Abstract
The extent by which the contribution of eucalypt harvest residues (HR) to soil organic carbon (SOC) is impacted by soil disturbance during and/or after harvesting is unclear. We addressed this question by following the decomposition of HR in microplots (15-cm diameter, 15-cm height) and determining their contribution to SOC in 10 sites across southeastern Brazil. The experiment was set up according to a complete randomized block design arranged into a 3 × 2 factorial scheme including: HR removal (HR0), only bark removal (HR − B) and HR including bark (HR + B) applied to: undisturbed soil (US) with HR left on the soil surface or disturbed soil with HR mixed into the first 5 cm of the topsoil. We had eight blocks as replicates. Following a 12-month field decomposition, soil samples were fractionated to isolate SOC within the particle-size fractions (PSF) greater and lower than 53 µm. Subsequently, we used 13C to quantify the effects of the treatments in C3-derived SOC content (C3-SOC) within each PSF. For both PSF, their C3-SOC content increased in response to HR − B or HR + B relative to HR0, depending on soil disturbance and HR half-life time (t0.5). For HR − B, net increments in C3-SOC within the PSF > 53 µm increased significantly with HR t0.5, regardless of soil disturbance. Otherwise, the C3-SOC content within the PSF < 53 µm increased with HR t0.5 in response to both HR types, but only for US treatments. Overall, in regions where climate drives fast decomposition rates, on-site disturbance during and/or after harvesting should be minimized to favor the contribution of HR to SOC, particularly within the PSF < 53 µm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida LFJ, Hurtarte LCC, Souza IF et al (2018) Soil organic matter formation as affected by eucalypt litter biochemistry—evidence from an incubation study. Geoderma 312:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.004
Balesdent J, Basile-Doelsch I, Chadoeuf J et al (2018) Atmosphere–soil carbon transfer as a function of soil depth. Nature 23:1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0328-3
Blumfield TJ, Xu Z, Mathers NJ, Saffigna PG (2004) Decomposition of nitrogen-15 labeled hoop pine harvest residues in subtropical Australia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1751–1761. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1751
Cambardella CA, Elliott ET (1992) Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:777. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x
Cotrufo MF, Wallenstein MD, Boot CM et al (2013) The microbial efficiency-matrix stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob Chang Biol 19:988–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12113
Epron D, Mouanda C, Mareschal L, Koutika L-S (2015) Impacts of organic residue management on the soil C dynamics in a tropical eucalypt plantation on a nutrient-poor sandy soil after three rotations. Soil Biol Biochem 85:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.03.010
Fang S, Xie B, Liu D, Liu J (2011) Effects of mulching materials on nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen availability and poplar growth on degraded agricultural soil. New For 41:147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-010-9217-9
Fernández C, Vega JA, Gras JM et al (2004) Soil erosion after Eucalyptus globulus clearcutting: differences between logging slash disposal treatments. For Ecol Manag 195:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.052
Ferreira GWD, Soares EMB, Oliveira FCC et al (2016) Nutrient release from decomposing Eucalyptus harvest residues following simulated management practices in multiple sites in Brazil. For Ecol Manag 370:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.047
Fialho RC, da Silva TR, Teixeira APM, da Silva IR (2018) Short-term carbon emissions: effect of various tree harvesting, transport, and tillage methods under a eucalyptus plantation. Land Degrad Dev 29:3995–4004. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3161
Frey SD, Six J, Elliott ET (2003) Reciprocal transfer of carbon and nitrogen by decomposer fungi at the soil-litter interface. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1001–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00155-X
Gatto A, Barros NF, Novais RF et al (2010) Estoques de carbono no solo e na biomassa em plantações de eucalipto. Rev Bras Ciência do Solo 34:1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832010000400007
Gonçalves JLM, Barros NF (1999) Improvement of site productivity for short-rotation plantations in Brazil. Bosque 20:89–106
Gonçalves JLM, Stape JL, Laclau J-P et al (2004) Silvicultural effects on the productivity and wood quality of eucalypt plantations. For Ecol Manag 193:45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.022
Gonçalves JLM, Alvares CA, Higa AR et al (2013) Integrating genetic and silvicultural strategies to minimize abiotic and biotic constraints in Brazilian eucalypt plantations. For Ecol Manag 301:6–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.030
James J, Harrison R (2016) The effect of harvest on forest soil carbon: a meta-analysis. Forests 7:308. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7120308
Jourgholami M, Fathi K, Labelle ER (2019) Effects of litter and straw mulch amendments on compacted soil properties and Caucasian alder (Alnus subcordata) growth. New For. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09738-5
Kohn MJ (2010) Carbon isotope compositions of terrestrial C3 plants as indicators of (paleo)ecology and (paleo)climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19691–19695. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004933107
Kumaraswamy S, Mendham DS, Grove TS et al (2014) Harvest residue effects on soil organic matter, nutrients and microbial biomass in eucalypt plantations in Kerala, India. For Ecol Manag 328:140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.021
Laclau J-P, Levillain J, Deleporte P et al (2010) Organic residue mass at planting is an excellent predictor of tree growth in Eucalyptus plantations established on a sandy tropical soil. For Ecol Manag 260:2148–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.007
Lavallee JM, Conant RT, Paul EA, Cotrufo MF (2018) Incorporation of shoot versus root-derived 13C and 15N into mineral-associated organic matter fractions: results of a soil slurry incubation with dual-labelled plant material. Biogeochemistry 137:379–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0428-z
Lê S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25:253–258. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01
Lehmann J, Kleber M (2015) The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069
Lima AMN, Silva IR, Neves JCL et al (2006) Soil organic carbon dynamics following afforestation of degraded pastures with eucalyptus in southeastern Brazil. For Ecol Manag 235:219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.331
Magagnotti N, Nati C, Pari L et al (2011) Assessing the cost of stump-site debarking in eucalypt plantations. Biosyst Eng 110:443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.09.009
Magnússon RÍ, Tietema A, Cornelissen JHC et al (2016) Tamm review: sequestration of carbon from coarse woody debris in forest soils. For Ecol Manag 377:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.033
Mendham D, Sankaran KV, O’Connell AM, Grove TS (2002) Eucalyptus globulus harvest residue management effects on soil carbon and microbial biomass at 1 and 5 years after plantation establishment. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1903–1912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00205-5
Mendham DS, Ogden GN, Short T et al (2014) Repeated harvest residue removal reduces E. globulus productivity in the 3rd rotation in south-western Australia. For Ecol Manag 329:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.033
Nambiar E (1996) Sustained productivity of forests is a continuing challenge to soil science. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60(1629):1642. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000060006x
Noormets A, Epron D, Domec J et al (2015) Effects of forest management on productivity and carbon sequestration: a review and hypothesis. For Ecol Manag 355:124–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.019
Powers RF (1999) On the sustainable productivity of planted forests. New For 17:263–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006555219130
Six J, Paustian K (2014) Aggregate-associated soil organic matter as an ecosystem property and a measurement tool. Soil Biol Biochem 68:A4–A9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.06.014
Six J, Frey SD, Thiet RK, Batten KM (2006) Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:555. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0347
Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, 12th edn. NRCS, Washington, DC
Souza IF, Barros NF, Silva IR et al (2016) Decomposition of eucalypt harvest residues as affected by management practices, climate and soil properties across southeastern Brazil. For Ecol Manag 374:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.012
Tipple BJ, Pagani M (2007) The early origins of terrestrial C4 photosynthesis. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 35:435–461. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140150
Viera M, Schumacher MV, Bonacina DM et al (2017) Biomass and nutrient allocation to aboveground components in fertilized Eucalyptus saligna and E. urograndis plantations. New For 48:445–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-017-9572-x
Wan X, Xiao L, Vadeboncoeur MA et al (2018) Response of mineral soil carbon storage to harvest residue retention depends on soil texture: a meta-analysis. For Ecol Manag 408:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.028
Acknowledgements
We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, processo: 88881.170174/2018-01) for providing the funding for this research. We thank José L. Teixeira, Geraldo V. T. Filho, Mariana Piacesi B. Chaves, Robert F. Renier, Lucas A. Silva for the effort during the installation of the experiments and laboratory analyses. We also thank the forestry companies affiliated to the NUTREE Group for providing the experimental fields and sample collection/transportation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11056_2019_9765_MOESM1_ESM.jpg
Experimental units illustrating undisturbed soil with harvest (HR) residues left on the soil surface and disturbed soil with HR mixed into the first 5 cm of topsoil. For both types of treatments, the tubes used for the experimental units were inserted to a total depth of 0–10 cm into the topsoil
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 1105 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Souza, I.F., Barros, N.F., Novais, R.F. et al. Potential contribution of eucalypt harvest residues to soil organic carbon in Brazil. New Forests 51, 911–932 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09765-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09765-2