Elsevier

Fluid Phase Equilibria

Volume 528, 15 January 2021, 112845
Fluid Phase Equilibria

Measurement and modeling of CO2 solubility in binary aqueous DMSO and MDEA and their ternary mixtures at different temperatures and compositions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2020.112845Get rights and content

Abstract

CO2 capturing is an industrial tool in worldwide sustainable development to reduce the greenhouse effect. In this study, the new experimental vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data for CO2 solubility in the mixtures of physical and chemical solvents were investigated. The carbon dioxide solubility measurements were carried out using a quasi-static method through the DMSO (10 wt.%) +H2O and sulfolane (20 wt.%) +H2O systems at the temperatures of 328.15 and 343.15 K and pressure up to 3554 kPa. Moreover, the CO2 partial pressure against its gas loading was obtained for the DMSO+MDEA+H2O system at the compositions of (10-40-50), (20-40-40) wt. %, 328.15, 343.15 K, and pressure up to 3343 kPa. The influence of the physical solvents such as sulfolane and DMSO in the aqueous MDEA mixtures on CO2 solubility was studied. We showed that DMSO was more effective than sulfolane in the absorption of CO2. Finally, using the ion-pair concept, the eNRTL model was used to model the vapor-liquid equilibrium experimental data so that the molecule–molecule, ion pair-molecule binary interaction parameters of this model were obtained. An overall average relative deviation (AAD%) of 10.95 has resulted in the quaternary DMSO+MDEA+H2O+CO2 system.

Introduction

The alkanolamines through the chemical absorption as an industrial process have been widely used to reduce the CO2 emission by post-combustion CO2 capturing from oil refineries, power plants, and natural gas sweetening processes [1]. The aqueous solutions of alkanolamines such as DEA and MDEA react with carbon dioxide to remove this acid gas from natural gas using an absorber at high pressure and low temperature so that the amine is regenerated in the stripper by increasing temperature [2]. The various alkanolamines with different compositions and temperatures are often used in an acid gas removal unit to find an optimized solvent mixture to achieve maximum CO2 absorption capacity, less corrosion, lower decomposing, and cost. Aqueous alkanolamine as a chemical solvent is protonated through the reactive solubility of CO2 in the solution. However, this mechanism is limited by reactant stoichiometry. The high solubility of acid gases in alkanolamines at low partial pressure allows one to use this technique economically in a wide range of flow / acid gases, so that is a demanded and applicable method in different operating conditions of pressure and temperature. This chemical solvent has been widely used in the gas treating industry due to low vapor pressure and the several advantages of the aqueous MDEA solution [3]. However, the absorption of CO2 in the solution is kinetically controlled. To overcome this problem at high pressure, one can use a combination of chemical and physical solvents to achieve both advantages of these solvents. The solubility of the acid gases in a physical solvent is taking place without any reaction, and the gas pressure is the primary driving force. Thus, using a physical solution leads to high loading at high partial pressure. Therefore, the chemical solvents are appropriate at low gas partial pressure, and the physical solvents are suitable for the absorption of acid gases at high partial pressures [4]. In other words, a combination of both physical and chemical solvents allows one to use these mixtures at the full range of pressures and temperatures conditions of gas capturing or a gas treatment unit.

Tetramethylene sulfone (sulfolane), which is abbreviated as TMS, is one of the well-known common physical solvents that are widely used in acid gas removal processes. Due to the presence of a sulfonyl group with a sulfur atom double-bonded to two oxygen atoms, it makes the possibility to interact with the sulfolane molecules with the sulfur components such as carbonyl sulfide (COS) and mercaptans. Thus, one can remove these contaminants from sour gases [5]. An alternative physical solvent such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) allows one to use in the absorption of carbon dioxide. The properties of this solvent are similar to tetramethylene sulfone (sulfolane). Moreover, DMSO has represented to be a versatile and powerful physical solvent with high potential to dissolve most aromatic and unsaturated hydrocarbons, organo-sulfur compounds, and many inorganic salts [6]. Thus, using a mixture of the physical and chemical solvents leads to reduce the concentration of acid gases in sour and industrial exhausted gases at low and high partial pressures and simultaneously remove the sulfur components such as mercaptans from stream gases [7].

Researchers have carried out several experimental works to measure the solubility of the acid gases in a mixture of chemical and physical solvents. However, the studies on the solubility of CO2 in a mixed-solvent of MDEA-DMSO in different compositions and temperatures are inadequate. Several researchers measured the CO2 solubility in pure DMSO [8], [9], [10]. However, to our best knowledge, no experimental data has been reported for blends of mixed-solvent. Andreatta et al. measured the CO2 solubility in two systems of pure and the aqueous DMSO at 280 and 370 K and pressure up to 15 MPa [11]. Besides, they modeled the experimental data with a group-contribution equation of state that takes into account the association effects (GCA-EOS). Wanren and Hua reported the solubility of SO2 and CO2 in DMSO within the temperature of 293.15 to 313.15 K, partial pressures of SO2, and CO2 from 0.15-2.62 kPa and 5-18 kPa, respectively, [12]. Dash and Bandyopadhyay measured the CO2 solubility in the mixture of sulfolane+piperazine (Pz) with aqueous MDEA within the temperatures of 308-328 K and CO2 partial pressures of 1-1400 kPa [13]. Their results showed that the CO2 solubility decreases at a lower partial pressure range of 10–100 kPa, but enhanced at higher partial pressure ranges of 100–1000 kPa at 323.15 K for the sulfolane based composite solvents. They also figured out that adding Pz to aqueous MDEA presented a positive effect on the mixed-solvent CO2 absorption. Rajasingam et al. produced the VLE experimental data for solubility of CO2 in the mixed-solvent of DMSO and NMP at a pressure near the critical point of each binary system and temperature of 298, 308 and 318 K [14]. Moreover, they measured and correlated the volumetric expansion of the DMSO+NMP+CO2 system against the solubility of CO2 in the liquid phase. In another work, Shirazizadeh and Haghtalab reported the new experimental VLE data for simultaneous solubility of CO2 and ethyl-mercaptan in the aqueous mixture of sulfolane and MDEA at the different solvent mass composition and the temperature range of 328.15 to 363.15 K and CO2 partial pressure up to 1235 kPa [15]. To modeling of CO2 capturing and adsorption of acid gases in pure and mixed-solvent, many models such as PC-SAFT, Electrolyte-NRTL, Kent-Eisenberg, and UNIQUAC have been developed so far. Zong and Chen applied the Electrolyte NRTL model for the aqueous sulfolane+DIPA and sulfolane+MDEA systems to calculate the activity coefficient of components in the liquid phase and the vapor phase nonideality was accounted for by PC-SAFT equation of state [16]. Moreover, Mondal et al. used Kent and Eisenberg's model for correlation of the experimental CO2 solubility in the aqueous mixture of 2-amino-2-methyl-2-propanol and hexamethylenediamine with good accuracy [17]. Also, Ghalib et al. applied the Electrolyte-NRTL model for correlation of the CO2+MDEA+PZ system [18].

Although researchers have performed extensive works for the solubility measurement of acid gasses in a mixed-solvent, to our best knowledge, no study has been reported for the mixed-sol DMSO's CO2 solubility a physical solvent and MDEA as a chemical solvent. Thus, our objective is to investigate the solubility of CO2 in the systems of MDEA + DMSO + water with the compositions of 40-10-50 and 40-20-40 wt. % and at temperatures of 328.15 and 343.15 K. Moreover, we measured the solubility of CO2 in the aqueous sulfolane (20 wt.%) +water and DMSO (10 wt.%) +water at 328.15 and 343.15 K. Furthermore, the experimental VLE data were modeled by an eNRTL activity coefficient model for correlation of the experimental solubility of CO2 in the present mixed-solvent systems. The eNRTL model consists of two terms of Pitzer-Debye-Hückel and the original NRTL for the long-range and short-range interactions, respectively.

Section snippets

Material

Merck supplied the sulfolane, MDEA, and DMSO compound with mass fraction purity more than 0.98, 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. Air Product Company supplied the CO2 gas cylinder with a mole fraction purity of 99.99%. We used all the materials without further purification. A digital balance (KERN, PLS 510-3) with an accuracy of ±0.001 g was used to measure the weights of the sulfolane, DMSO, MDEA, and water. The specifications of the chemical materials used in this work are given in Table 1.

The Experimental Apparatus

CO2

Thermodynamic framework

The solubility of acid gases such as carbon dioxide in the aqueous mixed-solvent solution was interpreted as the gas's partial pressure against its loading or mole fraction. Thus, using alkanolamines calculation is carried out through the chemical equilibrium reactions in the liquid phase and computation of vapor-liquid equilibria.

The density of the alkanolamine mixtures

We measured the density of the pure MDEA at the different temperatures to ensure and validate our density measurement; the results were compared with those reported in the literature [15]. The densities of the mixed solvent of DMSO and water were measured between 313.15 and 363.15 K at atmospheric pressure ~ 84 kPa in the laboratory and with two different compositions. The measured density results are given in Table 2 and Fig. 1. The densities of the aqueous MDEA + DMSO mixtures at a specified

Conclusions

The CO2 solubility in an aqueous mixture of physical and chemical solvent included DMSO and MDEA were measured with two different mass compositions of (10-40-50) wt.% and (20-40-40) wt. % for DMSO+MDEA+H2O, respectively, at 328.15 and 343.15 K and pressures up to 3343 kPa. Also, new experimental VLE data for two ternary systems of DMSO+H2O+CO2 and sulfolane+H2O+CO2 were reported. The partial pressure of CO2 versus its mole fraction is presented for DMSO+MDEA+H2O in two mass compositions of

Supplementary Information

The coefficients of the symmetric chemical equilibrium constants based on the mole fraction, characteristic volume parameters for the Brelvi–O'Connell model, parameters for Henry's constant correlation, the parameters of Antoine equation (in Pa) for the different solvent and the temperature dependence of Dielectric constants D for each solvent are given in Supporting Information.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Habib Allah Shirazizadeh: Writing - original draft, Investigation, Software, Validation, Formal analysis. Ali Haghtalab: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Resources, Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Software, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing for financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors of the manuscript entitled:“Measurement and Modeling of CO2 Solubility in Binary Aqueous DMSO and MDEA and Their Ternary Mixtures at Different Temperatures and Compositions by Habib Allah Shirazizadeh, Ali Haghtalab”. Here declare this work has not been published at any journal that it is not under

Acknowledgment

Authors appreciate for financial support of the vice president of research and technology of Tarbiat Modares University.

References (55)

  • BK. Mondal et al.

    Experimental measurement and Kent-Eisenberg modeling of CO2 solubility in an aqueous mixture of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and hexamethylenediamine

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2017)
  • L. Ghalib et al.

    Modeling the effect of piperazine on CO2 loading in MDEA/PZ mixture

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2017)
  • E. Asadi et al.

    High-pressure measurement and thermodynamic modeling of the carbon dioxide solubility in the aqueous 2-((2-aminoethyl)-amino)-ethanol± sulfolane system at different temperatures

    Journal of Molecular Liquids

    (2020)
  • A. Haghtalab et al.

    High-pressure measurement and thermodynamic modeling the solubility of H2S in the aqueous N-methyldiethanolamine+ 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol+ piperazine systems

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2014)
  • A. Haghtalab et al.

    The solubility measurement and modeling of CO2 in aqueous solution of N-methyldiethanolaminen+ 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol+ piperazine at high pressures

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2015)
  • A. Haghtalab et al.

    A nonelectrolyte local composition model and its application in the correlation of the mean activity coefficient of aqueous electrolyte solutions

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2009)
  • R. Sadeghi

    New local composition model for electrolyte solutions

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2005)
  • A Haghtalab et al.

    Modeling solubility of acid gases in alkanolamines using the nonelectrolyte Wilson-nonrandom factor model

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2010)
  • A. Haghtalab et al.

    Nonelectrolyte NRTL-NRF model to study thermodynamics of strong and weak electrolyte solutions

    The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics

    (2011)
  • R. Sidi-Boumedine et al.

    Experimental determination of carbon dioxide solubility data in aqueous alkanolamine solutions

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2004)
  • A. Haghtalab et al.

    An electrolyte segmental Wilson-nonrandom excess Gibbs energy model and measurement of carbon dioxide solubility into sulfolane+ water and N-methyldiethanolamine+ sulfolane+ water systems

    Journal of Molecular Liquids

    (2019)
  • I. Dalmolin et al.

    The solubility of carbon dioxide in binary and ternary mixtures with ethanol and water

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2006)
  • M. Shokouhi et al.

    Experimental solubility of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in dimethylformamide and dimethylsulfoxide

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2014)
  • A. Kordikowski et al.

    Volume expansions and vapor-liquid equilibria of binary mixtures of a variety of polar solvents and certain near-critical solvents

    The Journal of Supercritical Fluids

    (1995)
  • A.H. Jalili et al.

    Measuring the solubility of CO2 and H2S in Sulfolane and the density and viscosity of saturated liquid binary mixtures of (Sulfolane+ CO2) and (Sulfolane+ H2S)

    The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics

    (2015)
  • F-Y. Jou et al.

    Solubility of H2S, CO2, CH4 and C2H6 in Sulfolane at elevated pressures

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (1990)
  • F. Murrieta-Guevara et al.

    Solubilities of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide in propylene carbonate, N-methyl pyrrolidone, and Sulfolane

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (1988)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text