Sosa A et al (2007) Invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides: biology, ecology and management. J Syst Evol 45:884–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey P, Irulappan V, Bagavathiannan MV et al (2017) Impact of combined abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and avenues for crop improvement by exploiting physio-morphological traits. Front Plant Sci 8:537

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E et al (2013) New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61:167–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petruzzella A, van Leeuwen CHA, van Donk E et al (2020) Direct and indirect effects of native plants and herbivores on biotic resistance to alien aquatic plant invasions. J Ecol 108:1487–1496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Jong RD (2010) A comparison of specific leaf area, chemical composition and leaf construction costs of field plants from 15 habitats differing in productivity. New Phytol 143:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A (2001) Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an “invasional meltdown” occurring in the Great Lakes? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2513–2525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Davidson H, Trinder C et al (2010) Root–shoot growth responses during interspecific competition quantified using allometric modelling. Ann Bot 106:921–926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Russell JC, Sataruddin NS, Heard AD (2014) Over-invasion by functionally equivalent invasive species. Ecology 95:2268–2276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler SS, Yeates AG, Wilson JRU et al (2007) Herbivory, mowing, and herbicides differently affect production and nutrient allocation of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Aquat Bot 86:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (2004) Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends Ecol Evol 19:605–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invas 1:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MD, Knapp AK (2001) Physiological and morphological traits of exotic, invasive exotic, and native plant species in Tallgrass Prairie. Int J Plant Sci 162:785–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange EF, Landi P, Hill JM et al (2019) Modeling top-down and bottom-up drivers of a regime shift in invasive aquatic plant stable states. Front Plant Sci 10:889

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Ding JQ, Ren MX (2009) Effects of simulated herbivory and resource availability on the invasive plant, Alternanthera philoxeroides in different habitats. Biol Control 48:287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecco PA, Díaz S, Cabido M et al (2010) Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land-use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them? J Ecol 98:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiébaut G, Martinez L (2015) An exotic macrophyte bed may facilitate the anchorage of exotic propagules during the first stage of invasion. Hydrobiologia 746:183–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thouvenot L, Haury J, Thiébaut G (2012) Responses of two invasive macrophyte species to salt. Hydrobiologia 686:213–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thouvenot L, Haury J, Thiebaut G (2013a) A success story: water primroses, aquatic plant pests. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 23:790–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Thouvenot L, Puech C, Martinez L et al (2013b) Strategies of the invasive macrophyte Ludwigia grandiflora in its introduced range: Competition, facilitation or coexistence with native and exotic species? Aquat Bot 107:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2004) Testing Fox’s assembly rule: does plant invasion depend on recipient community structure? Oikos 105:551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Hu JT, Miao LL et al (2016) The invasive stoloniferous clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides outperforms its co-occurring non-invasive functional counterparts in heterogeneous soil environments–invasion implications. Sci Rep 6:38036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Hu JT, Wang RQ et al (2018) Tolerance and resistance facilitate the invasion success of Alternanthera philoxeroides in disturbed habitats: a reconsideration of the disturbance hypothesis in the light of phenotypic variation. Environ Exp Bot 153:135–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wersal RM, Madsen JD (2010) Comparison of subsurface and foliar herbicide applications for control of Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum). Invas Plant Sci Mana 3:262–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Yeates A, Schooler S et al (2007) Rapid response to shoot removal by the invasive wetland plant, alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). Environ Exp Bot 60:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Carrillo J, Ding J (2017) Species diversity and environmental determinants of aquatic and terrestrial communities invaded by Alternanthera philoxeroides. Sci Total Environ 581–582:666–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao T, Yu H, Song YB et al (2019) Nutrient enhancement of allelopathic effects of exotic invasive on native plant species. PLoS ONE 14:e0206165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xie D, Yu D, You WH et al (2013) The propagule supply, litter layers and canopy shade in the littoral community influence the establishment and growth of Myriophyllum aquaticum. Biol Invas 15:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu CY, Schooler SS, Van Klinken RD (2012) Differential influence of clonal integration on morphological and growth responses to light in two invasive herbs. PLoS ONE 7:e35873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yan X, Zhen Yu L, Gregg WP et al (2001) Invasive species in China: an overview. Biodivers Conserv 10:1317–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Ferrari MJ, Shea K (2011) Pollinator behavior mediates negative interactions between two congeneric invasive plant species. Am Nat 177:110–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yen S, Myerscough P (1989) Co-existence of three species of amphibious plants in relation to spatial and temporal variation: Investigation of plant responses. Aust J Ecol 14:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You WH, Fan SF, Yu D et al (2014) An invasive clonal plant benefits from clonal integration more than a co-occurring native plant in nutrient-patchy and competitive environments. PLoS ONE 9:e97246

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZJ, van Kleunen M (2019) Common alien plants are more competitive than rare natives but not than common natives. Ecol Lett 22:1378–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong XM, Shi ZS, Li FH et al (2014) Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of infertile and fertile stalks of paired near-isogenic lines in maize (Zea mays L.) under shade conditions. Photosynthetica 52:597–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou T, Liu SC, Feng ZL et al (2015) Use of exotic plants to control Spartina alterniflora invasion and promote mangrove restoration. Sci Rep 5:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Zihare L, Muizniece I, Blumberga D (2019) New vision on invasive alien plant management system 23:166

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from the Special Foundation of National Science and Technology Basic Research (2013FY112300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31900281) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M650634).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The National Field Station of Freshwater Ecosystem of Liangzi Lake, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, 430072, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoliang Zhang, Hongwei Yu, Haihao Yu, Chunhua Liu, Shufeng Fan & Dan Yu

Authors
  1. Xiaoliang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongwei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haihao Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunhua Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shufeng Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dan Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunhua Liu or Shufeng Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Yu, H., Yu, H. et al. Highly competitive native aquatic species could suppress the growth of invasive aquatic species with similar traits. Biol Invasions 23, 267–280 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02370-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02370-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation