Abstract
Key message
This study investigates efficient strategies for fine tree root sampling, in terms of estimating root trait parameters with desired confidence intervals for least effort and cost.
Abstract
Sampling tree roots is difficult and costly with high variation among samples and wide confidence intervals for parameter estimates. Efficient strategies for fine tree root sampling will estimate root trait parameters with the desired confidence interval for least effort and cost. We compared alternative strategies to sample and estimate fine root surface area density; (1) collecting samples at intervals of 10 cm to a depth of 150 cm for entire tree root systems versus (2) independently taking samples from different randomly-selected 10-cm depth intervals around different trees. We also quantified the pilot sample size needed to reliably estimate the number of samples that would achieve the desired confidence interval. Efficiency of sampling entire tree root systems versus independent samples depended on the structure of the sample data. Pilot sample sizes > 5 per 10-cm soil depth can give reliable estimates of sample sizes required to achieve a 95% confidence interval of ± 10% of the sample mean. The statistical strategies in this paper are not particularly novel or difficult, but are seldom applied to root studies. We contend that they should be used, both to guide efficiency in sampling design and also to assess how realistic it is to expect that estimated sample means will be reliable, in the sense of having confidence intervals of the required width.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addo-Danso SD, Prescott CE, Smith AR (2016) Methods for estimating root biomass and production in forest and woodland ecosystem carbon studies: a review. For Ecol Manage 359:332–351
Bengough AG, Castrignano A, Pagès L, Van Noordwijk M (2000) Sampling strategies, scaling, and statistics. Root methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 147–173
Berhongaray G, King J, Janssens I, Ceulemans R (2013) An optimized fine root sampling methodology balancing accuracy and time investment. Plant Soil 366(1–2):351–361
Chen W, Zhang Q, Cihlar J, Bauhus J, Price DT (2004) Estimating fine-root biomass and production of boreal and cool temperate forests using aboveground measurements: a new approach. Plant Soil 265(1–2):31–46
Cook FJ, Kelliher FM (2006) Determining vertical root and microbial biomass distributions from soil samples. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(3):728–735
Craine JM, Lee WG, Bond WJ, Williams RJ, Johnson LC (2005) Environmental constraints on a global relationship among leaf and root traits of grasses. Ecology 86(1):12–19
Di N, Liu Y, Mead DJ, Xie Y, Jia L, Xi B (2018) Root-system characteristics of plantation-grown Populus tomentosa adapted to seasonal fluctuation in the groundwater table. Trees 32(1):137–149
Englund EJ, Heravi N (1994) Phased sampling for soil remediation. Environ Ecol Stat 1(3):247–263
Fahey TJ, Yanai RD, Gonzales KE, Lombardi JA (2017) Sampling and processing roots from rocky forest soils. Ecosphere 8(6):e01863
Hutchings MJ, John EA (2003) Distribution of roots in soil, and root foraging activity. In: de Kroon H, Visser EJW (eds) Root Ecology. Ecological studies (analysis and synthesis), vol 168. Springer, Heidelberg
IPCC (2000) Quantifying uncertainties in practice. Chapter 6. In: Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan, pp 6.1–6.34
Levillain J, Thongo M’Bou A, Deleporte P, Saint-André JC (2011) Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations? Ann Bot 108:221–230
Metcalfe DB, Williams M, Aragão LE, Da Costa AC, De Almeida SS, Braga AP, Gonçalves PH, De Athaydes J, Junior S, Malhi Y, Meir P (2007) A method for extracting plant roots from soil which facilitates rapid sample processing without compromising measurement accuracy. New Phytol 174(3):697–703
Metcalfe D, Meir P, Aragão LE, da Costa A, Almeida S, Braga A, Gonçalves P, Athaydes J, Malhi Y, Williams M (2008) Sample sizes for estimating key ecosystem characteristics in a tropical terra firme rainforest. For Ecol Manage 255(3–4):558–566
Sochacki SJ, Ritson P, Brand B, Harper RJ, Dell B (2017) Accuracy of tree root biomass sampling methodologies for carbon mitigation projects. Ecol Eng 98:264–274
Tachibana Y, Ohta Y (1983) Root surface area, as a parameter in relation to water and nutrient uptake by cucumber plant. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 29(3):387–392
Taylor BN, Beidler KV, Cooper ER, Strand AE, Pritchard SG (2013) Sampling volume in root studies: the pitfalls of under-sampling exposed using accumulation curves. Ecol Lett 16(7):862–869
Waisel Y, Eshel A (2002) Functional diversity of various constituents of a single root system. Plant roots: the hidden half, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 157–174
Xi B, Wang Y, Jia L, Bloomberg M, Li G, Di N (2013) Characteristics of fine root system and water uptake in a triploid Populus tomentosa plantation in the North China Plain: implications for irrigation water management. Agric Water Manage 117:83–92
Yuen JQ, Ziegler AD, Webb EL, Ryan CM (2013) Uncertainty in below-ground carbon biomass for major land covers in Southeast Asia. For Ecol Manage 310:915–926
Acknowledgements
This work was jointly supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant number 2018ZY26] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant number 301872702]. The authors would like to acknowledge the work of the anonymous reviewers, which has helped to substantially improve this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by K. Noguchi.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xi, B., Di, N., Bloomberg, M. et al. Sample size estimation for achieving the desired uncertainty for estimates of tree fine root trait parameters. Trees 35, 347–356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02032-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02032-4