Abstract
The morphological distinction between the various types of mucinous ovarian tumors has major prognostic implications but may be challenging. The aims of our study were to describe inter-observer reproducibility in the morphological diagnosis of mucinous ovarian tumors, to evaluate the clinical relevance of possible diagnostic discrepancies, and to identify molecular abnormalities correlated with the histological type. Seventy-nine ovarian mucinous borderline tumors (MOB) and either expansile or infiltrative carcinomas (MOC) were independently reviewed by two gynecological pathologists. Molecular analysis was performed in 32 cases. Concordance between the two pathologists was reached in 67 cases (k: 0.78). The main discrepancies (8/12) were the evaluation of nuclear grade 3 or that of microfoci (< 5 mm) of infiltrative-type carcinoma in an otherwise typical expansile MOC. Our follow-up analysis showed that infiltrative MOC had a lower overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0024) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.0060) as compared with MOB and expansile MOC. The presence of nuclear grade 3 or microfoci (< 5 mm) of infiltrative-type pattern of invasion in an otherwise typical expansile MOC did not alter the prognosis as compared with expansile MOC without these features, in terms of OS (p < 0.0028) and PFS (p = 0.0074). KRAS mutations were more frequent in MOB (71%), than in expansile (50%) and infiltrative MOC (14%). In contrast, the prevalence of TP53 mutation was lower in MOB (43%), than in expansile (58%) and infiltrative MOC (71%). Our results confirm that in MOC, the expansile pattern of invasion is associated with a better prognosis than extensive (> 5 mm) infiltrative-type pattern of invasion. No specific or sensitive molecular profile might help in the differential diagnosis of mucinous ovarian tumors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kurman RJ, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (eds) (2014) WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs, 4th edn. Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer
Dube V, Roy M, Plante M et al (2005) Mucinous ovarian tumors of Mullerian-type: an analysis of 17 cases including borderline tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, and invasive carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 24:138–146
Riopel MA, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ (1999) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 23:617–635
Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A, Ledermann J, McCluggage WG, McNeish I, Morice P, Pignata S, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I, Baert T, Belaroussi I, Dashora A, Olbrecht S, Planchamp F, Querleu D, Baert T, Banerjee S, Belaroussi I, Blecharz P, Bruchim I, Cibula D, Colombo N, Concin N, Davidson B, Dashora A, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, du Bois A, Ferrero A, Glasspool R, González-Martin A, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Joly F, Kim JW, Kridelka F, Ledermann J, Lorusso D, Mahner S, McCluggage WG, McNeish I, Mikami M, Mirza MR, Morice P, Nicum S, Olbrecht S, O’Donnell DM, Pautier P, Planchamp F, Pignata S, Querleu D, Ray-Coquard I, Rodolakis A, Sehouli J, Selcukbiricik F, Sessa C, Singh N, Tan DSP, Timmerman D, Tognon G, van der Velden J, Vergote I, Witteveen PO, Zeimet AG, ESMO-ESGO Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference Working Group (2019) ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease†. Ann Oncol 30(5):672–705
Morice P, Gouy S, Leary A (2019) Mucinous ovarian carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380:1256–1266
Gouy S, Saidani M, Maulard A et al (2018) Characteristics and prognosis of stage I ovarian mucinous tumors according to expansile or infiltrative type. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28:493–499
Chiannilkulchai N, Pautier P, Genestie C, Bats AS, Vacher-Lavenu MC, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M et al (2017) Networking for ovarian rare tumors: a significant breakthrough improving disease management. Ann Oncol 28:1274–1279
Mayr D, Hirschmann A, Lohrs U, Diebold J (2006) KRAS and BRAF mutations in ovarian tumors: a comprehensive study of invasive carcinomas, borderline tumors and extraovarian implants. Gynecol Oncol 103:883–887
Cuatrecasas M, Villanueva A, Matias-Guiu X, Prat J (1997) K-ras mutations in mucinous ovarian tumors: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 95 cases. Cancer 79:1581–1586
Anglesio MS, Kommoss S, Tolcher MC, Clarke B, Galletta L, Porter H, Damaraju S, Fereday S, Winterhoff BJ, Kalloger SE, Senz J, Yang W, Steed H, Allo G, Ferguson S, Shaw P, Teoman A, Garcia JJ, Schoolmeester JK, Bakkum-Gamez J, Tinker AV, Bowtell DD, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN (2013) Molecular characterization of mucinous ovarian tumours supports a stratified treatment approach with HER2 targeting in 19% of carcinomas. J Pathol 229:111–120
Köbel M, Piskorz AM, Lee S, Lui S, LePage MF, Rosenfeld N, Mes Masson AM, Brenton JD (2016) Optimized p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of TP53 mutation in ovarian carcinoma. J Pathol Clin Res 2:247–258
Rodríguez IM, Prat J (2002) Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 75 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 26:139–152
Lee KR, Scully RE (2000) Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 196 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with ‘pseudomyxoma peritonei’. Am J Surg Pathol 24:1447–1464
Gilks CB, Ionescu DN, Kalloger SE, Köbel M, Irving J, Clarke B, Santos J, Le N, Moravan V, Swenerton K, Cheryl Brown Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Unit of the British Columbia Cancer Agency (2008) Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma. Hum Pathol 39:1239–1251
McCluggage WG, Judge MJ, Clarke BA, Davidson B, Gilks CB, Hollema H, Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Mikami Y, Stewart CJ, Vang R, Hirschowitz L, International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (2015) Data set for reporting of ovary, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinoma: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Mod Pathol 28:1101–1122
Lee YJ, Lee MY, Ruan A, Chen CK, Liu HP, Wang CJ, Chao WR, Han CP (2016) Multipoint Kras oncogene mutations potentially indicate mucinous carcinoma on the entire spectrum of mucinous ovarian neoplasms. Oncotarget. 7:82097–82103
Ryland GL et al (2015) Mutational landscape of mucinous ovarian carcinoma and its neoplastic precursors. Genome Med 7(1):87
Cheasley D, Wakefield MJ, Ryland GL, Allan PE, Alsop K, Amarasinghe KC, Ananda S, Anglesio MS, Au-Yeung G, Böhm M, Bowtell DDL, Brand A, Chenevix-Trench G, Christie M, Chiew YE, Churchman M, DeFazio A, Demeo R, Dudley R, Fairweather N, Fedele CG, Fereday S, Fox SB, Gilks CB, Gourley C, Hacker NF, Hadley AM, Hendley J, Ho GY, Hughes S, Hunstman DG, Hunter SM, Jobling TW, Kalli KR, Kaufmann SH, Kennedy CJ, Köbel M, le Page C, Li J, Lupat R, McNally OM, McAlpine JN, Mes-Masson AM, Mileshkin L, Provencher DM, Pyman J, Rahimi K, Rowley SM, Salazar C, Samimi G, Saunders H, Semple T, Sharma R, Sharpe AJ, Stephens AN, Thio N, Torres MC, Traficante N, Xing Z, Zethoven M, Antill YC, Scott CL, Campbell IG, Gorringe KL (2019) The molecular origin and taxonomy of mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Nat Commun 10:3935
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Catherine Genestie: pathological review of all cases, design of the study, writing of the article
Aurélie Auguste: molecular study, writing of the article (molecular study)
Miriam Al Battal: molecular study
Jean-Yves Scoazec: critical review of the article and English review
Sébastien Gouy, Philippe Morice, and Patricia Pautier: provided clinical data and consent of patients
Ludovic Lacroix: molecular study
Alexandra Leary: design of the molecular study, writing of the article (molecular study), and English writing
Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran: design of the pathological study, pathological review of the cases, writing of the article (pathological study)
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Board (Institut Gustave Roussy). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Genestie, C., Auguste, A., Al Battal, M. et al. Histological classification of mucinous ovarian tumors: inter-observer reproducibility, clinical relevance, and role of genetic biomarkers. Virchows Arch 478, 885–891 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02939-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02939-w