Skip to main content
Log in

Portfolio management with background risk under uncertain mean-variance utility

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies comparative static effects in a portfolio selection problem when the investor has mean-variance preferences. Since the security market is complex, there exists the situation where security returns are given by experts’ estimates when they cannot be reflected by historical data. This paper discusses the problem in such a situation. Based on uncertainty theory, the paper first establishes an uncertain mean-variance utility model, in which security returns and background asset returns are uncertain variables and subject to normal uncertainty distributions. Then, the effects of changes in mean and standard deviation of uncertain background asset on capital allocation are discussed. Furthermore, the influence of initial proportion in background asset on portfolio investment decisions is analyzed when investors have quadratic mean-variance utility function. Finally, the economic analysis illustration of investment strategy is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaud, M., & Willinger, M. (2014). Are people risk vulnerable? Management Science, 61(3), 624–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. (1973). The ordering of portfolios in terms of mean and variance. The Review of Economic Studies, 40(2), 167–190.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eichner, T., & Wagener, A. (2003). Variance vulnerability, background risks, and mean-variance preferences. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 28(2), 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichner, T., & Wagener, A. (2009). Multiple risks and mean-variance preferences. Operations Research, 57(5), 1142–1154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, X., Wagener, A., Wong, W. K., & Zhu, L. (2018). The two-moment decision model with additive risks. Risk Management, 20(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2010). Portfolio analysis: From probabilistic to credibilistic and uncertain approaches. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2011). Mean-risk model for uncertain portfolio selection. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 10(1), 71–89.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2012). Mean-variance models for portfolio selection subject to experts’ estimations. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5887–5893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2017). A review of uncertain portfolio selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(6), 4453–4465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., & Di, H. (2016). Uncertain portfolio selection with background risk. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 276, 284–296.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lajeri-Chaherli, F. (2003). Partial derivatives, comparative risk behavior and concavity of utility functions. Mathematical Social Sciences, 46(1), 81–99.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Wang, Y., Yan, Q., & Zhao, X. (2019). Uncertain mean-variance model for dynamic project portfolio selection problem with divisibility. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 18(1), 37–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2007). Uncertainty theory. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2009). Some research problems in uncertainty theory. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2010). Uncertaint theory: A branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2012). Why is there a need for uncertainty theory? Journal of Uncertain Systems, 6(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., et al. (1987). Two-moment decision models and expected utility maximization. American Economic Review, 77(3), 421–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormiston, M. B., & Schlee, E. E. (2001). Mean-variance preferences and investor behaviour. The Economic Journal, 111(474), 849–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Z., Kar, S., & Zheng, H. (2016). Uncertain portfolio adjusting model using semiabsolute deviation. Soft Computing, 20(2), 717–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A. (1997). Risk preference estimation in the nonlinear mean standard deviation approach. Economic Inquiry, 35(4), 770–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. The Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, L., Di, H., Zhao, X., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Uncertain portfolio selection with mental accounts and realistic constraints. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 346, 42–52.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, K. (2015). A formula to calculate the variance of uncertain variable. Soft Computing, 19(10), 2947–2953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, K., & Ji, X. (2014). Uncertain decision making and its application to portfolio selection problem. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(01), 113–123.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, J., & Bai, M. (2018). Mean-risk model for uncertain portfolio selection with background risk. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 330, 59–69.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Social Science Foundation of China No. 17BGL052, USTBNTUT Joint Research Program No. TW201709 and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities No. FRF-MP-20-12.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoxia Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Jiang, G. Portfolio management with background risk under uncertain mean-variance utility. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 20, 315–330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09345-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09345-6

Keywords

Navigation