Abstract
The use of high-strength longitudinal and transverse reinforcements in confined concrete columns can improve bearing capacity and deformability. Besides, experiments on confined concrete columns with side length of 400 mm can better reflect the behaviour of confined concrete columns in engineering project. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the seismic behaviour of full-scale confined concrete columns with high-strength longitudinal and transverse reinforcements. Based on 15 confined concrete columns subjected to lateral cyclic loading, the effects of axial compression ratio, shear span ratio and volumetric ratio on the seismic behaviour of confined concrete columns were studied. The results showed that the ultimate drift ratios of the 15 confined concrete columns ranged from 1/43 to 1/20, i.e. 1.2–2.5 times as much as the specified limit (1/50) of rate earthquake, indicating excellent ductility. Additionally, the high-strength transverse reinforcements could not yield at peak load but could yield at the ultimate displacement. The high-strength transverse reinforcement stresses at the peak lateral load were 430–690 MPa, approximately 56–91% of the transverse reinforcement yield strength. Finally, an empirical formula was proposed to predict the ductility factor that was then evaluated by comparing the predicted values with the experimental results of 37 confined concrete columns.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Han B, Shin S, Bahn B. A model of confined concrete in high-strength reinforced concrete tied columns. Magazine Concrete Res. 2003;55(3):203–14. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2003.55.3.203.
Paultre P, Legeron F, Mongeau D. Influence of concrete strength and transverse reinforcement yield strength on behavior of high-strength concrete columns. ACI Struct J. 2001;98(4):490–501. https://doi.org/10.14359/10292.
Kuang HW, Pan W, Ye LY. The development of high-strength reinforcement in China. Industrial Construction. 2016;46:620–6 (in Chinese).
ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–19) and commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute; 2019.
NZS3101. Concrete structures standard part 1—the design of concrete structures. Wellington: Standard Association of New Zealand; 2006. p. 256.
GB50010-2010. Code for design of concrete structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press; 2011. p. 43 (in Chinese).
Ou YC, Kurniawan DP. Shear behavior of reinforced of reinforced concrete columns with high-strength steel and concrete. ACI Struct J. 2015;112(1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686822.
Ou YC, Kurniawan DP. Effect of axial compression on shear behavior of high-strength reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J. 2015;112(2):209–20. https://doi.org/10.14359/51687300.
Su JS, Wang JJ, Bai ZZ, et al. Influence of reinforcement buckling on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns. Eng Struct. 2015;103:174–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.007.
Rautenberg JM, Pujol S, Tavallali H, et al. Drift capacity of concrete columns reinforced with high-strength steel. ACI Struct J. 2013;110(2):307–17. https://doi.org/10.14359/51684410.
Hwang HJ, Park HG, Choi WS, et al. Cyclic loading test for beam-column connections with 600 MPa (87 ksi) beam flexural reinforcing bars. ACI Struct J. 2014;111(4):913–24. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686920.
Li YZ, Cao SY, Jing DH. Concrete columns reinforced with high-strength steel subjected to reversed cycle loading. ACI Struct J. 2018;115(4):1037–48. https://doi.org/10.14359/51701296.
Hindi R, Turechek W. Experimental behavior of circular concrete columns under reversed cyclic loading. Construct Build Mater. 2008;22:684–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.002.
Xue JY, Zhang X, Ke XJ, Ma LL. Seismic resistance capacity of steel reinforced high-strength concrete columns with rectangular spiral stirrups. Construct Build Mater. 2019;229:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116880.
Yi WJ, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Liu LW. Experimental investigation of circular reinforced concrete columns under different loading histories. J Earthq Eng. 2016;20(4):654–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1104749.
He SF, Deng AC. Seismic behavior of ultra-high performance concrete short columns confined with high-strength reinforcement. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2019;23(12):5183–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0915-3.
Shi QX, Yang WX, Wang QW, et al. Experimental research on seismic behavior of high-strength concrete short columns with high-strength stirrups. J Build Struct. 2012;33(9):49–58. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2012.09.016(in Chinese).
Yang K, Shi QX, David I, Meng H, Men JJ. Axial compression ratio limits of HSC columns confined with high-strength stirrups. Adv Mater Res. 2011;163–167:1024–8. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.163-167.1024.
Xiao JZ, Zhang C. Seismic behavior of RC columns with circular, square and diamond sections. Construct Build Mater. 2008;22:801–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.01.010.
Liu J, Zhang S, Dong L, et al. A combined experimental and numerical analysis on the seismic behavior of short reinforced concrete columns with different structural sizes and axial compression ratios. Int J Damage Mech. 2018;27(9):1416–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789517735679.
GB50011-2010. Code for Seismic design of buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press; 2010. p. 28 (in Chiness).
CEB-FIB Bulletin. Mode Code Final Draft, vol. 2. Lausanne: Fédération Internationale du Béton; 2010.
GB/T228.1-2010. Metallic materials-tensile testing-part 1: method of test at room temperature. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2011. p. 61 (in Chinese).
JGJ/T 101-2015. Specification for seismic test of buildings. Beijing: China Building Industry Press; 2015 (in Chinese).
Xu SC, Wu CQ, Liu ZX, et al. Experimental investigation of seismic behavior of ultra-high performance steel fiber reinforced concrete columns. Eng Struct. 2017;152:129–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.007.
Wang DH, Ju YZ, Zheng WZ. Strength of reactive powder concrete beam-column joints reinforced with high-strength (HRB600) bars under seismic loading. Strength Mater. 2017;49(1):156–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-017-9852-x.
Park R. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing evaluation. Bull N Zeal Natl Soc Earthq Eng. 1989;22(3):155–66. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166.
Watson S, Park R. Simulated seismic load tests on reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng ASCE. 1994;120(6):1825–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1825).
Watson S, Zahn FA, Park R. Confining reinforcement for concrete columns. J Struct Eng ASCE. 1994;120(6):1798–824. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1798).
Wang XF. Study on seismic behavior of concrete frame columns with high-yield-strength rebars. PhD dissertation, China Academy of Building Research, China, 2013, pp. 56–61
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 51678190). The experiment was performed in the Key Laboratory of Disaster and Control in Structural Engineering of China Ministry of Education at Harbin Institute of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical statement
Authors state that the research was conducted according to ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hou, C., Zheng, W., Li, S. et al. Experimental investigation of full-scale concrete columns confined by high-strength transverse reinforcement subjected to lateral cyclic loading. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 20, 115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00126-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00126-x