Abstract
This paper examines vernacular governance and spatial transformations of low-cost apartments (LCAs). LCAs are a plausible solution to housing shortages for the urban poor in cities that face constantly increasing land values and limited space. Although prohibited by law, various spatial transformations occur to meet immediate needs. This case study addresses the practice of vernacular governance in the spatial transformations of LCAs through the vernacularisation by nomotropism to meet residents’ needs and solve their problems without the government’s complicated bureaucracy. Atomisation occurs from the neighbourhood to the molecular scale, among next-door neighbours and by creating multiple, distinctive vernacular governances on each LCA floor. This study offers a new perspective on housing policy in terms of distributing decision making to the community, thus creating flexible appropriation of space to meet residents’ ever-changing and immediate needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alif, M. R. (2009). Analisis Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Satuan Rumah Susun di Dalam Kerangka Hukum Benda [Ownership analysis of low cost apartment unit in the framework of legal objects]. Bandung: CV. Nuansa Aulia.
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2016). Handbook on theories of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Arabindoo, P. (2011). Rhetoric of the ‘slum’. Rethinking urban poverty. City, 15(6), 636–646.
Aurand, A. (2010). Density, housing types and mixed land use: Smart tools for affordable housing? Urban Studies, 47(5), 1015–1036.
Awan, N., Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2011). Spatial agency: Other ways of doing architecture. London: Routledge.
Ballesteros, M. (2008). Verb crisis. Verb Architecture Boogazine, 6, 150–159.
Bredenoord, J., & Van Lindert, P. (2010). Pro-poor housing policies: Rethinking the potential of assisted self-help housing. Habitat International, 34(3), 278–287.
Brugmann, J. (2010). Welcome to the urban revolution: How cities are changing the world. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Castells, M. (1984). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chan, Y.-K. (1999). Density, crowding, and factors intervening in their relationship: Evidence from a hyper-dense metropolis. Social Indicators Research, 48(1), 103–124.
Chua, B. H. (Ed.). (2000). Consumption in Asia: Lifestyle and identity. London: Routledge.
Crosby, B. C., Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2016). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655–669.
Dayaratne, R., & Kellett, P. (2008). Housing and homemaking in low-income urban settlements: Sri Lanka and Colombia. Journal of Housing & the Built Environment, 23(1), 53–70.
Deheragoda, K. (2007). Living high: The social dimension. Colombo: Institute of Town Planners Sri Lanka.
Ekblad, S., Chang-hui, C., Yue-qin, H., & Shuran, L. (1992). Effects of dwelling types and facilities of crowding, stress, life satisfaction and health of households in Western Beijing. Ekistics, 59, 354–355.
Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erman, T. (2016). Formalization by the state, reinformalization by the people: A Gecekondu transformation housing estate as site of multiple discrepancies. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 40(2), 425–440.
Ferguson, B. (1999). Micro-finance of housing: A key to housing the low or moderate-income majority. Environment & Urbanization, 11(1), 185–200.
Ferguson, B., & Navarette, J. (2003). A financial framework for reducing slums: Lessons from experience in Latin America. Environment and Urbanization, 15(2), 201–215.
Fincher, R. (2007). Is high-rise housing innovative? Developers’ contradictory narratives of high-rise housing in Melbourne. Urban Studies, 44(3), 631–649.
Frey, P. (2010). Learning from the vernacular: Towards a new vernacular architecture. Lausanne: Actes Sud.
Friedmann, J. (2003). Why do planning theory? Planning Theory, 2(1), 7–10.
Ghertner, D. A. (2011). The nuisance of slums: Environmental law and the production of slum illegality in India. New Delhi: Routledge.
Ha, S. K. (2007). Housing regeneration and building sustainable low-income communities in Korea. Habitat International, 31(1), 116–129.
Hamdi, N. (2004). Small change: About the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan.
Harapan, S. A., & Triyadi, S. S. (2007). Faktor Determinan Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Rusunawa di Bandung [Determinant factors affecting the performance of rented low cost apartment in Bandung]. Bandung: Budi Luhur.
Hernandez, F., Millington, M., & Borden, I. (2005). Transculturation: Cities, space and architecture in Latin America. Amsterdam: Rodopi BV.
Hussain, N. (2003). The jurisprudence of emergency: Colonialism and the rule of law. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Hutagalung, A.S. (1998)Condominium dan Permasalahannya [Condominium and its problems]. Depok: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia.
Indonesia Development Planning Board, Statistics Indonesia, & UNPFA. (2013). Indonesia population projection. Jakarta: Bappenas.
Jarvis, H. (2005). Moving to London time: Household co-ordination and the infrastructure of everyday life. Time & Society, 14(1), 133–154.
Jenkins, P., Smith, H., & Wang, Y. P. (2007). Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanizing world. London: Routledge.
Kapp, S., Baltazar, A. P., & Morado, D. (2008). Architecture as critical exercise: Little pointers towards alternative practices. Field Journal, 2(1), 7–30.
Karim, A. H. M. Z. (2013). Living conditions in the low cost apartments in Malaysia: An empirical investigation. Asian Social Science, 9(17), 20–29.
Keivani, R., & Werna, E. (2001). Modes of housing provision in developing countries. Progress in Planning, 55(2), 65–118.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainty in networks. London: Routledge.
Kudva, N. (2009). The everyday and the episodic: The spatial and political impacts of urban informality. Environment & Planning A, 41(7), 1614–1628.
Lawrence, R. J. (2006). Learning from the vernacular. In L. Asquith & M. Vellinga (Eds.), Vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century: Theory, education, and practice. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Levitt, P., & Merry, S. (2009). Vernacularization on the ground: local uses of global women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks, 9(4), 441–461.
Lindell, I. (2010). Between exit and voice: Informality and the spaces of popular agency. African Studies Quarterly, 11(2), 1–11.
Mayo, S. K., & Gross, D. J. (1987). Sites and services—And subsidies: The economics of low-cost housing in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 1(2), 301–335.
McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: Politics, crisis, and the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108.
Oliver, P. (2006). Built to meet needs: Cultural issues in vernacular architecture. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Oxley, M. (2009). Financing affordable social housing in Europe. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Ozkan, S. (2006). Traditionalism and vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century. In L. Asquith & M. Vellinga (Eds.), Vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century: Theory, education, and practice. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Patton, C. V. (1998). Spontaneous shelter: International perspectives and prospects. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Payne, G., & Majale, M. (2004). The urban housing manual: Making regulatory frameworks work for the poor. London: Earthscan.
Phang, S. Y. (2001). Housing policy, wealth formation and the Singapore economy. Housing Studies, 16(4), 443–459.
Pickerill, J., & Chatterton, P. (2006). Notes towards autonomous geographies: Creation, resistance and self-management as survival tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 30, 1–4.
Porter, L., Lombard, M., Huxley, M., Ingin, A. K., Islam, T., Briggs, J., et al. (2011). Informality, the commons and the paradoxes for planning: Concepts and debates for informality and planning self-made cities: Ordinary informality: The reordering of a romany neighbourhood the land formalisation process and the peri-urban Zone of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania street vendors and planning in indonesian cities informal urbanism in the USA: New challenges for theory and practice engaging with citizenship and urban struggle through an informality lens. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(1), 115–153.
Rabe, P. E. (2010).Land sharing in Phnom Penh and Bangkok. In Paper Presented at the slums and urban poverty in the developing world, policy workshop, Washington, DC.
Rapoport, A. (1969). House form culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rempel, M. (1996). Systems theory and power/knowledge: A Foucauldian reconstruction of Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 16(4), 58–90.
Røiseland, A. (2011). Governance, informal. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science (pp. 1019–1021). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Rosa, E. (2016). Rules, transgressions and nomotropism: The complex relationship between planning and Italian abusivismo. Geography Research Forum, 36, 110–126.
Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87.
Shetty, P. (2001). History of housing. Bombay: Kanla Raheja Institute for Architecture.
Simone, A. (2004). For the city yet to come: Changing African life in four cities. London: Duke University Press.
Smets, P. (1999). Housing finance trapped in a dilemma of perceptions: Affordability criteria for the urban poor in India questioned. Housing Studies, 14(6), 821–838.
Sundaresan, J. (2013).Urban planning in vernacular governance: Land use planning and violations in Bangalore. Doctoral dissertation. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
Turner, J. F. C. (1976). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments. London: Marion Boyars.
Uguy, M. J. H. (2012). Perilaku spasial penghuni lingkungan perumahan massal: Rumah Susun Tanah Abang dan Kebon Kacang Jakarta Pusat [Spatial behavior of mass housing resident: Tanah Abang and Kebon Kacang low cost apartment]. Master’s thesis. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
UN-Habitat. (2010).The state of Asian cities 2010/11.Fukuoka: UN-Habitat.
UN-Habitat. (2012). Making slums history: A global challenge for 2020. Rabat: UN.
Vellinga, M. (2013). The noble vernacular. Journal of Architecture, 18(4), 570–590.
Vestbro, D. U. (2008). Are architects and planners obstacles to slum upgrading? Papers from a seminar in Barcelona in April 2008. Stockholm: Division of Urban and Regional Studies, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Wahyudi, A. (2010).Evaluasi Dampak Program Rumah Susun di Surakarta [Evaluation of impacts of the low cost apartment program in Surakarta]. Undergraduate thesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Wai, L., & Lai, C. (2010). Hong Kong’s density policy towards public housing: A theoretical and empirical review. Third World Planning Review, 15, 65–68.
Waty, M. (2009). Evaluasi Ketersediaan Prasarana Dasar di Rumah Susun Sederhana Sewa Daya Kecamatan Biringkanaya Kota Makassar [Evaluation of availability of basic infrastructure in rented low cost apartment in Kecamatan Biringkanaya, Makasar]. Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin.
Wong, J. F. (2010). Factors affecting open building implementation in high density mass housing design in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 34(2), 174–182.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory. Research, and Policy, World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–250.
Yudohusodo, S. (1991). Rumah Untuk Seluruh Rakyat [Homes for people]. Jakarta: Inkoppol.
Yuen, B. (2009). Reinventing high-rise housing in Singapore. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development & Research, 11(1), 3–18.
Yuen, B., Yeh, A., Appold, S. J., Earl, G., Ting, J., & Kurnianingrum Kwee, L. K. (2006). High-rise living in Singapore public housing. Urban Studies, 43(3), 583–600.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express gratitude to Directorate of Research and Community Engagement Universitas Indonesia (DRPM UI) for administering the Hibah Publikasi Artikel di Jurnal International Kuartil Q1 dan Q2 (Q1Q2) Tahun Anggaran 2019 scheme under grant number NKB-0305/UN2.R3.1/HKP.05.00/2019, and Faculty of Engineering Universitas Indonesia (FTUI), Departement of Architecture for their support in this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adianto, J., Gabe, R.T. & Rahman, M.F. Vernacular governance and spatial transformations of low-cost apartments in Klender, Jakarta, Indonesia. J Hous and the Built Environ 36, 759–779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09785-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09785-x