Skip to main content
Log in

Potential contribution of eucalypt harvest residues to soil organic carbon in Brazil

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent by which the contribution of eucalypt harvest residues (HR) to soil organic carbon (SOC) is impacted by soil disturbance during and/or after harvesting is unclear. We addressed this question by following the decomposition of HR in microplots (15-cm diameter, 15-cm height) and determining their contribution to SOC in 10 sites across southeastern Brazil. The experiment was set up according to a complete randomized block design arranged into a 3 × 2 factorial scheme including: HR removal (HR0), only bark removal (HR − B) and HR including bark (HR + B) applied to: undisturbed soil (US) with HR left on the soil surface or disturbed soil with HR mixed into the first 5 cm of the topsoil. We had eight blocks as replicates. Following a 12-month field decomposition, soil samples were fractionated to isolate SOC within the particle-size fractions (PSF) greater and lower than 53 µm. Subsequently, we used 13C to quantify the effects of the treatments in C3-derived SOC content (C3-SOC) within each PSF. For both PSF, their C3-SOC content increased in response to HR − B or HR + B relative to HR0, depending on soil disturbance and HR half-life time (t0.5). For HR − B, net increments in C3-SOC within the PSF > 53 µm increased significantly with HR t0.5, regardless of soil disturbance. Otherwise, the C3-SOC content within the PSF < 53 µm increased with HR t0.5 in response to both HR types, but only for US treatments. Overall, in regions where climate drives fast decomposition rates, on-site disturbance during and/or after harvesting should be minimized to favor the contribution of HR to SOC, particularly within the PSF < 53 µm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, processo: 88881.170174/2018-01) for providing the funding for this research. We thank José L. Teixeira, Geraldo V. T. Filho, Mariana Piacesi B. Chaves, Robert F. Renier, Lucas A. Silva for the effort during the installation of the experiments and laboratory analyses. We also thank the forestry companies affiliated to the NUTREE Group for providing the experimental fields and sample collection/transportation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan F. Souza.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11056_2019_9765_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Experimental units illustrating undisturbed soil with harvest (HR) residues left on the soil surface and disturbed soil with HR mixed into the first 5 cm of topsoil. For both types of treatments, the tubes used for the experimental units were inserted to a total depth of 0–10 cm into the topsoil

Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 1105 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 18 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souza, I.F., Barros, N.F., Novais, R.F. et al. Potential contribution of eucalypt harvest residues to soil organic carbon in Brazil. New Forests 51, 911–932 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09765-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09765-2

Keywords

Navigation