Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental investigation of full-scale concrete columns confined by high-strength transverse reinforcement subjected to lateral cyclic loading

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of high-strength longitudinal and transverse reinforcements in confined concrete columns can improve bearing capacity and deformability. Besides, experiments on confined concrete columns with side length of 400 mm can better reflect the behaviour of confined concrete columns in engineering project. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the seismic behaviour of full-scale confined concrete columns with high-strength longitudinal and transverse reinforcements. Based on 15 confined concrete columns subjected to lateral cyclic loading, the effects of axial compression ratio, shear span ratio and volumetric ratio on the seismic behaviour of confined concrete columns were studied. The results showed that the ultimate drift ratios of the 15 confined concrete columns ranged from 1/43 to 1/20, i.e. 1.2–2.5 times as much as the specified limit (1/50) of rate earthquake, indicating excellent ductility. Additionally, the high-strength transverse reinforcements could not yield at peak load but could yield at the ultimate displacement. The high-strength transverse reinforcement stresses at the peak lateral load were 430–690 MPa, approximately 56–91% of the transverse reinforcement yield strength. Finally, an empirical formula was proposed to predict the ductility factor that was then evaluated by comparing the predicted values with the experimental results of 37 confined concrete columns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Han B, Shin S, Bahn B. A model of confined concrete in high-strength reinforced concrete tied columns. Magazine Concrete Res. 2003;55(3):203–14. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2003.55.3.203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paultre P, Legeron F, Mongeau D. Influence of concrete strength and transverse reinforcement yield strength on behavior of high-strength concrete columns. ACI Struct J. 2001;98(4):490–501. https://doi.org/10.14359/10292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuang HW, Pan W, Ye LY. The development of high-strength reinforcement in China. Industrial Construction. 2016;46:620–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–19) and commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. NZS3101. Concrete structures standard part 1—the design of concrete structures. Wellington: Standard Association of New Zealand; 2006. p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  6. GB50010-2010. Code for design of concrete structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press; 2011. p. 43 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ou YC, Kurniawan DP. Shear behavior of reinforced of reinforced concrete columns with high-strength steel and concrete. ACI Struct J. 2015;112(1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ou YC, Kurniawan DP. Effect of axial compression on shear behavior of high-strength reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J. 2015;112(2):209–20. https://doi.org/10.14359/51687300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Su JS, Wang JJ, Bai ZZ, et al. Influence of reinforcement buckling on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns. Eng Struct. 2015;103:174–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rautenberg JM, Pujol S, Tavallali H, et al. Drift capacity of concrete columns reinforced with high-strength steel. ACI Struct J. 2013;110(2):307–17. https://doi.org/10.14359/51684410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang HJ, Park HG, Choi WS, et al. Cyclic loading test for beam-column connections with 600 MPa (87 ksi) beam flexural reinforcing bars. ACI Struct J. 2014;111(4):913–24. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li YZ, Cao SY, Jing DH. Concrete columns reinforced with high-strength steel subjected to reversed cycle loading. ACI Struct J. 2018;115(4):1037–48. https://doi.org/10.14359/51701296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hindi R, Turechek W. Experimental behavior of circular concrete columns under reversed cyclic loading. Construct Build Mater. 2008;22:684–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xue JY, Zhang X, Ke XJ, Ma LL. Seismic resistance capacity of steel reinforced high-strength concrete columns with rectangular spiral stirrups. Construct Build Mater. 2019;229:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi WJ, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Liu LW. Experimental investigation of circular reinforced concrete columns under different loading histories. J Earthq Eng. 2016;20(4):654–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1104749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He SF, Deng AC. Seismic behavior of ultra-high performance concrete short columns confined with high-strength reinforcement. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2019;23(12):5183–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0915-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi QX, Yang WX, Wang QW, et al. Experimental research on seismic behavior of high-strength concrete short columns with high-strength stirrups. J Build Struct. 2012;33(9):49–58. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2012.09.016(in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang K, Shi QX, David I, Meng H, Men JJ. Axial compression ratio limits of HSC columns confined with high-strength stirrups. Adv Mater Res. 2011;163–167:1024–8. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.163-167.1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao JZ, Zhang C. Seismic behavior of RC columns with circular, square and diamond sections. Construct Build Mater. 2008;22:801–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu J, Zhang S, Dong L, et al. A combined experimental and numerical analysis on the seismic behavior of short reinforced concrete columns with different structural sizes and axial compression ratios. Int J Damage Mech. 2018;27(9):1416–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789517735679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. GB50011-2010. Code for Seismic design of buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press; 2010. p. 28 (in Chiness).

    Google Scholar 

  22. CEB-FIB Bulletin. Mode Code Final Draft, vol. 2. Lausanne: Fédération Internationale du Béton; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. GB/T228.1-2010. Metallic materials-tensile testing-part 1: method of test at room temperature. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2011. p. 61 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  24. JGJ/T 101-2015. Specification for seismic test of buildings. Beijing: China Building Industry Press; 2015 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xu SC, Wu CQ, Liu ZX, et al. Experimental investigation of seismic behavior of ultra-high performance steel fiber reinforced concrete columns. Eng Struct. 2017;152:129–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang DH, Ju YZ, Zheng WZ. Strength of reactive powder concrete beam-column joints reinforced with high-strength (HRB600) bars under seismic loading. Strength Mater. 2017;49(1):156–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-017-9852-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Park R. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing evaluation. Bull N Zeal Natl Soc Earthq Eng. 1989;22(3):155–66. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Watson S, Park R. Simulated seismic load tests on reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng ASCE. 1994;120(6):1825–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1825).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Watson S, Zahn FA, Park R. Confining reinforcement for concrete columns. J Struct Eng ASCE. 1994;120(6):1798–824. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1798).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang XF. Study on seismic behavior of concrete frame columns with high-yield-strength rebars. PhD dissertation, China Academy of Building Research, China, 2013, pp. 56–61

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 51678190). The experiment was performed in the Key Laboratory of Disaster and Control in Structural Engineering of China Ministry of Education at Harbin Institute of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenzhong Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

Authors state that the research was conducted according to ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, C., Zheng, W., Li, S. et al. Experimental investigation of full-scale concrete columns confined by high-strength transverse reinforcement subjected to lateral cyclic loading. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 20, 115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00126-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00126-x

Keywords

Navigation