Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying increased fire risk in California in response to different levels of warming and drying

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Warming temperatures and severe droughts have contributed to increasing fire activity in California. Decadal average summer temperature in California has increased by 0.8 °C during 1984–2014, while the decadal total size of large fires has expanded by a factor of 2.5. This study proposes a multivariate probabilistic approach for quantifying changes to fire risk given different climatic conditions. Our results indicate that the risk of large fires in California increases substantially in response to unit degree changes in summer temperature. The probability of annual mean fire size exceeding its long-term average increases by 30% when summer temperature anomaly increases by 1 °C (from −0.5 °C to + 0.5 °C). Furthermore, the probability of annual average fire size exceeding its long-term average doubles when the annual precipitation decreases from the 75th (wet) to the 25th (dry) percentile. The proposed model can help manage fire-prone regions where fire activity is expected to intensify under projected global warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abatzoglou JT, Kolden CA (2013) Relationships between climate and macroscale area burned in the western United States. Int J Wildl Fire 22(7):1003–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Abatzoglou JT, Williams AP (2016) Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(42):11770–11775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abatzoglou JT, Smith CM, Swain DL, Ptak T, Kolden CA (2020) Population exposure to pre-emptive de-energization aimed at averting wildfires in Northern California. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ager AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA (2010) A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure. For Ecol Manage 259:1556–1570

    Google Scholar 

  • AghaKouchak A, Cheng L, Mazdiyasni O, Farahmand A (2014) Global warming and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: insights from the 2014 California drought. Geophys Res Lett 41:8847–8852

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldersley A, Murray SJ, Cornell SE (2011) Global and regional analysis of climate and human drivers of wildfire. Sci Total Environ 409(18):3472–3481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DM, Johnston FH (2005) Wildfire smoke, fire management, and human health. EcoHealth 2(1):76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant BP, Westerling AL (2014) Scenarios for future wildfire risk in California: links between changing demography, land use, climate, and wildfire. Environmetrics 25(6):454–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y et al (2011) Forecasting fire season severity in South America using sea surface temperature anomalies. Sci 334(6057):787–791

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG (1978) A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological dtudies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz MG, Alexander ME (2010) Assessing crown fire potential in coniferous forests of western North America: a critique of current approaches and recent simulation studies. Int J Wildl Fire 19:377–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming SG (2001) A parametric model of the fire-size distribution. Can J For Res 31(8):1297–1303

    Google Scholar 

  • De Michele C, Salvadori G, Canossi M, Petaccia A, Rosso R (2005) Bivariate statistical approach to check adequacy of dam spillway. J Hydrol Eng 10(1):50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennison PE, Brewer SC, Arnold JD, Moritz MA (2014) Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011. Geophys Res Lett 41(8):2928–2933

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidenshink J et al (2007) Project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecol 3(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia M, Giannico V, Lafortezza R, Sanesi G (2019) Modeling fire ignition patterns in Mediterranean urban interfaces. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 33(1):169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts P, Lindskog F, McNeil A J (2003) Modelling dependence with copulas and applications to risk management. In: Rachev ST (ed) Handbook of heavy tailed distributions in finance. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

  • Finney MA (2007) A computational method for optimising fuel treatment locations. Int J Wildl Fire 16:702–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank MJ (1979) On the simultaneous associativity of F(x, y) and x+y-F(x, y). Aequationes Math 19:194–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney MA, McHugh CW, Grenfell IC, Riley KL, Short KC (2011) A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 25(7):973–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Rémillard B (2008) Validity of the parametric bootstrap for goodness-of-fit testing in semiparametric models. Annales de l'IHP Probabilités et statistiques 44(6):1096–1127

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss M, Swain DL, Abatzoglou JT, Sarhadi A, Kolden C, Williams AP, Diffenbaugh NS (2020). Climate change is increasing the risk of extreme autumn wildfire conditions across California. Environ Res Lett 15 (9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab83a7

  • Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol 34:623–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SJ, Veblen TT, Mietkiewicz N, Kulakowski D (2015) Area burned in the western United States is unaffected by recent mountain pine beetle outbreaks. PNAS 112(14):4375–4380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y et al (2015) Identification of two distinct fire regimes in Southern California: implications for economic impact and future change. Environ Res Lett 10(9):094005

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane RE, Drury SA, Karau EC, Hessburg PF, Reynolds KM (2010) A method for mapping fire hazard and risk across multiple scales and its application in fire management. Ecol Modell 221:2–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley JE (2004) Impact of antecedent climate on fire regimes in coastal California. Int J Wildl Fire 13(2):173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley JE, Safford H, Fotheringham CJ, Franklin J, Moritz M (2009) The 2007 southern California wildfires: lessons in complexity. J Forest 107(6):287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley JE, Syphard AD (2017) Different historical fire–climate patterns in California. Int J Wildl Fire 26(4):253–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly KS, Krzysztofowicz R (1997) A bivariate meta-Gaussian density for use in hydrology. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 11(1):17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsias N et al (2013) On the relationships between forest fires and weather conditions in Greece from long-term national observations (1894–2010). Int J Wildl Fire 22(4):493–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell JS, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Westerling AL (2009) Climate and wildfire area burned in western US ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. Ecol Appl 19(4):1003–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Madadgar S, Moradkhani H (2014) Spatio-temporal drought forecasting within Bayesian networks. J Hydrol 512(6):134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Madadgar S, Moradkhani H (2015) Improved Bayesian multimodeling: integration of copulas and Bayesian model averaging. Water Resour Res 50:9586–9603. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallakpour I, AghaKouchak A, Sadegh M (2019) Climate-induced changes in the risk of hydrological failure of Major Dams in California. Geophys Res Lett 46(4):2130–2139

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C, Ager AA (2013) A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management. Int J Wildl Fire 22(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C, Parisien M-A, Ager A A, Finney M A (2008) Evaluating spatially explicit burn probabilities for strategic fire management planning. In: De las Heras J, Brebbia CA, Viegas D, Leone V (eds) Modelling, monitoring, and management of forest fires, pp. 245–252. WIT Press, Boston

  • Miller JD, Safford H (2012) Trends in wildfire severity: 1984 to 2010 in the Sierra Nevada, Modoc Plateau, and southern Cascades, California, USA. Fire Ecol 8(3):41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE (2009) Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12(1):16–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Skinner CN, Safford HD, Knapp EE, Ramirez CM (2012) Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA. Ecol Appl 22(1):184–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddas JJ, Collins BM, Menning K, Moghaddas EEY, Stephens SL (2010) Fuel treatment effects on modeled landscape-level fire behavior in the northern Sierra Nevada. Can J For Res 40:1751–1765

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz MA et al (2012) Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity. Ecosphere 3(6):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen RB (2013) An introduction to Copulas. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg, pp 218

  • Nishino T (2019) Physics-based urban fire spread simulation coupled with stochastic occurrence of spot fires. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 33(2):451–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik JM (1987) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pausas JG (2004) Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean basin). Clim Change 63(3):337–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisler HK, Brillinger DR, Burgan RE, Benoit JW (2004) Probability based models for estimating wildfire risk. Int J Wildl Fire 13:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadegh M, Ragno E, AghaKouchak A (2017) Multivariate Copula Analysis Toolbox (MvCAT): Describing dependence and underlying uncertainty using a Bayesian framework. Water Resour Res 53. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020242

  • Sadegh M et al (2018) Multihazard scenarios for analysis of compound extreme events. Geophys Res Lett 45:5470–5480

    Google Scholar 

  • Salis M et al (2010) Application of wildfire spread and behavior models to assess fire probability and severity in the Mediterranean region. Geophys Res Abstracts 12(EGU2010):12991

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori G, De Michele C, Durante F (2011) On the return period and design in a multivariate framework. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:3293–3305

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A (2000) Seasonal to interannual rainfall probabilistic forecasts for improved water supply management: Part 3—a nonparametric probabilistic forecast model. J Hydrol 239(1–4):249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2006) Fitting drought duration and severity with two-dimensional copulas. Water Resour Manage 20(5):795–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Shojaeezadeh SA, Nikoo MR, McNamara JP, AghaKouchak A, Sadegh M (2018) Stochastic modeling of suspended sediment load in alluvial rivers. Adv Water Resour 119:188–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Shojaeezadeh SA, Nikoo MR, Mirchi A, Mallakpour I, AghaKouchak A, Sadegh M (2020) Probabilistic hazard assessment of contaminated sediment in rivers. Sci Total Environ 703:134875

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla S, Safeeq M, AghaKouchak A, Guan K, Funk C (2015) Temperature impacts on the water year 2014 drought in California. Geophys Res Lett 42:4384–4393

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2011) Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. J Environ Manage 92(8):1895–1909

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson MP, Calkin DE, Finney MA, Ager AA, Gilbertson-Day JW (2011) Integrated national-scale assessment of wildfire risk to human and ecological values. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 25(6):761–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigo RM, Sousa PM, Pereira MG, Rasilla D, Gouveia CM (2016) Modelling wildfire activity in Iberia with different atmospheric circulation weather types. Int J Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turco M, Llasat MC, von Hardenberg J, Provenzale A (2013) Impact of climate variability on summer fires in a Mediterranean environment (northeastern Iberian Peninsula). Clim Change 116(3–4):665–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Turco M, Llasat MC, von Hardenberg J, Provenzale A (2014) Climate change impacts on wildfires in a Mediterranean environment. Clim Change 125(3–4):369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Ye X, Tsou M (2016) Spatial, temporal, and content analysis of Twitter for Wildfire Hazards. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2329-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313(5789):940–943

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerling AL (2016) Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Phil Trans R Soc B 371(1696):20150178

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerling AL, Turner MG, Smithwick EA, Romme WH, Ryan MG (2011a) Continued warming could transform Greater Yellowstone fire regimes by mid-21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(32):13165–13170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerling AL, Bryant BP, Preisler HK, Holmes TP, Hidalgo HG, Das T, Shrestha SR (2011b) Climate change and growth scenarios for California wildfire. Clim Change 109(1):445–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue S, Ouarda TBMJ, Bobée B (2001) A review of bivariate gamma distributions for hydrological application. J Hydrol 246(1–4):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue Y, Dong K, Zhao X, Ye X (2019) Assessing wild fire risk in the Unites States using social media data. J Risk Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1569098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Cui L, Zhang J, Liu X, Tong Z (2015) Grid based dynamic risk assessment for grassland fire disaster in Hulunbuir. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 29(2):589–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhijun T, Jiquan Z, Xingpeng L (2009) GIS-based risk assessment of grassland fire disaster in western Jilin province, China. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23(4):463–471

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is partially supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) award NA19OAR4310294 and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) award NA14OAR4310222. We appreciate the data and review comments provided by Todd Sanford, Alyson Kenward and James Bronzan from Climate Central. Fire data is obtained from Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Project (MTBS.gov), and monthly temperature and precipitation from the CRU TS v3.23 gridded climate dataset (https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AA and SM conceived the study. SM and MS developed the code. SM led the data analysis with inputs from AA and ER. SM, AA and FC prepared the first draft. All authors reviewed the paper and contributed to the discussions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir AghaKouchak.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3506 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madadgar, S., Sadegh, M., Chiang, F. et al. Quantifying increased fire risk in California in response to different levels of warming and drying. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 34, 2023–2031 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01885-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01885-y

Keywords

Navigation