Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bridge flexural rigidity calculation using measured drive-by deflections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses simulated deflections on a bridge taken from a model of an instrumented moving vehicle in an attempt to back calculate the distribution of flexural rigidity along the bridge length and hence to evaluate bridge condition. Eight sensors are simulated at different locations on the vehicle. It is assumed that measured deflections are absolute, i.e. they have been corrected for vehicle motion and that the characteristics of the vehicle are known. The unit load theorem is used to relate the measured deflections to the reciprocals of flexural rigidity at every location on the bridge. A Blackman window filter is used to regularise the problem and to improve the conditioning of an ill-conditioned system of equations. In addition, a moving average filter is used to reduce the influence of noise and dynamics, which are sources of inaccuracy in this study. This method is shown to give good results in indicating the presence and intensity of bridge damage and contains some weak information on location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green M, Cebon D (1994) Dynamic response of highway bridges to heavy vehicle loads: theory and experimental validation. J Sound Vib 170(1):51–78

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hwang E-S, Nowak AS (1991) Simulation of dynamic load for bridges. J Struct Eng 117(5):1413–1434

    Google Scholar 

  3. Catbas N, Ciloglu K, Celebioglu A, Popovics J, Aktan E (2001) Fleet health monitoring of large populations: aged concrete T-beam bridges in Pennsylvania. In Health Monitoring and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Newport Beach

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ko J, Ni Y (2005) Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Eng Struct 27(12):1715–1725

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ntotsios E, Papadimitriou C, Panetsos P, Karaiskos G, Perros K, Perdikaris PC (2009) Bridge health monitoring system based on vibration measurements. Bull Earthq Eng 7(2):469–483

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yi T, Li H, Gu M (2010) Recent research and applications of GPS based technology for bridge health monitoring. Sci China Technol Sci 53(10):2597–2610

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prendergast LJ, Gavin K (2014) A review of bridge scour monitoring techniques. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(2):138–149

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horberry T, Halliday M, Gale AG (2002) Bridge strike reduction: optimising the design of markings. Accid Anal Prev 34(5):581–588

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen B, Brilakis I (2016) Understanding the problem of bridge and tunnel strikes caused by over-height vehicles. Transp Res Procedia 14:3915–3924

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rytter A (1993) Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures, in PhD Thesis, Dept. of Building Technology and Structural Engineering. Aalborg University: Aalborg.

  11. Shih HW, Thambiratnam D, Chan TH (2011) Damage detection in truss bridges using vibration based multi-criteria approach. Struct Eng Mech 39(2):187–206

    Google Scholar 

  12. Comisu CC, Taranu N, Boaca G, Scutaru MC (2017) Structural health monitoring system of bridges. Procedia Eng 199:2054–2059

    Google Scholar 

  13. Washer GA (1998) Developments for the non-destructive evaluation of highway bridges in the USA. NDT E Int 31(4):245–249

    Google Scholar 

  14. Phares BM, Washer GA, Rolander DD, Graybeal BA, Moore M (2004) Routine highway bridge inspection condition documentation accuracy and reliability. J Bridge Eng 9(4):403–413

    Google Scholar 

  15. Whelan MJ, Gangone MV, Janoyan KD (2009) Highway bridge assessment using an adaptive real-time wireless sensor network. IEEE Sens J 9(11):1405–1413

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haritos N, Owen J (2004) The use of vibration data for damage detection in bridges: a comparison of system identification and pattern recognition approaches. Struct Health Monit 3(2):141–163

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCarter WJ, Vennesland Ø (2004) Sensor systems for use in reinforced concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 18(6):351–358

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim J-T, Stubbs N (2003) Crack detection in beam-type structures using frequency data. J Sound Vib 259(1):145–160

    Google Scholar 

  19. Au FT, Si X (2012) Time-dependent effects on dynamic properties of cable-stayed bridges. Struct Eng Mech 41(1):139–155

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sun L, Zhang W, Nagarajaiah S (2018) Bridge real-time damage identification method using inclination and strain measurements in the presence of temperature variation. J Bridge Eng 24(2):04018111

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jesus A, Brommer P, Westgate R, Koo K, Brownjohn J, Laory I (2018) Bayesian structural identification of a long suspension bridge considering temperature and traffic load effects. Struct Health Monit. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718794299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peeters B, De Roeck G (2001) One-year monitoring of the Z 24-Bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 30(2):149–171

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spiridonakos MD, Chatzi EN, Sudret B (2016) Polynomial chaos expansion models for the monitoring of structures under operational variability. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part A 2(3):B4016003

    Google Scholar 

  24. Soyoz S, Feng MQ (2009) Long-term monitoring and identification of bridge structural parameters. Comput-Aid Civ Infrastruct Eng 24(2):82–92

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matarazzo TJ, Pakzad SN (2018) Scalable structural modal identification using dynamic sensor network data with STRIDEX. Comput-Aid Civ Infrastruct Eng 33(1):4–20

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matarazzo TJ, Santi P, Pakzad SN, Carter K, Ratti C, Moaveni B, Osgood C, Jacob NL (2018) Crowdsensing framework for monitoring bridge vibrations using moving smartphones. Proc IEEE 106(4):577–593

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang Y-B, Lin C, Yau J (2004) Extracting bridge frequencies from the dynamic response of a passing vehicle. J Sound Vib 272(3):471–493

    Google Scholar 

  28. Malekjafarian A, McGetrick PJ, OBrien EJ (2015) A review of indirect bridge monitoring using passing vehicles. Shock Vib 2015:16

    Google Scholar 

  29. Malekjafarian A, OBrien EJ (2014) Identification of bridge mode shapes using short time frequency domain decomposition of the responses measured in a passing vehicle. Eng Struct 81:386–397

    Google Scholar 

  30. González A, OBrien EJ, McGetrick PJ (2012) Identification of damping in a bridge using a moving instrumented vehicle. J Sound Vib 331(18):4115–4131

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bowe C, Quirke P, Cantero D, OBrien EJ (2015) Drive-by structural health monitoring of railway bridges using train mounted accelerometers. In: 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25–27 May, 2015. Crete Island, Greece: Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research School of Civil EngineeringNational Technical University of Athens (NTUA).

  32. Hester D, González A (2017) A discussion on the merits and limitations of using drive-by monitoring to detect localised damage in a bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 90:234–253

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yang Y, Yang JP (2018) State-of-the-art review on modal identification and damage detection of bridges by moving test vehicles. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 18(02):1850025

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mei Q, Gül M, Boay M (2019) Indirect health monitoring of bridges using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and principal component analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 119:523–546

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mei Q, Gül M (2019) A crowdsourcing-based methodology using smartphones for bridge health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 18(5–6):1602–1619

    Google Scholar 

  36. Malekjafarian A, Golpayegani F, Moloney C, Clarke S (2019) A machine learning approach to bridge-damage detection using responses measured on a passing vehicle. Sensors 19(18):4035

    Google Scholar 

  37. Matarazzo TJ, Pakzad SN (2016) Structural identification for mobile sensing with missing observations. J Eng Mech 142(5):04016021

    Google Scholar 

  38. Matarazzo TJ, Pakzad SN (2016) Truncated physical model for dynamic sensor networks with applications in high-resolution mobile sensing and BIGDATA. J Eng Mech 142(5):04016019

    Google Scholar 

  39. Marulanda J, Caicedo JM, Thomson P (2017) Modal identification using mobile sensors under ambient excitation. J Comput Civ Eng 31(2):04016051

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sadeghi Eshkevari S, Pakzad SN, Takáč M, Matarazzo TJ (2020) Modal identification of bridges using mobile sensors with sparse vibration data. J Eng Mech 146(4):04020011

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liu J, Chen S, Bergés M, Bielak J, Garrett J, H., Kovačević, H., Noh, H.Y. (2020) Diagnosis algorithms for indirect structural health monitoring of a bridge model via dimensionality reduction. Mech Syst Signal Process 136:106454

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tan C, Elhattab A, Uddin N (2017) “Drive-by’’ bridge frequency-based monitoring utilizing wavelet transform. J Civ Struct Health Monit 7(5):615–625

    Google Scholar 

  43. Elhattab A, Uddin N, OBrien E (2018) Drive-by bridge frequency identification under operational roadway speeds employing frequency independent underdamped pinning stochastic resonance (FI-UPSR). Sensors 18(12):22

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li Z, Au F (2014) Damage detection of a continuous bridge from response of a moving vehicle. Shock Vib 2014:7

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yang Y, Zhu Y, Wang LL, Jia BY, Jin R (2018) Structural damage identification of bridges from passing test vehicles. Sensors 18(11):23

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yang Y, Liu H, Mosalam KM, Huang S (2013) An improved direct stiffness calculation method for damage detection of beam structures. Struct Control Health Monit 20(5):835–851

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chai G, Manoharan S, Golding A, Kelly G, Chowdhury S (2016) Evaluation of the traffic speed deflectometer data using simplified deflection model. Transport Res Procedia 14:3031–3039

    Google Scholar 

  48. Elbagalati O, Elseifi MA, Gaspard K, Zhang Z (2016) Prediction of in-service pavement structural capacity based on traffic-speed deflection measurements. J Transport Eng 142(11):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sinha J, Friswell M, Edwards S (2002) Simplified models for the location of cracks in beam structures using measured vibration data. J Sound Vib 251(1):13–38

    Google Scholar 

  50. Moses F (1979) Weigh-in-motion system using instrumented bridges. J Transport Eng 105(3):233–249

    Google Scholar 

  51. O'Brien EJ, Quilligan M, Karoumi R (2006) Calculating an influence line from direct measurements. J Bridge Eng 159(1):31–34

    Google Scholar 

  52. Honerkamp J, Weese J (1990) Tikhonovs regularization method for ill-posed problems. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 2(1):17–30

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Golub GH, Hansen PC, O'Leary DP (1999) Tikhonov regularization and total least squares. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 21(1):185–194

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Calvetti D, Morigi S, Reichel L, Sgallari F (2000) Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems. J Comput Appl Math 123(1–2):423–446

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Zeinali Y, Story BA (2018) Impairment localization and quantification using noisy static deformation influence lines and Iterative Multi-parameter Tikhonov Regularization. Mech Syst Signal Process 109:399–419

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zeinali Y, Story BA (2017) Framework for flexural rigidity estimation in Euler-Bernoulli beams using deformation influence lines. Infrastructures 2(4):23

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chakraborty S (2013) Advantages of Blackman window over hamming window method for designing FIR filter. Int J Comput Sci Eng Technol 4(8):1181–1189

    Google Scholar 

  58. Podder P, Khan TZ, Khan MH, Rahman MM (2014) Comparative performance analysis of hamming, hanning and Blackman window. Int J Comput Appl 96(18):1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support for the work reported in this paper from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 642453. Greenwood Engineering, designers of the TSD, are also acknowledged for their cooperation and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. WS Atkins Ireland Ltd., formerly University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Daniel Martinez

  2. School of Civil Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04V1W8, Ireland

    Abdollah Malekjafarian & Eugene OBrien

Authors
  1. Daniel Martinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdollah Malekjafarian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eugene OBrien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene OBrien.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinez, D., Malekjafarian, A. & OBrien, E. Bridge flexural rigidity calculation using measured drive-by deflections. J Civil Struct Health Monit 10, 833–844 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00419-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00419-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation