Abstract
This study aims to investigate gender differences in effective parenting strategies for adolescent mathematics achievement growth, taking into account socioeconomic status (SES), based on a bioecological model. Latent growth curve modeling examines longitudinal data (n = 4163) from the Taiwan Education Panel Survey. The analysis reveals that girls’ performance fits to a quadratic development model; boys’ performance better fits to a linear model. At early adolescence, mothers’ monitoring is the only common effective parenting strategy for both genders. At later adolescence, fathers need to monitor boys but to play a peripheral role (e.g., school participation and rescued discussion)for girls; mothers play direct roles (e.g., listening and persuasion) for boys, but a rational or light-minded role (e.g., discussion and letting-conflict-go) for girls. SES matters mostly in early adolescence. The findings generally support the bioecological model in terms of differential model fit and effective parenting strategies between genders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Author (2009)
Author (2011)
Author (2016a)
Author (2016b)
Author (2018)
Author (2019)
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Bodovski, K., & Youn, M. J. (2010). Love, discipline and elementary school achievement: the role of family emotional climate. Social Science Research, 39(4), 585–595.
Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2001). Inheritance of economic status: education, class and genetics. In M. Feldman & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 4132–4414). Oxford: Pergamon.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). The inheritance of inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 3–30.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments in nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (6th ed., pp. 187–249). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793-828). New York: Wiley.
Burton, L. (1994). Children learning mathematics: patterns and relationships. Herts: Simon & Schuster Education.
Burton, L. (2004). “Confidence is everything”—perspectives of teachers and students on learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(4), 357–381.
Cabrera, N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71(1), 127–136.
Castelao, C. F., & Kröner-Herwig, B. (2014). Developmental trajectories and predictors of externalizing behavior: a comparison of girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 775–789.
Catsambis, S. (2001). Expanding knowledge of parental involvement in children's secondary education: connections with high school seniors' academic success. Social Psychology of Education, 5(2), 149–177.
Chan, T. W., & Koo, A. (2011). Parenting style and youth outcomes in the UK. European Sociological Review, 27(3), 385–399.
Chang, L.-Y. (2001-2007). Taiwan Education Panel Survey (C00124B, C00124H, C00137B, C00175A, C00189A)[Data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica Web site: http://srda.sinica.edu.tw
Chen, Z. Y. (2000). The relation between parental constructive behavior and adolescent association with achievement-oriented peers: a longitudinal study. Sociological Inquiry, 70(3), 360–381.
Crandall, A., Deater-Deckard, K., & Riley, A. W. (2015). Maternal emotion and cognitive control capacities and parenting: a conceptual framework. Developmental Review, 36, 105–126.
Duncan, G. J., Morris, P. A., & Rodrigues, C. (2011). Does money really matter? Estimating impacts of family income on young children's achievement with data from random-assignment experiments. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1263–1279.
Eamon, M. K. (2005). Social-demographic, school, neighborhood, and parenting influences on the academic achievement of Latino young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(2), 163–174.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127.
Engelhardt, L. E., Church, J. A., Paige Harden, K., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2019). Accounting for the shared environment in cognitive abilities and academic achievement with measured socioecological contexts. Developmental Science, 22(1), e12699.
Fan, X. (2001). Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: a growth modeling analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(1), 27–61.
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537.
Galindo, C., & Sonnenschein, S. (2015). Decreasing the SES math achievement gap: initial math proficiency and home learning environments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 25–38.
Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and mathematics. Science, 320(5880), 1164–1165.
Gutman, L. M., & McLoyd, V. C. (2000). Parents' management of their children's education within the home, at school, and in the community: an examination of African-American families living in poverty. The Urban Review, 32(1), 1–24.
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Halpern, D. F., Wai, J., & Saw, A. (2005). A psychobiosocial model: Why females are sometimes greater than and sometimes less than males in math achievement. In J. Kaufman & A. Gallagher (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: an integrative psychological approach (pp. 48–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hentges, R. F., & Wang, M. T. (2018). Gender differences in the developmental cascade from harsh parenting to educational attainment: an evolutionary perspective. Child Development, 89(2), 397–413.
Herrenkohl, T. I., Lee, J. O., Kosterman, R., & Hawkins, J. D. (2012). Family influences related to adult substance use and mental health problems: a developmental analysis of child and adolescent predictors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(2), 129–135.
Hong, S., & Ho, H. Z. (2005). Direct and indirect longitudinal effects of parental involvement on student achievement: second-order latent growth modeling across ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 32–42.
Hsu, H. Y., Zhang, D., Kwok, O. M., Li, Y., & Ju, S. (2011). Distinguishing the influences of father’s and mother’s involvement on adolescent academic achievement: analyses of Taiwan Education Panel Survey data. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(5), 694–713.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155.
Jeynes, W. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47(4), 706–742.
Lu, L., Weber, H. S., Spinath, F. M., & Shi, J. (2011). Predicting school achievement from cognitive and non-cognitive variables in a Chinese sample of elementary school children. Intelligence, 39(2-3), 130–140.
Martin, A. J., Liem, G. A., Mok, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Problem solving and immigrant student mathematics and science achievement: multination findings from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1054–1073.
McBride, B. A., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., & Ho, M. H. (2005). The mediating role of fathers' school involvement on student achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 201–216.
McCulloch, A., & Joshi, H. E. (2001). Neighborhood and family influences on the cognitive ability of children in the British National Child Development Study. Social Science & Medicine, 53(5), 579–591.
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 37–45.
Morin, A. J., Rodriguez, D., Fallu, J. S., Maïano, C., & Janosz, M. (2012). Academic achievement and smoking initiation in adolescence: a general growth mixture analysis. Addiction, 107(4), 819–828.
Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & VomHofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students' mathematics achievement: the unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475–1490.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2013). Mplus (version 7.11) [computer software]. Los Angeles: Author.
Phillipson, S., & Phillipson, S. N. (2007). Academic expectations, belief of ability, and involvement by parents as predictors of child achievement: a cross-cultural comparison. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 329–348.
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015). Sex differences in mathematics and science achievement: a meta-analysis of National Assessment of Educational Progress assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 645–662.
Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj, I., Taggart, B., Toth, K., & Smees, R. (2014). Influences on students’ GCSE attainment and progress at age 16. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
Simons, L. G., & Conger, R. D. (2007). Linking mother–father differences in parenting to a typology of family parenting styles and adolescent outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 28(2), 212–241.
Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj, I., Taggart, B., Smees, R., Toth, K., Welcomme, W., & Hollingworth, K. (2014). Students’ educational and developmental outcomes at age 16. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
Thoemmes, F., MacKinnon, D. P., & Reiser, M. R. (2010). Power analysis for complex mediational designs using Monte Carlo methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(3), 510–534.
Turney, K., & Kao, G. (2009). Barriers to school involvement: are immigrant parents disadvantaged? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 257–271.
Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174–1204.
Wu, W., & Jia, F. (2013). A new procedure to test mediation with missing data through nonparametric bootstrapping and multiple imputation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(5), 663–691.
Yang, M., Tan, K., & Huang, M. (2003). Psychometric report: TEPS2001 analytical ability test. Taipei: Academic Sinica Retrieved from http://www.teps.sinica.edu.tw/description/TestingReport2004-2-10.pdf (in Chinese).
Yu, Y., & Ho, H. Z. (2018). Parental involvement and adolescent mental health in Taiwan: gender and mediational effects. International Journal About Parents in Education, 10(1), 111–123.
Disclaimer
The funder only provides financial support and does not substantially influence the entire research process, from study design to submission. The authors are fully responsible for the content of the paper.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 109-2511-H-004-001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Mei-Shiu Chiu, PhD Professor, Department of Education National Chengchi University 64, Zhinan Rd. Sec. 2 Taipei 11605, Taiwan ROC E-mail: chium@nccu.edu.tw; meishiuchiu@gmail.com
Current themes of research
Mei-Shiu Chiu’s research interests focus on the design, implementation, and effectiveness evaluation of learning, teaching, and assessment in a variety of areas of knowledge (e.g., mathematics, science, and energy); interactions between emotions, cognition, and culture; and multiple research methods and data analysis methods (including educational and data science methods). She has developed several research-based educational theories, relevant assessment tools, as well as school and teacher development courses for educational and research practices.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education
Chiu, M.-S. (2009). Approaches to the teaching of creative and non-creative mathematical problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 55–79.
Chiu, M.-S. (2016a). The challenge of learning physics before mathematics: a case study of curriculum change in Taiwan. Research in Science Education, 46, 767–786.
Chiu, M.-S. (2016b). Using demographics to predict mathematics achievement development and academic ability and job income expectations. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 103–107.
Chiu, M.-S. (2018). Effects of early numeracy activities on mathematics achievement and affect: parental value and child gender conditions and socioeconomic status mediation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1634.
Chiu, M.-S. (2019 online first). An ecological approach to adolescent mathematics ability development: differences in demographics, parenting, mathematics teaching, and student behaviors and emotions. Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1672522
Chiu, M.-S., & Whitebread, D. (2011). Taiwanese teachers’ implementation of a new ‘constructivist mathematics curriculum’: how cognitive and affective issues are addressed. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 196–206.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiu, MS. Gender differences in effects of father/mother parenting on mathematics achievement growth: a bioecological model of human development. Eur J Psychol Educ 36, 827–844 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00506-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00506-0