Scenarios for transitioning cars from ICEV to BEVs and PHEVs using household level GPS travel data
Introduction
Plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs), including plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and battery electric vehicles (BEVs), have an important role in reducing transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Duvall, et al., 2007, Yang, 2009, Stephan and Sullivan, 2008, Kromer et al., 2010). It is a complex endeavor to quantify the benefit of PEV adoption in GHG emission reductions, especially for PHEVs, as they can be fueled by both gasoline and electricity. The amount of GHGs emitted per year of traveling is a function of the vehicle characteristics and of driving and charging patterns. For some driving patterns, a short-range (80 or 120 mile in our analysis) BEV will satisfy both travel needs and minimize GHGs, but for other travel needs either a long-range (200 mile) BEV or a PHEV will produce better results. Changes in daily driving routines from one day to another or between weekdays and weekends may change the household GHG emissions for any given vehicle. This paper compares the best BEV or PHEV range (based on battery size) vehicle that will produce the lowest amount of GHGs for California households based on their GPS travel patterns. We use household level data to optimize GHGs while controlling for the long and short-range vehicle mix.
A life cycle assessment (LCA) of vehicle GHG emissions usually consists of two parts: one looks at the life cycle of a vehicle (Moon et al., 2006, Lewis et al., 2014) including vehicle production (Samaras and Meisterling, 2008), vehicle operation, and after-life disposal/recycling (Ma, 2012); the other looks at the life cycle of fuel (Wang et al., 2005, Elgowainy, 2009) including well-to-tank fuel production and transmission and tank-to-wheel fuel consumption, which is accounted for in both the vehicle operation part of the vehicle life cycle and the fuel life cycle. The tank-to-wheel GHG emissions are also known as on-road emissions. There are many factors throughout the phases of a PEV’s life cycle that can influence the on-road emissions of the vehicle. For example, in the vehicle production phase, the powertrain design (Bradley and Frank, 2009, Letendre and Watts, 2009), battery capacity (Shiau, 2009), and energy-management strategies (Gonder and Markel, 2007, Wirasingha and Emadi, 2011) can all significantly influence the vehicle fuel consumption during operation, and thus influence the on-road GHG emissions. There are studies to model the performance of each power system component in order to understand the energy consumption of PHEVs (Lee et al., 2002). Although the on-road emissions of PEVs in all-electric mode is zero, the life-cycle emissions are determined by the upstream GHG emissions from electricity generation (Tamayao, 2015, Onat et al., 2015), which is subject to many uncertainties including the fluctuations in demand on the grid throughout the day and the power source used to satisfy the marginal electricity demand (Axsen, 2011, Zivin et al., 2014).
Beyond the vehicle design and the upstream GHG emissions from electricity generation, driving behavior is crucial for estimating the on-road GHG emissions of PHEVs as the engine may be on or off in charge-depleting mode (Bradley and Frank, 2009). There are generally two types of approaches to simulate driving behavior. One option is to use standard driving cycles to characterize the cycles (Samaras and Meisterling, 2008, Raykin et al., 2012, Silva et al., 2009) and to create various driving cycles to represent different types of driving behavior (Dynamometer, 2017, Yuan, 2015). Another common approach is to sample real-world driving behavior by either tracking vehicle performance through on-board diagnostics systems (Nicholas et al., 2016), quantifying variation of real-world driving behavior (Lee et al., 2011, Wang et al., 2015, He, 2016), or simulating vehicle performance based on speed trace data (Silva et al., 2009, Hamza and Laberteaux, 2016). Road grade (Wood, et al., 2014) is another factor that impacts a vehicle’s fuel economy. Charging behavior (Shiau, 2009, Neubauer et al., 2013, Tal, 2014) and weather conditions (Yuksel and Michalek, 2015) will also influence the amount of available electricity in the battery in real-world driving activities, therefore impacting the on-road GHG emissions.
There are many vehicle energy consumption models, and they all have their strengths and weaknesses in terms of the capacity to consider vehicle design, road grade, charging activities, etc. (Mahmud and Town, 2016). For example, the Advanced Vehicle Simulator (ADVISOR) is a popular vehicle energy analysis tool which takes a hybrid backward-forward approach to simulate the component performance (Markel, 2002). The Vehicle Technologies Office of the U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE. VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE: MODELING AND SIMULATION., 2017) supported the development of Autonomie (Kim et al., 2010) and FASTSim (described in detail in Section 2) (Brooker, et al., 2015). There are also custom PEV energy consumption models, which are not publicly available, such as Muratori et al to analyze energy consumption of different vehicle models (Muratori, 2013), Doucette and McCulloch to compute CO2 emissions from PEVs and ICE vehicles (Doucette and McCulloch, 2011), and Khayyer et al to analyze energy management strategies’ impact on energy consumption (Khayyer, 2012).
PEV market share is another essential factor in estimating the total GHG emissions reductions that can be achieved by implementing PEVs. Vehicle ownership is usually a household decision, and there are many studies that explored how household vehicle ownership is influenced by various factors including household size, age, education, income, number of workers, residential location and condition, vehicle utility, operating costs, etc. (Manski and Sherman, 1980, Mannering and Winston, 1985, Mannering et al., 2002). With the introduction of PEVs, electricity becomes a more significant part of the vehicle’s fuel so the electricity price plays an important role in the adoption of PEVs (Kumar and Alok, 2020 Apr, Bhat et al., 2009) and the improvement in fuel economy is an important motivation for PEV adoption (Kurani and Turrentine, 2004, Kurani et al., 2008). On the other hand, the limited battery range available in current technology is a primary barrier to the adoption of PEVs, especially BEVs (Lee et al., 2020 Feb, Tal and Nicholas, 2013).
This study explores the potential of reducing GHG emissions by wide-scale adoption of PEVs including a mix of BEVs and PHEVs in the household level. Recent studies explore the utility factor and GHG emissions of single PEV households (Nicholas et al., 2013, Tal and Nicholas, 2016) but not the electrification of all vehicles in the household based on travel needs and utilization restrictions. In this study, fuel consumption is simulated using FASTSim based on speed trace data from real trips rather than standard driving cycles or custom vehicle energy models which are more common approaches used in previous studies.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: the second section introduces FASTSim and the configuration of vehicle models which are used for fuel consumption simulation; the third section introduces the speed trace data along with weights to produce representative statistics; and the fourth section shows the GHG emissions reduction in different PEV adoption scenarios with and without considering household vehicle ownership limitations.
Section snippets
Fastsim introduction and configuration
The Future Automotive Systems Technology Simulator (FASTSim) is an open-source tool developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (NREL. Future Automotive Systems Technology Simulator., 2016). FASTSim is capable of simulating the fuel consumption of conventional vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, PHEVs, BEVs, compressed natural gas vehicles, and fuel cell vehicles based on speed-over-time trace data, and it accounts for “drag, acceleration, ascent, rolling resistance, each
Speed trace data preparation
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) conducts the California Household Travel Survey (CHTS) every ten years to understand socioeconomic characteristics and travel behavior of households in California. The latest survey began in 2010 and concluded in 2012 (CalTrans., 2013). Besides traditional travel diary data, the 2010–2012 CHTS also collected detailed GPS trace information. Recruited households can choose either to install in-vehicle GPS devices to collect second-by-second
Scenario analysis of GHG emissions reduction by PEVS
To explore the potential of reducing transportation-induced GHG emissions by implementing PEVs, we selected speed trace data from the 2010–2012 CHTS (as mentioned in Section 3), simulated the GHG emissions of these ICE trips if they had been completed by the PEV models listed in Table 4 (using FASTSim), and calculated the GHG emissions reduction achieved by each PEV model compared to a 2012 Toyota Corolla. As mentioned in Section 1, charging behavior could have significant impact on a PEV’s GHG
Conclusion
This paper explored the potential for PEVs to reduce GHG emissions. Nearly one week’s GPS trace data from over two thousand California vehicles were used, and we used FASTSim to simulate the emissions of these trips if they are completed by different vehicle models and to find out the best vehicle model for each sample vehicle that can achieve the most GHG reduction. This study found that when the travel demand is within the battery range, BEVs with shorter range can always achieve better
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Wei Ji: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Gil Tal: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing - review & editing.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to recognize Ken Laberteaux, Karim Hamza, and John Willard from the Toyota Research Institute of North America for sharing the new FASTSim scripts and supporting the FASTSim analysis.
References (66)
Plug-in hybrid vehicle GHG impacts in California: Integrating consumer-informed recharge profiles with an electricity-dispatch model
Energy Policy
(2011)- et al.
The impact of demographics, built environment attributes, vehicle characteristics, and gasoline prices on household vehicle holdings and use
Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol.
(2009) - et al.
Electrification of the two-car household: PHEV or BEV?
Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol.
(2017 Dec) - et al.
Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2009) - et al.
Modeling the prospects of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles to reduce CO2 emissions
Appl. Energy
(2011) Individual trip chain distributions for passenger cars: Implications for market acceptance of battery electric vehicles and energy consumption by plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
Appl. Energy
(2016)- et al.
Long-term greenhouse gas emission and petroleum reduction goals: Evolutionary pathways for the light-duty vehicle sector
Energy
(2010) - et al.
Modelling and simulation of vehicle electric power system
J. Power Sources
(2002) - et al.
Vehicle lightweighting vs. electrification: life cycle energy and GHG emissions results for diverse powertrain vehicles
Appl. Energy
(2014) A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles
Energy Policy
(2012)